,SPEE* 9 ,DISCUSSION ( ,ORGANIZ+ ! ,EXECUTIVE 

,PEOPLE 3 

,AU?OR 3 ,AMADEO ,BORDIGA 

,TEXT 3 

,NOVEMB] #c1 #aibb 

,S\RCE3 ,PUBLI%$ 9 ,T[>D ! ,UNIT$ ,FRONT3 ,PROCE$+S ( ! ,F\R? ,CONGRESS ( ! ,COMMUNI/ ,9T]NATIONAL1 #aibb 7HTTPS3_/_/WWW4HAYM>KETBOOKS4ORG_/BOOKS_/#d#g#b-T[>D-!-UNIT$-FRONT71 PP4 #i#c#e-#i#c#g 
,TRANSLATION3 ,TRANSLATION BY ,JOHN ,RIDDELL 
,H,T,M,L ,M>KUP3 ,DAVID ,WALT]S = ! ,M>XI/S ,9T]NET ,>*IVE1 #bah 
,COPYRI<T3 ,JOHN ,RIDDELL1 #b#a#g4 ,REPUBLI%$ H]E ) P]MISSION4 

,I HAVE ASK$ = ! FLOOR 9 ORD] TO SPEAK ON ,COMRADE ,EB]LE9'S REPORT ON REORGANIZ+ ! ,EXECUTIVE ,COMMITTEE ( ! ,9T]NATIONAL4 ,9 ! COMMISSION1 ,I SAID ?AT ?IS 9VOLV$ A REORGANIZATION NOT JU/ ( ! ,EXECUTIVE ,COMMITTEE BUT ( ! 5TIRE ,9T]NATIONAL4 ,!RE >E IMPORTANT QUE/IONS AT /AKE H]E1 9VOLV+ A DE FACTO REVISION ( ! ,9T]NATIONAL'S /ATUTES ) REG>D TO ALL RELATION%IPS BETWE5 ! SECTIONS & ! C5T] & ! 5TIRE ORGANIZATIONAL WORK ( ! ,9T]NATIONAL4 

,I PROPOS$ ?AT IT WAS NECESS>Y TO REVISE ! ,9T]NATIONAL'S /ATUTES4 ,H[EV]1 ,COMRADE ,EB]LE9 HAS JU/ SAID ?AT ?IS MATT] %\LD BE TABL$ UNTIL ! NEXT CONGRESS4 

,9 MY OP9ION1 ALL ASPECTS ( ! DRAFT ON ORGANIZATION >E QUITE ACCEPTABLE4 ,IT CONTA9S PROVISIONS ?AT >E OBJECTIVELY V]Y IMPORTANT1 9 AS MU* AS !Y AIM TO WIPE \T ! LA/ REMNANTS ( ! F$]ATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL ME?ODS ( ! OLD .<,SECOND.> ,9T]NATIONAL4 

,IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO BROAD5 ! DISCUSSION A BIT AT ?IS /AGE ( ! CONGRESS1 ! QUE/ION C\LD BE POS$ :E!R EV]Y?+ ?AT IS REQUIR$ TO A*IEVE A G5U9E REVOLUTION>Y C5TRALISM CAN REALLY BE ATTA9$ ?R\< A RE=M ( ! ORGANIZATIONAL APP>ATUS4 

,I HAVE ALREADY SAID A FEW WORDS ON ?IS !ME 9 MY COMM5TS ON ! REPORT ( ! ,EXECUTIVE ,COMMITTEE4 ,I WILL NOT REPEAT ?IS N[2 !RE IS NO TIME = ?AT4 ,A G5U9E C5TRALIZATION W\LD BR+ AB\T A SYN!SIS ( ! REVOLUTION>Y MOVEM5T'S SPONTANE\S VANGU>D 9 EV]Y C\NTRY1 9 ORD] TO 5D ONCE & = ALL ! CRISES ( DISCIPL9E ?AT WE EXP]I5CE AT PRES5T4 ,H[EV]1 ,I MU/ REIT]ATE ?AT IF ?IS IS :AT WE WANT1 WE MU/ NOT ONLY C5TRALIZE ! ORGANIZATIONAL APP>ATUS BUT ALSO SIMULTANE\SLY UNIFY \R ME?ODS ( /RUGGLE & SPECIFY V]Y PRECISELY EV]Y?+ ?AT RELATES TO PROGRAM & TACTICS4 ,WE MU/ EXPLA9 TO ALL GR\PS & ALL COMRADES :O BELONG TO ! ,9T]NATIONAL ! MEAN+ ( ! PL$GE ( UNCONDITIONAL OB$I5CE ?AT !Y MAKE :5 !Y JO9 \R RANKS4 

,AS REG>DS ! 9T]NATIONAL CONGRESSES1 ,I AM 9 COMPLETE AGREEM5T ) ABOLI%+ ! IMP]ATIVE M&ATE & ) HOLD+ ( NATIONAL CONGRESSES AFT] ! WORLD CONGRESSES4 ,I CONC$E )\T RES]VATIONS ?AT !SE MEASURES >E CONSI/5T ) ! PR9CIPLES ( C5TRALIZATION4 ,H[EV]1 9 MY OP9ION1 WE %\LD NOT LIMIT \RSELVES TO /AT+ ?AT ! 9T]E/S ( G5U9E C5TRALIZATION REQUIRES GETT+ RID ( IMP]ATIVE M&ATES & HOLD+ 9T]NATIONAL CONGRESSES BE=E ! NATIONAL CONGRESSES4 ,SOME S]I\S WORDS MU/ BE SPOK5 AB\T ! WORK & ORGANIZATION ( ! CONGRESSES4 

,WE HAVE REA*$ ! F9AL SESSIONS ( ?IS CONGRESS1 & WE MU/ CONC$E ?AT ! P]=MANCE HAS NOT BE5 9 ALL RESPECTS SATISFACTORY4 

,MANY IMPORTANT QUE/IONS W]E ANALYZ$4 ,WE >E 9 ! F9AL DAYS ( DISCUSSIONS1 & WE SEE ?AT !SE DISCUSSIONS W]E NOT P>TICUL>LY EFFECTIVE4 

,WE MU/ LOOK 9TO ! QUE/ION ( RESIGNATIONS4 ,I AGREE ) ! VIEW ?AT !SE RESIGNATIONS MU/ BE PREV5T$4 ,WE C\LD ALSO TRY A RULE ?AT HAS BE5 SUCCESSFULLY APPLI$ 9 \R P>TY1 NAMELY1 ?AT ALL RESIGNATIONS >E IMM$IATELY ACCEPT$1 & ! COMRADE :O RESIGNS CANNOT REASSUME HIS PLACE 9 ! P>TY 9 ! NEXT ONE OR TWO YE>S4 ,I BELIEVE ?AT ?IS SY/EM W\LD LEAD TO A SIGNIFICANT FALL 9 ! NUMB] ( RESIGNATIONS4 

,!RE IS ALSO A QUE/ION BE=E US ?AT ,I MU/ TAKE UP1 DESPITE ! LATE /AGE 9 ! CONGRESS'S DELIB]ATIONS4 ,?IS IS ! PROPOSAL ?AT !RE BE A TWO-YE> P]IOD BETWE5 ! WORLD CONGRESSES4 ,IF ! NEXT CONGRESS WAS GO+ TO BE LESS OV]:ELM$ ) WORK & ISSUES ?AN ?IS ONE HAS BE51 IT W\LD BE QUITE CORRECT NOT TO REPEAT ?IS SIGNIFICANT EXP5DITURE ( ORGANIZATIONAL1 F9ANCIAL1 & O!R RES\RCES4 ,BUT ,I W\LD LIKE TO RAISE ! SPECIFIC QUE/ION ( ! AM\NT ( TIME ?AT WILL PASS BE=E ! ,FIF? ,CONGRESS4 

,WE >E 9 ! PROCESS ( REF]R+ TO ! NEXT CONGRESS QUE/IONS ( GREAT IMPORTANCE4 ,WE >E PO/PON+ ADOPTION ( A NEW PROGRAM - OR1 BETT] SAID1 ! FIR/ PROGRAM ( ! ,COMMUNI/ ,9T]NATIONAL4 ,WE HAVE PO/PON$ ! REVISION ( ! /ATUTES1 ?AT IS1 ! ORGANIZATIONAL L9K BETWE5 ! ,9T]NATIONAL & ITS SECTIONS4 

,AFT] ! REPORT FROM ! ,EXECUTIVE WE HAD A L5G?Y DISCUSSION ( TACTICS4 ,BUT ! DIFF]5T SPEAK]S ?AT TOOK ! FLOOR1 ONE AFT] ANO!R1 DID NOT TAKE UP ! GREAT PROBLEM ( ! ,9T]NATIONAL'S TACTICS4 ,!Y LIMIT$ !MSELVES TO DISCUSS+ SOME REM>KS BY ! ,EXECUTIVE ,COMMITTEE ON ! WORK OR ! SITUATION 9 ?IS OR ?AT NATIONAL SECTION4 ,BUT V]Y IMPORTANT QUE/IONS1 LIKE ?AT ( ! WORK]S' GOV]NM5T1 = EXAMPLE1 W]E NOT RESOLV$ 9 ?IS DISCUSSION4 ,?IS TEXT WAS REF]R$ TO A COMMISSION1 :I* HAS NOT YET COME TO A DECISION4 ,! QUE/ION IS /ILL NOT CL>IFI$1 & WE HAVE NO TIME LEFT = ?AT4 ,I DO NOT PROPOSE ?AT ! QUE/ION ( TACTICS BE REOP5$ = A BROAD DEBATE4 ,BUT :5 ,I CONSID] ! PROGRAM1 ! /ATUTES1 & TACTICS1 IT SEEMS TO ME ABSURD TO SUGGE/ ?AT ! ,FIF? ,WORLD ,CONGRESS CAN TAKE PLACE ONLY 9 TWO YE>S4 ,I !RE=E CONSID] IT APPROPRIATE TO PRES5T TO ! CONGRESS A PROPOSAL ON BEHALF ( ! MAJORITY ( ! ,ITALIAN DELEGATION ?AT1 GIV5 ! IMPORTANT DECISIONS ?AT >E BE+ PUT (F1 ! ,FIF? ,CONGRESS ( ! ,9T]NATIONAL TAKE PLACE 9 ! SUMM] OR FALL ( #a#i#b#c4 

,FROM 3 ,M>XI/S4ORG4 

,*RONOLOGY 3 
,M>* #c1 #bba 3 ,SPEE* 9 ,DISCUSSION ( ,ORGANIZ+ ! ,EXECUTIVE -- ,ADD$4 
,JANU>Y #h1 #bbb 3 ,SPEE* 9 ,DISCUSSION ( ,ORGANIZ+ ! ,EXECUTIVE -- ,UPDAT$4 

 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3  
HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/