,! ,ECONOMIC ,RELATIONS ( ,SEX #ahia ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,VOLTAIR9E ,DE ,CLEYRE ,TAGS 3 PR(ESSOR COPE1 ECONOMIC 9DEP5D5CE1 SEX RELATIONS1 SOCIAL >RANGEM5T1 PHYSICAL DISABILITY1 PHYSICAL1 WOMAN1 MAN1 SEX1 ECONOMIC4 ,TEXT 3 ,PHOTO BY ,PATRICK ,WILLEM>CK1,C,C ,B,Y-,N,C ,LIC5SE ,TO ! ,$ITOR ( ,! ,OP5 ,C\RT3 ,POSSESS$ ( RA!R MORE ?AN ORD9>Y 9T]E/ 9 ! SEX QUE/ION1 & AGREE+ ) ,PR(ESSOR ,COPE ?AT ANY PROPOSITION = ! AMELIORATION ( ! CONDITION ( WOM5 %\LD BE DISCUSS$ & DECID$ BY WOM51 ,I AM MOV$ TO C]TA9 REM>KS SUGGE/$ BY HIS >TICLE ON 0,! ,MAT]IAL ,RELATIONS ( ,SEX0 9 ! FIR/ NUMB] ( ,! ,MONI/4 ,ALL ?R\< ITS P]USAL ,I WAS IMPRESS$ BY HIS UNCONSCI\S RECOGNITION ( AN UND]LY+ QUE/ION1 :I*1 AP>T FROM WOMAN'S 9F]IORITY1 DET]M9ES ! RELATIONS ( ! SEXES4 ,?IS IS PLA9LY APP>5T 9 ! P>AGRAPH ALLUD+ TO ! COMMUNI/IC SY/EM ( WEAL? PRODUCTION & DI/RIBUTION1 9 :I* HE ADMITS ! POSSIBILITY ( PROMISCU\S SEX-RELATIONS4 ,:ILE ,I AGREE ) ,PR(ESSOR ,COPE ?AT TO 9/ITUTE COMMUNISM W\LD BE A DECID$ BL[ AT PROGRESS1 S9CE PROGRESS CONSI/S 9 A CON/ANT WID5+ ( 9DIVIDUAL LIB]TY :ILE COMMUNISM 9VOKES AU?ORIT>IAN DIRECTION1 NEV]!LESS1 ,I HOLD ?AT 9 ACKN[L$G+ ! POSSIBILITY ( V>IETY 9 SEX RELATIONS UND] ! COMMUNI/IC REGIME1 HE HAS ADMITT$ ?AT ! PRES5T SOCIAL >RANGEM5T ( SEX IS ! NECESS>Y \TGR[? ( \R ECONOMIC CONDITIONS4 ,PO/ULAT+ ! FACT ( WOMAN'S M5TAL & PHYSICAL 9F]IORITY1 \R WRIT] SEES NO POSSIBLE ULTIMATUM = H] BUT ! S]VICE ( MAT]NITY & *ILD-BE>+ 9 RETURN = 0PROTECTION & SUPPORT0 FROM SOME MAN1 OR SET ( M5 CALL$ A 0/ATE40 ,?IS BR+S US AT ONCE TO TWO VITAL QUE/IONS3 ,IS WOMAN'S 9F]IORITY ! CAUSE1 OR ! EFFECT1 ( H] ECONOMIC SUBJECTION8 ,IS ECONOMIC 9DEP5D5CE = WOMAN A POSSIBLE IDEAL8 ,I ?9K IT CAN BE CLE>LY PROV5 ?AT ! M5TAL CON/ITUTION ( WOMAN1 LIKE ?AT ( MAN1 HAS NEV] FAIL$ TO RISE :]E RE/RICTIONS UPON EQUAL FRE$OM HAVE BE5 TORN D[N4 ,:5EV] WOMAN HAS HAD ! SAME OPPORTUNITY AS MAN1 RESULTS HAVE PROV5 ?AT H] CAPACITIES = DEVELOPM5T >E AS UNLIMIT$ AS HIS4 ,IT MAY BE OBJECT$ ?AT ,I AM 9/ANC+ EXCEPTIONAL CASES 9/EAD ( DEAL+ ) TYPES4 ,MY REPLY IS ?AT ONLY 9 EXCEPTIONAL CASES HAVE WOM5 5JOY$ ! SAME OPPORTUNITIES AS M54 ,YET !SE CASES >E SUFFICI5TLY NUM]\S TO W>RANT ! CONCLUSION ?AT NATURE AF=DS NO 9SUP]ABLE OB/ACLE TO SEX-EQUALITY 9 BRA92 & ?AT 9F]IORITY 9 ! TYPICAL WOMAN MU/ BE REG>D$ AS ! RESULT ( H] DEP5D5T ECONOMIC CONDITION1 CREAT$ BY ! >TIFICIAL RE/RICTIONS ( MAN4 ,CONC]N+ ! PHYSICAL DISABILITY ( ! SEX1 IT IS MORE DIFFICULT TO %[ ! B5EFIC5T RESULTS ( LIB]TY1 S9CE EV5 ! MO/ ADVANC$ ( WOM5 >E SO HAMP]$ BY BODY-DW>F+1 DRESS1 & CU/OM ?AT WE HAVE SC>CELY SUFFICI5T DATA = OP9ION CONC]N+ H] POSSIBILITIES ( PHYSICAL DEVELOPM5T4 ,SU* AS WE HAVE W\LD 9DICATE ?AT MU* ( H] PRES5T 9COMPET5CE DUR+ P]IODS ( GE/ATION & NURS+1 IS 9CID5TAL TO ! PRES5T DEFECTIVE SOCIAL >RANGEM5T :I* CONDEMNS WOMAN TO ! WA/EFUL DRUDG]Y ( 9DIVIDUAL H\SEKEEP+1 & ALL ! SLAVI% WORK ( ! MU* LAUD$ FAMILY-LIFE4 ,H[EV]1 EV5 PHYSICAL 9F]IORITY NE$ NOT PROVE ! ET]NAL B>RI] TO ECONOMIC 9DEP5D5CE :I* ,PR(ESSOR ,COPE W\LD MAKE ( IT4 ,TO-DAY 9DU/RIAL PROGRESS DEM&S NOT SO MU* PHYSICAL /R5G? AS SKILL4 ,UND\BT$LY ! ELEPHANT HAS PHYSICAL /R5G? SUP]IOR TO MAN1 YET ?AT HE IS NO COMPETITOR AGA9/ MAN ,I NE$ WA/E NO SPACE TO PROVE4 ,LIKEWISE ! ,H]CULES ( AGES PA/ W\LD HAVE NO PLACE 9 COMPETITIVE 9DU/RY TO-DAY SIMPLY BECAUSE HE W\LD NOT BE ADAPT$ TO HIS 5VIRONM5T4 ,GRANT+ ! PRES5T PHYSICAL DISABILITY ( WOMAN1 IT BY NO MEANS FOLL[S ?AT1 ) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY1 %E W\LD BE UNABLE TO COMPETE ) MAN 9 ! FIELDS ( PRODUCTIVE 9DU/RY4 ,9DE$ ONE G5]AL COM- PLA9T ( ! WORK+M5 IS ?AT !Y >E COMPET+1 &1 BY ! LAW ( ! SURVIVAL ( ! FITTE/1 HAVE ALREADY DRIV5 M5 \T ( SEV]AL BRAN*ES ( EMPLOYM5T1 SU* AS TEXTILE FABRICS1 %OE- MAK+1 ETC4 ,NO GREAT AM\NT ( /R5G? IS REQUIR$1 BUT SKILL & PATI5CE2 & IT IS ! UNIV]SAL TE/IMONY ( ! OV]SE]S ?AT WOM5 >E EQUALLY SKILLFUL & MORE RELIABLE4 ,!RE IS A CLASS ( ECONOMIC RE=M]S CALL$ AN>*I/S1 :O CONT5D ?AT ) OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLOIT NATURE ?R[N FREE TO ! HUMAN RACE1 ! H\RS ( LABOR W\LD BE SO R$UC$ AS TO 5ABLE ONE TO PRODUCE SUFFICI5T TO SATISFY ALL HIS NE$S BY ?REE H\RS WORK P] DAY4 ,?IS ) \R PRES5T MA*9]Y1 ! POSSIBILITIES ( FUR!R R$UCTION BE+ LEFT TO FUR!R DEVELOPM5TS4 ,!Y ALSO CONT5D ?AT SU* FRE$OM MU/ NECESS>ILY RESULT 9 CON/ANT LABOR-DEM&1 ?US SECUR+ ! LABOR] AGA9/ ! PRES5T NIE ( 9VOLUNT>Y IDL5ESS4 ,UND] SU* CONDITIONS1 BE>+ 9 M9D ?AT ! EV] 9CREAS+ DISPLACEM5T ( PHYSICAL /R5G? BY MA*9]Y1 KEEPS R$UC+ ! PHYSICAL BURD5 ( PRODUCTIVE LABOR1 WOMAN'S ECONOMIC 9DEP5D5CE BECOMES A REALIZABLE IDEAL1 & ! :OLE MATT] ( SEX ASSOCIATION *ANGES4 ,:5 WOMAN COMPREH5DS H] 9DEP5D5CE1 M>RIAGE WILL NO LONG] BE A MATT] ( 0PROTECTION & SUPPORT10 :I* ,PR(ESSOR ,COPE DECL>ES IS ! BASIS ( MONOGAMIC WIFEHOOD4 ,IT WILL BECOME A MATT] ( MUTUAL COOP]ATION1 BAS$1 LET US HOPE ON SOME?+ HI<] ?AN ! SALE ( ! P[]S ( MO!RHOOD1 & DEM&+ ! SAME /&>D = MAN AS = WOMAN4 ,:E!R MONOGAMY OR V>IETY WILL !N OBTA9 DEP5DS ON :I* ( !SE SY/EMS PRODUCES ! HI<] TYPE ( HUMANITY4 ,AT PRES5T IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DECIDE1 S9CE )\T ! 9DEP5D5CE ( WOMAN !RE CAN BE NO EQUALITY1 & )\T EQUALITY NO TRUE ADJU/M5T ( SEX RELATIONS4 ,VOLTAIR9E DE ,CLEYRE4 ,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,NOVEMB] #c1 #ahi 3 ,! ,ECONOMIC ,RELATIONS ( ,SEX -- ,PUBLICATION4 ,M>* #c1 #bai 3 ,! ,ECONOMIC ,RELATIONS ( ,SEX -- ,ADD$4 ,JANU>Y #a1 #bbb 3 ,! ,ECONOMIC ,RELATIONS ( ,SEX -- ,UPDAT$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/