,*APT] #d ,VALUE & ,PRICE ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,PAUL ,MATTICK ,TEXT 3 ,9 ORD] TO /AY 9 BUS9ESS1 EV]Y CAPITALI/ 5TREPR5EUR MU/ /RIVE = ! L>GE/ POSSIBLE AM\NT ( SURPLUS-LABOR2 = ONLY BY A*IEV+ ?IS MAXIMUM CAN HE MAXIMIZE ! PR(ITS HE CAN REALIZE ?R\< M>KET PRICES4 ,?IS PR(IT MAXIMUM IS ONLY P>TLY DET]M9$ BY HIS [N EX]TIONS 9 MA9TA9+ OR RAIS+ ! RATE ( EXPLOITATION2 IT IS CO-DET]M9$ BY SIMIL> EX]TIONS ON ! P>T ( ALL O!R CAPITALI/S4 ,TO 9CREASE ! PR(ITABILITY ( ANY P>TICUL> CAPITAL1 ! PR(ITABILITY ( TOTAL SOCIAL CAPITAL MU/ BE 9 CREAS$1 = O!RWISE !RE W\LD BE NO WAY ( REALIZ+ ! 9CREAS$ APPROPRIATION ( SURPLUS-LABOR AS PR(ITS 9 ! M>KET4 ,S9CE SURPLUS-LABOR 9 ! =M ( COMMODITIES FALLS \TSIDE ! CAPITAL-LABOR RELATION%IP1 IT MU/ BE EX*ANG$ BETWE5 CAPITALI/S !MSELVES 9 !IR EF=TS TO PRES]VE !IR CAPITAL BY AUGM5T+ IT4 ,! GR[? ( ANY P>TICUL> CAPITAL DEP5DS ON ! ACCUMULATION ( TOTAL SOCIAL CAPITAL4 ,?IS FACT SETS DEF9ITE LIMITS TO ! EXPANSION ( ALL SEP>ATE CAPITALS4 ,! [N] ( A GR[+ BUS9ESS BECOMES AW>E ( !SE LIMITS :]E DIM9I%+ RETURNS MAKE IT UNPR(ITABLE = HIM TO EXP& IT FUR!R4 ,H[EV]1 CAPITAL1 LIKE LABOR-P[] 9 ! AB/RACT1 IS DIFF]5TIAT$ ONLY QUANTITATIVELY4 ,NO MATT] :AT ! TYPE ( PRODUCTION1 CAPITAL WILL BE EMPLOY$ :]EV] !RE IS A PROSPECT ( SUFFICI5T YIELDS4 ,IF ONE AV5UE ( EXPANSION CLOSES1 O!RS OP5+ UP WILL BE 9VAD$4 ,IT IS ! PR(ITABILITY PR9CIPLE :I* DI/RIBUTES 9VE/M5TS OV] ! DIFF]5T SPH]ES & BRAN*ES ( PRODUCTION1 ?US ALLOCAT+ SOCIAL LABOR 9 ACCORDANCE ) ! SURPLUS-VALUE REQUIREM5TS ( CAPITAL ACCUMULATION4 ,& IT IS ?IS COMPETITIVE FL[ ( CAPITAL :I* GIVES RISE TO A T5D5CY TO EQUALIZE RATES ( PR(IT ON CAPITAL4 ,AL?\< ! CAPITAL M>KET DOES NOT DIFF]5TIATE BETWE5 CAPITAL & LABOR 9VE/M5TS1 ?IS DIVISION DOES AFFECT ! ECONOMY4 ,! PHYSICAL NATURE ( ! PRODUCTION PROCESS DEF9ES ! RELATION%IP BETWE5 LABOR & CAPITAL1 & ?US DET]M9ES ! PROPORTION ( 9VE/M5T FALL+ TO EA* FACTOR4 ,!RE IS A DIFF]5CE1 TO SPEAK 9 ,M>XIAN T]MS1 BETWE5 ! 0ORGANIC COMPOSITIONS0 ( DIFF]5T CAPITALS 9 DIFF]5T SPH]ES ( PRODUCTION4 ,SOME PRODUCTION PROCESSES REQUIRE GREAT 9VE/M5TS 9 MEANS ( PRODUCTION & RELATIVELY SMALL 9VE/M5TS 9 LABOR1 :ILE O!RS NE$ LESS CAPITAL 9VE/M5TS & DEM& MORE LABOR4 ,! FIR/ RELATION%IP ,M>X CALL$ A 0HI<0 & ! SECOND A 0L[0 ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( CAPITAL4 ,S9CE LABOR IS ! ONLY S\RCE ( SURPLUS-VALUE1 OR PR(ITS1 & PR(ITS >E MEASUR$ ON TOTAL 9VE/M5TS 7I4E4 MEANS ( PRODUCTION TOGE!R ) LABOR-P[]71 IT %\LD FOLL[ FROM ! LABOR !ORY ( VALUE ?AT CAPITALS ( DIFF]5T ORGANIC COMPOSITIONS1 BUT ) EQUAL RATES ( SURPLUS-VALUE1 %\LD YIELD DIFF]5T RATES ( PR(IT4 ,9 REALITY1 !RE PREVAILS A T5D5CY T[>D !IR EQUALIZATION4 ,LEAV+ ASIDE SU* CONSID]ATIONS AS V>Y+ RATES ( SURPLUS-VALUE 9 DIFF]5T 5T]PRISES1 ORIG9ALLY DIV]SE RATES ( PR(IT PO9T TO ! V>IETY 9 ORGANIC COMPOSITIONS ( V>I\S CAPITALS4 ,S9CE ! DIFF]5CES 9 ! ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( CAPITAL :I* 9DU/RIES POSSESS >E DET]M9$ BY !IR PRODUCTION PROCESS1 !Y CANNOT BE ELIM9AT$4 ,IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO A DEGREE TO AV]AGE ! ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( CAPITAL )9 A P>TICUL> 9DU/RY2 BUT ?IS CANNOT BE DONE BETWE5 TOTALLY DIFF]5T SPH]ES ( PRODUCTION4 ,?US ! AV]AG+ ( 9DIVIDUAL RATES ( PR(IT MU/ TAKE PLACE 9 CIRCULATION4 ,9 ORD] TO UND]/& ?IS ME*ANISM IT IS NECESS>Y TO CONSID] ! 0SOCIAL0 *>ACT] ( CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION & ! DUAL NATURE ( ! COMMODITY AS BO? A USE-VALUE & AN EX*ANGE-VALUE4 ,!RE EXI/S A REAL NE$ TO CO-ORD9ATE PRODUCTION 9 T]MS ( USE-VALUES4 ,9 CAPITALISM ! M>KET FULFILLS ?IS FUNCTION4 ,IT CAN ONLY EX*ANGE :AT HAS BE5 PRODUC$2 BUT :AT HAS BE5 PRODUC$ REFLECTS ! SOCIAL DEM& ( CAPITALISM AT ANY P>TICUL> /AGE ( ITS DEVELOPM5T4 0,SOCIAL DEM&0 AS REVEAL$ BY ! M>KET IS NOT ID5TICAL ) ACTUALLY EXI/+ SOCIAL NE$S BUT ONLY ) !SE NE$S )9 ! FRAME ( CAPITAL PRODUCTION4 ,/ILL1 ?IS CAPITALI/ICALLY-DET]M9$ SOCIAL DEM& EXPRESSES ITSELF AS A DEM& = USE-VALUES4 ,! RIS+ ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( CAPITAL 9 A P>TICUL> 9DU/RY IMPLIES AN 9CREAS+ DEM& = ITS COMMODITIES4 ,& IT IS ?IS SOCIAL DEM& = COMMODITIES PRODUC$ BY 9DU/RIES ( A HI< ORGANIC COMPOSITION :I* ALL[S !M TO REALIZE PRICES ?AT SECURE !IR PR(ITABILITY4 ,S9CE ! L[ ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( O!R 9DU/RIES DOES NOT BY ITSELF L5D !IR COMMODITIES MORE SOCIAL USE-VALUE ?AN !Y ACTUALLY POSSESS1 !SE 9DU/RIES WILL NOT BE ABLE TO REALIZE A GREAT] PR(IT ?AN IS COMPATIBLE ) EXI/+ SOCIAL DEM& AS DET]M9$ BY ! ECONOMIC SY/EM AS A :OLE4 ,9 ! C\RSE ( CAPITAL ACCUMULATION ALMO/ ALL 9DU/RIES WILL 9CREASE !IR 9VE/M5T 9 CAPITAL AT A FA/] RATE ?AN !IR 9 VE/M5T 9 LABOR-P[]4 ,CAPITALS ( PREVI\SLY L[ ORGANIC COMPOSITION MAY TURN 9TO CAPITALS ( HI< ORGANIC COMPOSITION & VICE V]SA4 ,BECAUSE ( ! SOCIAL 9T]DEP5D5CE ( ! CAPITALI/ MODE ( PRODUCTION ! GR[? & *ANGE ( ! TOTAL CAPITAL /RUCTURE WILL AFFECT ALL 9DIVIDUAL SPH]ES ( PRODUCTION & ! RELATIONS BETWE5 V>I\S 9DU/RIES4 ,A %IFT FROM LIY = ! FUNCTION+ ( ! SY/EM AS A :OLE1 IT WILL BE ABLE TO COMM& PRICES ?AT WILL MAKE ITS EXI/5CE & EXPANSION POSSIBLE4 ,BECAUSE ALL CAPITALI/S TRY = ! HIKET :]E DEM& IS PR$ET]M9$ BY ! PRODUCTION SY/EM AS A :OLE1 ! DI/RIBUTION ( SURPLUS-VALUE IS A 0SOCIAL0 AFFAIR4 ,AS SU*1 IT EXCLUDES 9DIVIDUAL CONSID]ATIONS SU* AS ! SPECIFIC ORGANIC COMPOSITIONS ( 9DEP5D5T CAPITALS4 ,! TOTAL SOCIAL SURPLUS-VALUE COMPRISES A DEF9ITE QUANTITY ( SOCIAL LABOR 9CORPORAT$ 9 COMMODITIES4 ,NOT ONLY ! SURPLUS-LABOR BUT ! TOTAL SOCIAL PRODUCT1 OR ! GREAT BULK ( IT1 MU/ GO ?R\< ! CIRCULATION PROCESS4 ,! IMPOSSIBILITY ( ISOLAT+ SURPLUS-VALUE FROM ITS COMMODITY EMBODIM5T & ! NE$ TO ?R[ ALMO/ ! :OLE ( SOCIAL PRODUCTION ON ! M>KET DIVORCES ! REALIZATION & ! DIVISION ( SURPLUS-VALUE FROM ITS PRODUCTION4 ,IF !RE W]E A VALUE-=-VALUE EX*ANGE1 5T]PRISES ) A HI< ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( CAPITAL C\LD NOT EXP& = LACK ( PR(ITABILITY1 :ILE ?OSE ( A L[ ORGANIC COMPOSITION C\LD NOT EXP& = LACK ( ADDITIONAL M>KETS4 ,PRIVATE CAPITAL ACCUMULATION1 H[EV]1 IMPLIES COMPETITIVE M>KET RELATIONS :I* 0TRANS=M0 VALUES 9TO PRICES ( PRODUCTION4 ,( C\RSE1 ! 0TRANS=MATION0 IS ONLY A WAY ( SAY+ ?AT AL?\< EV]Y?+ 9 ! EX*ANGE PROCESS OCCURS 9 T]MS ( PRICES1 ! LATT] >E NEV]!LESS DET]M9$ BY VALUE RELATIONS ( :I* ! PRODUC]S >E NOT AW>E4 ,?IS DET]M9ATION ( PRICE BY VALUE CANNOT BE E/ABLI%$ EMPIRICALLY2 IT CAN ONLY BE D$UC$ FROM ! FACT ?AT ALL COMMODITIES >E PRODUCTS ( LABOR1 ( DIFF]5T QUANTITIES ( LABOR1 & FROM ! NECESS>ILY PROPORTIONAL DI/RIBUTION ( ! :OLE ( SOCIAL LABOR4 ,!RE IS NO DIRECT WAY ( DISCOV]+ A COMMODITY'S PRICE 9 ITS 0VALUE10 OR1 BY A REV]SE PROC$URE1 ( DISCOV]+ ITS 0VALUE0 9 ITS PRICE4 ,!RE IS NO OBS]VABLE 0TRANS=MATION0 ( VALUES 9TO PRICES2 & ! VALUE CONCEPT HAS MEAN+ ONLY ) REG>D TO TOTAL SOCIAL CAPITAL4 ,! 0TRANS=MATION0 IS BR\* = PR(ITS & EXTRA-PR(ITS :I* CON/ITUTES ! CAPITALI/ CONTRIBUTION & REACTION TO ! 9CREAS+ PRODUCTIVITY ( LABOR4 ,AS PO9T$ \T ABOVE1 CAPITAL COMPETES = ! MORE PR(ITABLE L9ES ( BUS9ESS &1 :]E POSSIBLE1 %IFTS FROM ONE TYPE ( ECONOMIC ACTIVITY TO ANO!R4 ,IT TRIES TO ESCAPE FROM SPH]ES ( L[ PR(ITABILITY & TO 5T] ?OSE ( HI< PR(ITABILITY4 ,UND] CONDITIONS ( COMPETITIVE M>KET+ & 9VE/M5T1 ANY P>TICUL> CAPITAL WILL REALIZE AN APPROXIMATELY AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT4 ,ACTUALLY1 ( C\RSE1 0! RATES ( PR(IT DIFF] FROM BUS9ESS TO BUS9ESS & FROM YE> TO YE> ACCORD+ TO ! DIFF]5T CIRCUM/ANCES1 & ! G5]AL RATE EXI/S ONLY AS AN AV]AGE ( MANY BUS9ESSES & A NUMB] ( YE>S444 .<,IT IS.> ! NATURE ( ! RATE ( PR(IT & ( ECONOMIC LAWS 9 G5]AL1 . NONE ( !M HAS ANY REALITY EXCEPT AS APPROXIMATION1 T5D5CY1 AV]AGE1 & NOT AS IMM$IATE REALITY40 .<#a.> ,SUBJECT$ TO ! 0EQUALIZATION0 ( PR(IT RATES 9 ?IS S5SE1 AN 5T]PRISE'S %>E ( ! TOTAL SOCIAL PR(IT WILL DEP5D ON ! SIZE ( ITS CAPITAL4 ,?IS IS A FUR!R 9DUCEM5T = A RAPID CAPITAL ACCUMULATION4 ,! 9T]DEP5D5CE ( CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION1 ?AT IS1 ! DEP5D5CE ( EA* PRODUC] ON ! EXI/5CE ( ALL O!R PRODUC]S1 AS WELL AS !IR COMMON NE$ TO GO ?R\< ! M>KET 9 ORD] TO TURN SURPLUS-LABOR 9TO PR(ITS1 PRODUCES A K9D ( 0CAPITALI/IC COMMUNISM40.<#b.> ,ACCORD+ TO ,M>X1 ORIG9ALLY DIFF]5T RATES ( PR(IT >E EQUALIZ$ BY MEANS ( COMPETITION 9TO A G5]AL RATE ( PR(IT1 :I* IS ! AV]AGE ( ! SPECIAL RATES ( PR(IT4 ,! EQUALIZATION ( PR(ITS 0TRANS=MS0 VALUES 9TO PRICES ( PRODUCTION & DIVIDES SOCIAL SURPLUS-VALUE EQUALLY AMONG ! 9DIVIDUAL CAPITALS 9 PRO PORTION TO !IR SIZES4 ,?IS WORLD ( PRICES IS ! ONLY WORLD = ! CAPITALI/S4 ,= !M1 ?AT P>T ( ! VALUE ( ! COMMODITY :I* !Y HAVE TO PAY = CON/ITUTES ITS CO/-PRICE1 :I* EXCLUDES UNPAID LABOR4 ,PR(ITS APPE> TO !M AS ! EXCESS ( ! SELL+-PRICE OV] ! CO/-PRICE4 ,COMMODITIES CAN ?US BE SOLD BEL[ !IR VALUE SO LONG AS !Y >E SOLD ABOVE !IR CO/-PRICE4 ,IT IS >\ND ! CO/-PRICE1 OR PRICE ( PRODUCTION1 ?AT M>KET PRICES OSCILLATE4 ,CO/-PRICES >E SPECIFIC BUT ! PR(IT ADD$ TO !M IS NOT4 ,ACCORD+ TO ,M>X1 :ILE 0ONE COMMODITY RECEIVES TOO LITTLE ( ! SURPLUS-VALUE ANO!R RECEIVES TOO MU*1 SO ?AT ! DEVIATIONS FROM VALUE %[N BY ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION MUTUALLY COMP5SATE ONE ANO!R4 ,9 %ORT1 UND] CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION1 ! G5]AL LAW ( VALUE 5=CES ITSELF M]ELY AS ! PREVAIL+ T5D5CY1 9 A V]Y COMPLICAT$ & APPROXIMATE MANN]1 AS A NEV] ASC]TA9ABLE AV]AGE ( CEASELESS FLUCTUATIONS40.<#c.> ,M>X ?\X1 /ILL RE/RICT$ TO VALUE ANALYSIS1 PO9T$ \T ?AT A 0QUANTITATIVE 9CONGRUITY BETWE5 PRICE & MAGNITUDE ( VALUE1 OR ! DEVIATION ( ! =M] FROM ! LATT]1 IS 9H]5T 9 ! PRICE-=M ITSELF4 ,?IS IS NO DEFECT1 BUT1 ON ! CONTR>Y1 ADMIRABLY ADOPTS ! PRICE-=M TO A MODE ( PRODUCTION :OSE 9H]5T LAWS IMPOSE !MSELVES ONLY AS ! MEAN ( APP>5TLY LAWLESS IRREGUL>ITIES ?AT COMP5SATE ONE ANO!R40 ,MOREOV]1 0! PRICE-=M IS NOT ONLY COMPATIBLE ) ! POSSIBILITY ( A QUANTITATIVE 9CONGRUITY BETWE5 MAGNITUDE ( VALUE & PRICE1 444 BUT IT MAY ALSO CONCEAL A QUALITATIVE 9CONSI/5CY1 SO MU* SO1 ?AT AL?\< MONEY IS NO?+ BUT ! VALUE =M ( COMMODITIES1 PRICES CEASE ALTOGE!R TO EXPRESS VALUES4 ,OBJECTS ?AT 9 !MSELVES >E NOT COMMODITIES1 SU* AS CONSCI5CE1 HONOR1 ETC41 >E CAPABLE ( BE+ (F]$ = SALE BY !IR HOLD]S1 & ?US ACQUIR+1 ?R\< !IR PRICES1 ! =M ( COMMODITIES4 ,H5CE AN OBJECT MAY HAVE A PRICE )\T HAV+ A VALUE40.<#d.> ,ACCORD+ TO ,M>X1 !N1 COMMODITIES >E NOT & CANNOT BE EX*ANG$ 9 ACCORDANCE ) ! SOCIALLY-NECESS>Y LABOR TIME 9CORPORAT$ 9 !M4 ,YET ,M>X 9SI/S ?AT 0NO MATT] :AT MAY BE ! WAY 9 :I* PRICES >E REGULAT$ 444 ! LAW ( VALUE DOM9ATES ! MOVEM5TS ( PRICES1 S9CE A R$UCTION OR 9CREASE ( ! LABOR-TIME REQUIR$ = PRODUCTION CAUSES PRICES ( PRODUCTION TO FALL OR TO RISE40.<#e.> ,& S9CE 0! TOTAL VALUE ( ! COMMODITIES REGULATES ! TOTAL SURPLUS-VALUE1 & ?IS ! LEVEL ( ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT 444 IT FOLL[S ?AT ! LAW ( VALUE REGULATES ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION10.<#f.> EV5 ?\< 9DIVIDUAL COMMODITY PRICES DO NOT CORRESPOND TO LABOR-TIME VALUES4 ,ACTUALLY1 ( C\RSE1 PRICES EXI/ ONLY 9DIVIDUALLY1 & !IR 0REGULATION0 BY ! LAW ( VALUE CAN ONLY BE D$UC$ FROM ! FACT ?AT1 AL?\< !RE IS NO WAY ( DEAL+ ) TOTAL SOCIAL PRODUCTION 9 CAPITALISM1 IT IS NONE!LESS A REALITY :I* OV]RIDES ALL 9DIVIDUAL EX*ANGE RELATIONS4 ,M>X'S ADH]5CE TO ! LABOR !ORY ( VALUE1 C\PL$ ) HIS DEMON/RATION ?AT COMMODITIES CANNOT BE EX*ANG$ 9 ACCORDANCE PI? !IR VALUE1 CAUS$ BO? FRI5DS & FOES TO ACCUSE HIM ( SELF-CONTRADICTION4 ,TO QUOTE ONE ( ! LATT]1 ,BOHMM-,BAW]K WROTE ?AT 0EI!R PRODUCTS DO ACTUALLY EX*ANGE 9 ! LONG RUN 9 PROPORTION TO ! LABOR ATTA*+ TO !M - 9 :I* CASE AN EQUALIZATION ( ! GA9S ( CAPITAL IS IMPOSSIBLE2 OR !RE IS AN EQUALIZATION ( ! GA9S ( CAPITAL - 9 :I* CASE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE ?AT PRODUCTS %\LD CONT9UE 0TO EX*ANGE 9 PROPORTION TO ! LABOR ATTA*+ TO !M 444 ,! !ORY ( ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT & ( ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION CANNOT BE RECONCIL$ ) ! !ORY ( VALUE40.<#g.> ,M>X NEV] CLAIM$1 H[EV]1 ?AT 09 ! LONG RUN0 PRODUCTS EX*ANGE 9 ACCORDANCE ) !IR LABOR-TIME4 ,HE HELD ?AT ! LAW ( VALUE 0REGULATES0 ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION & ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT BY DET]M9+ :E!R !IR LEVELS >E HI< OR L[ ) RESPECT TO TOTAL VALUE & SURPLUS-VALUE4 ,! LAW ( VALUE DOM9ATES ! MOVEM5TS ( PRICES BY VIRTUE ( ! V>Y+ PRODUCTIVITY ( LABOR4 ,!RE IS NO NE$ = A 0RECONCILIATION0 ( ! LAW ( VALUE ) ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION & ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT4 ,VALUE DOES NOT DOM9ATE ! ACTUAL QUANTITATIVE EX*ANGE RATIOS ( ! COMMODITY M>KET4 ,BUT ! OV]ALL FALL OR RISE ( ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION & ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT IS CAUS$ BY ! *ANG+ VALUE RELATIONS & ! *ANG+ VALUE CONT5T ( COMMODITIES 9 ! C\RSE ( ! *ANG+ PRODUCTIVITY ( LABOR & ! /RUCTURAL *ANGES 9 ! ORGANIC COMPOSITION ( TOTAL CAPITAL4 ,BECAUSE 0! RATIONAL & NATURALLY NECESS>Y ASS]TS ITSELF ONLY AS A BL9DLY WORK+ AV]AGE10 ,M>X WROTE TO ,KUGELMANN1 0! VULG> ECONOMI/ ?9KS HE HAS MADE A GREAT DISCOV]Y :51 AS AGA9/ ! REVELATION ( ! 9N] 9T]CONNECTION1 HE PR\DLY CLAIMS ?AT 9 APPE>ANCE ?+S LOOK DIFF]5T4 ,9 FACT1 HE IS BOA/+ ?AT HE HOLDS FA/ TO APPE>ANCE & TAKES IT = ! LA/ WORD4 ,:Y1 !N1 HAVE ANY SCI5CE AT ALL80.<#h.> ,= ,M>X1 ! VALUE CONCEPT WAS ! 0SCI5CE10 OR TOOL1 ) :I* HE C\LD P5ETRATE & UND]/& ! NATURE & HI/ORY ( CAPITALISM4 ,BUT ?\< A 0CONCEPT HAS ! ESS5TIAL NATURE ( ?AT CONCEPT & CANNOT PRIMA FACIE CO9CIDE ) REALITY1 FROM :I* IT MU/ FIR/ BE AB/RACT$10.<#i.> ,M>X'S 0AB/RACTIONS ONLY REFLECT1 9 ! =M ( ?\ ,EV5 IF !RE W]E NO *APT] ON VALUE 9 ,CAPITAL1 ,M>X WROTE1 0! ANALYSIS ( ! REAL RELATION%IPS :I* ,I GAVE W\LD CONTA9 ! PRO( & DEMON/RATION ( ! REAL VALUE RELATIONS4 ,ALL ?AT PALAV] AB\T ! NECESSITY ( PROV+ ! CONCEPT ( VALUE COMES FROM COMPLETE IGNORANCE BO? ( ! SUBJECT DEALT ) & ( SCI5TIFIC ME?OD40.<#a#a.> ,9 ORD] TO UND]/& ! CAPITALI/ SY/EM & ITS DYNAMIC IT WAS NECESS>Y TO LAY B>E ITS REAL SOCIAL PRODUCTION RELATIONS & TO ANALYZE ITS DEVELOPM5T 9 ITS FETI%I/IC DET]M9ATION1 I4E4 AS A VALUE-EXPANSION PROCESS4 ,?IS ANALYSIS DOES NOT REQUIRE PRO( ?AT ! ACTUALLY-GIV5 PRICE RELATIONS BETWE5 SPECIFIC COMMODITIES >E TRACEABLE TO LABOR-TIME4 ,IT M]ELY REQUIRES RECOGNITION ( ! OBVI\S FACT ?AT1 JU/ AS 9 ANY O!R ECONOMIC SY/EM1 SO ALSO 9 CAPITALISM1 SOCIAL EXI/5CE & DEVELOPM5T >E UNALT]ABLY B\ND UP ) LABOR-TIME RELATIONS 9 ! PRODUCTION PROCESS4 ,NO MATT] H[ PRICES MAY DEVIATE FROM VALUES1 !Y MU/ F9D !IR EXPLANATION AS WELL AS !IR B\ND>IES 9 LABOR-TIME RELATIONS & ?US1 9 CAPITALI/IC T]MS1 9 ! LAW ( VALUE4 ,M>X TOOK PA9S TO DEMON/RATE ! VALIDITY ( ! LAW ( VALUE = A SY/EM :I* PRECLUDES A VALUE EX*ANGE4 ,!SE EF=TS DO NOT BETRAY ANY DESIRE ON HIS P>T TO MAKE ! LAW ( VALUE 0OP]ATIONAL03 HE DID NOT EXPECT ! LAW TO V]IFY ACTUAL EX*ANGE RELATIONS 9 T]MS ( PRICES4 ,RA!R1 HIS EF=TS RELATE TO ! !ORETICAL NE$ TO TE/ ! VALIDITY ( ! LAW 9 CONFRONTATION ) A REALITY :I* SEEM$ TO CONTRADICT IT4 ,F9D+ \T :E!R OR NOT VALUE RELATIONS DO1 9 FACT1 UND]LAY M>KET & PRICE RELATIONS REQUIR$ A !ORY ( PRICES CONSI/5T ) ! !ORY ( VALUE4 ,! 0TRANS=MATION0 ( VALUES 9TO PRICES ( PRODUCTION SATISFIES ?IS !ORETICAL NE$4 ,! PROBLEM ( 9DIVIDUAL PRICE DET]M9ATION WAS ( NO REAL 9T]E/ TO ,M>X2 ONLY VALUE RELATIONS MATT]$1 PLUS ! ASSURANCE ?AT ! DIFF]5CE BETWE5 VALUE & PRICE AS 5C\NT]$ 9 REALITY W\LD NEI!R LOGICALLY1 NOR ACTUALLY1 9VALIDATE ! VALUE CONCEPT AS ! KEY TO ! 0ESS5TIAL FUNDAM5TAL LAWS0 ( CAPITAL PRODUCTION4 ,CONV9C$ ?AT ! DEVIATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE DOES NOT ELIM9ATE ! D]IVATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE1 EV5 ?\< ?IS D]IVATION CAN ONLY BE E/ABLI%$ D$UCTIVELY1 ,M>X WAS NOT SURPRIS$ ?AT ! E/ABLI%$ B\RGEOISIE %\LD F9D ! VALUE !ORY IRRELEVANT TO !IR [N PRACTICAL PROBLEMS4 ,:]EAS ! V]Y EXI/5CE ( AN AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT1 AS BR\KET REALITY & ?US ! HORIZON ( B\RGEOIS ECONOMIC 9T]E/1 IT S]V$ ,M>X AS A V]IFICATION ( ! LABOR !ORY ( VALUE4 ,HE SAW V]Y WELL1 ( C\RSE1 ?AT 0BY ! TRANS=MATION ( VALUE 9TO PRICES ( PRODUCTION1 ! BASIS ( ! DET]M9ATION ( VALUE IS ITSELF REMOV$ FROM DIRECT OBS]VATION10 & HE F\ND IT ONLY 0NATURAL ?AT ! CAPITALI/ %\LD LOSE ! MEAN+ ( ! T]M ( VALUE AT ?IS JUNCTURE40.<#a#b.> ,=1 ) REG>D TO ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT1 0! 9DIVIDUAL CAPITALI/S 444 JU/LY BELIEVE ?AT !IR PR(ITS >E NOT D]IV$ SOLELY FROM ! LABOR EMPLOY$ 9 !IR 9DIVIDUAL SPH]ES02 & S9CE !Y SAW FUR!R 0?AT A R$UCTION 9 ! QUANTITY ( LABOR REQUIR$ = PRODUCTION 444 EX]TS NO 9JURI\S 9FLU5CE ON PR(ITS1 444 H[1 !N1 C\LD LIV+ LABOR BE ! EXCLUSIVE S\RCE ( PR(IT40.<#a#c.> ,:ILE COMPETITION AV]AGES ! V>I\S RATES ( PR(IT1 IT DOES NOT DET]M9E ! MAGNITUDE ( ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT AT ANY GIV5 TIME1 NOR DOES IT CAUSE ! *ANGES :I* OCCUR 9 ?IS RATE4 ,COMPETITION1 ACCORD+ TO ,M>X1 0CAN 9FLU5CE ! RATE ( PR(IT ONLY TO ! EXT5T ?AT IT AFFECTS ! PRICES ( COMMODITIES4 ,IT CAN M]ELY MAKE ! PRODUC]S )9 ! SAME SPH]E ( PRODUCTION SELL !IR COMMODITIES AT ! SAME PRICE1 & MAKE !M SELL !IR COMMODITIES 9 DIFF]5T SPH]ES ( PRODUCTION AT PRICES :I* WILL GIVE !M ! SAME PR(IT4 ,9 ORD] TO BALANCE UNEQUAL RATES ( PR(IT1 ! PR(IT AS AN ELEM5T 9 ! PRICE ( COMMODITIES MU/ ALREADY EXI/1 & COMPETITION DOES NOT CREATE IT40.<#a#d.> ,RA!R1 COMPETITION IS ITSELF CONDITION$ UPON ! EXI/5CE ( PR(IT1 & ! EXPLANATION ( ! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT PRESUPPOSES ! RECOGNITION ( ITS S\RCE1 :I* !N LEADS BACK TO VALUE & SURPLUS-VALUE4 ,! AV]AGE RATE ( PR(IT 9DICATES ?AT PRICES >E DET]M9$ BY ! SY/EM AS A :OLE4 ,! SY/EM AS A :OLE IS SUSCEPTIBLE TO VALUE ANALYSIS4 ,COMPETITION LEADS TO ! DIVISION & ACCUMULATIVE APPLICATION ( SURPLUS-VALUE4 ,& ?IS COMPETITION IMPLIES A DEVIATION ( PRICES FROM VALUES JU/ BECAUSE IT TAKES PLACE 9 A VALUE & SURPLUS-VALUE PRODUC+ SOCIETY :]E9 0! DI/RIBUTION ( SOCIAL LABOR & ! MUTUAL SUPPLEM5T+ & CIRCULATION ( MATT] 9 ! PRODUCTS1 ! SUBORD9ATION UND] ! SOCIAL ACTIVITY & ! 5TRANCE 9TO IT1 >E LEFT TO ! ACCID5TAL & MUTUALLY NULLIFY+ 9ITIATIVE ( ! 9DIVIDUAL CAPITALI/S40.<#a#e.> ,)9 ! M>KET ME*ANISM1 ! ACTUAL DIVISION ( ! PRODUCTS :I* COMPRISE ! AGGREGATE VALUE ( ! NECESS>Y LABOR TIME1 AS WELL AS ! ACTUAL DIVISION ( SURPLUS-VALUE AMONG ! CAPITALI/S & NONPRODUCTIVE LAY]S ( SOCIETY1 IS DET]M9$ BY ! REAL ACTIVITIES ( M5 9 ! COMPETITIVE PURSUIT ( !IR 9T]E/S )9 ! FRAME ( !IR SOCIALLY-DET]M9$1 BUT *ANG+ POSSIBILITIES4 ,& H]E !RE IS NO?+ BUT ! /RUGGLE ( ALL AGA9/ ALL1 SELF-9T]E/ AGA9/ SELF-9T]E/1 A G5]AL & IMP5ETRABLE SCRAMBLE = ! AMASS+ ( WEAL?1 OR = M]E EXI/5CE4 ,M>KET & EXTRA-M>KET ACTIVITIES 9T]TW9E & !RE IS NO ROOM = ! CLE>-CUT EX*ANGE RELATIONS ( EI!R VALUE ON PRICE !ORY4 ,BUT EV5 FROM A PURELY ECONOMIC PO9T ( VIEW1 ! V>IETY ( DEGREES ( EXPLOITATION1 DIFF]5CES 9 ! TURN-OV] ( V>I\S CAPITALS1 DIFF]5CES BETWE5 ! SPH]ES ( PRODUCTION1 ! EXI/5CE ( MONOPOLIES1 ! EFFECTS ( R5T & 9T]E/ UPON ! RATE ( PR(IT1 & SO =?1 EXCLUDE ! POSSIBILITY ( RECOGNIZ+ ! VALUE BASE ( ! COMMODITY PRICE4 ,?IS BASE 0REMA9S VISIBLE ONLY 9 ! 9FLU5CE ( ! FLUCTUAT+ PRODUCTIVITY ( LABOR UPON ! RISE & FALL ( ! PRICES ( PRODUCTION40.<#a#f.> ,M>X NEV] 9T5D$ 0TO DESC5D FROM ! G5]AL IDEA ( VALUE 444 BY MEANS ( EV] CLOS] DET]M9ANTS TO A DIRECT DET]M9ATION4 ! PRICES ( COMMODITIES40.<#a#g.> ,:AT HE TRI$ TO %[ ) RESPECT TO ! VALUE-PRICE PROBLEM IS ?AT ! ABS5CE ( VALUE CONSID]ATIONS 9 ! M>KET DOES NOT 9VALIDATE AN ANALYSIS ( CAPITAL 9 VALUE T]MS4 ,BEYOND ! /ATEM5T ?AT PRICE RELATIONS PRESUPPOSE VALUE RELATIONS & ?AT 9 ?IS S5SE ! LATT] DET]M9E & LIMIT ! =M]1 NO NE$ EXI/S = A 0,M>XIAN !ORY ( PRICES40 ,M>X'S GOAL - ! =MULATION ( A !ORY ( CAPITAL DEVELOPM5T NECESSITAT$ ANALYZ+ CAPITAL 9 T]MS ( LABOR & SURPLUS-LABOR1 VALUE & SURPLUS-VALUE4 ,! VALUE-PRICE TRANS=MATION DOES NOT /& 9 OPPOSITION TO ! AB/RACT VALUE S*EME2 IT M]ELY PO9TS TO ITS LIMITATIONS4 ,M>X SAW NO O!R WAY - & NO O!R WAY HAS YET BE5 F\ND - TO P5ETRATE ! BEWILD]+ CAPITALI/ REALITY & ! CEASELESS FLUX ( ITS DEVELOPM5T EXCEPT ) ! VALUE CONCEPT4 ,! CONTROV]SY >\ND ! VALUE-PRICE TRANS=MATION PROBLEM HAS MEAN:ILE ABAT$4 ,IT IS NO LONG] D\BT$ ?AT IT IS 0POSSIBLE TO CON/RUCT AN ECONOMIC MODEL 9 :I* ! LABOR !ORY ( VALUE IS SET =? AS A SY/EM ( DI/RIBUTION BUT 9 :I* COMMODITIES DO NOT EX*ANGE 9 PROPORTION TO ! AM\NT ( LABOR US$ 9 !IR RESPECTIVE PRODUCTION40.<#a#h.> ,H[EV]1 B\RGEOIS ECONOMY IS NOT 9T]E/$ 9 ! ORIG9 BUT ONLY 9 ! MAK+ ( PR(IT4 ,IT IS 9T]E/$ 9 ! M>KET1 NOT 9 :AT SU/A9S & DET]M9ES ITS ME*ANISM & *ANG+ /RUCTURE4 ,! DEVIATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE C\LD NOT DO AWAY ) ! D]IVATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE SIMPLY BECAUSE SOCIAL PRODUCTION IS TIME SP5T 9 ! LABOR+ PROCESS1 & ! QUANTITY ( PRODUCTS IT COMPRISES CAN NEV] EXCE$ ?AT NUMB] :I* AN EQUIVAL5T QUANTITY ( LABOR TIME CAN PRODUCE4 ,H[EV]1 ! DEVIATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE1 DUE TO ! M>KET RELATIONS :I* REFLECT SOCIAL NECESSITIES )9 ! SY/EM ( CAPITAL PRODUCTION1 IS NOT SU* ?AT VALUE IS DISC]NIBLE 9 PRICE4 ,ASIDE FROM BE+ A PRACTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY1 IT W\LD BE A SUP]FLU\S UND]TAK+1 = ONLY 9 ITS PRICE =M1 NOT 9 ITS VALUE =M1 DOES ! EVALUATION ( COMMODITIES 9 ! EX*ANGE PROCESS REFLECT ! CAPITALI/ICALLY-MODIFI$ SOCIAL NE$S :I* DET]M9E ! CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION & EXPANSION PROCESS4 ,! DISREG>D ( ! HIDD5 VALUE CONT5T ( COMMODITIES ?R\< ! DEVIATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE 9DICATES ! EXT5T ( 0SOCIALIZATION0 POSSIBLE )9 ! O!RWISE ASOCIAL CAPITALI/ SOCIETY4 ,SO LONG AS ! DEVIATION ( PRICE FROM VALUE SECURES1 9 ONE FA%ION OR ANO!R1 ! NECESS>Y & CAPITALI/ICALLY-DET]M9$ PROPORTION+ ( SOCIAL LABOR VIA ! COMPETITIVE M>KET RELATIONS1 PRICE & M>KET RELATIONS >E ! SOLE CONC]N ( B\RGEOIS !ORY & PRACTICE4 ,)\T EI!R IDEOLOGICAL OR PRACTICAL APPLICABILITY 9 CAPITALI/ SOCIETY1 ! LABOR !ORY ( VALUE C\LD SURVIVE ONLY 9 ! ,M>XI/ CRITIQUE ( B\RGEOIS ECONOMY4 #a4 ,5GELS TO ,C4 ,S*MIDT1 ,M>X-,5GELS1 ,SELECT$ ,CORRESPOND5CE1 P4 #e#f#c4 #b4 ,M>X TO ,5GELS1 ,SELECT$ ,CORRESPOND5CE1 P4 #b#d#h4 #c4 ,CAPITAL1 ,VOL4 ,I,I,I1 P4 #a#i4 #d4 ,CAPITAL1 ,VOL4 ,I1 P4 #a#a#e4 #e4 ,CAPITAL1 ,VOL4 ,I,I,I1 P4 #b#a#a4 #f4 IBID41 P4 #b#a#b4 #g4 ,E4 ,V4 ,BOHM-,BAW]K1 ,K>L ,M>X & ! ,CLOSE ( HIS ,SY/EM1 ,NEW ,YORK1 #a#i#d#i1 PP4 #b#h-#c4 #h4 ,M>X-,5GELS1 ,SELECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 ,I,I1 P4 #d#f#b4 #i4 ,5GELS TO ,C4 ,S*MIDT1 ,SELECT$ ,CORRESPOND5CE1 ,P4 #efc #a4 ,5GELS TO ,KAUTSKY ,SELECT$ ,CORRESPOND5CE1 P4 #d#e#d4 #a#a4 ,M>X-,5GELS1 ,SELECT$ ,WORKS1 ,VOL4 ,I,I1 P4 #d#f#a4 #a#b4 ,CAPITAL1 ,VOL4 ,ILL1 P4 #a#i#h4 #a#c4 ,IBID41 P4 #b#a4 #a#d4 ,IBID41 P4 #a#g4 #a#e4 ,IBID41 P4 #a#b4 #a#f4 IBID41 P4 #i#f#e4 #a#g4 ,K4 ,KORS*1 ,K>L ,M>X1 ,LONDON1 #a#i#c#i1 P4 #a#e#c4 #a#h4 ,J4 ,P4 ,H5D]SON1 0,M>X1 ,CLASSICAL ,ECONOMICS1 & ! ,LABOR ,!ORY ( ,VALUE10 ,! ,C5T5NIAL ,REVIEW ( ,>TS & ,SCI5CE1 ,VOL4 ,I,I,I1 #a#i#e#i1 P4 #ddh ,FROM 3 ,M>XI/S4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,M>* #b1 #bba 3 ,*APT] #d -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/