,EPILOGUE #b1 ,*APT] #ab 

#ahfiahfi 

,PEOPLE 3 

,AU?OR 3 ,LEO ,TOL/OY 

,TEXT 3 

,FROM ! TIME ! LAW ( ,COP]NICUS WAS DISCOV]$ & PROV$1 ! M]E 
 RECOGNITION ( ! FACT ?AT IT WAS NOT ! SUN BUT ! E>? ?AT MOVES 
 SUFFIC$ TO DE/ROY ! :OLE COSMOGRAPHY ( ! ANCI5TS4 ,BY DISPROV+ 
 ?AT LAW IT MI<T HAVE BE5 POSSIBLE TO RETA9 ! OLD CONCEPTION ( ! 
 MOVEM5TS ( ! BODIES1 BUT )\T DISPROV+ IT1 IT W\LD SEEM 
 IMPOSSIBLE TO CONT9UE /UDY+ ! ,PTOLEMAIC WORLDS4 ,BUT EV5 AFT] ! 
 DISCOV]Y ( ! LAW ( ,COP]NICUS ! ,PTOLEMAIC WORLDS W]E /ILL /UDI$ 
 = A LONG TIME4 

,FROM ! TIME ! FIR/ P]SON SAID & PROV$ ?AT ! NUMB] ( BIR?S 
 OR ( CRIMES IS SUBJECT TO MA!MATICAL LAWS1 & ?AT ?IS OR ?AT MODE 
 ( GOV]NM5T IS DET]M9$ BY C]TA9 GEOGRAPHICAL & ECONOMIC 
 CONDITIONS1 & ?AT C]TA9 RELATIONS ( POPULATION TO SOIL PRODUCE 
 MIGRATIONS ( PEOPLES1 ! F\NDATIONS ON :I* HI/ORY HAD BE5 BUILT 
 W]E DE/ROY$ 9 !IR ESS5CE4 

,BY REFUT+ !SE NEW LAWS ! =M] VIEW ( HI/ORY MI<T HAVE BE5 
 RETA9$2 BUT )\T REFUT+ !M IT W\LD SEEM IMPOSSIBLE TO CONT9UE 
 /UDY+ HI/ORIC EV5TS AS ! RESULTS ( MAN'S FREE WILL4 ,= IF A 
 C]TA9 MODE ( GOV]NM5T WAS E/ABLI%$ OR C]TA9 MIGRATIONS ( 
 PEOPLES TOOK PLACE 9 CONSEQU5CE ( SU* & SU* GEOGRAPHIC1 
 E?NOGRAPHIC1 OR ECONOMIC CONDITIONS1 !N ! FREE WILL ( ?OSE 
 9DIVIDUALS :O APPE> TO US TO HAVE E/ABLI%$ ?AT MODE ( GOV]NM5T 
 OR OCCASION$ ! MIGRATIONS CAN NO LONG] BE REG>D$ AS ! CAUSE4 

,& YET ! =M] HI/ORY CONT9UES TO BE /UDI$ SIDE BY SIDE ) ! 
 LAWS ( /ATI/ICS1 GEOGRAPHY1 POLITICAL ECONOMY1 COMP>ATIVE PHILOLOGY1 
 & GEOLOGY1 :I* DIRECTLY CONTRADICT ITS ASSUMPTIONS4 

,! /RUGGLE BETWE5 ! OLD VIEWS & ! NEW WAS LONG & /UBBORNLY 
 F\<T \T 9 PHYSICAL PHILOSOPHY4 ,!OLOGY /OOD ON GU>D = ! OLD 
 VIEWS & ACCUS$ ! NEW ( VIOLAT+ REVELATION4 ,BUT :5 TRU? 
 CONQU]$1 !OLOGY E/ABLI%$ ITSELF JU/ AS FIRMLY ON ! NEW 
 F\NDATION4 

,JU/ AS PROLONG$ & /UBBORN IS ! /RUGGLE N[ PROCE$+ BETWE5 ! 
 OLD & ! NEW CONCEPTION ( HI/ORY1 & !OLOGY 9 ! SAME WAY /&S 
 ON GU>D = ! OLD VIEW1 & ACCUSES ! NEW VIEW ( SUBV]T+ 
 REVELATION4 

,9 ! ONE CASE AS 9 ! O!R1 ON BO? SIDES ! /RUGGLE PROVOKES 
 PASSION & /IFLES TRU?4 ,ON ! ONE H& !RE IS FE> & REGRET = 
 ! LOSS ( ! :OLE $IFICE CON/RUCT$ ?R\< ! AGES1 ON ! O!R 
 IS ! PASSION = DE/RUCTION4 

,TO ! M5 :O F\<T AGA9/ ! RIS+ TRU?S ( PHYSICAL PHILOSOPHY1 IT 
 SEEM$ ?AT IF !Y ADMITT$ ?AT TRU? IT W\LD DE/ROY FAI? 9 ,GOD1 9 
 ! CREATION ( ! FIRMAM5T1 & 9 ! MIRACLE ( ,JO%UA ! SON ( 
 ,NUN4 ,TO ! DEF5D]S ( ! LAWS ( ,COP]NICUS & ,NEWTON1 TO ,VOLTAIRE 
 = EXAMPLE1 IT SEEM$ ?AT ! LAWS ( A/RONOMY DE/ROY$ RELIGION1 & 
 HE UTILIZ$ ! LAW ( GRAVITATION AS A WEAPON AGA9/ RELIGION4 

,JU/ SO IT N[ SEEMS AS IF WE HAVE ONLY TO ADMIT ! LAW ( 9EVITABILITY1 
 TO DE/ROY ! CONCEPTION ( ! S\L1 ( GOOD & EVIL1 & ALL ! 
 9/ITUTIONS ( /ATE & *UR* ?AT HAVE BE5 BUILT UP ON ?OSE 
 CONCEPTIONS4 

,SO TOO1 LIKE ,VOLTAIRE 9 HIS TIME1 UN9VIT$ DEF5D]S ( ! LAW ( 
 9EVITABILITY TODAY USE ?AT LAW AS A WEAPON AGA9/ RELIGION1 ?\< ! 
 LAW ( 9EVITABILITY 9 HI/ORY1 LIKE ! LAW ( ,COP]NICUS 9 A/RONOMY1 
 F> FROM DE/ROY+1 EV5 /R5G!NS ! F\NDATION ON :I* ! 
 9/ITUTIONS ( /ATE & *UR* >E ]ECT$4 

,AS 9 ! QUE/ION ( A/RONOMY !N1 SO 9 ! QUE/ION ( HI/ORY N[1 
 ! :OLE DIFF]5CE ( OP9ION IS BAS$ ON ! RECOGNITION OR 
 NONRECOGNITION ( SOME?+ ABSOLUTE1 S]V+ AS ! MEASURE ( VISIBLE 
 PH5OM5A4 ,9 A/RONOMY IT WAS ! IMMOVABILITY ( ! E>?1 9 HI/ORY 
 IT IS ! 9DEP5D5CE ( P]SONALITY--FREE WILL4 

,AS ) A/RONOMY ! DIFFICULTY ( RECOGNIZ+ ! MOTION ( ! E>? 
 LAY 9 AB&ON+ ! IMM$IATE S5SATION ( ! E>?'S FIXITY & ( ! 
 MOTION ( ! PLANETS1 SO 9 HI/ORY ! DIFFICULTY ( RECOGNIZ+ ! 
 SUBJECTION ( P]SONALITY TO ! LAWS ( SPACE1 TIME1 & CAUSE LIES 9 
 R5\NC+ ! DIRECT FEEL+ ( ! 9DEP5D5CE ( ONE'S [N 
 P]SONALITY4 ,BUT AS 9 A/RONOMY ! NEW VIEW SAID3 0,IT IS TRUE ?AT WE DO 
 NOT FEEL ! MOVEM5T ( ! E>?1 BUT BY ADMITT+ ITS IMMOBILITY WE 
 >RIVE AT ABSURDITY1 :ILE BY ADMITT+ ITS MOTION 7:I* WE DO NOT FEEL7 
 WE >RIVE AT LAWS10 SO ALSO 9 HI/ORY ! NEW VIEW SAYS3 0,IT IS TRUE ?AT 
 WE >E NOT CONSCI\S ( \R DEP5D5CE1 BUT BY ADMITT+ \R FREE WILL WE 
 >RIVE AT ABSURDITY1 :ILE BY ADMITT+ \R DEP5D5CE ON ! EXT]NAL 
 WORLD1 ON TIME1 & ON CAUSE1 WE >RIVE AT LAWS40 

,9 ! FIR/ CASE IT WAS NECESS>Y TO R5\NCE ! CONSCI\SNESS ( AN 
 UNREAL IMMOBILITY 9 SPACE & TO RECOGNIZE A MOTION WE DID NOT FEEL2 9 
 ! PRES5T CASE IT IS SIMIL>LY NECESS>Y TO R5\NCE A FRE$OM ?AT DOES 
 NOT EXI/1 & TO RECOGNIZE A DEP5D5CE ( :I* WE >E NOT CONSCI\S4 

,FROM 3 ,GUT5B]G4ORG4 

,*RONOLOGY 3 
,NOVEMB] #c1 #ahfh 3 ,EPILOGUE #b1 ,*APT] #ab -- ,PUBLICATION4 
,FEBRU>Y #a#a1 #bag 3 ,EPILOGUE #b1 ,*APT] #ab -- ,ADD$4 

 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3  
HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/