,:AT ,SAVAGES ,WE ,MU/ ,BE3 ,VEGANS ,)\T ,MORALITY 

,PEOPLE 3 

,AU?OR 3 ,FL[] ,BOMB 

,TEXT 3 

@9 ,NEW MORALS1 ,SAME GOV]NANCE @9 

  

0,MORALITY IS COMMON S5SE IDEAS ?AT WE CAN ALL AGREE ON4 ,WE NE$ TO EXP& MORALITY TO 9CLUDE NON-HUMAN ANIMALS40 -,LOGIC COMMONLY F\ND 9 ! VEGAN MOVEM5T 

,MO/ MOVEM5TS :O ATTEMPT TO MAKE SOCIAL *ANGE 5 MASSE RELY ON ! 0APPEAL TO MORALITY0 TACTIC AS A PRIM>Y ME?OD ( GA9+ SUPPORT4 ,= EXAMPLE1 0,MEAT IS ,MURD]0 IS A COMMON CAT* PHRASE )9 ! ANIMAL RI<TS MOVEM5T4 ,?IS CAT* PHRASE RELIES ON ! ASSUMPTION ?AT ALL PEOPLE >E AGA9/ MURD] S9CE1 BY ! SAME LOGIC1 MURD] IS MORALLY REPREH5SIBLE4 ,BUT ?IS ASSUMES ?AT !RE IS A S+UL>1 UNIV]SAL MORALITY ?AT GUIDES EV]YONE'S DECISIONS :51 9 REALITY1 IT MAY HAVE DIFF]5T 9T]PRETATIONS TO SOME1 & ONLY GUIDE ?OSE :O EMBRACE IT TO BEG9 )4 ,= EXAMPLE1 SOME SELF-PROCLAIM$ MORALI/S DEF5D ! VIOL5T MANIFE/ATIONS ( PATRI>*Y2 O!RS ADVOCATE :ITE SUPREMACY & MANY MORALI/S SUPPORT VIOL5CE T[>DS NON-HUMAN ANIMALS4 0,COMMON S5SE0 IS ONLY COMMON TO ?OSE :O MAKE UP ! MEMB]%IP ( A SPECIFIC GR\P1 :O FEEL ! NE$ TO UNIV]SALIZE ITS PR9CIPLES4 ,BUT 0COMMON S5SE0 DOES NOT APPLY TO O!RS \TSIDE ?AT GR\P :O HAVE SELF-9T]E/S ?AT RUN CONTR>Y TO ITS ASSUM$ COLLECTIVE 0GOOD04 ,(T5 TIMES1 IT IS NOT A LACK ( MORALITY ?AT IS PROBLEMATIC BUT ! V]Y EXI/5CE ( MORALITY2 ! SET ( PR9CIPLES & VALUES 9DEP5D5T ( ! COMPLEXITY ( SELF-9T]E/1 :I* EXT]NALLY GUIDE & JU/IFY ONE'S ACTIONS4 

,AN?ROPOC5TRISM IS ! BELIEF ?AT HUMAN BE+S >E ! MO/ IMPORTANT 5TITY 9 ! UNIV]SE4 ,AN?ROPOC5TRISM 9T]PRETS OR REG>DS ! WORLD 9 T]MS ( HUMAN VALUES & EXP]I5CES4 ,! T]M CAN BE US$ 9T]*ANGEABLY ) HUMANOC5TRISM1 & SOME REF] TO ! CONCEPT AS HUMAN SUPREMACY OR HUMAN EXCEPTIONALISM4 -,WIKIP$IA 

,AN?ROPOC5TRIC MORALITY PROVIDES ! JU/IFICATION = A WIDE RANGE ( ECO-DE/RUCTIVE & DOME/ICAT+ DISA/]S4 ,REPRES5T+ A WORLDVIEW ?AT CON/RUCTS ! HUMAN_/ANIMAL DI*OTOMY1 AN?ROPOC5TRISM IS RE9=C$ BY A CAPITALI/-9DU/RIAL SOCIETY ?AT REQUIRES ! L>GE-SCALE DEA? & DE/RUCTION ( WILDLIFE 9 ORD] TO EXI/4 ,! 0RI<TE\SNESS0 ( HUMAN DOM9ATION PROVIDES ! SOCIO-POLITICAL NORMALIZATION REQUIR$ TO PACIFY ANY POT5TIAL = EMOTIONAL \TRAGE AGA9/ ?IS SY/EMIZ$ VIOL5CE4 ,SO BETWE5 VEGAN MORALITY & AN?ROPOC5TRIC MORALITY1 :I* ONE IS 0RI<T08 

,MORAL NIHILISM IS ! META-E?ICAL VIEW ?AT NO?+ IS MORALLY RI<T OR WRONG4 ,!RE >E NO MORAL FEATURES 9 ?IS WORLD2 NO?+ IS RI<T OR WRONG4 ,!RE=E1 NO MORAL JUDGM5TS >E TRUE2 H[EV]1 \R S9C]E MORAL JUDGM5TS TRY1 BUT ALWAYS FAIL1 TO DESCRIBE ! MORAL FEATURES ( ?+S4 ,?US1 WE ALWAYS LAPSE 9TO ]ROR :5 ?9K+ 9 MORAL T]MS4 ,WE >E TRY+ TO /ATE ! TRU? :5 WE MAKE MORAL JUDGM5TS4 ,BUT S9CE !RE IS NO MORAL TRU?1 ALL ( \R MORAL CLAIMS >E MI/AK54 -,WIKIP$IA 

,MORALITY IS A SOCIAL CON/RUCT ?AT DOES NOT REPRES5T A UNIV]SAL TRU?1 NOR ! 9T]E/S ( ALL PEOPLE4 ,:ILE ALSO FAIL+ TO ACC\NT = ! COMPLEX CIRCUM/ANCES 9 :I* MORAL-BAS$ DECISIONS >E IMPRACTICAL1 MORALITY LIMITS ! SCOPE ( DECISION MAK+ & 9DIVIDUAL ACTION4 ,!RE=E1 9 ORD] TO CONDITION MORALITY ON A MASS SCALE1 RIGID OB$I5CE IS REQUIR$ :I* NECESSITATES AN EQUALLY RIGID VIOL5T APP>ATUS TO 5=CE IT4 

,OBEY+ MORALITY ( ANY TYPE REQUIRES PUTT+ ASIDE 9DIVIDUAL EXP]I5CE & P]SONAL MOTIVES ( SELF-9T]E/4 ,?IS ALSO MEANS DISREG>D+ ! PRAGMATIC CONSID]ATIONS CONC]N+ ! PRACTICAL CONSEQU5CES ( ONE'S MORALITY-BAS$ DECISION4 ,9 SOCIETY1 MORALS >E SOCIALLY CONDITION$ 9 ORD] TO MA9TA9 A /&>DIZ$ SY/EM ( BELIEFS4 ,?IS SY/EM DISC\RAGES 9DIVIDUALI/ ?9K+ & QUE/ION+ ( NOT ONLY ?AT SY/EM1 BUT ( ! F\NDATIONS ( AU?ORITY 9 G5]AL4 ,! PRIM>Y ME?OD = ?IS DISC\RAGEM5T IS TO ADV]TISE A DESIR$ BELIEF AS A 0COMMON S5SE0 OR NORMALITY ?AT 0EV]YONE0 KN[S OR FOLL[S4 ,?IS IMM$IATELY PLACES ! 0GR\P0 ABOVE ! 09DIVIDUAL04 ,) 9DIVIDUAL SELF-9T]E/1 ONE MI<T REFUSE TO OBEY )\T QUE/ION+1 !RE=E GR\P-?9K IS SOCIALLY RE9=C$ TO DISC\RAGE 9DIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY1 CREATIVITY1 & ?9K+ = ONE'S SELF4 ,EXAMPLES ( ! DEPLOY$ SOCIALIZ$ HO/ILITY T[>DS 9DIVIDUALISM 9CLUDE LABEL+ ?OSE :O ASS]T !IR 9DIVIDUALITY AS 0SELFI%0 OR 0EGOTI/IC0 & !RE=E UNDESIRABLE4 

,A MOVEM5T ?AT MORALIZES VEGANISM MEANS 9/ITUT+ ANO!R SOCIAL SY/EM ?AT W\LD 5=CE NEW MORALITY-BAS$ LAWS & NORMS4 ,NOT ONLY W\LD ?IS REQUIRE AN 7IRONICALLY7 VIOL5T APP>ATUS = RE9=CEM5T1 BUT W\LD /ILL COME )\T A GU>ANTEE ( A MORE 0PEACEFUL01 0COMPASSIONATE0 CAPITALISM4 ,AS LONG AS !RE >E SY/EMS ( GOV]NANCE1 79CLUD+ ! CONTRADICTORY 0COMPASSIONATE CAPITALISM07 !RE WILL BE REBELS4 ,AS LONG AS !RE >E LAWS1 !RE IS CORRUPTION )9 ! APP>ATUS ITSELF ?AT 5=CES !M4 ,AS BO? A HI/ORICAL & CONTEMPOR>Y SOCIAL PROJECT ATTEMPT+ TO CREATE PEACE & COMPASSION ON A MASS SCALE1 MORALISM HAS FAIL$4 

@9 ,BEYOND MORALITY3 NO GOV]NM5T CAN EV] GIVE US FRE$OM @9 

  

,AN>*Y IS ! ABS5CE ( GOV]NM5T & ABSOLUTE FRE$OM ( 9DIVIDUALITY4 -,WIKIP$IA 

,! SAME APP>ATUSES ( CO]CION ?AT RE9=CES MORALITY 7RELIGION1 ! /ATE1 ETC47 >E ! 5EMIES ( FRE$OM4 ,:ILE ONE MI<T SAY !SE 9/ITUTIONS C\LD RE9=CE ! VEGAN MORALITY ?AT W\LD LIB]ATE NON-HUMAN ANIMALS1 !SE SAME 9/ITUTIONS REQUIRE 9DIVIDUALI/ SUBJUGATION TO !IR COLLECTIVE 0GOOD04 ,BUT !IR GOOD W\LDN'T BE A 0GOOD0 ( MY [N2 IT W\LD BE !IR ?9K+ OV] M9E1 EMP[]$ BY ITS ASSUM$ 0UNIV]SAL TRU?04 ,?IS IS ! SAME LOGIC ( CONTROL & DOM9ATION ?AT IS US$ BY ?OSE :O DOM9ATE & CONSUME NON-HUMAN ANIMALS4 ,GUID$ BY ! VALUES ( HUMAN SUPREMACY1 !RE IS A S5SE ( 5TITLEM5T ?AT POSITIONS !M ABOVE QUE/ION4 ,! SAME APP>ATUS ?AT CONDITIONS MORALITY HOLDS ?AT 0BEYOND QUE/ION0 POSITION4 ,BUT AS AN 9DIVIDUAL1 NOT ONLY DO ,I QUE/ION IT1 ,I REJECT IT ALL TOGE!R4 

,MY 9DIVIDUALISM IS EMP[]$ BY SELF-9T]E/ & 9=M$ DECISION-MAK+4 ,MY REFUSAL TO SURR5D] MY M9D TO ! 0COLLECTIVE GOOD0 ( CONSUM+ ! FLE% & SECRETIONS ( NON-HUMAN ANIMALS IS A REFLECTION ( MY [N REBELLION4 ,ALONG ) ! 9SPIRATION FROM O!R 9DIVIDUAL VEGANS ,I REALIZ$ ! P[] ( ?9K+ 9DEP5D5TLY1 SELFI%LY1 & EGOTI/ICALLY - AGA9/ ! MASS SOCIETY :OSE NORMALIZ$ TRADITIONS & VALUES CONFLICT ) MY 9T]E/S4 ,AS AN 9DIVIDUALI/1 BE+ VEGAN IS PRACTICAL 9 EXT5D+ 9DIVIDUAL AUTONOMY TO NON-HUMAN ANIMALS4 ,MY REFUSAL TO SOCIALLY RE9=CE !IR COMMODITY /ATUS ALL[S !M ! NATURAL RI<T TO EXI/ AS !IR [N AUTONOM\S 9DIVIDUAL SELVES1 ! SAME WAY ,I W\LD EXPECT TO BE RESPECT$ BY O!RS4 ,I REFUSE TO 9DIVIDUALLY P>TICIPATE 9 ! MASS NORMALIZATION ( !IR DOM9ATION4 

,AN>*Y1 = ME1 MEANS 9DIVIDUAL NEGATION TO LAWS1 ORD]1 & SY/EMS4 ,?IS AN>*Y NOT ONLY OPPOSES BO? VEGAN & AN?ROPOC5TRIC MORALITY BUT MORALITY ALL TOGE!R3 MORALITY BE+ ! AB/RACT =M ( GOV]NANCE ?AT ATTEMPTS TO SUBJUGATE MY 9DIVIDUALITY4 ,MY VEGANISM REQUIRES NO EXT]NAL GOV]NANCE TO 5=CE OR GUIDE IT4 ,IT IS AN 9DIVIDUALI/ *OICE ?AT REFLECTS ! CONSI/5CY & PRACTICALITY ( LIV+ MY LIFE AGA9/ AU?ORITY4 

,= VEGANISM TO BE LOGICALLY CONSI/5T ) ANIMAL LIB]ATION1 IT MU/ BE ANTI-AU?ORIT>IAN4 ,FROM ?IS PO9T =W>D1 ! TOTALITY ( CAPITALI/1 9DU/RIAL CIVILIZATION MU/ BE CALL$ 9TO QUE/ION4 ,BE+ VEGAN & PRO-CAPITALI/ IS A CONTRADICTION S9CE ! FULL FUNCTION+ ( CAPITALISM REQUIRES L>GE-SCALE EXPLOITATION ( NATURAL RES\RCES1 SUBSEQU5TLY DE/ROY+ & WIP+ \T 5TIRE ECO-SY/EMS4 ,CAPITALISM REQUIRES ! EXPANSION ( TE*NOLOGICAL 9DU/RIALIZATION TO ACCOMMODATE ! DEM&S ( MASS SOCIETY4 ,MASS SOCIETY REQUIRES ! EV]-EXP&+ DISPLACEM5T ( WILDLIFE TO H\SE ! GR[+ HUMAN POPULATION4 ,CIVILIZATION IS ROOT$ BY AGRICULTURE :I* IS PR$ICAT$ ON ! BASIC =MULA ( TAK+ MORE FROM ! L& ?AN PUTT+ BACK4 ,?IS RESULTS 9 IRREV]SIBLE DAMAGE TO ALL ECO-SY/EMS ?AT DIRECTLY AFFECT NON-HUMAN ANIMALS4 

,TO BE VEGAN & PRO-/ATI/ IS A CONTRADICTION1 S9CE VEGANISM AIMS = ANIMAL LIB]ATION1 :ILE ! ,/ATE IS ! ANTI!SIS ( LIB]ATION - RE9=C+ LAWS ?AT UTILIZE PHYSICAL =CE TO CO]CE ALL BE+S 9TO COMPLIANCE4 ,! COMMON D5OM9ATOR ) ! ,/ATE & VEGAN MORALITY IS ! %>$ POSITIONS HELD AS 0UNIV]SAL TRU?S0 ABOVE ! 9DIVIDUAL4 ,BO? CO]CE2 ONE M5TALLY & ! O!R PHYSICALLY4 ,BO? COMPLIM5T EA* O!R'S 9T5TIONS ON CONDITION+ 0! MASSES01 & BO? 5C\RAGE ! DISREG>D = 9DIVIDUAL SELF-9T]E/1 CREATIVITY1 & SELF-RESPONSIBILITY4 

,IF ! BASIS ( ANIMAL LIB]ATION IS FRE$OM1 EMP[]+ A GOV]N+ AG5CY TO 5=CE MORAL-BAS$ LAWS UPON 9DIVIDUALS IS A CONTRADICTION4 ,IT RE9=CES SPECIESISM ?R\< ! DIVISION ( HUMAN & ANIMAL2 IF HUMANS >E 9 FACT ANIMALS1 & ! VEGAN AIM IS ANIMAL LIB]ATION1 :Y W\LDN'T 0HUMAN0 ANIMALS LIB]ATE !MSELVES FROM ! SAME %ACKLES ( BO? SPECIESISM & GOV]NANCE AS WELL8 ,SPECIESISM IS RE9=C$ ?R\< HUMAN SUPREMACY1 & IF HUMAN SUPREMACY IS TO BE DISMANTL$ SOCIALLY1 ANIMAL LIB]ATION APPLIES TO EV]YONE4 ,FROM ?IS PO9T ( VIEW1 GOV]NM5T IS NOT NE$$ = GRANT+ RI<TS3 ! RI<T TO BODILY AUTONOMY & EQUALITY COMES ) ! DISMANTL+ ( GOV]NANCE - BO? ! GOV]NANCE ( MORALITY & /ATISM4 

,IT IS NOT A MORALITY ?AT GOV]NS MY ACTIONS1 BUT RA!R AN 9DIVIDUALI/ DESIRE TO WAGE W> UPON ALL SY/EMS1 MORAL OR NOT1 ?AT ATTEMPT TO SUBJUGATE ME & DE/ROY ! E>? ,I REQUIRE TO SURVIVE4 ,MY DECISION TO BECOME VEGAN DID NOT COME FROM A VEGAN MORALITY OR A NEW LAW PROHIBIT+ ME FROM CONSUM+ FLE% & SECRETIONS4 ,IT CAME FROM UNGOV]N$ FREE ?\<T :I* HELP$ ME VIEW SOCIETY 9 A CRITICAL WAY1 DISCOV]+ PRAGMATIC WAYS ( 5ACT+ MY [N PROJECT ( LIB]ATION4 ,MY VEGAN AN>*I/ PRAXIS IS A %>$ AFF9ITY ) ! NON-HUMANS :O FI<T AGA9/ ! CON/RA9TS & TORTURE DEVICES ( MOD]N TE*NOLOGY1 SLAU<T]H\SES1 & ! HUMAN-MADE HELL ( 9DU/RIAL SOCIETY4 ,!RE IS NO ,GOD1 GOV]NM5T1 OR MORALITY TO SAVE US4 ,ONLY \R 9DIVIDUAL SELVES1 ! DECISIONS WE MAKE & ! ACTIONS WE TAKE4 

@9 ,>M+ ! WILL TO SURVIVE ) ATTACK @9 

,SAVAGE 7( AN ANIMAL OR =CE ( NATURE7 FI]CE1 VIOL5T1 & UNCONTROLL$4 -,WIKIP$IA 

,ONE COMMON T5ET ( MORALITY IS ! COMMITM5T TO NONVIOL5CE4 ,AS AN 9DIVIDUALI/1 ,I F9D VIOL5CE TO BE USEFUL 9 SOME CIRCUM/ANCES1 & IMPRACTICAL 9 O!RS4 ,BUT IT IS ?IS OP5-5D$ UTILIZATION ( VIOL5CE ?AT MORALITY-BAS$ NONVIOL5CE PROHIBITS4 ,:5 IT COMES TO ANIMAL LIB]ATION 7OR FROM ! /ATI/ P]SPECTIVE1 ANIMAL RI<TS71 VEGANISM IS (T5 ADV]TIS$ AS A 0CRUELTY-FREE01 0NO H>M DONE0 OR 0NONVIOL5T0 MOVEM5T4 ,?IS NOT ONLY IGNORES ! HI/ORICAL EXAMPLES ( SUCCESSFUL ANIMAL LIB]ATIONS ?R\< VIOL5CE1 BUT IT ALSO PROMOTES A LIMIT$ RANGE ( /RATEGIC ACTIVITY4 ,! RE9=CEM5T ( A NONVIOL5T MORALITY DISC\RAGES ! USE ( VIOL5CE AGA9/ ! 9/ITUTIONS & 9DIVIDUAL AG5TS ( SPECIESI/ DOM9ATION4 ,HUMAN SUPREMACY UTILIZES EV]Y & ALL AV5UES ( VIOL5CE TO MA9TA9 ITS CONTROL4 ,TO LIMIT ! >S5AL ( RESI/ANCE TO M]E DEF5SE RA!R ?AN 9CORPORAT+ ATTACK IS TO /RATEGICALLY LIMIT ! RANGE ( POSSIBILITY & POT5TIAL 9 ADVANC+ ANIMAL LIB]ATION4 ,:5 ANIMAL LIB]ATION IS CONF9$ TO ! LEGAL >5A ( /ATISM1 ! AG5CY ( 9DIVIDUAL 9SURG5CY HAS BE5 SURR5D]$4 

,)9 MASS SOCIETY1 SPECIESISM IS NOT JU/ CONF9$ TO GROC]Y /ORES2 IT IS ALSO EMB$D$ 9 ! SOCIAL & CULTURAL TRADITIONS RE9=C$ BY 9DIVIDUAL P>TICIPATION4 ,!RE=E1 9DIVIDUALS SOCIALLY REPRODUCE ! NORMALIZATION ( NON-HUMAN ANIMAL ABUSE1 CONTROL1 & DOM9ATION4 ,& :ILE SOME ( !SE 9DIVIDUALS MI<T EMANCIPATE !MSELVES FROM ! SPECIESI/ M9DSET ( HUMAN C5TRIC 5TITLEM5T1 O!RS MI<T EMBRACE & DEF5D IT4 ,!RE=E1 VIOL5CE BECOMES A NECESS>Y TASK C>RI$ \T BY ?OSE 9DIVIDUALS :O REFUSE TO /& BY & ALL[ ! SOCIAL REPRODUCTION ( AN?ROPOC5TRIC MORALITY & PRACTICE4 

,I F9D AFF9ITY ) ?OSE ( ! WILD ?AT /RUGGLE AGA9/ ! MA*9]Y ( 9DU/RIAL SOCIETY & ?OSE :O FI<T TO DEF5D ! ECOLOGICAL HABITATS )9 :I* !Y SURVIVE4 ,! NE$ = 9T5SIFI$ CONFRONTATION ) SPECIESISM IS ONE ?AT 5COMPASSES AN ANTI-AU?ORIT>IAN /RIKE AGA9/ ! IDEOLOGY & 9/ITUTIONS ( CAPITALISM1 ! /ATE1 & AN?ROPOC5TRIC MORALITY4 ,BEYOND M]E LEGISLATIVE RE=M1 ANIMAL LIB]ATION FROM ?IS P]SPECTIVE NECESSITATES ! DE/RUCTION ( ALL CAGES & APP>ATUSES ?AT PHYSICALLY CAPTIVATE NON-HUMAN ANIMALS4 ,SIMULTANE\SLY1 A W> WAG$ AGA9/ ! =CES ( 0HUMAN0 ANIMAL CAPTIVITY & 5SLAVEM5T OP5S AV5UES ( EXPLORATION BEYOND ! SUP]IORITY COMPLEX - ! ROLE & ID5TITY ( 0HUMAN0 AS DI/9CT FROM ANIMAL & WILDNESS4 

,?R\< SPONTANE\S RUPTURES TO ! CIVILIZ$ ORD]1 VEGAN SAVAG]Y ASS]TS RESI/ANCE ?R\< ATTACK+ ! F\NDATIONS ?AT PRODUCE 5SLAVEM5T4 ,FROM NONP>TICIPATION TO F]AL 9SURG5CY1 AN>*Y IS ! P]SONIFICATION ( ANY 9DIVIDUAL ) ! C\RAGE TO BECOME WILD AGA9/ DOME/ICAT+ SUBORD9ATION4 

,BUT VEGAN SAVAG]Y IS MORE ?AN JU/ VIOL5T VEGANISM3 IT IS ! CELEBRATION ( LIFE AGA9/ ! LAWS ( MORALITY1 CIVILIZATION1 CONTROL1 & DOM9ATION4 ,IT IS ! REFUSAL TO 9T]NALIZE ! CAPITALI/-9DU/RIAL VIEW ( O!RS AS M]E OBJECTS TO EXPLOIT1 CONSUME1 OR 5?RALL$4 ,?IS ALL[S 9DIVIDUALS TO DEF9E !MSELVES AS !IR [N AUTONOM\S BE+S1 >M$ ) ! AG5CY TO ATTACK ?OSE :O ATTEMPT TO SUBJUGATE !M4 

,AS A VEGAN AN>*I/1 MY FI<T = FRE$OM IS P>ALLEL ) ! /RUGGLES F\<T BY ! WILD S9CE ! DAWN ( 9DU/RIAL SOCIETY & CIVILIZ$ DOME/ICATION4 ,:AT SAVAGES WE MU/ BE - FI<T+ = FRE$OM ) EV]Y BREA?1 RECLAIM+ \R LIVES ?R\< EV]Y ACT ( VIOL5CE AGA9/ ! MA*9ES ( SOCIAL CONTROL & DOM9ATION6 ,:ILE ! MOVEM5TS ( MORALITY CONT9UE TO IGNORE ! VITAL REALITY ( AMORAL VIOL5T NECESSITY1 SOME ( US CONT9UE TO WAGE W> AGA9/ SPECIESISM ) NO?+ MORE ?AN A FIRE = FRE$OM 9 \R HE>TS4 ,9 SOLID>ITY ) ! WILD1 & 9 DEF5SE ( ! ECOLOGICAL T]RA9 ,I CALL HOME1 MY FI<T IS FI]CE & UNGOV]NABLE4 ,T[>D VEGANISM BEYOND MORALITY1 T[>D 9DU/RIAL COLLAPSE & TOTAL LIB]ATION6 

7,S\RCE3 HTTPS3_/_/W>ZON$I/RO4NOBLOGS4ORG_/47 

,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 

,*RONOLOGY 3 
,JANU>Y #a#e1 #bbb 3 ,:AT ,SAVAGES ,WE ,MU/ ,BE3 ,VEGANS ,)\T ,MORALITY -- ,ADD$4 

 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3  
HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/