,*APT] #d ,L59'S ,REVOLUTION ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,PAUL ,MATTICK ,TEXT 3 ,?OSE 9 ! SOCIALI/ MOVEM5T :O W]E ?9K+ 9 T]MS ( A PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION W]E OBLIG$ TO TAKE ALL !SE FACTS 9TO CONSID]ATION4 ,9 !IR VIEW1 ! REVOLUTION W\LD NOT RESULT FROM A GRADUAL GR[? ( PROLET>IAN CLASS CONSCI\SNESS1 F9D+ ITS EXPRESSION 9 ! 9CREAS+ MIY SOLUTION ( ITS [N PROBLEMS ?R\< A *ANGE ( ! SOCIAL /RUCTURE4 ,& BECAUSE ?IS *OICE WAS RE/RICT$ TO ! WORK+ CLASS1 9 OPPOSITION TO ALL O!R CLASS 9T]E/S1 IT HAD TO LEAD TO ! DICTATOR%IP ( ! PROLET>IAT AS ! PRECONDITION = ITS REALIZATION4 ,9 O!R WORDS1 ! *ANGE 9 WORK+-CLASS IDEOLOGY1 BE+ BY & L>GE A REFLECTION ( B\RGEOIS IDEOLOGY1 W\LD BE ! RESULT ( CAPITALISM'S DECAY & COLLAPSE4 ,! DISSIPATION ( B\RGEOIS SELF-CONFID5CE & CLASS CONSCI\SNESS ?R\< ! UNCONTROLLABLE DECOMPOSITION ( ITS ECONOMIC BASE1 & !RE) ITS POLITICAL P[]1 W\LD ALSO BREAK ITS IDEOLOGICAL HOLD OV] ! WORK+ POPULATION4 ,H[EV]1 ?IS WAS NOT A QUE/ION ( M]ELY WAIT+ = ! EXPECT$ ECONOMIC & POLITICAL CATA/ROPHE ( B\RGEOIS SOCIETY2 IT 9VOLV$ PREP>ATION = SU* AN EV5TUALITY ?R\< ! ORGANIZATION ( ?AT P>T ( ! PROLET>IAT ALREADY POSSESS$ ( REVOLUTION>Y CONSCI\SNESS4 ,! L>G] ?IS ORGANIZATION1 ! LESS DIFFICULT IT W\LD BE TO 9/ILL ITS [N IDEAS 9TO ! M9DS ( ! REBELLI\S MASSES TO AID !IR REACTIONS TO ! DIS9TEGRAT+ CAPITALISM4 ,WAIT+ DID NOT IMPLY PASSIVITY1 BUT ! LEGAL OR ILLEGAL =G+ ( IDEOLOGICAL & PRACTICAL 9/RUM5TS ( REVOLUTION4 ,! OBJECTIVE CONDITIONS = A PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION W]E TO F\ND 9 DEVA/AT+ ECONOMIC CRISIS CONDITIONS FROM :I* ! B\RGEOISIE W\LD BE UNABLE TO EXTRICATE ITSELF 9 TIME TO ALLAY !IR SOCIAL CONSEQU5CES4 ,AS ! SOCIAL UPHEAVALS W\LD BE ( A VIOL5T NATURE1 IT W\LD BE NECESS>Y TO >M ! PROLET>IAT = ! DE/RUCTION ( ! B\RGEOIS /ATE MA*9]Y4 ,! PROBLEM WAS H[ TO GET ! >MS REQUIR$ TO ?IS 5D4 ,BUT AS A SEV]E 9T]NATIONAL CRISIS W\LD MO/ LIKELY LEAD TO IMP]IALI/IC W>S1 OR ! LATT] ISSUE 9TO ECONOMIC CRISIS CONDITIONS1 :I* C\LD NOT BE DEALT ) 9 ! USUAL 0NORMAL0 WAYS1 IT WAS CONCEIVABLE ?AT AN >\S$ & >M$ WORK+ CLASS MI1 IT WAS NOT 5TIRELY PRECLUD$ ?AT A P>T ( ! >M$ =CES ( ! B\RGEOISIE W\LD SIDE ) ! REBELLI\S WORK]S IF !Y DISPLAY$ 5\< 5]GY TO 9ITIATE CIVIL W>4 ,& BECAUSE IMP]IALISM WAS ITSELF A SIGN ( ! DEEP5+ CONTRADICTIONS ( CAPITAL PRODUCTION1 ITS W>S C\LD BE REG>D$ AS GIGANTIC CRISIS CONDITIONS & AS SO MANY ATTEMPTS AT !IR SOLUTION BY POLITICAL MEANS4 ,9 ANY CASE1 :AT REVOLUTIONS HAVE TAK5 PLACE - ! ,P>IS ,COMMUNE & ! REVOLUTIONS ( ! TW5TIE? C5TURY 9 ,RUSSIA & ,C5TRAL ,EUROPE - GREW NOT \T ( PURELY ECONOMIC CRISES BUT \T ( W> & DEFEAT & ! G5]AL MIS]IES ASSOCIAT$ ) !M4 ,WE MAY RECALL H]E ,K>L ,KAUTSKY'S ANSW] TO ,UPTON ,S9CLAIR1 REF]R$ TO E>LI]1 :I* EXPRESS$ ! RA!R VAGUE HOPE ?AT 0AFT] ! W>1 AFT] ! DEBACLE ( A GOV]NM5T1 WE MAY GET /R5G? 5\< TO CONQU] ! POLITICAL P[]40 ,AT ?AT TIME1 AS ! (FICIAL DEF5D] ( ,M>XIAN OR?ODOXY1 ,KAUTSKY /ILL SPOKE ( ! CONQUE/ ( P[] BY REVOLUTION>Y MEANS & ( ! DICTATOR%IP ( ! PROLET>IAT4 ,:ILE A PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION1 AS A CONSEQU5CE ( ! %>P5+ ( ! EXI/+ CLASS CONTRADICTIONS1 WAS = ,KAUTSKY NOT A DET]M9ABLE OCCURR5CE1 A REVOLUTION GR[+ \T ( W> & DEFEAT SEEM$ TO HIM A C]TA9TY1 EV5 ?\< ITS SUCCESS REMA9$ QUE/IONABLE47#a7,KAUTSKY'S MO/ FAI?FUL DISCIPLE1 ,L59 7#b7 - AT ! SAME TIME1 & ) ! EXP]I5CE ( ! ,RUSSIAN ,REVOLUTION ( #aie BEH9D HIM - LIKEWISE ASSOCIAT$ W> ) REVOLUTION4 ,9 A LETT] TO ,MAXIM ,GORKY 9 #a#i#a#c1 HE PO9T$ \T ?AT 0A W> BETWE5 ,AU/RIA & ,RUSSIA W\LD BE A V]Y USEFUL ?+ = ! REVOLUTIONS ?R\<\T ,EA/]N ,EUROPE1 BUT IT IS NOT V]Y PROBABLE ?AT ,FRANZ-,JOSEF & ,NICKY WILL GIVE US ?IS PLEASURE40 7#c7 ,SOON !REAFT] ID5TIFY+ ! 0AGE ( IMP]IALISM0 AS 0CAPITALISM'S LA/ /AGE ( DEVELOPM5T0 & AS 0! EVE ( ! PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION10 ,L59 SAW ! FIR/ WORLD W> AS ! BEG9N+ ( AN 9T]NATIONAL REVOLUTION & CONSI/5TLY CALL$ NOT = ! RE/ORATION ( ! CAPITALI/ PEACE BUT = TURN+ ! IMP]IALI/ W> 9TO CIVIL W>4 ,IF SOME:AT BELAT$LY1 ,FRANZ-,JOSEF1 ,NICKY1 & ALL ! O!R POT5TATES ( ,EUROPE F9ALLY PROVID$ ! REVOLUTION>IES & ALL !IR O!R SUBJECTS ) ! PLEASURES ( W>4 ,! PLEASURE DID NOT LA/ LONG1 DUE TO ! W>'S DE/RUCTIV5ESS ) RESPECT TO HUMAN LIVES & CAPITALI/ PROP]TY4 ,BUT ONCE IT />T$ ! B\RGEOISIE C\LD NOT CONCEIVE ( AN 5D TO IT EXCEPT 9 T]MS ( POSITIVE RESULTS1 ?AT IS1 VICTORY1 EXPROPRIATION1 & ANNEXATION4 ,LIKE BUS9ESS 9 G5]AL1 ! W> HAD TO BE PR(ITABLE & TO ?AT 5D CONC5TRATE MORE CAPITAL 9TO FEW] H&S ON AN 9T]NATIONAL SCALE4 ,H[EV]1 ! EXPECTATION ?AT ! W> W\LD TURN 9TO REVOLUTION1 AT LEA/ 9 ! DEFEAT$ NATIONS1 ALSO HAD TO WAIT SOME TIME = ITS REALIZATION4 ,AS 5VISION$ BY ,L59 & O!R REVOLUTION>IES1 ?IS HAPP5$ FIR/ 9 ,RUSSIA1 BECAUSE IT WAS ! 0WEAKE/ L9K 9 ! *A9 ( IMP]IALI/ P[]S40 ,& IT HAPP5$ NOT BECAUSE IT PROVID$ ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION>IES ) OBJECTIVE CONDITIONS TO BE UTILIZ$ TO W9 ! WORK]S TO !IR SIDE1 BUT BECAUSE ( ! POPULATION'S [N W>-WE>9ESS & ! BREAKD[N ( BO? ! W> MA*9]Y & ! ECONOMY ON :I* IT DEP5D$4 ,UNLIKE ITS AFT]MA? 9 ,OCTOB] #a#i#a#g1 ,RUSSIA'S ,FEBRU>Y ,REVOLUTION ( ! SAME YE> WAS A TRULY SPONTANE\S EV5T1 EV5 ?\< IT WAS PREC$$ BY A S]IES ( 9CREAS+LY MORE OM9\S SOCIAL & POLITICAL CONFLICTS 9VOLV+ ALL SOCIAL CLASSES & ! AUTOCRATIC GOV]NM5T47#d7 ,! MILIT>Y DEFEATS & A REL5TLESS DET]IORATION ( ECONOMIC CONDITIONS L$ TO LOCK-\TS1 /RIKES1 HUNG] RIOTS1 & MUT9IES 9 ! >MY1 CULM9AT+ 9 5ORM\S MASS DEMON/RATIONS1 CONFRONTATIONS ) ! AU?ORITIES1 & F9ALLY 9 ! FRAT]NIZATION ( DECISIVE GR\PS ( ! MILIT>Y ) ! REBELLI\S MASSES4 ,!RE W]E ( C\RSE ALSO POLITICALLY ORGANIZ$ =CES AT WORK1 ATTEMPT+ TO 9JECT !IR DEF9ITELY DEM>CAT$ GOALS 9TO ! DISAFFECT$ MASSES & TO GIVE !M A SOCIALI/ DIRECTION1 BUT AT ?AT TIME !Y W]E TOO SMALL & 9EFFECTIVE TO MAKE MU* ( A DIFF]5CE4 ,ON ! CONTR>Y1 9/EAD ( LEAD+ ! UPHEAVAL1 !Y W]E L$ BY IT1 & ADAPT$ !MSELVES TO ITS ELEM5TAL =CE4 ,! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION C\LD NOT BE A SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION1 SOME?+ ?AT1 9 A S5T5CE1 IMPLIES ! ABOLITION ( WAGE LABOR & ! SOCIALIZATION ( ALL ! MEANS ( PRODUCTION4 ,SU* A REVOLUTION PRESUPPOSES A DEVELOP$ CAPITALISM & ! EXI/5CE ( A PROLET>IAT ABLE TO DET]M9E ! SOCIAL PRODUCTION PROCESS4 ,SU* CONDITIONS DID NOT EXI/ 9 ,RUSSIA EXCEPT 9 ! FIR/ /AGES ( !IR DEVELOPM5T4 ,BUT !Y APPE>$ TO EXI/ 9 ,WE/]N ,EUROPE1 :I*1 CONSEQU5TLY1 WAS ?AT P>T ( ! WORLD 9 :I* A SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION C\LD CONCEIVABLY TAKE PLACE4 ,A ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION C\LD LEAD ONLY TO ! OV]?R[ ( CZ>DOM & ! 9/ITUTION ( B\RGEOIS RULE4 ,ON ! O!R H&1 A SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION 9 ,WE/]N ,EUROPE W\LD MO/ LIKELY PRECLUDE ! CONT9U$ EXI/5CE ( A B\RGEOIS ,RUSSIA1 JU/ AS IT HAD NOT BE5 POSSIBLE TO PRES]VE ,RUSSIAN S]FDOM )9 A B\RGEOIS ,EUROPE4 ,! RELATION%IP BETWE5 ! EXPECT$ SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION 9 ! ,WE/ & A POSSIBLE REVOLUTION 9 ,RUSSIA HAD ALREADY AGITAT$ ,M>X & ,5GELS1 BO? COM+ TO ! TIME-CONDITION$ & SPECULATIVE CONCLUSION ?AT A REVOLUTION 9 ,RUSSIA1 IF IT SPILL$ OV] 9TO ,WE/]N ,EUROPE1 MIODNIKS71 :O W]E AT ?AT TIME ! ONLY REVOLUTION>Y =CE 9 ,RUSSIA1 ?AN A REAL CONVICTION & IT WAS !RE=E ALL[$ TO BE =GOTT54 ,) ! RISE ( A ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRATIC MOVEM5T & ! =MATION ( TRADE UNIONS 9 ,RUSSIA1 ! ,POPULI/S' IDEA ( A PEOPLE'S REVOLUTION BAS$ ON ! PEASANTRY MADE WAY = ! ,M>XI/ CONCEPTION ( REVOLUTION BY ! 9DU/RIAL PROLET>IAT4 ,?IS MEANT1 ( C\RSE1 ! REVOLUTION'S PO/PONEM5T1 AS IT PRESUPPOS$ ! FUR!R UNFOLD+ ( ! CAPITALI/ SY/EM ( PRODUCTION4 ,! APPROA*+ SOCIAL REVOLUTION WAS ?US ALMO/ G5]ALLY ANTICIPAT$ AS A B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION1 TO BE SUPPORT$ BY ! SOCIALI/ MOVEM5T & ! 9DU/RIALI/ PROLET>IAT4 ,& IT C\LD BE SUPPORT$ BE/ BY MAK+ DEM&S ( A MORE RADICAL NATURE ?AN ?OSE ! LIB]AL B\RGEOISIE WAS ABLE TO =MULATE1 OR EV5 ?9K (4 ,! WORK]S W]E TO LEAD ?IS REVOLUTION1 EV5 ?\< IT C\LD REA* NO MORE ?AN A CAPITALI/IC B\RGEOIS DEMOCRACY1 ?AT IS1 CONDITIONS SU* AS PREVAIL$ 9 ! ,WE/4 ,?IS SEEM$ TO BE ALL ! MORE NECESS>Y BECAUSE ! LIB]AL B\RGEOISIE WAS ITSELF V]Y WEAK &1 AS ,ALEX&] ,H]Z5 REM>K$1 PREF]R$1 0AGA9/ ITS [N CONVICTIONS1 TO WALK ON A LEA%1 IF ONLY ! MOB IS NOT RELEAS$ FROM IT40 7#e7 ,QUITE AP>T FROM ! QUE/ION AS TO :E!R OR NOT IT WAS CAPABLE ( 9ITIAT+ A B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION1 IT WAS NOT WILL+ TO DO SO1 \T ( FE> ( ! BL9D RAGE ( ! PEASANT MASSES1 :I* MII/ REGIME4 ,CAPITAL ACCUMULATION ITSELF W\LD SL[LY *ANGE ! NATURE ( ! REGIME & =CE IT TO ADAPT ITSELF TO ! REQUIREM5TS ( MOD]N SOCIETY4 ,:ILE IT WAS CLE> ?AT IT WAS ! ,REVOLUTION ( #aie :I* HAD L$ TO ! FIR/1 ?\< MEAG]1 RE=MS ( CZ>ISM1 SU* AS ! E/ABLI%M5T ( ! ,DUMA1 ?IS REVOLUTION1 RELEAS$ BY ! 9DU/RIAL WORK+ CLASS1 ALSO HAD OP5$ ! ,P&ORA'S BOX ( ! CAPITAL-LABOR RELATION & REVEAL$ ! ?REAT ( AN ANTI-B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION4 ,= ! ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRATS1 ! DEVELOPM5T ( CAPITALISM 9 ,RUSSIA1 :ATEV] ITS C\RSE1 W\LD AT ! SAME TIME1 ?R\< ITS CREATION ( AN 9DU/RIAL PROLET>IAT1 BE A DEVELOPM5T T[>D SOCIALISM4 ,& BECAUSE CAPITALI/ DEVELOPM5T ACCEL]AT$ RA!R RAPIDLY AT ! TURN ( ! C5TURY1 9VOLV+ BO? ! CAPITALIZATION ( AGRICULTURE & ! =MATION ( A PROPRIET>Y PEASANTRY1 ! EXPECT$ REVOLUTION>Y *ANGES W]E NO LONG] ?\KET RELATIONS & !IR POLITICAL REFLECTIONS 9 B\RGEOIS DEMOCRACY4 ,) ?IS1 ,M>XISM CAME TO LOOK T[>D A SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION 9 ! WAKE ( A SUCCESSFUL B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION4 ,= ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES1 H[EV]1 ,WE/]N SOCIALISM HAD ALREADY JETTISON$ ITS ,M>XIAN H]ITAGE4 ,9 ! REVISIONI/-RE=MI/ PO9T ( VIEW1 ! EXT5SION ( B\RGEOIS DEMOCRACY ELIM9AT$ NOT ONLY ! POSSIBILITY BUT ALSO ! NE$ = A SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION TO BE REPLAC$ BY EVOLUTION>Y *ANGES 9 ! CAPITALI/ CLASS & EXPLOITATION RELATIONS4 ,BUT IF SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION HAD ALREADY BECOME AN ANA*RONISM 9 ! ,WE/]N WORLD1 !RE WAS NO PO9T 9 EXPECT+ ITS >RIVAL 9 ,RUSSIA4 ,& AS ! /EADY CAPITALIZATION ( ! ,RUSSIAN ECONOMY PROMIS$ A RELUCTANT BUT NONE!LESS NECESS>Y DEMOCRATIZATION ( ITS POLITICAL /RUCTURE1 !RE WAS1 P]HAPS1 NOT EV5 ROOM = A B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION 9 ! ,WE/]N S5SE ( T]M4 ,M>XI/ REVISIONISM WAS ADAPT$ TO ,RUSSIAN CONDITIONS1 ! ONE H& 9 ! 0LEGAL ,M>XISM0 ( ! LIB]AL B\RGEOISIE = :OM IT M]ELY IMPLI$ ! CAPITALIZATION ( ,RUSSIA & ITS 9TEGRATION 9TO ! WORLD M>KET1 TOGE!R ) ALL ! P>APH]NALIA ( B\RGEOIS DEMOCRACY1 SU* AS POLITICAL P>TIES & TRADE UNIONS - &1 ON ! O!R H& 9 ! RE=MI/ ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRATIC CONVICTION ?AT ! IMP5D+ REVOLUTION 9 ,RUSSIA C\LD ISSUE 9TO A B\RGEOIS /ATE1 :I* W\LD FIR/ PROVIDE ! BASIS = A VA/ SOCIALI/ MOVEM5T /RIV+ TO TRANS=M ! CAPITALI/ 9TO A SOCIALI/ SOCIETY ?R\< A CON/ANT /RUGGLE = SOCIAL RE=MS4 ,9 ! LATT] VIEW1 MEAN+FUL RE=MS 9 ,RUSSIA PRESUPPOS$ A POLITICAL REVOLUTION1 & ?IS REVOLUTION W\LD1 BY =CE ( CIRCUM/ANCES1 HAVE A B\RGEOIS *>ACT]4 ,?IS VIEW WAS %>$ BY ! LEFT W+ ( ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY1 AS REPRES5T$ S9CE #aic BY ITS ,BOL%EVIK FACTION1 BUT ) ! DIFF]5CE ?AT ?IS W+ BELIEV$ ?AT SU* A REVOLUTION W\LD HAVE TO BE BR\TY BAS$ ON ! WORK+ CLASS & ! POOR PEASANTRY1 = ! LIB]AL B\RGEOISIE ITSELF1 EV5 AP>T FROM ! QUE/ION ( ITS PRACTICAL CAPABILITIES1 WAS ONLY TOO READY TO /OP %ORT AT SOME COMPROMISE ) ! CZ>I/ REGIME4 ,! IMP5D+ REVOLUTION W\LD BE A WORK]-PEASANT REVOLUTION1 OR P]HAPS EV5 A PURELY WORK+-CLASS REVOLUTION1 EV5 ?\< IT C\LD ACCOMPLI% NO MORE )9 ! ,RUSSIAN CONTEXT ?AN ! CREATION ( A MOD]N /ATE & ! FULL RELEASE ( ! CAPITALI/ =CES ( PRODUCTION4 ,BUT1 ! LEFT >GU$1 EV5 SU* A REVOLUTION MIACT] ( ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION4 ,AFT] ALL1 SU* A POSSIBILITY HAD 5T]$ ! M9DS ( ,M>X & ,5GELS & /ILL HAD AN IDEOLOGICAL BASIS 9 ! ,WE/1 ?ANKS TO ! DEF5SE ( 0,M>XIAN OR?ODOXY0 BY ,K>L ,KAUTSKY & HIS FOLL[]S4 ,?IS CONCEPT ( 0OR?ODOXY0 WAS !RE=E BAS$ ON A FALSE APPREH5SION ( ! NATURE ( ,WE/]N SOCIALISM1 :I* MI/OOK ITS IDEOLOGY = REALITY1 & ON AN 9COMPREH5SION ( ! TRANS=MATION ?IS MOVEM5T HAD UND]GONE >\ND ! TURN ( ! C5TURY4 ,!SE ILLUSIONS W]E LO/ AT ONE /ROKE ) ! W> ( #a#i#a#d1 :I* REVEAL$ ?AT NOT EV5 ,KAUTSKY HIMSELF C>$ MU* = 0,M>XIAN OR?ODOXY10 = :I* HE HAD BE5 ! SYMBOL )9 ! ,SECOND ,9T]NATIONAL4 ,! 0TRU/EE ( REVOLUTION>Y ,M>XISM0 OV]NITICUL>4 ,PRIOR TO ?IS REVELATION1 ! ,RUSSIAN SOCIALI/S HAD PAID F> MORE ATT5TION TO ! CONDITIONS ( ! CZ>I/ REGIME ?AN TO ! ACTUAL /ATE ( 9T]NATIONAL SOCIALISM4 ,! LATT]1 AT LEA/ 9 AN IDEOLOGICAL S5SE1 SEEM$ TO =EORDA9 ! C\RSE ( ! IMP5D+ ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION1 JU/ AS ,WE/]N CAPITALISM PREFIGUR$ ! DEVELOPM5T ( ,RUSSIAN CAPITALISM4 0,M>XIAN OR?ODOXY10 AS ,KAUTSKY 9T]PRET$ IT1 9 OPPOSITION TO ! PURE RE=MISM ( ! REVISIONI/S1 PROVID$ ! IDEOLOGY ( ,BOL%EVISM1 9 OPPOSITION TO ! ,M5%EVIK1 OR RE=MI/1 W+ ( ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY4 ,:]EAS ! LATT] DID NOT EXPECT MORE FROM ! HOP$-= ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION ?AN ! UNDILUT$ RULE ( ! B\RGEOISIE1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS 5VISION$ ! TRANSC5D5CE ( ?IS REVOLUTION ?R\< ITS 9T]NATIONALIZATION1 CULM9AT+ 9 ! RULE ( ! PROLET>IAT4 ,( C\RSE1 ?IS WAS NOT A C]TA9TY1 :I* MAY EXPLA9 ! AMBIGUITIES ON ! P>T ( ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY AS REG>DS ! *>ACT] ( ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION4 ,:ILE ADMITT+ ITS B\RGEOIS NATURE1 !Y EMPLOY$ AT ! SAME TIME A T]M9OLOGY REF]R+ TO A SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION1 AS IF !SE C\LD BE ONE & ! SAME ?+4 ,!SE AMBIGUITIES HAD !IR ORIG9 9 ! PREVAIL+ ,RUSSIAN CONDITIONS1 :I* SEEM$ TO RULE \T EI!R A CONSI/5TLY B\RGEOIS OR A PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION1 BECAUSE ( ! UNRESOLV$ QUASI-FEUDAL AGRICULTURAL SY/EM & ITS DEP5D5CE ON ! AUTOCRATIC /ATE4 ,ANY REVOLUTION MU/ 9VOLVE ! GREAT MASS ( ! POPULATION2 9 ?IS CASE ?AT MEANT ! PEASANTRY1 :I*1 H[EV]1 C\LD NOT BE EXPECT$ TO SUBORD9ATE ITS [N 9T]E/S TO ?OSE ( ! B\RGEOISIE OR ! 9DU/RIAL PROLET>IAT4 ,!SE ?REE CLASSES W\LD HAVE TO P>TAKE 9 ! REVOLUTION1 BUT C\LD DO SO ONLY ) DIFF]5T IDEAS & DIFF]5T GOALS1 :I* C\LD H>DLY BE BR\I/ REGIME1 ?IS C\LD ONLY LEAD TO A REASS]TION ( !IR P>TICUL> CLASS 9T]E/S 9 ! PO/-REVOLUTION>Y SITUATION4 ,ONE CLASS W\LD HAVE TO DOM9ATE TO HOLD ! CLASS-DIVID$ SOCIETY TOGE!R4 ,LOGICALLY1 & TO JUDGE BY HI/ORICAL PREC$5T1 ! B\RGEOISIE W\LD HAVE TO BE ! RUL+ CLASS4 ,H[EV]1 AS SOON AS ! REVOLUTION WAS SE5 9 AN 9T]NATIONAL CONTEXT1 ! 0HI/ORICAL PREC$5TS0 & ! 0LOGICAL0 RULE ( ASC5DANCE W]E NO LONG] CONV9C+4 ,:ILE TWO DIFF]5T SOCIAL REVOLUTIONS CANNOT OCCUR TOGE!R 9 A P>TICUL> NATION1 !Y OCCUR SIMULTANE\SLY 9 AN 9T]NATIONAL SETT+1 :I* MAY *ANGE ! 9T]NATIONAL CLASS /RUCTURE 9 SU* A WAY AS TO LEAD TO DOM9ANCE ( ! PROLET>IAT OV] ! :OLE ( ! REVOLUTION>Y PROCESS1 JU/ AS ! DIV]SITY ( ! DEVELOPM5TAL /AGES ( ! NATIONAL 5TITIES DOES NOT PREV5T CAPITALISM'S OV]-ALL RULE ! WORLD ECONOMY4 ,9 VIEW ( ?IS POSSIBILITY1 IT MADE SOME S5SE TO *ANGE ! 0RULE0 ( HI/ORICAL ASC5DANCE & TO TRY TO BASE ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION ON ! POLITICAL DOM9ANCE ( ! WORK+ CLASS1 ESPECIALLY S9CE ! ,RUSSIAN B\RGEOISIE WAS ITSELF AN 9EFFECTIVE M9ORITY4 ,! PEASANTRY W\LD HAVE TO BE 0NEUTRAL0 9 ONE WAY OR ANO!R1 NO MATT] :I* CLASS1 ! B\RGEOISIE OR ! PROLET>IAT1 %\LD COME 9 POSSESSION ( ! ,RUSSIAN /ATE4 ,A SOCIAL REVOLUTION CANNOT BE ORGANIZ$1 AS IT DEP5DS ON CONDITIONS :I* ESCAPE CONSCI\S CONTROL4 ,IT CAN ONLY BE AWAIT$1 AS ! RESULT ( AN OBS]VABLE 9T5SIFICATION ( ! CLASS CONTRADICTIONS EXI/+ )9 ! GIV5 SOCIAL RELATIONS ( PRODUCTION4 ,:AT CAN BE ORGANIZ$ 9 ADVANCE IS ! LEAD]%IP REQUIR$ TO GIVE ! EXPECT$ REVOLUTION A DEF9ITE DIRECTION & A P>TICUL> GOAL4 ,ANY POLITICAL P>TY ?AT ?9KS 9 T]MS ( REVOLUTION CONC]NS ITSELF NOT ) ITS PREP>ATION BUT ) ! ORGANIZATION ( ITS LEAD]%IP1 ! ONLY ?+ ?AT IS ORGANIZABLE4 ,?IS 9VOLVES1 ( C\RSE1 A CONT9U\S ASSESSM5T & REASSESSM5T ( ! *ANG+ POLITICAL & ECONOMIC CONDITIONS1 SO AS TO MAKE ITS CONTROL ( ! AWAIT$ REVOLUTION AS EFFECTIVE AS POSSIBLE4 ,PROPAG&A & AGITATION S]VE ! =MATION ( ORGANIZATIONS ASPIR+ TO REVOLUTION>Y LEAD]%IP1 BUT ONCE !SE ORGANIZATIONS EXI/1 !Y SEE !MSELVES AS ! IRREPLACEABLE PRESUPPOSITION ( A SUCCESSFUL REVOLUTION4 ,BUT H[ TO LEAD A REVOLUTION ?AT LACK$ ANY SORT ( HOMOG5EITY ( 9T]E/S )9 ITS REVOLUTION>Y =CES1 AS EXEMPLIFI$ BY ! V>IETY ( ORGANIZATIONS OPPOS$ TO ! SOCIAL /ATUS QUO8 ,! SITUATION 9 ,RUSSIA AT L>GE1 ) ITS DIFF]5T SPECIFIC CLASS 9T]E/S1 WAS REPEAT$ )9 ! REVOLUTION>Y CAMP4 ,ALL ITS ORGANIZATIONS - ! RIIES1 7#f7 ! RE=MI/S & ! REVOLUTION>IES ( ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY1 & ! V>I\S IDEOLOGICAL GR\P+S BETWE5 !SE MAJOR ORGANIZATIONS - HAD !IR [N IDEAS ) RESPECT TO PROC$URES & ! DESIR$ \TCOME ( ! REVOLUTION>Y PROCESS1 ?US PRECLUD+ A UNIFI$ REVOLUTION>Y POLICY4 ,JU/ AS ONE CLASS HAD TO DOM9ATE ! REVOLUTION ITSELF1 SO ONE ( ! COMPET+ REVOLUTION>Y ORGANIZATIONS HAD TO /RIVE = SUPREMACY IF IT WAS TO REALIZE ITS [N PROGRAM4 ,AS ,L59 & ! ,BOL%EVIKS HAD OPT$ = ! 9DU/RIAL PROLET>IAT AS ! LEAD+ ELEM5T ( ! REVOLUTION1 IT FOLL[$ ?AT ! P>TY ( ! PROLET>IAT1 ?AT IS1 ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY1 MU/ /RIVE TO MONOPOLIZE POLITICAL P[]1 IF ONLY TO SAFEGU>D ! PROLET>IAN *>ACT] ( ! REVOLUTION4 ,QUITE AP>T FROM ,L59'S ASSUMPTION ?AT ! WORK+ CLASS IS UNABLE TO EVOLVE A POLITICAL REVOLUTION>Y CONSCI\SNESS ON ITS [N ACCORD1 ! FACT WAS ?AT ! M9ORITY POSITION ( ?IS CLASS1 TOGE!R ) ! EXI/5CE & ASPIRATIONS ( O!R CLASSES & !IR ORGANIZATIONS1 PRECLUD$ A DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION>Y DEVELOPM5T ) AN \TCOME FAVORABLE TO ! WORK+ CLASS & SOCIALISM4 ,ONLY A DICTATOR%IP1 AS ,L59 SAW IT1 C\LD MA9TA9 ! PROLET>IAN IMPETUS ( ! REVOLUTION & CREATE PRECONDITIONS = A SOCIALI/ DEVELOPM5T 9 CONJUNCTION ) ! EXPECT$ SOCIALI/ REVOLUTIONS 9 ! DEVELOP$ NATIONS ( ! ,WE/4 ,H[EV]1 ! V]Y EXI/5CE ( ! CZ>I/ REGIME DEMON/RAT$ ?AT IT WAS POSSIBLE TO HOLD POLITICAL P[] 9 SPITE ( ! EXI/5CE ( ! MO/ V>I$ POLITICAL & ECONOMIC 9T]E/S ?AT 9 ONE WAY OR ANO!R OPPOS$ ! ANA*RONI/IC AUTOCRATIC GOV]NM5T4 ,IF A BACKW>D & DECAY+ POLITICAL REGIME HAD BE5 ABLE TO KEEP ITSELF 9 P[]1 ?IS %\LD BE EV5 MORE POSSIBLE = A DICTATORIAL REGIME GE>$ TO A PROGRESSIVE SOCIAL DEVELOPM5T 9 H>MONY ) ! GLOBAL C\RSE ( EVOLUTION4 ,RUSSIA1 ,L59 ONCE SAID1 0WAS ACCU/OM$ TO BE+ RUL$ BY #a#e1 L& [N]S4 ,:Y CAN #b#d1 ,BOL%EVIKS NOT TAKE OV] ! TASK80 7#g7 ,9 ANY CASE1 E/ABLI%+ SU* A DICTATOR%IP W\LD MEAN HAV+ AT LEA/ A FOOT 9 ! DOOR LEAD+ TO WORLD REVOLUTION4 ,ALREADY BE=E ! ,M5%EVIK-,BOL%EVIK SPLIT ( ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY 9 #a#i#c1 ,L59 HAD %IFT$ ! QUE/ION ( ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION AWAY FROM PURELY !ORETICAL CONSID]ATIONS T[>D ITS PRACTICAL PROBLEMS1 ?AT IS1 ! ORGANIZATION ( ITS LEAD]%IP4 ,9 HIS BOOK ,:AT ,IS TO ,BE ,DONE87#h7 H[EV]1 HE PRES5T$ HIS CONC]N ) ORGANIZATION AS A !ORETICAL PROBLEM1 =1 9 HIS VIEW1 0!RE CAN BE NO REVOLUTION>Y MOVEM5T )\T A REVOLUTION>Y !ORY40 ,BY ?IS HE DID NOT MEAN ?AT M5 CONCEPTUALIZE !IR ACTIVITIES1 BUT REF]R$ TO ! SOCIAL DIVISION ( LABOR1 AS A DIVISION BETWE5 M5TAL & MANUAL WORK1 AS IT PREVAILS 9 CAPITALI/ SOCIETY4 ,LIKE ALL !ORY1 ! !ORY ( SOCIALISM1 ACCORD+ TO ,L591 0GREW \T ( ! PHILOSOPHICAL1 HI/ORICAL & ECONOMIC !ORIES ?AT W]E ELABORAT$ BY ! $UCAT$ REPRES5TATIVES ( PROP]TI$ CLASSES1 ! 9TELLECTUALS407#i7 ,DUE TO ITS SUBORD9ATE POSITION 9 SOCIETY1 ! WORK+ CLASS MAY SPONTANE\SLY EVOLVE A TRADE-UNION CONSCI\SNESS1 BUT NOT A REVOLUTION>Y !ORY ABLE TO LEAD TO A *ANGE ( SOCIETY4 ,! REVOLUTION>Y !ORY IS NOT AN \TGR[? ( ! SOCIAL PRODUCTION RELATIONS1 BUT A RESULT ( SCI5CE & PHILOSOPHY & !IR PRACTITION]S' [N DISSATISFACTION ) !SE RELATIONS & ! PRIVILEGES B\ND UP ) !M4 ,IT IS1 !N1 ! CONSCI5CE1 ! MORAL SCRUPLES1 ! IDEALI/IC DISPOSITION1 ! KN[L$GE ( ! 9TELLECTUALS ?AT PROVIDE ! PROLET>IAT ! REVOLUTION>Y CONSCI\SNESS IT IS UNABLE TO DEVELOP BY ITSELF4 ,?US ! UNHAPP9ESS ( ! 9TELLECTUALS ) ! REALITIES ( CAPITALI/ SOCIETY YIELDS ! REVOLUTION>Y !ORY ON :I* ALL REVOLUTION>Y PRACTICE IS BAS$4 ,L59 DID NOT1 AS IS (T5 ASSUM$1 D]IVE ?IS /RANGE 9V]SION ( ,M>XIAN !ORY FROM ! PECULI> CONDITIONS PREVAIL+ 9 ,RUSSIA1 BUT FROM A G5]AL PR9CIPLE1 AS IS OBVI\S 9 HIS APPLICATION ( ?IS ANALYSIS TO ,WE/]N SOCIALISM4 ,H]E TOO1 9 ,L59'S VIEW1 ! LABOR MOVEM5T RE/RICT$ ITSELF TO PURELY RE=MI/ =MS ( CLASS /RUGGLE BECAUSE !IR 9TELLECTUAL LEAD]S HAD 0BETRAY$0 !IR COMRADES & ! IDEAS ( REVOLUTION BY LEAV+ ! PA? ( REVOLUTION>Y ,M>XISM4 ,AL?\< ! REVOLUTION>Y 9TELLIG5TSIA IS A NECESS>Y PRESUPPOSITION ( ANY REVOLUTION>Y ACTIVITY1 APP>5TLY IT CAN LOSE ITS REVOLUTION>Y 9CL9ATIONS & CEASE BE+ ! F]M5T ( REVOLUTION>Y !ORY4 ,TO AVOID SU* 0BETRAYALS10 IT W\LD BE NECESS>Y TO =GE A TYPE ( REVOLUTION>Y ORGANIZATION ?AT ALL[$ ONLY ! MO/ /EADFA/ REVOLUTION>IES 9TO ITS RANKS4 ,9 ,L59'S VIEW1 ?IS WAS MADE POSSIBLE ?R\< ! CREATION ( ! 0PR(ESSIONAL REVOLUTION>Y10 :OSE :OLE EXI/5CE DEP5DS ON HIS REVOLUTION>Y ACTIVITY - 9 O!R WORDS1 SOMEONE LIKE HIMSELF1 :O KN[S ( NO DI/9CTION BETWE5 HIS 9DIVIDUAL & HIS ORGANIZATIONAL LIFE & :OSE SOLE FUNCTION IS ! PROMOTION ( REVOLUTION4 ,IT IS TRUE ?AT ,L59 ALSO PO9T$ TO ! REQUIREM5T ( ILLEGALITY )9 ! ,RUSSIAN SETT+1 BUT AS AN ADDITIONAL >GUM5T1 NOT AS ! BASIC RATIONALE = HIS ORGANIZATIONAL CONCEPT4 ,= HIM1 ! ORGANIZATIONS ( REVOLUTIONI/S >E NOT ID5TICAL ) WORK+-CLASS ORGANIZATIONS BUT >E NECESS>ILY SEP>AT$ FROM ! LATT] PRECISELY BECAUSE ( !IR PR(ESSIONAL *>ACT]4 ,! EFFECTIV5ESS ( SU* AN ORGANIZATION1 REPRES5T+ ! 0VANGU>D0 ( ! REVOLUTION1 DEP5DS ON C5TRALIZ$ LEAD]%IP1 5DORS$ BY ALL ITS MEMB]S1 ?US COMB9+ 9TRAP>TY DEMOCRACY ) C5TRALIZATION1 OR1 9 BRIEF1 EMBODY+ TO ! PR9CIPLE ( 0DEMOCRATIC C5TRALISM40 ,:AT ALL ?IS AM\NT$ TO WAS ! =MATION ( A P>TY OP]AT+ AS A K9D ( /ATE MA*9]Y1 LONG BE=E ! QUE/ION ( ! ACTUAL CAPTURE ( /ATE P[] >OSE4 ,! P>TY WAS TO BE BUILT UP AS A C\NT]-/ATE TO ! EXI/+ /ATE1 READY TO DISPLACE ! LATT] AT ! FIR/ OPPORTUNITY4 ,! CON/RUCTION ( ?IS TYPE ( P>TY WAS ?US ! PRACTICAL PREP>ATION = ITS ASSUMPTION ( ! P[] ( ! /ATE4 ,H]E !ORY & PRACTICE FELL TOGE!R4 ,BECAUSE ( ! APP>5T REMOT5ESS ( ! ,RUSSIAN1 OR ANY O!R1 REVOLUTION1 ,L59'S CONCEPT ( ! P>TY-/ATE WAS NOT GRASP$ 9 ITS FULL MEAN+ BY ! ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRATIC MOVEM5T1 BUT ONLY AS A RA!R QUE] IDEA ( ! RELATION%IP BETWE5 SPONTANEITY & ORGANIZATION1 P>TY & CLASS1 DEMOCRATIC & C5TRALIZ$ LEAD]%IP1 & WAS L>GELY ADJUDG$ AS AN AB]RATION FROM A TRULY ,M>XIAN POSITION4 ,WE/]N ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY WAS ITSELF HIE ALL ORGANIZATIONS 9 ! CAPITALI/ SY/EM4 ,L59'S QUE/ = AN EV5 MORE /R+5T C5TRALIZATION C\LD H>DLY BE UND]/OOD1 EXCEPT AS AN >GUM5T = AU?ORIT>IAN CONTROL & ONE-MAN RULE4 ,EV]YONE KNEW FROM HIS [N EXP]I5CE ?AT 0DEMOCRATIC C5TRALISM0 IS A CONTRADICTION 9 T]MS1 AS IT IS A PRACTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY TO REA* A REAL CONS5SUS 9 A C5TRALIZ$ ORGANIZATION :]E9 ! P[] ( P]SUASION IS ALSO VE/$ 9 ! ORGANIZ$ LEAD]%IP4 ,IT MADE 9 P>TICUL> NO S5SE FROM ,L59'S [N PO9T ( VIEW1 :I* D5I$ ! 0PLA9 & SIMPLE0 WORK] ! ABILITY TO =M HIS [N REVOLUTION>Y OP9IONS & ?US CONDEMN$ HIM 9 ADVANCE TO ACCEPT :ATEV] ! $UCAT$ LEAD]%IP PROPOS$4 ,MOREOV]1 ! MANY ?\S&S ( PAID ORGANIZ]S & FUNCTION>IES 9 ! SOCIALI/ P>TIES & TRADE UNIONS C\LD SEE NOT MU* DIFF]5CE BETWE5 !MSELVES & ! 0PR(ESSIONAL REVOLUTION>IES0 ( ,L59'S ORGANIZATION4 ,! ORGANIZATION WAS ALSO !IR LIVELIHOOD1 BUT IT DID NOT FOLL[ ?AT ?IS DET]M9$ !IR REVOLUTION>Y OR ANTI-REVOLUTION>Y ATTITUDES4 ,9 ! FACE ( ?IS OPPOSITION1 FROM ! RIE =M$ BUT ALSO A MEANS TO !IR CONTROL4 ,! HI<] ONE CLIMBS UP ! ORGANIZATIONAL LADD]1 ! GREAT] ! 9FLU5CE HE CAN EX]T & ! MORE DIFFICULT IT BECOMES TO BE REPLAC$ BY ?OSE OCCUPY+ ! L[] RUNGS4 ,?IS IS NOT AUTOMATICALLY SO1 BUT IS DELIB]ATELY BUILT 9TO ! ORGANIZATION1 SO AS TO ASSURE ITS CONTROL BY ?OSE :O >E NE>1 OR HAVE REA*$1 ITS TOP4 ,AL?\< NOT TOTALLY FOOLPRO( ! SY/EM WORKS WELL1 = :I* ! :OLE ( CAPITALISM BE>S WITNESS AS WELL AS ITS MANIFOLD SEP>ATE ORGANIZATIONS :I* 9CLUDE ?OSE ( ! LABOR MOVEM5T4 ,CONTROL ( ! ORGANIZATION ONCE GA9$1 ?IS DOM9ATION IS R>ELY1 IF EV]1 REL9QUI%$ ?R\< PRESSURES FROM BEL[4 ,UNLESS ! ORGANIZATION IS DE/ROY$1 9 MO/ CASES1 ONLY DEA? CAN P>T IT FROM ITS E/ABLI%$ LEAD]%IP4 ,ACCORD+ TO ,L591 ?IS IS AS IT %\LD BE1 = IF ! LEAD]%IP IS ! CORRECT ONE1 IT W\LD BE SILLY TO REPLACE IT A NEW & UNTRI$ ONE4 ,OBS]VE1 HE WROTE1 H[ 9 ,G]MANY ?IS VA/ CR[D ( MILLIONS VALUES ITS 0DOZ50 TRI$ POLITICAL LEAD]S1 H[ FIRMLY IT CL+S TO !M4 ,MEMB]S ( ! HO/ILE P>TIES 9 P>LIAM5T (T5 TEASE ! SOCIALI/S BY EXCLAIM+3 0,F9E DEMOCRATS Y\ >E 9DE$6 ,Y\R MOVEM5T IS A WORK+-CLASS MOVEM5T ONLY 9 NAME2 AS A MATT] ( FACT IT IS ! SAME CLIQUE ( LEAD]S ?AT IS ALWAYS 9 EVID5CE1 ,BEBEL & ,LIEBKNE*T1 YE> 9 YE> \T1 & ?AT GOES ON = DECADES4 ,Y\R DEPUTIES >E SUPPOS$ TO BE ELECT$ FROM AMONG ! WORK]S1 BUT !Y >E MORE P]MAN5T ?AN ! (FICIALS APPO9T$ BY ! ,EMP]OR4 0,BUT ! ,G]MANS ONLY SMILE ) CONTEMPT AT !SE DEMAGOGIC ATTEMPTS TO SET ! 0CR[D0 AGA9/ ! 'LEAD]S1' TO >\SE TURBID & VA9 9/9CTS 9 ! =M]1 & TO ROB ! MOVEM5T ( ITS SOLIDITY & /ABILITY BY UND]M9+ ! CONFID5CE ( ! MASSES 9 ! 'DOZ5 ( WISE M54' ,! POLITICAL IDEAS ( ! ,G]MANS HAVE ALREADY DEVELOP$ SUFFICI5TLY1 & !Y HAVE ACQUIR$ 5\< POLITICAL EXP]I5CE TO 5ABLE !M TO UND]/& ?AT )\T ! 'DOZ5' ( TRI$ & TAL5T$ LEAD]S1 PR(ESSIONALLY TRA9$1 S*OOL$ BY LONG EXP]I5CE & WORK+ 9 P]FECT H>MONY1 NO CLASS 9 MOD]N SOCIETY IS CAPABLE ( CONDUCT+ A DET]M9$ /RUGGLE4 444 ,\R 7,RUSSIAN7 WISE-ACRES1 H[EV]1 AT ! V]Y MOM5T :5 ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY IS PASS+ ?R\< A CRISIS 5TIRELY DUE TO \R LACK ( A SUFFICI5T NUMB] ( TRA9$1 DEVELOP$ & EXP]I5C$ LEAD]S TO GUIDE ! SPONTANE\S F]M5T ( ! MASSES1 CRY \T ) ! PR(UNDITY ( FOOLS1 IT IS A BAD BUS9ESS :5 ! MOVEM5T DOES NOT PROCE$ FROM ! RANK & FILE40 7#a7 ,IT W\LD ( C\RSE BE UNFAIR TO PO9T TO ,L59'S E>LY & RA!R SILLY RUM9ATIONS ON ! QUE/ION ( ORGANIZATION1 AS PRES5T$ 9 ,:AT ,IS TO ,BE ,DONE8 W]E IT NOT = ! FACT ?AT !Y CONT9U$ TO MOTIVATE HIM ?R\<\T HIS LIFE & GUID$ ! ACTIVITIES ( ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY4 ,ON ?IS PO9T1 :I* =M$ ! />T+ PO9T ( ! ,L59I/ TYPE ( ORGANIZATION1 & :I* OCCASION$ ! SPLIT )9 ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY1 ,L59 NEV] WAV]$1 BR++ IT TO ITS FULL REALIZATION 9 ! /RICTLY C5TRALIZ$ /RUCTURE ( HIS P>TY & ! LATT]'S DICTATOR%IP OV] ! WORK+ CLASS 9 ! NAME ( SOCIALISM4 ,H[EV] /RANGE !SE RUM9ATIONS MAY HAVE S\ND$ 9 ! E>S ( SOCIALI/S1 = :OM ! LABOR MOVEM5T IMPLI$ ! SELF-DET]M9ATION ( ! WORK+ CLASS1 !Y W]E AT ! SAME TIME DEVOID ( ALL ORIG9ALITY1 AS !Y M]ELY COPI$ ! PREVAL5T POLITICAL PROC$URES )9 ! CAPITALI/ SY/EM & TRI$ TO UTILIZE !M = ITS OV]?R[4 ,:AT ,L59 PROPOS$ APPE>$ TO HIM TO BE A REALI/IC APPROA* TO ! PRACTICAL NE$S ( ! REVOLUTION1 ! EFFECTIV5ESS ( :I* C\LD BE QUE/ION$ ONLY BY ?OSE :O M]ELY TALK$ AB\T REVOLUTION BUT DID NO?+ TO BR+ IT AB\T4 ,AS ! B\RGEOIS IDEOLOGY HAD TO BE C\NT]$ BY A SOCIALI/ IDEOLOGY1 SO ! C5TRALISM ( B\RGEOIS POLITICAL RULE HAD TO BE COMBAT$ BY ! C5TRALIZ$ DET]M9ATION ( ! REVOLUTION>Y P>TY4 ,AL?\< )9 ! G5]AL SETT+ ( ! CAPITAL-LABOR RELATIONS1 ! REVOLUTION>Y /RUGGLE :I* C\LD YIELD PRACTICAL RESULTS WAS1 ACCORD+ TO ,L591 MA9LY A FITY DET]M9$ TO DE/ROY IT4 ,! LATT] WAS ?US ! PRECONDITION = ! ANTICIPAT$ NEW /ATE & ! GU>ANTEE ?AT ! REVOLUTION W\LD NOT DISSIPATE 9TO =MLESS UPHEAVALS BUT W\LD ISSUE 9TO ! DICTATOR%IP ( ! P>TY AS A PRESUPPOSITION = ! DICTATOR%IP ( ! PROLET>IAT4 ,! MEANS & ME?ODS ( ?IS /RUGGLE W]E DET]M9$ BY ! PREVI\S /RUCTURE ( B\RGEOIS SOCIETY ITSELF1 BUT C\LD BE TURN$ AGA9/ IT1 IF US$ 9TELLIG5TLY BY A TRULY REVOLUTION>Y P>TY & A TRULY REVOLUTION>Y LEAD]%IP1 SU* AS ,L59 & ! ,BOL%EVIKS 5DEAVOR$ TO CON/RUCT4 ,!RE WAS ( C\RSE A WIDE GAP BETWE5 ! ,BOL%EVIKS' 9T5TIONS & !IR ACTUAL A*IEVEM5TS4 ,IF /ATI/ICS CAN BE TRU/$1 >\ND #aie !RE W]E AB\T #h1#d ORGANIZ$ ,BOL%EVIKS & MO/ PROBABLY ! SAME NUMB] ( ,M5%EVIKS4 ,BY #a#i#f1 MEMB]%IP HAD GR[N TO #a#c1 = ! ,BOL%EVIKS & #a#h1 = ! ,M5%EVIKS - 0ONE MAY FAIRLY SAFELY CONCLUDE ?AT BO? FACTIONS COMPRIS$ AB\T #d1 MEMB]S 9 #a#i#g4 .<,?US.> ONE \D0 ( ! REVOLUTION4 ,( C\RSE1 A RAPID GR[? 9 NUMB]S C\LD BE EXPECT$ ) 9CREAS+ 9DU/RIALIZATION1 CAPITALIZATION1 & RADICALIZATION BUT EV5 SO ?IS GR[? WAS LIMIT$ BY ! G5]AL BACKW>DNESS ( ,RUSSIAN SOCIETY4 ,AS TO ! SOCIAL COMPOSITION ( ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY1 IT C\LD BE CONSID]$ A WORK+-CLASS MOVEM5T1 EV5 IF TOP-HEAVY ) ELEM5TS FROM ! MIDDLE CLASS4 ,BUT ,L59'S CONC]N WAS NOT ) :AT HE CALL$ ! 0PLA9 & SIMPLE0 WORK]S1 BUT ) ! 0WISE M510 DESIGNAT$ TO LEAD ?OSE WORK]S AWAY FROM ! RE=MI/ 9TO ! REVOLUTION>Y PA? ( ACTIVITY4 ,AP>T FROM ! IMPOSSIBILITY ( TRANS=M+ ALL P>TY MEMB]S 9TO 0PR(ESSIONAL REVOLUTION>IES10 :I* W\LD RELEASE !M FROM !IR WORK+-CLASS /ATUS1 & :I* WAS ANYWAY PRECLUD$ = F9ANCIAL REASONS1 ! PR9CIPLE ( C5TRALIZATION ITSELF EXCLUD$ MORE ?AN CONC5TRATION UPON ! LEAD]%IP4 ,L59 TRU/$ 9 ! RISE ( REVOLUTION>Y SITUATIONS1 BR\Y *ANGE4 ,BY & L>GE1 ! WORK+ CLASS WAS = HIM A P>T ( ! OBJECTIVE CONDITIONS1 NOT ( ! SUBJECTIVE REQUIREM5TS ( ! REVOLUTION4 ,H[EV] NECESS>Y ! >\S$ MASSES W]E1 !IR WANT ( PROP] KN[L$GE & IDEOLOGICAL CONSI/5CY C\LD EASILY LEAD TO A FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE !IR 0HI/ORIC MISSION10 OR TO ! SUBMISSION TO & BETRAYAL BY MISLEAD]S ( ! WORK+ CLASS1 :O EI!R CONSCI\SLY OR UNCONSCI\SLY PUT !MSELVES AT ! S]VICE ( ! B\RGEOISIE4 ,9 ! PR]EVOLUTION>Y PHASE ( ,BOL%EVISM1 ,L59'S ORGANIZATIONAL CONCEPTS MU/ HAVE HAD A RA!R COMICAL T+E1 BECAUSE ( ! 5ORM\S DI/ANCE ! P>TY W\LD /ILL HAVE TO TRAVEL TO REA* ITS REVOLUTION>Y GOAL4 ,AL?\< ACTUALLY IT FUNCTION$ NOT MU* DIFF]5TLY FROM ANY O!R SOCIALI/ ORGANIZATION1 IT PRES5T$ ITSELF FROM ITS V]Y BEG9N+ AS ! P>TY ?AT W\LD ACTUALLY LEAD ! REVOLUTION1 BECAUSE IT WAS ! ONLY ONE 9 POSSESSION ( ! !ORY ?AT ASSUR$ ITS SUCCESS4 ,?IS CLAIM ALREADY IMPLI$ A REL5TLESS /RUGGLE AGA9/ ALL O!R ORGANIZATIONS & ! DEM& = SOLE CONTROL ( ! REVOLUTION4 ,! P>TY'S AU?ORIT>IANISM CAN ?US NOT BE BLAM$ ON UNEXPECT$ DIFFICULTIES ?AT >OSE DUR+ ! REVOLUTION1 = IT CON/ITUT$ ! PR9CIPLE ( ,BOL%EVISM FROM ! DAY ( ITS 9ITIATION4 ,AT ! TOP ( ! ORGANIZATIONAL LADD] !RE IS ONLY ROOM = ONE4 ,BUT ?IS MAY HAVE ONLY ORNAM5TAL MEAN+ & NE$ NOT IMPLY AN ULTIMATE C5T] ( DECISION-MAK+ P[]4 ,9 NOTICEABLE CONTRA/ TO O!R SOCIALI/ ORGANIZATIONS ( ! TIME1 ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY WAS FROM ! V]Y \TSET UND] ,L59'S COMPLETE & UNDIVID$ CONTROL4 ,IT WAS NOT ?9KABLE UND] ANY O!R LEAD]%IP4 ,MO/ !ORETICIANS LEAVE ! PRACTICAL EXECUTION ( !IR IDEAS TO O!RS1 BUT 9 ,L59 ! !ORETICAL & ! PRACTICAL W]E COMB9$ 9 HIS [N P]SON4 ,HE WAT*$ OV] BO? ) EQUAL F]VOR1 AS IF 9CAPABLE ( DELEGAT+ ANY DEGREE ( RESPONSIBILITY TO O!R PEOPLE4 ,!RE WAS ( C\RSE DISS5SION 9 ! P>TY1 BUT IT WAS ALWAYS RESOLV$ TO ,L59'S SATISFACTION4 ,AN ALT]NATIVE SOLUTION C\LD ONLY SPLIT ! P>TY1 AS ,L59 SEEM$ TO BE UNABLE TO ADMIT TO ]RORS DETECT$ BY O!RS ?AN HIMSELF4 ,HE WAS CAPABLE ( SELF-CRITICISM & SUDD5 REV]SALS BUT NOT ( ACCEPT+ CORRECTIONS BY O!R PEOPLE4 ,BUT EV5 SO1 ,A4 ,N4 ,POTRESOV1 :O HAD KN[N ,L59 S9CE #a#h#i#d1 & ORGANIZ$ & $IT$ ,ISKRA TOGE!R ) HIM1 BUT LAT] ON1 DUR+ ! FIR/ & SECOND REVOLUTIONS1 CAME TO DETE/ HIM1 & WAS ?R[N 9TO PRISON UND] ,L59'S DICTATOR%IP1 WAS IMP>TIAL 5\< TO WRITE ! FOLL[+ WORDS AB\T HIM 4443 0,NO ONE C\LD SWEEP PEOPLE AWAY SO MU* BY HIS PLANS1 IMPRESS !M BY HIS /R5G? ( WILL1 & W9 !M OV] BY HIS P]SONALITY AS ?IS MAN1 :O AT FIR/ SIM40 ,NEI!R ,PLEKHANOV NOR ,M>TOV1 NOR ANYONE ELSE HAD ! SECRET ( ?AT HYPNOTIC 9FLU5CE ON OR RA!R ASC5DANCY OV] PEOPLE1 :I* ,L59 RADIAT$4 ,ONLY ,L59 WAS FOLL[$ UNQUE/IONABLY AS ! 9DISPUTABLE LEAD]1 AS IT WAS ONLY ,L59 :O WAS ?AT R>E PH5OM5ON1 P>TICUL>LY 9 ,RUSSIA - A MAN ( IRON WILL & 9DOMITABLE 5]GY1 CAPABLE ( 9/ILL+ FANATICAL FAI? 9 ! MOVEM5T & ! CAUSE1 & POSSESS$ ( EQUAL FAI? 9 HIMSELF0' 7#a#b7 ,!RE >E SU* M51 =TUNATELY NOT ALWAYS AT ! HEAD ( A MOVEM5T4 ,! COMPETITIVE AGGRESSIVE *>ACT] ( ,L59 CANNOT BE D5I$2 IT COMES TO ! =E NOT ONLY 9 HIS TOTAL RULE OV] HIS [N ORGANIZATION1 BUT 9 ALL HIS WRIT+S1 :I* - NO MATT] :AT ! SUBJECT MATT] - W]E ALWAYS ( A POLEMICAL NATURE1 DESIGN$ TO DE/ROY REAL OR IMAG9>Y 5EMIES ( ! REVOLUTION4 ,MO/ PROBABLY HE SUFF]$ FROM SOME =M ( P>ANOIA1 = HIS SELF-CONFID5CE WAS AS EXCESSIVE AS HIS FE> ( POLITICAL RIVALS4 ,BUT ?IS IS NEI!R H]E NOR !RE1 AS IT IS QUITE POSSIBLE TO %>E HIS ATTITUDES & CONVICTIONS )\T BE+ OBSESS$ BY !M TO ! SAME DEGREE4 ,! WORLD IS SW>M+ ) 0*>ISMATIC0 PEOPLE1 SANE OR 9SANE :O W\LD LIKE TO HEAD A SOCIAL MOVEM5T & TO SYMBOLIZE IT 9 !IR [N P]SON4 ,BUT EA* MOVEM5T CAN HAVE ONLY ONE SUPREME LEAD]1 :O MU/ CLAW HIS WAY TO ! TOP & MU/ COMM& ! NECESS>Y QUALIFICATIONS4 ,?US M5 ) DISPOSITIONS TOTALLY DIFF]5T FROM ?OSE *>ACT]I/IC ( ,L591 SU* AS ,TROTSKY OR ,/AL91 ,HITL] OR ,MUSSOL9I1 MAY DO AS WELL 9 REA*+ & HOLD+ SUPREME P[] & 9 W9N+ ! ADMIRATION ( ! MULTITUDE AS WELL AS ?AT ( !IR UND]L+S4 ,!RE MU/ ( C\RSE ALSO BE PEOPLE :O ACCEPT !IR SUBORD9ATION WILL+LY & >E READY TO 0FOLL[ ! L9E0 DRAWN BY LEAD]%IP4 ,BUT 9 A P>TY ?AT EXPECTS TO BECOME ! RUL+ P>TY1 EV5 SUBORD9ATION MAY APPE> AS A GOOD ?+1 TO ASSURE CONC]T$ ACTIONS LEAD+ TO ! DESIR$ GOAL4 ,AFT] ALL1 ?IS IS H[ BUS9ESS IS DONE & IS ! PR9CIPLE UPON :I* /ATE P[] RE/S1 A SITUATION TO :I* MO/ PEOPLE HAVE BE5 HABITUAT$ & :I* !Y REG>D AS UNAVOIDABLE4 ,JU/ AS ! WORLD ( BUS9ESS COMPETITION LEADS TO MONOPOLIZATION1 ! /RUGGLE = POLITICAL LEAD]%IP 5G5D]S A POLITICAL MONOPOLY1 :I* MU/ !N BE DEF5D$ ?R\< ! EXCLUSION ( ANY FUR!R OPPOSITION4 ,9 O!R WORDS1 POLITICAL MONOPOLY MU/ BE ORGANIZ$1 & ?US :ILE ! /RUGGLE = P[] MAY ISSUE 9TO ONE-MAN RULE1 ! LATT] MU/ BE RETA9$ BY 5D+ ALL S]I\S CONT5TION )9 ! ORGANIZATION4 ,9 ?IS RESPECT1 ! ,L59I/ ORGANIZATION WAS A FULL SUCCESS1 = IT WAS ABLE TO REA* A CONS5SUS ( ITS MEMB]%IP DESPITE ITS HI< C5TRALIZATION DOM9AT$ BY A S+UL> WILL4 ,MORE ?AN ?AT1 ! SITUATION WAS IDEALIZ$ BY A RITUAL ADULATION ( ,L59 ?AT WAS BO? E>NE/LY FELT & DELIB]ATELY FO/]$ AS AN EXP$I5T WAY TO MA9TA9 9T]NAL COHESION4 ,:AT SEEM$ ABNORMAL = A SOCIALI/ MOVEM5T BECAME ! NORM1 =E%AD[+ ! FUTURE T]ROR ( ,/AL9'S 0P]SONALITY CULT10 & WAS ADOPT$ BY ALL ! ,M>XI/-,L59I/ ORGANIZATIONS =M$ AFT] ! ,BOL%EVIK ,REVOLUTION4 ,IT IS ! ,BOL%EVIK TYPE ( ORGANIZATION ?AT EXPLA9S ,L59'S EXTRAORD9>Y P]SONAL ROLE 9 ! DET]M9ATION ( ,BOL%EVIK POLICY AFT] ! ,FEBRU>Y ,REVOLUTION ( #a#i#a#g4 ,L59'S UNCONTE/$ LEAD]%IP IMPLI$ ( C\RSE POLITICAL P>ALYZES ON ! P>T ( ?OSE ,BOL%EVIKS ACCU/OM$ TO FOLL[ ! *]I%$ 0OLD MAN'S0 ADVICE & B\ND TO IT BY P>TY DISCIPL9E4 ,!RE CAN BE LITTLE D\BT ?AT !RE W\LD NOT HAVE BE5 ! C\P D'ETAT ( ,OCTOB] )\T ,L59'S DET]M9ATION TO GRASP POLITICAL P[]1 :I*1 HE ?\TY1 & ITS MANY SYMPA?IZ]S4 ,AFT] ?AT1 AS ! SAY+ GOES1 NO?+ SUCCE$S LIKE SUCCESS4 ,! WILL TO ASSUME POLITICAL P[] BY REVOLUTION>Y MEANS MAY ALWAYS BE PRES5T BUT HAS TO AWAIT A HI/ORICAL OPPORTUNITY TO BE EX]CIS$4 ,:AT MAKES A REVOLUTION>Y IS ( C\RSE HIS IMPATI5CE ) ! SL[ C\RSE ( SOCIAL DEVELOPM5T & HIS DESIRE TO HA/5 ITS PACE4 ,HE WILL !RE=E (T5 5D[ HIS ANTICIPATIONS 9 REG>D TO ! EXI/+ SOCIAL CONFLICTS ) A GREAT] REVOLUTION>Y POT5TIALITY ?AN !Y ACTUALLY POSSESS4 ,AL?\< ,L59 & HIS COLLEAGUES DID NOT OBJECT TO ! POLICIES ADOPT$ BY ,WE/]N SOCIALISM1 :I*1 = ! TIME BE+1 CONSI/$ 9 ! UTILIZATION ( B\RGEOIS DEMOCRACY & ! LABOR M>KET = PURPOSES ( FO/]+ PROLET>IAN CLASS CONSCI\SNESS & BUILD+ UP AN 9DEP5D5T LABOR MOVEM5T1 !Y SAW ?IS AS A TIME-CONDITION$ 5DEAVOR :I* DID NOT EXHAU/ ! POSSIBILITIES = WORK+-CLASS ACTION4 ,AL?\< VAGUELY1 ,L59 RECOGNIZ$ AFT] ! EXP]I5CE ( #aie ?AT JU/ AS IT SEEM$ NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO TAKE P[] 9 ! CONTEXT ( A B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION1 & 9 CONJUNCTION ) A ,WE/]N REVOLUTION TO ANNUL ! B\RGEOIS *>ACT] ( SU* A REVOLUTION1 SO IT W\LD ALSO BE POSSIBLE TO SET ASIDE ! TRADITIONAL ACTIVITIES ( ,WE/]N SOCIALISM & TO REPLACE B\RGEOIS DEMOCRACY ) A SOCIALI/ DICTATOR%IP1 :I* W\LD TURN ! NOM9AL 9TO A REAL DEMOCRACY4 ,?IS VIEW WAS ALSO %>$1 ) GREAT] CONSI/5CY1 BY PEOPLE \TSIDE ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY1 SU* AS = 9/ANCE1 ,A4 ,I4 ,HELPH& 7,P>VUS7 & ,L4 ,TROTSKY 9 !IR CONCEPT ( ! 0P]MAN5T REVOLUTION40 ,AS PO9T$ \T BE=E1 ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY >\ND #aie WAS TOO SMALL AN ORGANIZ$ =CE TO HAVE MORE ?AN A M>G9AL EFFECT UPON ! SOCIAL UPHEAVALS ( ?AT YE>4 ,!RE W]E AB\T #c MILLION 9DU/RIAL WORK]S1 MORE ?AN #b MILLION ( :OM P>TICIPAT$ 9 A WAVE ( /RIKES :I* SOON TOOK ON A POLITICAL *>ACT] AS !Y TOOK PLACE )9 G5]AL CRISIS CONDITIONS AGGRAVAT$ BY ! ,RUSSIAN DEFEAT 9 ! ,RUSSO-,JAPANESE W>4 ,AL?\< ! REVOLUTION 9VOLV$ NONPROLET>IAN LAY]S ( ! POPULATION1 AS WELL AS SEGM5TS ( ! PEASANTRY1 ! >MY1 & ! NAVY1 IT F\ND 9 ! /RIK+ WORK]S 9 ! BIG CITIES1 P>TICUL>LY ,/4 ,PET]SBURG & ,MOSC[1 ITS MO/ DECISIVE ELEM5T4 ,! /RIKES W]E SPONTANE\S 9 ! S5SE ?AT !Y W]E NOT CALL$ BY POLITICAL ORGANIZATIONS OR TRADE UNIONS BUT 9 ! MA9 W]E LAUN*$ BY WORK]S :O HAD NO *OICE BUT TO LOOK UPON !IR WORKPLACE AS ! SPR+BO>D ( !IR ACTIONS & ! C5T] ( ORGANIZATIONAL EF=TS4 ,! LOCAL COORD9ATION ( ! ACTIVITIES DEM&$ REPRES5TATION ?R\< CITY-WIDE SOVIETS1 WORK]S' C\NCILS OR WORK]S' DEPUTIES1 TO =MULATE POLICIES & TO NEGOTIATE ) ! AU?ORITIES4 ,( ALL ! SOVIETS =M$ 9 ,RUSSIA DUR+ ! REVOLUTION>Y EV5TS1 ! ,/4 ,PET]SBURG ,SOVIET1 :I* LA/$ FROM ,OCTOB] TO ,DECEMB] #a#i#e1 WAS P]HAPS ! MO/ REPRES5TATIVE4 ,IT F\ND ITS FIR/ HI/ORIAN 9 ,LEON ,TROTSKY - HIMSELF ONE ( ! LEAD+ MEMB]S - :O SAW ! SOVIETS 0AS A RESPONSE TO AN OBJECTIVE NE$ - A NE$ BORN ( ! C\RSE ( EV5TS4 ,IT WAS AN ORGANIZATION :I* WAS AU?ORITATIVE & YET HAD NO TRADITION1 :I* C\LD IMM$IATELY 9VOLVE A SCATT]$ MASS ( HUNDR$S ( ?\S&S ( PEOPLE :ILE HAV+ VIRTUALLY NO ORGANIZATIONAL MA*9]Y2 :I* UNIT$ ! REVOLUTION>Y CURR5TS )9 ! PROLET>IAT2 :I* WAS CAPABLE ( 9ITIATIVE & SPONTANE\S SELF-CONTROL - & MO/ IMPORTANT ( ALL1 :I* C\LD BE BR\TICULATE & !RE=E1 G5]ALLY1 ! MO/ POLITICALLY AL]T ( ! LABOR+ POPULATION1 & !Y F\ND SUPPORT 9 ! SOCIALI/ ORGANIZATIONS & 9CIPI5T TRADE UNIONS47#a#d7 ,! CITY-WIDE SOVIETS COMPRIS$ DELEGATES ( V>I\S FACTORIES1 =M+ A K9D ( 0WORK]S' P>LIAM5T0 ) AN ELECT$ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE4 ,! DELEGATES C\LD AT ANY TIME BE RECALL$4 ,! SOVIETS W]E IMP>TIAL ) RESPECT TO SOCIALI/ ORGANIZATIONS1 ALL[+ !M TO S5D DELEGATES :O C\LD ADVISE BUT HAD NO VOT+ RIK1 ?AT :ILE ! SOCIALI/ P>TIES W]E ORGANIZATIONS )9 ! PROLET>IAT1 & !IR IMM$IATE AIM WAS TO A*IEVE 9FLU5CE OV] ! MASSES1 ! SOVIET WAS1 FROM ! />T1 0! ORGANIZATION ( ! PROLET>IAT1 & ITS AIM WAS ! /RUGGLE = REVOLUTION>Y P[]40 7#a#e7 ,= ,L591 ! SOVIETS ( #aie W]E 0ORGANS ( DIRECT MASS /RUGGLE04 ,!Y ORIG9AT$ AS ORGANS ( ! /RIKE /RUGGLE4 ,BY =CE ( CIRCUM/ANCES !Y V]Y QUICKLY BECAME ! ORGANS ( ! G5]AL REVOLUTION>Y /RUGGLE AGA9/ ! GOV]NM5T4444 ,IT WAS NOT SOME !ORY1 NOT APPEALS ON ! P>T ( SOMEONE1 OR TACTICS 9V5T$ BY SOMEONE1 NOT P>TY DOCTR9E1 BUT ! =CE ( CIRCUM/ANCES ?AT L$ !SE NONP>TY MASS ORGANS TO REALIZE ! NE$ = AN UPRIS+ & TRANS=M$ !M 9TO ORGANS ( AN UPRIS+40 7#a#f7 ,L59 SAW ! SOVIETS AS 0! EMBRYOS ( A PROVISIONAL GOV]NM5T0 BECAUSE 0P[] W\LD 9EVITABLY HAVE PASS$ TO !M HAD ! UPRIS+ BE5 VICTORI\S10 & SPOKE ( ! NE$ TO %IFT ! C5T] ( ATT5TION 0TO /UDY+ !SE EMBRYONIC ORGANS ( A NEW GOV]NM5T ?AT HI/ORY HAS BR\Y LEAD]%IP ( ! ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRATIC ,P>TY4 ,! SOVIETS W]E = ,L59 0NOT AN ORGAN ( PROLET>IAN SELF-GOV]NM5T1 NOR AN ORGAN ( SELF-GOV]NM5T AT ALL1 BUT A FITY 0HAS NEV] R5\NC$ ITS 9T5TION ( US+ NONP>TY ORGANIZATIONS1 SU* AS ! SOVIETS10 HE SAID1 0IT %\LD DO SO 9 ORD] TO /R5G!N ITS [N 9FLU5CE 9 ! WORK+ CLASS & TO 9CREASE ITS [N P[]40 7#a#i7 ,FROM ?IS POSITION ,L59 NEV] DEVIAT$ EV5 :5 HE PROCLAIM$ ! SLOGAN 0,ALL P[] TO ! SOVIETS0 9 ORD] TO BREAK UP ! DUAL P[] ( ! SOVIETS & ! LIB]AL ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T E/ABLI%$ BY ! ,FEBRU>Y ,REVOLUTION ( #a#i#a#g4 ,! SOVIETS W]E1 9 ,L59'S VIEW1 TO BE 9DUC$ TO ELIM9ATE ! PROVISIONAL GOV]NM5T1 BUT ONLY TO =M A NEW GOV]NM5T1 BAS$ ON ! SOVIETS 9/EAD ( ON ! CONTEMPLAT$ ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY4 ,?IS W\LD EXCLUDE ! NONWORK+ POPULATION FROM DIRECT OR 9DIRECT P>TICIPATION 9 /ATE ACTIVITIES & ?US REALIZE ! DICTATOR%IP ( ! PROLET>IAT4 ,! NEW GOV]NM5T W\LD BE SUBJECT TO ! CONTROL ( ! SOVIETS1 NOT TO ?AT ( ANY P>TICUL> P>TY4 ,BUT AT ! SAME TIME1 :ILE ASK+ = A SOVIET GOV]NM5T1 ,L59 WAS /ILL ?9K+ 9 T]MS ( A ,BOL%EVIK GOV]NM5T1 ) OR )\T ! CONS5T ( ! SOVIETS4 ,AT ! ,FIR/ ,CONGRESS ( ,SOVIETS ON ,JUNE #c1 #a#i#a#g1 ,TS]ETELLI1 A ,M5%EVIK ,M9I/] 9 ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T1 MADE ! REM>K ?AT 9 ,RUSSIA AT ?AT TIME !RE EXI/$ NOT ONE POLITICAL P>TY ?AT W\LD SAY1 GIVE US ! P[] 9TO \R H&S4 0,I ANSW] !RE IS10 ,L59 RETORT$4 0,NO P>TY CAN DECL9E TO DO ?AT1 & \R P>TY DOES NOT DECL9E4 ,IT IS READY AT ANY M9UTE TO TAKE ! :OLE P[]40' 7#b7 ,AT ?IS TIME ! SITUATION WAS /ILL 9 FLUX2 ! W> WAS CONT9U+ DESPITE ! PROGRESSIVE DISSOLUTION ( ! >MY2 C\NT]-REVOLUTION>Y PLOTS W]E BE+ HAT*$2 ! ECONOMY WAS DIS9TEGRAT+ ) 9CREAS+ SPE$2 & ! ,BOL%EVIK FACTION 9 ! SOVIETS WAS /ILL A SMALL M9ORITY1 UNABLE TO TURN ! SITUATION TO ITS [N ACC\NT4 ,IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO TELL1 FROM ! EXI/+ POLITICAL CON/ELLATION1 :I* WAY ! :EEL W\LD TURN4 ,W\LD ! COALITION ( ! SOVIETS ) ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T LA/ UNTIL ! CALL+ ( ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY - TO :I* ALL P>TIES HAD COMMITT$ !MSELVES - & LEAD TO ! =MATION ( A B\RGEOIS GOV]NM5T & ! COMPLETION ( ! B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION8 ,OR W\LD A *ANGE 9 ! EXT]NAL SITUATION1 OR 9 ! COMPOSITION ( ! SOVIETS1 5D ! COALITION & ISSUE 9TO A R5EWAL ( ! CIVIL W>8 ,OR W\LD ! PROVISIONAL GOV]NM5T1 ) ! AID ( LOYAL P>TS ( ! >MY1 SUBDUE ! SOVIETS TO ITS [N WILL ?R\< SOME =M ( DICTATOR%IP8 ,! MANY P>TIES OP]AT+ )9 ! SOVIETS & !IR WIDELY DIV]G+ POLITICAL & ECONOMIC PROGRAMS1 AS WELL AS FRICTIONS )9 ! GOV]NM5T ITSELF1 MADE = A *AOTIC POLITICAL SITUATION 9 :I* EV]Y?+ & NO?+ SEEM$ POSSIBLE4 ,UND] !SE CONDITIONS1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS C\LD COME TO P[] EI!R BY GA9+ ! MAJORITY 9 ! SOVIETS & !N TRY+ TO DISLODGE ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T1 OR BY RISK+ A MILIT>Y UPRIS+ ) !IR [N LIMIT$ =CES1 )\T C\NT+ ON ! SOVIETS' SUPPORT4 ,EI!R WAY WAS FEASIBLE & ! BE/ SOLUTION W\LD BE TO PREP>E = BO?4 ,?IS 9VOLV$ A C]TA9 AMBIVAL5CE T[>D ! SOVIETS1 :I* ,L59 ?US AT TIMES F\ND 9DISP5SABLE & AT O!R TIMES SAW AS A H9DRANCE TO ! EXECUTION ( A SECOND REVOLUTION4 ,BUT NO MATT] :AT ROLE ! SOVIETS W\LD COME TO PLAY1 IT WAS P[] = ! P>TY ?AT DET]M9$ ,L59'S POLICY1 AS MAY EASILY BE SURMIS$ FROM ALL ! SUBSEQU5T DEVELOPM5TS4 ,?IS WAS ( C\RSE ONLY CONSI/5T ) BO? HIS G5]AL PHILOSOPHY & HIS CONCEPTION ( ! P>TY AS ! DET]M9+ ELEM5T ( ! SOCIALI/ REVOLUTION4 ,BECAUSE 9 ,FEBRU>Y #aiag SOLDI]S W5T OV] TO ! REVOLUTION1 ! FIR/ SOVIETS W]E COMPOS$ ( SOLDI]S' & WORK]S' C\NCILS ) ! =M] 9 ! GREAT MAJORITY4 ,! ,PETROGRAD ,SOVIET 9 ! SECOND P>T ( ,M>* #a#i#a#g1 = 9/ANCE1 HAD #c1 DELEGATES1 #b1 ( :OM W]E SOLDI]S4 ,! 9FLU5CE ( ! REVOLUTION>Y 9TELLIG5TSIA WAS F> GREAT] 9 #aiag ?AN 9 #a#i#e1 AS MAY BE SE5 FROM ! FACT ?AT ( ! #db MEMB]S ( ! ,PETROGRAD ,SOVIET'S ,EXECUTIVE ,COMMITTEE ONLY SEV5 W]E FACTORY WORK]S4 ,M5%EVIKS & ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES W]E AT FIR/ PR$OM9ANT4 ,! ,BOL%EVIK FRACTION 9 ! ,PETROGRAD ,SOVIET CONSI/$ ( #d \T ( ! #c1 DELEGATES4 ,BY ,SEPTEMB] #a#i#a#g1 H[EV]1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS HAD GA9$ ! MAJORITY4 ,!IR GR[+ /R5G? )9 ! REVOLUTION>Y DEVELOPM5T WAS DUE TO !IR [N UNCONDITIONAL ADAPTATION TO ! REAL GOALS ( ! REBELLI\S MASSES4 ,AP>T FROM ! LATT]'S N>R[] DEM&S = ! RELIEF ( IMM$IATE MIS]IES1 !IR WID] DEM&S EMBRAC$ ! 5D+ ( ! W> & ! EXPROPRIATION & DI/RIBUTION ( ! L&$ E/ATES4 ,! ,FEBRU>Y ,REVOLUTION WAS AT ONCE A B\RGEOIS1 A PROLET>IAN1 & A PEASANT REVOLUTION1 BUT IT WAS ITS PEASANT ASPECT ?AT ASSUR$ ITS SUCCESS4 ,( ,RUSSIA'S #agd MILLION POPULATION ONLY #bd MILLION LIV$ 9 CITIES1 & IT WAS ! T]RIBLE PLIIAT4 ,AL?\< ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T WAS READY TO 9/ITUTE A S]IES ( AGRICULTURAL RE=MS1 IT WAS NOT WILL+ TO ASS5T TO ! EXPROPRIATION ( ! BIG L&[N]S )\T COMP5SATION1 = ?IS W\LD VIOLATE ! PR9CIPLE ( PRIVATE PROP]TY ON :I* ! RULE ( ! B\RGEOISIE IS BAS$4 ,NEI!R WAS IT WILL+ TO SUE = PEACE1 = IT /ILL HOP$ = AN ALLI$ VICTORY & P>TICIPATION 9 ! SPOILS ( W>4 ,! ,BOL%EVIKS1 H[EV]1 W]E = ! IMM$IATE 5D+ ( ! W> & = ! DI/RIBUTION ( L& TO ! PEASANTRY4 ,BECAUSE ! MAJORITY ( ! SOLDI]S CAME FROM ! PEASANTRY1 ! SOLDI]S' C\NCILS NO LESS ?AN ! WORK]S' C\NCILS %IFT$ !IR ALLEGIANCE FROM ! B\RGEOISIE & SOCIAL RE=MI/ P>TIES TO ! ,BOL%EVIKS4 ,IT WAS NOT ! ,M>XI/ AGR>IAN PROGRAM ?AT ATTRACT$ ! PEASANTS BUT ?AT ( ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES1 :I* DEM&$ ! NATIONALIZATION ( ALL L& UND] ! CONTROL ( DEMOCRATICALLY ORGANIZ$ VILLAGE COMMUNES ON ! BASIS ( EQUAL L& HOLD+S4 ,FROM A ,M>XIAN PO9T ( VIEW SU* A PROGRAM WAS UTOPIAN4 ,M>XISM FAVORS L>GE-SCALE PRODUCTION ?AT DOES AWAY ) 9DIVIDUAL PEASANT F>M+4 ,BECAUSE IT 5VISION$ SOCIALISM AS ! SUCCESSOR TO CAPITALISM1 & BECAUSE 9 ITS VIEW CAPITALISM ITSELF IS DO+ AWAY ) SMALL-SCALE PEASANT F>M+1 IT EXPECT$ ?AT ! PEASANT QUE/ION W\LD L>GELY BE SOLV$ )9 CAPITALISM SO AS NOT TO CON/ITUTE A MAJOR PROBLEM = SOCIALISM4 ,L59'S E>LY OPPOSITION TO ,N>ODNISM & ITS ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>Y HEIRS WAS BAS$ ON ! BELIEF ?AT AN EQUAL DI/RIBUTION ( L& TO ! PEASANTS WAS NOT ONLY HIM+ & SMALL HOLD+ FROM ! ONSLAUD+ ( SOCIAL DEVELOPM5T40 7#b#a7 ,AP>T FROM ALL PROGRAMS1 H[EV]1 SOON AFT] ! ,FEBRU>Y ,REVOLUTION1 ! PEASANTS BEGAN TO EXPROPRIATE & DIVIDE ! L& ON !IR [N ACCORD4 ,UNTIL !N1 ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T HAD PAID LITTLE ATT5TION TO ! PEASANT QUE/ION4 ,IT ONLY BEGAN TO CONSID] IT S]I\SLY 9 ! FACE ( UPHEAVALS 9 ! C\NTRYSIDE4 ,BUT EV5 SO1 IT ONLY BR\D+ ! EXPROPRIATION & DI/RIBUTION ( ! L&1 ! 5ACTM5T ( :I* 9TO LAW WAS LEFT TO ! =?COM+ ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY4 ,BECAUSE ,M5%EVIKS & ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES W]E N[ REPRES5T$ ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T1 ! LATT]'S AMBIGU\S ATTITUDE & 9ACTIVITY REG>D+ ! L& PROBLEM CO/ !SE P>TIES ! ACTIVE SUPPORT ( ! PEASANTS40,WE W]E VICTORI\S 9 ,RUSSIA1 & ) SU* EASE10 ,L59 PO9T$ \T AT A LAT] DATE1 BECAUSE WE PREP>$ \R REVOLUTION DUR+ ! IMP]IALI/ W>444 ,T5 MILLION WORK]S & PEASANTS 9 ,RUSSIA W]E >M$1 & \R SLOGAN WAS AN IMM$IATE PEACE AT ALL CO/S4 ,WE W]E VICTORI\S BECAUSE ! VA/ MASSES ( ! PEASANTS W]E REVOLUTION>ILY DISPOS$ AGA9/ ! L&-[N]S4 ,! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES 444 DEM&$ REVOLUTION>Y ME?ODS1 444 BUT LACK$ ! C\RAGE TO ACT 9 A REVOLUTION>Y WAY4 ,WE W]E VICTORI\S 444 NOT ONLY BECAUSE ! UNDISPUT$ MAJORITY ( ! WORK+ CLASS WAS ON \R SIDE 444 BUT ALSO BECAUSE HALF ! >MY1 IMM$IATELY AFT] \R SEIZURE ( P[]1 & N9E-T5?S ( ! PEASANTS1 9 ! C\RSE ( SOME WEEKS1 CAME OV] TO \R SIDE2 WE W]E VICTORI\S BECAUSE WE ADOPT$ ! AGR>IAN PROGRAM ( ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES 9/EAD ( \R [N40 7#b#b7 ,9 ! QUE/ = /ATE P[]1 IT WAS CLE> TO ,L59 ?AT IT WAS ABSOLUTELY ESS5TIAL TO W9 ! PEASANTS' SUPPORT1 EV5 IF ONLY !IR PASSIVE SUPPORT4 ,! ,M>XI/ AGR>IAN PROGRAM HAD BE5 DEVELOP$ 9 OPPOSITION TO ?AT ( ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES1 BUT AT A TIME :5 ! PRACTICAL QUE/IONS ( ! REVOLUTION W]E NOT YET ACUTE4 ,UND] ,RUSSIAN CONDITIONS ?IS PROGRAM WAS TOTALLY UNREALI/IC4 ,ALL AB/RACT CONSID]ATIONS ( ! AGR>IAN PROBLEM BECAME MEAN+LESS :5 ! PEASANTS SIMPLY SEIZ$ :AT WAS SEIZABLE4 ,IT WAS NOT BECAUSE 0! ,BOL%EVIKS AVAIL$ !MSELVES ( ! AGR>IAN PROGRAM ( ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES ?AT !Y W]E VICTORI\S10 BUT BECAUSE !Y M]ELY SANCTION$ :AT WAS TAK+ PLACE ANYWAY4 ,IT IS TRUE1 ( C\RSE1 ?AT 9 ?IS WAY !Y WON ! 0GOOD WILL0 ( ! PEASANTS & ?US HAD AN EASI] TIME ( GA9+ & HOLD+ /ATE P[]4 ,BUT ,L59'S PRES5TATION MAKES IT APPE> AS IF A TIMELY OPPORTUNI/IC MOVE1 A P>T ( A G5]AL /RATEGY1 L$ TO ! ,BOL%EVIKS' TRIUMPH1 ?US JU/IFY+ OPPORTUNISM AS A WEAPON ( REVOLUTION4 ,! ACQUIESC5CE 9 ! PEASANTS' SEIZURE ( L&1 ?\< RECOGNIZ$ AS A VIOLATION ( ,M>XIAN PR9CIPLES1 WAS NONE!LESS SE5 AS A CLEV] RUSE TO HELP ! 0,M>XI/0 REVOLUTION ALONG4 ,AL?\< REL5TLESSLY D5\NC+ ! OPPORTUNISM ( !IR POLITICAL ADV]S>IES1 ,L59 & ! ,BOL%EVIKS PRID$ !MSELVES ON !IR G5]AL WILL+NESS TO RESORT TO ALL K9DS ( TEMPOR>Y CONCESSIONS & COMPROMISES1 SACRIFIC+ !IR [N PR9CIPLES TO GA9 A GREAT] ADVANTAGE 9 ! LONG RUN4 ,AL?\< ,L59 WAS ! DEADLY 5EMY ( ! B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION1 HIS POLITICS W]E ?OSE ( ! B\RGEOIS M9D2 ?AT IS1 HE SAW ! /RUGGLE BETWE5 CLASSES & NATIONS AS DEP5D5T UPON ! /RATEGIES & TACTICS ( POLITICAL LEAD]S & /ATESM51 :O DET]M9E ! MOVEM5TS ( ! POPULATIONS4 ,IT WAS A QUE/ION ( \TMANEUV]+ & \TWITT+ ONE'S ADV]S>IES1 A GAME TO BE WON BY ?OSE MO/ ADEPT 9 ! MANIPULATION ( EV5TS4 ,POLITICS & REVOLUTION W]E AN 0>T10 :I* W\LD GIVE ! PALM ( VICTORY TO ! MO/ V]SATILE & MO/ KN[L$GEABLE ( ! COMPET+ CONTE/ANTS - NOT AN 0>T0 9 CONTRA/ TO ! RIGIDITIES ( SCI5CE1 OR ! DULLNESS ( ! COMMONPLACE1 BUT AS A MAT*+ ( TAL5TS ?AT W\LD BR+ ! BE/ MAN TO ! TOP4 ,TO BE SURE1 ! GAME HAD TO BE PLAY$ UND] ! V>Y+ H&ICAPS SET BY ! PREVAIL+ OBJECTIVE SOCIAL CONDITIONS1 BUT EV5 SO1 )9 !SE CONDITIONS IT WAS /ILL A QUE/ION ( 0:O WAS GO+ TO DE/ROY :OM0 9 ! /RUGGLE = POLITICAL P[]4 ,IT WAS ?IS ?AT ,L59 MEANT BY ! PREPOND]ANCE ( !ORY OV] PRACTICE1 OR ?AT ( ! LEAD]S OV] ! MORE OR LESS UN$UCAT$ MASSES1 :O C\LD ONLY REACT BL9DLY TO SITUATIONS BEYOND !IR COMPREH5SION4 ,NOT D5Y+ ! OBJECTIVE LIMITATIONS SET = ! HI/ORY-MAK+ SOCIAL PROCESS BY CLASS RELATIONS & ! LEVEL ( ECONOMIC DEVELOPM5T1 ,L59 SUCCE$$ 9 CONV9C+ HIMSELF ?AT ?\< HI/ORY IS MADE BY M51 IT IS ACTUALLY MADE BY ONLY A FEW ( !M1 :O BY ID5TIFY+ !MSELVES ) P>TICUL> CLASS 9T]E/S1 ALT] ! C\RSE ( EV5TS ?R\< !IR P[]S ( P]SUASION & !IR EXCEPTIONAL ABILITIES4 ,BUT EV]Y B\RGEOIS KN[S ?AT %E] >BITR>9ESS IS AN IMPOSSIBILITY1 EV5 ?\< HE MAY 9SI/ UPON ! HI/ORY-MAK+ CAPACITY ( 9DIVIDUALS & CR$IT HI/ORICAL DEVELOPM5TS TO ! EXI/5CE ( GREAT M54 ,HE OV]LOOKS ! FACT ?AT ! GREAT MAN IS SU* ONLY BECAUSE ! APEX ( ! PYRAMIDAL SOCIAL /RUCTURE DEM&S HIS EXI/5CE1 NO MATT] :AT HIS P>TICUL> QUALIFICATIONS 7AL?\< COMPETITION MAY ON OCCASION BR+ SOME \T/&+ P]SONALITY TO ! TOP ( ! PYRAMID74 ,9 A CLASS-RIDD5 SOCIETY ! ROLE ( ! GREAT MAN IS NOT ONLY FILL$ AUTOMATICALLY1 IT MU/ BE 9SI/$ UPON TO KEEP ! SOCIAL FABRIC TOGE!R4 ,NO CLASS SOCIETY CAN EXI/ )\T ITS GREAT M51 = ?IS IS ONLY ! O!R SIDE ( ! SAME CO94 ,BY ! SAME TOK51 H[EV]1 ! GREAT M5 >E LIMIT$ 9 !IR REA* BY ! G5]AL SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS :I* !Y COME TO SYMBOLIZE4 ,!IR 9T]F]5CE 9 EV5TS IS CIRCUMSCRIB$ BY :AT IS HI/ORICALLY POSSIBLE4 ,BUT :AT IS HI/ORICALLY POSSIBLE IS NOT DET]M9$ BY :AT MAY BE POLITICALLY POSSIBLE1 BUT BY ! ACTUAL LEVEL ( ! SOCIAL =CES ( PRODUCTION & ! SOCIAL RELATIONS ASSOCIAT$ ) !M4 ,IT WAS POLITICAL EV5TS ?AT FAVOR$ ! ,BOL%EVIKS4 ,AT ! ,FIR/ ,ALL-,RUSSIAN ,SOVIET ,CONGRESS1 9 ,JUNE #a#i#a#g1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS CONTROLL$ #ac P]C5T ( ! #gi DELEGATES2 AT ! SECOND CONGRESS1 9 ,OCTOB] #a#i#a#g1 !Y CONTROLL$ #ea P]C5T ( ! #fge DELEGATES4 ,H[EV]1 ?\< ! ,BOL%EVIKS HAD ! MAJORITY 9 ! SOVIETS ( ,PETROGRAD & ,MOSC[ AS E>LY AS ,SEPTEMB] #a#i#a#g1 ,L59 W\LD HAVE BE5 READY TO TAKE P[] EV5 IF IT HAD BE5 O!RWISE4 0,IT W\LD BE NAIVE10 HE WROTE1 0TO WAIT = A '=MAL' MAJORITY = ! ,BOL%EVIKS4 ,NO REVOLUTION EV] WAITS = ?AT40 7#b#c7 ,DESPITE OPPOSITION )9 HIS [N P>TY1 HE DEM&$ AN >M$ 9SURRECTION PRIOR TO ! CONVOCATION ( ! ,SECOND ,ALL-,RUSSIAN ,CONGRESS ( ,SOVIETS4 ,A FAIT ACOMPLI W\LD MAKE IT EASI] TO GET ! CONGRESS'S SUPPORT = ! ELIM9ATION ( ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T4 ,TO ?AT 5D1 ! ,PETROGRAD ,SOVIET ORGANIZ$ A MILIT>Y-REVOLUTION>Y COMMITTEE UND] ! LEAD]%IP ( ,TROTSKY1 :I* W5T 9TO ACTION ON ! TW5TY-FIF? ( ,OCTOB]4 ,)9 A FEW H\RS ( ! C\P D'ETAT1 ,L59 WAS ABLE TO CLAIM VICTORY = ! WORK]S' & PEASANTS' REVOLUTION1 &1 LAT] 9 ! DAY1 TO W9 ! APPROVAL ( ! ,ALL-,RUSSIAN ,CONGRESS ( ,SOVIETS4 ,?IS WAS ! EASI] BECAUSE ! RIIES & ! ,M5%EVIKS HAD LEFT ! CONGRESS 9 PROTE/ AGA9/ ! C\P D'ETAT4 ,ON ! FOLL[+ DAY ! FIR/ ,WORK]S' & ,PEASANTS' ,GOV]NM5T WAS =M$4 ,L59'S TIM+ ( ! 9SURRECTION PROV$ TO BE CORRECT4 ,IT F\ND ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T DEF5SELESS & ASSUR$ AN ALMO/ BLOODLESS TRANSF] ( P[] TO ! ,SOVIET GOV]NM5T4 ,SUPPOS$LY1 IT ALSO *ANG$ ! HI!RTO B\RGEOIS 9TO A PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION1 EV5 ?\< ?IS WAS BR\Y =CE ( >M$ ,BOL%EVIK WORK]S & MILIT>Y DETA*M5TS SID+ ) ! ,BOL%EVIKS4 ,AL?\< A P>TY AFFAIR1 IT UND\BT$LY CO9CID$ ) ! REAL DEM&S ( ! WORK]S1 AS EXPRESS$ 9 ! %IFT ( POLITICAL ALLEGIANCES )9 ! SOVIETS & 9 ! G5]AL ATTITUDE ( ! WORK+ POPULATION4 ,L59 HAD ACTUALLY SUCCE$$ 9 MAK+ ! PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION = ! WORK]S1 ?US SUB/ANTIAT+ HIS [N REVOLUTION>Y CONCEPTS4 ,H[EV]1 :5 HE DEM&$ ! PREP>ATION = ! 9SURRECTION1 HE DID NOT SPEAK ( ! EX]CISE ( /ATE P[] BY ! SOVIETS BUT ( ?AT BY ! P>TY4 ,) ! MAJORITY ( ! SOVIET DEPUTIES BE+ ,BOL%EVIK1 OR SUPPORT+ ! ,BOL%EVIKS1 HE TOOK = GRANT$ ?AT ! NEW GOV]NM5T W\LD BE A ,BOL%EVIK GOV]NM5T4 ,& ?AT WAS ! CASE ( C\RSE1 EV5 ?\< SOME LEFT ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES & LEFT ,SOCIALI/S OBTA9$ POSITIONS 9 ! NEW GOV]NM5T4 ,AT FIR/1 H[EV]1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS PROCE$$ RA!R CAUTI\SLY1 EMPHASIZ+ ! DEMOCRATIC NATURE ( !IR NEW REGIME & !IR WILL+NESS TO ACCEPT ! DECISIONS ( ! POPUL> MASSES EV5 IF NOT 9 AGREEM5T ) !M4 ,!Y DID NOT AT ONCE REPUDIATE ! ELECTION ( ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY1 :I*1 AS IT TURN$ \T1 GAVE A L>GE MAJORITY TO ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES & PUT ! ,BOL%EVIKS 9 ! M9ORITY4 ,BUT DESPITE !IR ELECTION SUCCESS1 DUE TO !IR TRADITIONAL EMPA?Y ) ! PEASANTS1 ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES W]E NOT A UNIFI$ P>TY1 P>TICUL>LY ) REG>D TO ! QUE/ION ( ! CONT9UATION ( W>4 ,! LEFT ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES W]E 9 CLOS] ACCORD ) ! ,BOL%EVIKS ?AN ) ! RITY4 ,:ILE ! ELECTIONS = ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY W]E BE+ HELD1 AN ,ALL-,RUSSIAN ,CONGRESS ( ,PEASANT ,DEPUTIES WAS ALSO 9 PROGRESS4 ,! CONGRESS SPLIT ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES & ! LEFT W+ 5T]$ A COALITION ) ! ,BOL%EVIKS4 ,! ELECTION RESULTS HAD MADE CLE> ?AT ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY W\LD DE/ROY ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY'S POLITICAL DOM9ANCE & ! ACCOMPLI%M5TS ( ! REVOLUTION AS WELL4 ,) ! CONS5T ( ! ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES & SOME LEFT ,SOCIALI/S1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS SIMPLY DROVE ! ASSEMBLY AWAY4 ,! WILL ( ! MAJORITY ( ! POPULATION1 WORK]S & PEASANTS1 TO REA* = PEACE1 L&1 BREAD1 & LIB]TY1 F\ND A COMPLETE C\NT]P>T 9 ! POLITICAL PROGRAM ( ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY4 ,! E>LY B\RGEOIS DEMOCRATIC ASPIRATION = A ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY HAD LO/ ITS APP>5T IMPORTANCE1 NOT ONLY = ! ,BOL%EVIKS BUT = ! BROAD MASSES AS WELL4 ,NOT ONLY 9 ,RUSSIA BUT 9T]NATIONALLY REVOLUTION>IES HAIL$ SOVIET RULE AS AN ACCOMPLI%M5T ( HI/ORICAL SIGNIFICANCE4 ,EV5 SU* A SKEPTICAL SOCIALI/ AS ,LUXEMBURG /AT$ ?AT BY SEIZ+ P[]1 ! ,BOL%EVIKS HAD 0= ! FIR/ TIME PROCLAIM$ ! F9AL AIM ( SOCIALISM AS ! DIRECT PROGRAM ( PRACTICAL POLICIES40 7#b#d7 ,!Y HAD DONE SO BY 0SOLV+ ! FAM\S PROBLEM ( W9N+ A MAJORITY ( ! PEOPLE0 BY REVOLUTION>Y TACTICS ?AT L$ TO A MAJORITY1 9/EAD ( WAIT+ = LATT] TO EVOLVE A REVOLUTION>Y TACTIC47#b#e7 ,9 H] VIEW1 AT LEA/ F> AS ! URBAN MASSES W]E CONC]N$1 ,L59'S P>TY HAD GRASP$ !IR TRUE 9T]E/S BY PLAY+ ALL P[] 9TO ! H&S ( SOVIETS4 ,FROM HIS [N PO9T ( VIEW1 H[EV]1 ,L59 EQUAT$ SOVIET P[] ) ! P[] ( ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY2 HE SAW 9 ! LATT]'S MONOPOLY ( ! /ATE ! REALIZATION ( ! RULE ( ! SOVIETS4 ,AFT] ALL1 !RE WAS ONLY ! *OICE BETWE5 A CAPITALI/ GOV]NM5T & A WORK]S' & PEASANTS' GOV]NM5T ABLE TO PREV5T ! RETURN ( ! B\RGEOIS RULE4 ,BUT TO CONT9UE ,BOL%EVIK DOM9ATION ( ! GOV]NM5T & ITS /ATE APP>ATUS1 ! WORK]S & PEASANTS W\LD HAVE TO CONT9UE TO ELECT ,BOL%EVIKS TO ! SOVIETS4 ,= ?AT !RE WAS NO GU>ANTEE4 ,JU/ AS ! ,M5%EVIKS & ,SOCIAL ,REVOLUTION>IES1 ONCE 9 ! MAJORITY1 N[ F\ND !MSELVES 9 A M9ORITY POSITION1 SO ?+S C\LD *ANGE AGA9 = ! ,BOL%EVIKS4 ,IT WAS ?US NECESS>Y TO PREV5T A REEM]G5CE ( ! SOVIETS1 :I* MIACT] ( ! REVOLUTION DEM&$1 !N1 ! SUPPRESSION ( ALL ANTI-,BOL%EVIK =CES )9 & \TSIDE ! SOVIET SY/EM4 ,9 A %ORT TIME ! SOVIET REGIME BECAME ! DICTATOR%IP ( ! ,BOL%EVIK ,P>TY4 ,! EMASCULAT$ SOVIETS W]E RETA9$1 ?\< ONLY =MALLY1 TO HIDE ?IS FACT4 ,QUITE AP>T FROM ! TACTICAL P>TICIPATION 9 ! ELECTIONS TO ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY1 & ! OCCASIONAL LIP S]VICE PAID TO ?IS B\RGEOIS 9/ITUTION1 ,L59 HAD ALREADY1 9 ! SO-CALL$ 0,APRIL ,!SES0 PROPOS$ TO HIS ORGANIZATION AFT] HIS RETURN TO ,RUSSIA1 >GU$ ?AT A P>LIAM5T>Y REPUBLIC WAS UNNECESS>Y BECAUSE ( ! EXI/5CE ( ! SOVIETS1 :I* 9 HIS VIEW W\LD ALL[ = A TYPE ( /ATE SU* AS HAD BE5 BR\IS ,COMMUNE4 ,9 ACCORDANCE ) ?IS IDEA1 HE DID NOT ?9K ?AT SOCIALISM WAS ! IMM$IATE TASK1 BUT ?AT ! 0TRANSITION TO ! CONTROL ( PRODUCTION & ! DI/RIBUTION ( PRODUCTS BY ! SOVIET ( WORK]S' DEPUTIES0 SUFFIC$ TO S]VE ! IMM$IATE NE$S ( ! REVOLUTION4 ,:AT WAS ( =EMO/ IMPORTANCE WAS ! NATURE ( ! /ATE1 ( POLITICAL P[]1 FROM :I* EV]Y?+ ELSE W\LD FL[ 9 ! DIRECTION ( SOCIALISM4 0,ALL P[] TO ! SOVIETS10 DID NOT 9CLUDE POSSESSION ( ! MEANS ( PRODUCTION1 OR ! ABOLITION ( WAGE LABOR4 ,! WORK]S W]E NOT EXPECT$ TO ADM9I/] BUT M]ELY TO OV]SEE ! 9DU/RIAL 5T]PRISES4 ,! FIR/ DECREE ( ,WORK]S' ,CONTROL EXT5D$ IT OV] ! PRODUCTION1 /OR+1 BUY+ & SELL+ ( RAW MAT]IALS & F9I%$ GOODS AS WELL AS OV] ! F9ANCES ( ! 5T]PRISES4 ,! WORK]S EX]CISE ?IS CONTROL ?R\< !IR ELECT$ ORGANIZATIONS1 SU* AS FACTORY & %OP COMMITTEES1 SOVIET ELD]S1 ETC4 ,! (FICE EMPLOYES & ! TE*NICAL P]SONNEL >E ALSO TO HAVE REPRES5TATION 9 !SE COMMITTEES4 444 ,! ORGANS ( WORK]S' CONTROL HAVE ! RIE ABOLI%$4 ,! [N]S HAVE TO %[ TO ! ORGANS ( WORK]S' CONTROL ALL !IR BOOKS & /ATEM5TS = ! CURR5T YE> & = ! PA/ YE>40 7#b#f7 ,H[EV]1 CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION & WORK]S' CONTROL >E 9COMPATIBLE & ?IS MAKE%IFT AFFAIR1 :]EBY ! ,BOL%EVIKS HOP$ TO RETA9 ! AID ( ! CAPITALI/ ORGANIZ]S ( PRODUCTION & YET SATISFY ! YE>N+S ( ! WORK]S TO TAKE POSSESSION ( 9DU/RY1 C\LD NOT LA/ = LONG4 0,WE DID NOT DECREE SOCIALISM ALL AT ONCE ?R\<\T ! :OLE ( 9DU/RY10 ,L59 EXPLA9$ A YE> LAT]1 BECAUSE SOCIALISM CAN TAKE %APE & BECOME F9ALLY E/ABLI%$ ONLY :5 ! WORK+ CLASS HAS LE>N$ TO RUN ! ECONOMY4 444 ,?AT IS :Y WE 9TRODUC$ WORK]S' CONTROL1 KN[+ ?AT IT WAS A CONTRADICTORY & P>TIAL MEASURE4 ,BUT WE CONSID] IT MO/ IMPORTANT & VALUABLE ?AT ! WORK]S HAVE !MSELVES TACKL$ ! JOB1 ?AT FROM WORK]S' CONTROL1 :I* 9 ! PR9CIPAL 9DU/RIES WAS B\ND TO BE *AOTIC1 AMATEURI% & P>TIAL1 WE HAVE PASS$ TO WORK]S' ADM9I/RATION ( 9DU/RY ON A NATION-WIDE SCALE40 7#b#g7 ,! *ANGE FROM 0CONTROL0 TO 0ADM9I/RATION0 TURN$ \T 5TAIL ! ABOLITION ( BO?4 ,TO BE SURE1 JU/ AS ! EMASCULATION ! SOVIETS TOOK SOME TIME1 = IT REQUIR$ ! =MATION & CONSOLIDATION ( ! ,BOL%EVIK /ATE APP>ATUS1 SO ! WORK]S 9FLU5CE 9 FACTORIES & WORK%OPS WAS ONLY GRADUALLY ELIM9AT$ ?R\< SU* ME?ODS AS %IFT+ ! CONTROLL+ RIDS PREC$$ ! GOV]NM5TAL DECREE4 ,!SE COMMITTEES >OSE SPONTANE\SLY DUR+ ! ,REVOLUTION1 AS ! ONLY POSSIBLE =M ( WORK]S' REPRES5TATION DUE TO ! DE/RUCTION ( ! TRADE UNIONS DUR+ ! W>4 ,! LATT] HAD BE51 ( C\RSE1 ! C\NT]P>T ( ,RUSSIAN ,SOCIAL ,DEMOCRACY & W]E A /RONY ,REVOLUTION BUT F\ND N[ /RONG OPPOSITION 9 ! FACTORY COMMITTEES1 :I* HELD ! UNIONS TO BE SUP]FLU\S UND] ! *ANG$ CONDITIONS4 ,G5]ALLY ! FACTORY C\NCILS SID$ ) ! ,BOL%EVIKS & CONSID]$ !MSELVES A MORE ADEQUATE =M ( ORGANIZATION1 NOT ONLY 9 ! FIY1 ! ,BOL%EVIK /ATE EXT5D$ ITSELF 9TO ! ECONOMIC SPH]E1 9SI/+ ALL ! :ILE ?AT ECONOMIC CONTROL BY ! /ATE ACTUALLY MEANT CONTROL BY ! PROLET>IAT4 ,?IS DID NOT H9D] ,L59 FROM DECL>+ ?AT IT WAS ABSOLUTELY ESS5TIAL ?AT ! TE*NICAL & ORGANIZATIONAL DIRECTION ( PRODUCTION MU/ BE ! EXCLUSIVE RIT ( ?OSE TAK+ P>T 9 ! COMMON WORK1 ?IS SUBORD9ATION W\LD BE QUITE LIKE ! MILD LEAD]%IP ( A CONDUCTOR ( AN OR*E/RA4 ,IT MAY ASSUME ! %>P =M ( DICTATOR%IP IF IDEAL DISCIPL9E & CLASS CONSCI\SNESS >E LACK+4 ,BUT BE ?AT AS IT MAY1 UNQUE/ION+ SUBORD9ATION TO A S+LE WILL IS ABSOLUTELY NECESS>Y = ! SUCCESS ( PROCESSES ORGANIZ$ ON ! PATT]N ( L>GE-SCALE 9DU/RY4 7#b#i7 ,IF ?IS /ATEM5T IS TAK5 S]I\SLY1 CLASS CONSCI\SNESS MU/ HAVE BE5 TOTALLY LACK+ 9 ,RUSSIA1 = CONTROL ( PRODUCTION1 & ( SOCIAL LIFE 9 G5]AL1 TOOK ON DICTATORIAL =MS EXCE$+ ANY?+ EXP]I5C$ 9 CAPITALI/ NATIONS & EXCLUD+ ANY MEASURE ( SELF-DET]M9ATION ON ! P>T ( ! WORK]S D[N TO ! PRES5T DAY4 ,NOTES #a4 ,CF4 ,KAUTSKY1 ,! ,ROAD TO ,P[] 7#a#i#i74 #b4 ,! 9DIVIDUALS REF]R$ TO H]E REPRES5T NOT ONLY !MSELVES BUT CURR5TS )9 ! LABOR MOVEM5T1 9 :I* !Y PLAY$ \T/&+ ROLES ?R\< !IR CONTRIBUTIONS TO ! MOVEM5T'S !ORY & PRACTICE4 #c4 ,L591 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 #ce 7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f#f71 P4 #g#f4 #d4 ,! LIT]ATURE & DOCUM5TATION ( ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION IS SO IMM5SE ?AT H>DLY ANY?+ CAN OR NE$ BE ADD$ TO IT AP>T FROM ! WORK ( PR(ESSIONAL HI/ORIANS1 ESPECIALLY AS ?IS UPHEAVAL HAS BE5 TREAT$ FROM EV]Y CONCEIVABLE PO9T ( VIEW1 PRO & CONTRA1 AS WELL AS ) RESPECT TO ITS IMPACT UPON ! WORLD AT L>GE & ! DEVELOPM5T ( CAPITALISM4 ,WE WILL !RE=E DEAL ONLY ) ASPECTS ( ?IS REVOLUTION RELEVANT TO UND]/&+ ITS EFFECT UPON ! LABOR MOVEM5T 9 G5]AL & ! !ORY & PRACTICE ( ,M>XISM 9 P>TICUL>4 #e4 ,MY ,PA/ & ,?\Y ,P>TY REPRES5T$ ! 9T]E/S ( ! PEASANTRY 9 ! ,RUSSIAN REVOLUTION4 ,IT WAS ORGANIZ$ 9 #aie ?R\< ! UNIFICATION ( A NUMB] ( ,POPULI/ GR\PS4 ,ITS PROGRAM DEM&$ A F$]AT$ REPUBLIC BAS$ ON A G5]AL FRAN*ISE1 & /RESS$ ! 0SOCIALIZATION0 ( ALL L&1 ?AT IS1 ITS [N]%IP & CONTROL BY DEMOCRATICALLY ORGANIZ$ COMMUNITIES ON ! BASIS ( EQUAL HOLD+S & ! ABOLITION ( HIR$ LABOR4 ,AL?\< IT 9CLUD$ WORK]S & 9TELLECTUALS1 ! P>TY DID NOT CONC]N ITSELF ) ! NATIONALIZATION ( 9DU/RY1 ON ! ASSUMPTION ?AT ! ABOLITION ( L&[N]%IP W\LD BY ITSELF PREV5T ! FUR!R DEVELOPM5T ( ! CAPITALI/ RELATIONS ( PRODUCTION4 ,H[EV]1 ITS LEFT W+1 ! 0,MAXIMALI/S10 ADVOCAT$ ! 9CLUSION 9 ITS PROGRAM ( ! SOCIALIZATION ( 9DU/RY UND] ! EGIS ( A ,WORK]S' ,REPUBLIC4 ,IT ALSO DIFF]5TIAT$ ITSELF FROM ! PRO-W> RITY BY ITS 9T]NATIONALI/ /& ON ! W> ISSUE4 ,=M+ A POLITICAL BLOC ) ! ,M5%EVIKS1 ! ,SOCIAL-,REVOLUTION>IES DOM9AT$ ! ,PETROGRAD ,SOVIET2 BY !MSELVES !Y CONTROLL$ ! ,SOVIET ( ,PEASANT ,DEPUTIES4 ,9 ! ELECTION = ! ,ALL-,RUSSIAN ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY1 9 ,NOVEMB] #a#i#a#g1 !Y RECEIV$ #ag MILLION \T ( #d#a1#g1 VOTES1 & ! P>TY'S *AIRMAN1 ,V4 ,M4 ,*]NOV1 WAS ELECT$ ,PRESID5T ( ! ,ASSEMBLY4 ,PRIOR TO ?IS1 ! P>TY WAS REPRES5T$ 9 ! ,PROVISIONAL ,GOV]NM5T =M$ AT ! TIME ( ! ,FEBRU>Y ,REVOLUTION4 ,ITS LEFT W+ SUPPORT$ ! ,BOL%EVIKS & TOOK P>T 9 ! FIR/ ,BOL%EVIK GOV]NM5T1 AS WELL AS 9 ! DISP]SAL ( ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY4 #g4 ,L591 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 #ba 7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f#d71 P4 #c#c#f4 #h4 ,:AT IS TO ,BE ,DONE8 7,NEW ,YORK1 #a#i#b#i71 WRITT5 9 ,FEBRU>Y #a#i#b4 #i4 ,IBID41 P4 #c#c4 #a4 ,IBID41 PP4 #a#a#c#d4 #a#a4 ,DAVID ,LANE1 ,! ,ROOTS ( ,RUSSIAN ,COMMUNISM 7,/ATE ,COLLEGE1 ,PA43 ,P5NSYLVANIA ,/ATE ,UNIV]SITY ,PRESS1 #a#i#f#i71 PP4 #a#b-#a#e4 ,?IS IS AN EXT5SIVE ANALYSIS - ) RESPECT TO ! C\NTRY AS A :OLE & TO SPECIFIC DI/RICTS - ( ! SOCIAL COMPOSITION1 /RUCTURE1 MEMB]%IP1 & POLITICAL ACTIVITY ( ,RUSSIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC GR\PS FROM #ahhi TO #a#i#g4 #a#b4 ,AS QUOT$ BY ,N4 ,VAL5T9OV 9 HIS BOOK ,5C\NT]S ,) ,L59 7#a#i#f#h7 P4 #d#b4 ,SEE ALSO ,A4 ,BALABAN(F1 ,MY ,LIFE ,AS A ,REBEL 7#a#i#f#h71 & O!R MEMOIRS4 #a#c4 ,L4 ,TROTSKY1 #aie 7,NEW ,YORK3 ,V9TAGE1 #a#i#g#b71 P4 #a#d4 #a#d4 ,= A DETAIL$ HI/ORY ( ! SOVIETS SEE ,O4 ,ANWEIL]1 ,! ,SOVIETS3 ,! ,RUSSIAN ,WORK]S1 ,PEASANTS1 & ,SOLDI]S ,C\NCILS1 #a#i#e-#a#i#b#a 7,NEW ,YORK3 ,PAN!ON1 #a#i#g#d74 #a#e4 ,TROTSKY1 #a#i#e1 P4 #b#e#a4 #a#f4 ,L591 0,! ,DISSOLUTION ( ! ,DUMA & ! ,TASKS ( ! ,PROLET>IAT0 7#a#i#f7 9 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 #aa 7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f#b71 PP4 #a#b#d-#e4 #a#g4 ,IBID41 PP4 #a#b#h-#i4 #a#h4 0,SOCIALISM & ,AN>*ISM0 7#a#i#e71 9 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 #a 7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f#b71 P4 #g#b4 #a#i4 0,DRAFT ,RESOLUTIONS = ! ,FIF? ,CONGRESS ( ! ,R4,S4,D4,L4,P40 7#a#i#g71 9 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL #a#b7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f#b71 PP4 #a#d#b-#d4 #b4 ,TROTSKY1 ,! ,HI/ORY ( ! ,RUSSIAN ,REVOLUTION1 ,VOL4 ,I 7,ANN ,>BOR3 ,UNIV]SITY ( ,MI*IGAN ,PRESS1 #a#i#c#b71 P4 #d#g#i4 ,CF4 ,M4 ,F]RO1 ,! ,RUSSIAN ,REVOLUTION ( ,FEBRU>Y #aiag 7,5GLEWOOD ,CLIFFS1 ,N4,J43 ,PR5TICE-,HALL1 #a#i#g#b71 P4 #c#h4 #b#a4 0,! ,WORK]S' ,P>TY & ! ,PEASANTRY0 7#a#i#b7 9 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS ,VOL4 #d 7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f71 P4 #d#b#b4 #b#b4 0,SPEE* 9 ,DEF5SE ( ! ,TACTICS ( ! ,COMMUNI/ ,9T]NATIONAL0 AT ! ,?IRD ,CONGRESS ( ! ,COMMUNI/ ,9T]NATIONAL 7,JULY #a#i#b#a71 ,AGA9/ ,DOGMATISM & ,SECT>IANISM 9 ! ,WORK+-,CLASS ,MOVEM5T 7,MOSC[1 #a#i#f#e71 PP4 #a#g#i-#h#a4 #b#c4 0,! ,BOL%EVIKS ,MU/ ,ASSUME ,P[]0 7,LETT] TO ! ,C5TRAL ,COMMITTEE ( ! ,PETROGRAD & ,MOSC[ ,P>TY ,COMMITTEE1 ,SEPTEMB] #a#i#a#g7 9 ,COLLECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 #bf 7,MOSC[3 ,PROGRESS1 #a#i#f#d71 P4 #b#a4 #b#d4 ,R4 ,LUXEMBURG1 ,! ,RUSSIAN ,REVOLUTION 7,ANN ,>BOR3 ,UNIV]SITY ( ,MI*IGAN ,PRESS1 #a#i#f#a71 P4 #c#i4 #b#e4 ,IBID4 #b#f4 ,J4 ,BUNYAN & ,H4 ,H4 ,FI%]1 ,! ,BOL%EVIK ,REVOLUTION 7,/AN=D3 ,/AN=D ,UNIV]SITY ,PRESS1 #a#i#c#d74 #b#g4 ,QUE/IONS ( ! ,SOCIALI/ ,ORGANIZATION ( ! ,ECONOMY 7,MOSC[3 P4 #a#g#c74 #b#h4 ,A4 ,M4 ,PANKRATOVA1 ,FABRIKRATE 9 ,RUSSL& 7,FRANKFURT3 ,FIS*]1 #a#i#g#f71 P4 #b#c#b4 ,?IS IMPORTANT BOOK1 FIR/ PUBLI%$ 9 ,MOSC[ 9 #a#i#b#c1 (F]S A COMPREH5SIVE DESCRIPTION - ALBEIT FROM A ,BOL%EVIK PO9T ( VIEW - ( ! RISE1 ACTIVITIES1 & ASPIRATIONS ( ! ,RUSSIAN FACTORY C\NCILS1 !IR RELATIONS TO ! TRADE UNIONS1 & !IR ELIM9ATION BY ! ,BOL%EVIK /ATE4 #b#i4 ,L591 ,QUE/IONS ( ! ,SOCIALI/ ,ORGANIZATION ( ! ,ECONOMY1 P4 #a#b#g4 ,FROM 3 ,M>XI/S4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,M>* #c1 #bba 3 ,*APT] #d -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/