,EPILOGUE #b1 ,*APT] #i #ahfiahfi ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,LEO ,TOL/OY ,TEXT 3 ,= ! SOLUTION ( ! QUE/ION ( FREE WILL OR 9EVITABILITY1 HI/ORY HAS ?IS ADVANTAGE OV] O!R BRAN*ES ( KN[L$GE 9 :I* ! QUE/ION IS DEALT )1 ?AT = HI/ORY ?IS QUE/ION DOES NOT REF] TO ! ESS5CE ( MAN'S FREE WILL BUT ITS MANIFE/ATION 9 ! PA/ & UND] C]TA9 CONDITIONS4 ,9 REG>D TO ?IS QUE/ION1 HI/ORY /&S TO ! O!R SCI5CES AS EXP]IM5TAL SCI5CE /&S TO AB/RACT SCI5CE4 ,! SUBJECT = HI/ORY IS NOT MAN'S WILL ITSELF BUT \R PRES5TATION ( IT4 ,& SO = HI/ORY1 ! 9SOLUBLE MY/]Y PRES5T$ BY ! 9COMPATIBILITY ( FREE WILL & 9EVITABILITY DOES NOT EXI/ AS IT DOES = !OLOGY1 E?ICS1 & PHILOSOPHY4 ,HI/ORY SURVEYS A PRES5TATION ( MAN'S LIFE 9 :I* ! UNION ( !SE TWO CONTRADICTIONS HAS ALREADY TAK5 PLACE4 ,9 ACTUAL LIFE EA* HI/ORIC EV5T1 EA* HUMAN ACTION1 IS V]Y CLE>LY & DEF9ITELY UND]/OOD )\T ANY S5SE ( CONTRADICTION1 AL?\< EA* EV5T PRES5TS ITSELF AS P>TLY FREE & P>TLY COMPULSORY4 ,TO SOLVE ! QUE/ION ( H[ FRE$OM & NECESSITY >E COMB9$ & :AT CON/ITUTES ! ESS5CE ( !SE TWO CONCEPTIONS1 ! PHILOSOPHY ( HI/ORY CAN & %\LD FOLL[ A PA? CONTR>Y TO ?AT TAK5 BY O!R SCI5CES4 ,9/EAD ( FIR/ DEF9+ ! CONCEPTIONS ( FRE$OM & 9EVITABILITY 9 !MSELVES1 & !N RANG+ ! PH5OM5A ( LIFE UND] ?OSE DEF9ITIONS1 HI/ORY %\LD D$UCE A DEF9ITION ( ! CONCEPTION ( FRE$OM & 9EVITABILITY !MSELVES FROM ! IMM5SE QUANTITY ( PH5OM5A ( :I* IT IS COGNIZANT & ?AT ALWAYS APPE> DEP5D5T ON !SE TWO ELEM5TS4 ,:ATEV] PRES5TATION ( ! ACTIVITY ( MANY M5 OR ( AN 9DIVIDUAL WE MAY CONSID]1 WE ALWAYS REG>D IT AS ! RESULT P>TLY ( MAN'S FREE WILL & P>TLY ( ! LAW ( 9EVITABILITY4 ,:E!R WE SPEAK ( ! MIGRATION ( ! PEOPLES & ! 9CURSIONS ( ! B>B>IANS1 OR ( ! DECREES ( ,NAPOLEON ,I,I,I1 OR ( SOMEONE'S ACTION AN H\R AGO 9 *OOS+ ONE DIRECTION \T ( SEV]AL = HIS WALK1 WE >E UNCONSCI\S ( ANY CONTRADICTION4 ,! DEGREE ( FRE$OM & 9EVITABILITY GOV]N+ ! ACTIONS ( !SE PEOPLE IS CLE>LY DEF9$ = US4 ,\R CONCEPTION ( ! DEGREE ( FRE$OM (T5 V>IES ACCORD+ TO DIFF]5CES 9 ! PO9T ( VIEW FROM :I* WE REG>D ! EV5T1 BUT EV]Y HUMAN ACTION APPE>S TO US AS A C]TA9 COMB9ATION ( FRE$OM & 9EVITABILITY4 ,9 EV]Y ACTION WE EXAM9E WE SEE A C]TA9 MEASURE ( FRE$OM & A C]TA9 MEASURE ( 9EVITABILITY4 ,& ALWAYS ! MORE FRE$OM WE SEE 9 ANY ACTION ! LESS 9EVITABILITY DO WE P]CEIVE1 & ! MORE 9EVITABILITY ! LESS FRE$OM4 ,! PROPORTION ( FRE$OM TO 9EVITABILITY DECREASES & 9CREASES ACCORD+ TO ! PO9T ( VIEW FROM :I* ! ACTION IS REG>D$1 BUT !IR RELATION IS ALWAYS ONE ( 9V]SE PROPORTION4 ,A S9K+ MAN :O CLUT*ES AT ANO!R & DR[NS HIM2 OR A HUNGRY MO!R EXHAU/$ BY FE$+ H] BABY1 :O /EALS SOME FOOD2 OR A MAN TRA9$ TO DISCIPL9E :O ON DUTY AT ! WORD ( COMM& KILLS A DEF5SELESS MAN--SEEM LESS GUILTY1 ?AT IS1 LESS FREE & MORE SUBJECT TO ! LAW ( NECESSITY1 TO ONE :O KN[S ! CIRCUM/ANCES 9 :I* !SE PEOPLE W]E PLAC$1 & MORE FREE TO ONE :O DOES NOT KN[ ?AT ! MAN WAS HIMSELF DR[N+1 ?AT ! MO!R WAS HUNGRY1 ?AT ! SOLDI] WAS 9 ! RANKS1 & SO ON4 ,SIMIL>LY A MAN :O COMMITT$ A MURD] TW5TY YE>S AGO & HAS S9CE LIV$ PEACEABLY & H>MLESSLY 9 SOCIETY SEEMS LESS GUILTY & HIS ACTION MORE DUE TO ! LAW ( 9EVITABILITY1 TO SOMEONE :O CONSID]S HIS ACTION AFT] TW5TY YE>S HAVE ELAPS$ ?AN TO ONE :O EXAM9$ IT ! DAY AFT] IT WAS COMMITT$4 ,& 9 ! SAME WAY EV]Y ACTION ( AN 9SANE1 9TOXICAT$1 OR HIS LESS FREE & MORE 9EVITABLE TO ONE :O KN[S ! M5TAL CONDITION ( HIM :O COMMITT$ ! ACTION1 & SEEMS MORE FREE & LESS 9EVITABLE TO ONE :O DOES NOT KN[ IT4 ,9 ALL !SE CASES ! CONCEPTION ( FRE$OM IS 9CREAS$ OR DIM9I%$ & ! CONCEPTION ( COMPULSION IS CORRESPOND+LY DECREAS$ OR 9CREAS$1 ACCORD+ TO ! PO9T ( VIEW FROM :I* ! ACTION IS REG>D$4 ,SO ?AT ! GREAT] ! CONCEPTION ( NECESSITY ! SMALL] ! CONCEPTION ( FRE$OM & VISE V]SA4 ,RELIGION1 ! COMMON S5SE ( MANK9D1 ! SCI5CE ( JURISPRUD5CE1 & HI/ORY ITSELF UND]/& ALIKE ?IS RELATION BETWE5 NECESSITY & FRE$OM4 ,ALL CASES )\T EXCEPTION 9 :I* \R CONCEPTION ( FRE$OM & NECESSITY IS 9CREAS$ & DIM9I%$ DEP5D ON ?REE CONSID]ATIONS3 7#a7 ,! RELATION TO ! EXT]NAL WORLD ( ! MAN :O COMMITS ! DE$S4 7#b7 ,HIS RELATION TO TIME4 7#c7 ,HIS RELATION TO ! CAUSES LEAD+ TO ! ACTION4 ,! FIR/ CONSID]ATION IS ! CLE>NESS ( \R P]CEPTION ( ! MAN'S RELATION TO ! EXT]NAL WORLD & ! GREAT] OR LESS] CLE>NESS ( \R UND]/&+ ( ! DEF9ITE POSITION OCCUPI$ BY ! MAN 9 RELATION TO EV]Y?+ COEXI/+ ) HIM4 ,?IS IS :AT MAKES IT EVID5T ?AT A DR[N+ MAN IS LESS FREE & MORE SUBJECT TO NECESSITY ?AN ONE /&+ ON DRY GR\ND1 & ?AT MAKES ! ACTIONS ( A MAN CLOSELY CONNECT$ ) O!RS 9 A ?ICKLY POPULAT$ DI/RICT1 OR ( ONE B\ND BY FAMILY1 (FICIAL1 OR BUS9ESS DUTIES1 SEEM C]TA9LY LESS FREE & MORE SUBJECT TO NECESSITY ?AN ?OSE ( A MAN LIV+ 9 SOLITUDE & SECLUSION4 ,IF WE CONSID] A MAN ALONE1 AP>T FROM HIS RELATION TO EV]Y?+ >\ND HIM1 EA* ACTION ( HIS SEEMS TO US FREE4 ,BUT IF WE SEE HIS RELATION TO ANY?+ >\ND HIM1 IF WE SEE HIS CONNECTION ) ANY?+ :ATEV]--) A MAN :O SPEAKS TO HIM1 A BOOK HE READS1 ! WORK ON :I* HE IS 5GAG$1 EV5 ) ! AIR HE BREA!S OR ! LINESS ( \R P]CEPTION ( ! PLACE ! MAN'S ACTION OCCUPIES 9 TIME4 ,?AT IS ! GR\ND :I* MAKES ! FALL ( ! FIR/ MAN1 RESULT+ 9 ! PRODUCTION ( ! HUMAN RACE1 APPE> EVID5TLY LESS FREE ?AN A MAN'S 5TRY 9TO M>RIAGE TODAY4 ,IT IS ! REASON :Y ! LIFE & ACTIVITY ( PEOPLE :O LIV$ C5TURIES AGO & >E CONNECT$ ) ME 9 TIME CANNOT SEEM TO ME AS FREE AS ! LIFE ( A CONTEMPOR>Y1 ! CONSEQU5CES ( :I* >E /ILL UNKN[N TO ME4 ,! DEGREE ( \R CONCEPTION ( FRE$OM OR 9EVITABILITY DEP5DS 9 ?IS RESPECT ON ! GREAT] OR LESS] LAPSE ( TIME BETWE5 ! P]=MANCE ( ! ACTION & \R JUDGM5T ( IT4 ,IF ,I EXAM9E AN ACT ,I P]=M$ A MOM5T AGO 9 APPROXIMATELY ! SAME CIRCUM/ANCES AS ?OSE ,I AM 9 N[1 MY ACTION APPE>S TO ME UND\BT$LY FREE4 ,BUT IF ,I EXAM9E AN ACT P]=M$ A MON? AGO1 !N BE+ 9 DIFF]5T CIRCUM/ANCES1 ,I CANNOT HELP RECOGNIZ+ ?AT IF ?AT ACT HAD NOT BE5 COMMITT$ MU* ?AT RESULT$ FROM IT--GOOD1 AGREEABLE1 & EV5 ESS5TIAL--W\LD NOT HAVE TAK5 PLACE4 ,IF ,I REFLECT ON AN ACTION /ILL MORE REMOTE1 T5 YE>S AGO OR MORE1 !N ! CONSEQU5CES ( MY ACTION >E /ILL PLA9] TO ME & ,I F9D IT H>D TO IMAG9E :AT W\LD HAVE HAPP5$ HAD ?AT ACTION NOT BE5 P]=M$4 ,! F>!R ,I GO BACK 9 MEMORY1 OR :AT IS ! SAME ?+ ! F>!R ,I GO =W>D 9 MY JUDGM5T1 ! MORE D\BTFUL BECOMES MY BELIEF 9 ! FRE$OM ( MY ACTION4 ,9 HI/ORY WE F9D A V]Y SIMIL> PROGRESS ( CONVICTION CONC]N+ ! P>T PLAY$ BY FREE WILL 9 ! G5]AL AFFAIRS ( HUMANITY4 ,A CONTEMPOR>Y EV5T SEEMS TO US TO BE 9DUBITABLY ! DO+ ( ALL ! KN[N P>TICIPANTS1 BUT ) A MORE REMOTE EV5T WE ALREADY SEE ITS 9EVITABLE RESULTS :I* PREV5T \R CONSID]+ ANY?+ ELSE POSSIBLE4 ,& ! F>!R WE GO BACK 9 EXAM9+ EV5TS ! LESS >BITR>Y DO !Y APPE>4 ,! ,AU/RO-,PRUSSIAN W> APPE>S TO US UND\BT$LY ! RESULT ( ! CRAFTY CONDUCT ( ,BISM>CK1 & SO ON4 ,! ,NAPOLEONIC W>S /ILL SEEM TO US1 ?\< ALREADY QUE/IONABLY1 TO BE ! \TCOME ( !IR H]OES' WILL4 ,BUT 9 ! ,CRUSADES WE ALREADY SEE AN EV5T OCCUPY+ ITS DEF9ITE PLACE 9 HI/ORY & )\T :I* WE CANNOT IMAG9E ! MOD]N HI/ORY ( ,EUROPE1 ?\< TO ! *RONICL]S ( ! ,CRUSADES ?AT EV5T APPE>$ AS M]ELY DUE TO ! WILL ( C]TA9 PEOPLE4 ,9 REG>D TO ! MIGRATION ( ! PEOPLES IT DOES NOT 5T] ANYONE'S HEAD TODAY TO SUPPOSE ?AT ! R5OVATION ( ! ,EUROPEAN WORLD DEP5D$ ON ,ATTILA'S CAPRICE4 ,! F>!R BACK 9 HI/ORY ! OBJECT ( \R OBS]VATION LIES1 ! MORE D\BTFUL DOES ! FREE WILL ( ?OSE CONC]N$ 9 ! EV5T BECOME & ! MORE MANIFE/ ! LAW ( 9EVITABILITY4 ,! ?IRD CONSID]ATION IS ! DEGREE TO :I* WE APPREH5D ?AT 5DLESS *A9 ( CAUSATION 9EVITABLY DEM&$ BY REASON1 9 :I* EA* PH5OM5ON COMPREH5D$1 & !RE=E MAN'S EV]Y ACTION1 MU/ HAVE ITS DEF9ITE PLACE AS A RESULT ( :AT HAS GONE BE=E & AS A CAUSE ( :AT WILL FOLL[4 ,! BETT] WE >E ACQUA9T$ ) ! PHYSIOLOGICAL1 PSY*OLOGICAL1 & HI/ORICAL LAWS D$UC$ BY OBS]VATION & BY :I* MAN IS CONTROLL$1 & ! MORE CORRECTLY WE P]CEIVE ! PHYSIOLOGICAL1 PSY*OLOGICAL1 & HI/ORICAL CAUSES ( ! ACTION1 & ! SIMPL] ! ACTION WE >E OBS]V+ & ! LESS COMPLEX ! *>ACT] & M9D ( ! MAN 9 QUE/ION1 ! MORE SUBJECT TO 9EVITABILITY & ! LESS FREE DO \R ACTIONS & ?OSE ( O!RS APPE>4 ,:5 WE DO NOT AT ALL UND]/& ! CAUSE ( AN ACTION1 :E!R A CRIME1 A GOOD ACTION1 OR EV5 ONE ?AT IS SIMPLY NONMORAL1 WE ASCRIBE A GREAT] AM\NT ( FRE$OM TO IT4 ,9 ! CASE ( A CRIME WE MO/ URG5TLY DEM& ! PUNI%M5T = SU* AN ACT2 9 ! CASE ( A VIRTU\S ACT WE RATE ITS M]IT MO/ HIE LESS 9SI/5T ON PUNI%M5T = ! CRIME1 OR ! ACKN[L$GM5T ( ! M]IT ( ! VIRTU\S ACT1 OR ! FRE$OM ( ! APP>5TLY ORIG9AL ACTION4 ,?AT A CRIM9AL WAS RE>$ AMONG MALE FACTORS MITIGATES HIS FAULT 9 \R EYES4 ,! SELF-SACRIFICE ( A FA!R OR MO!R1 OR SELF-SACRIFICE ) ! POSSIBILITY ( A REW>D1 IS MORE COMPREH5SIBLE ?AN GRATUIT\S SELF-SACRIFICE1 & !RE=E SEEMS LESS DES]V+ ( SYMPA?Y & LESS ! RESULT ( FREE WILL4 ,! F\ND] ( A SECT OR P>TY1 OR AN 9V5TOR1 IMPRESSES US LESS :5 WE KN[ H[ OR BY :AT ! WAY WAS PREP>$ = HIS ACTIVITY4 ,IF WE HAVE A L>GE RANGE ( EXAMPLES1 IF \R OBS]VATION IS CON/ANTLY DIRECT$ TO SEEK+ ! CORRELATION ( CAUSE & EFFECT 9 PEOPLE'S ACTIONS1 !IR ACTIONS APPE> TO US MORE UND] COMPULSION & LESS FREE ! MORE CORRECTLY WE CONNECT ! EFFECTS ) ! CAUSES4 ,IF WE EXAM9$ SIMPLE ACTIONS & HAD A VA/ NUMB] ( SU* ACTIONS UND] OBS]VATION1 \R CONCEPTION ( !IR 9EVITABILITY W\LD BE /ILL GREAT]4 ,! DI%ONE/ CONDUCT ( ! SON ( A DI%ONE/ FA!R1 ! MISCONDUCT ( A WOMAN :O HAD FALL5 9TO BAD COMPANY1 A DRUNK>D'S RELAPSE 9TO DRUNK5NESS1 & SO ON >E ACTIONS ?AT SEEM TO US LESS FREE ! BETT] WE UND]/& !IR CAUSE4 ,IF ! MAN :OSE ACTIONS WE >E CONSID]+ IS ON A V]Y L[ /AGE ( M5TAL DEVELOPM5T1 LIKE A *ILD1 A MADMAN1 OR A SIMPLETON--!N1 KN[+ ! CAUSES ( ! ACT & ! SIMPLICITY ( ! *>ACT] & 9TELLIG5CE 9 QUE/ION1 WE SEE SO L>GE AN ELEM5T ( NECESSITY & SO LITTLE FREE WILL ?AT AS SOON AS WE KN[ ! CAUSE PROMPT+ ! ACTION WE CAN =ETELL ! RESULT4 ,ON !SE ?REE CONSID]ATIONS ALONE IS BAS$ ! CONCEPTION ( IRRESPONSIBILITY = CRIMES & ! EXT5UAT+ CIRCUM/ANCES ADMITT$ BY ALL LEGISLATIVE CODES4 ,! RESPONSIBILITY APPE>S GREAT] OR LESS ACCORD+ TO \R GREAT] OR LESS] KN[L$GE ( ! CIRCUM/ANCES 9 :I* ! MAN WAS PLAC$ :OSE ACTION IS BE+ JUDG$1 & ACCORD+ TO ! GREAT] OR LESS] 9T]VAL ( TIME BETWE5 ! COMMISSION ( ! ACTION & ITS 9VE/IGATION1 & ACCORD+ TO ! GREAT] OR LESS] UND]/&+ ( ! CAUSES ?AT L$ TO ! ACTION4 ,FROM 3 ,GUT5B]G4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,NOVEMB] #c1 #ahfh 3 ,EPILOGUE #b1 ,*APT] #i -- ,PUBLICATION4 ,FEBRU>Y #a#a1 #bag 3 ,EPILOGUE #b1 ,*APT] #i -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/