,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #aa 
,LIB]TY & ,PROP]TY 

#aihaih 

,PEOPLE 3 

,AU?OR 3 ,B5JAM9 ,R4 ,TUCK] 

,TEXT 3 

,LIB]TY & ,PROP]TY 

,EXC]PT$ FROM ! BOOK2 

,9DIVIDUAL ,LIB]TY  

 ,SELECTIONS ,FROM ! ,WRIT+S ( ,B5JAM9 ,R4 ,TUCK]  

 ,VANGU>D ,PRESS1 ,NEW ,YORK1 #aibf  

 ,KRAUS ,REPR9T ,CO41 ,MILLWOOD1 ,N,Y1 #a#i#g#c4 

 ,MR4 ,HUGO ,BILGRAM ( ,PHILADELPHIA1 AU?OR ( 0,9VOLUNT>Y ,IDL5ESS0 & 0,! ,CAUSE ( ,BUS9ESS ,DEPRESSIONS10 CONTRIBUT$ AN >TICLE TO ,LIB]TY ON 0,! ,RI<T ( ,[N]%IP10 9 :I* HE DEF9$ ?AT RI<T AS 0?AT RELATION BETWE5 A ?+ & A P]SON CREAT$ BY ! SOCIAL PROMISE TO GU>ANTEE POSSESSION02 & !N PROP\ND$ TO ! $ITOR ( ,LIB]TY ! FOLL[+ QUE/ION3  

0,HAS ,AN>*ISM A DIFF]5T CONCEPTION ( ! RI<T ( [N]%IP1 OR IS ?IS RI<T ALTOGE!R REPUDIAT$1 OR IS IT ASSUM$ ?AT \T ( ! RU9S ( GOV]NM5T ANO!R SOCIAL ORGANIZATION1 WIELD+ A SUPREME P[]1 WILL >ISE80 

,MR4 ,TUCK] REPLI$3 

,9 DISCUSS+ SU* A QUE/ION AS ?IS1 IT IS NECESS>Y AT ! />T TO PUT ASIDE1 AS ,MR4 ,BILGRAM D\BTLESS DOES PUT ASIDE1 ! 9TUITIVE IDEA ( RI<T1 ! CONCEPTION ( RI<T AS A /&>D :I* WE >E EXPECT$ TO OBS]VE FROM MOTIVES SUPPOS$ TO BE SUP]IOR TO ! CONSID]ATION ( \R 9T]E/S4 ,:5 ,I SPEAK ( ! 0RI<T ( [N]%IP10 ,I DO NOT USE ! WORD 0RI<T0 9 ?AT S5SE AT ALL4 ,9 ! ?\<T ?AT ,I TAKE TO BE FUNDAM5TAL 9 ,MR4 ,BILGRAM'S >GUM5T - NAMELY1 ?AT !RE IS NO RI<T1 FROM ! /&PO9T ( A SOCIETY1 O!R ?AN SOCIAL EXP$I5CY - ,I FULLY CONCUR4 ,BUT ,I AM EQUALLY C]TA9 ?AT ! /&>D ( SOCIAL EXP$I5CY - ?AT IS TO SAY1 ! FACTS AS TO :AT REALLY IS SOCIALLY EXP$I5T1 & ! G5]ALIZATIONS FROM ?OSE FACTS :I* WE MAY CALL ! LAWS ( SOCIAL EXP$I5CY - EXI/S AP>T FROM ! DECREE ( ANY SOCIAL P[] :ATEV]4 ,9 ACCORDANCE ) ?IS VIEW1 ! ,AN>*I/IC DEF9ITION ( ! RI<T ( [N]%IP1 :ILE CLOSELY RELAT$ TO ,MR4 ,BILGRAM'S1 IS SU* A MODIFICATION ( HIS ?AT IT DOES NOT C>RY ! IMPLICATION :I* HIS C>RIES & :I* HE PO9TS \T4 ,FROM AN ,AN>*I/IC /&PO9T1 ! RI<T ( [N]%IP IS ?AT CONTROL ( A ?+ BY A P]SON :I* WILL RECEIVE EI!R SOCIAL SANCTION1 OR ELSE UNANIM\S 9DIVIDUAL SANCTION1 :5 ! LAWS ( SOCIAL EXP$I5CY %ALL HAVE BE5 F9ALLY DISCOV]$4 7,( C\RSE ,I MI<T GO F>!R & EXPLA9 ?AT ,AN>*ISM CONSID]S ! GREATE/ AM\NT ( LIB]TY COMPATIBLE ) EQUALITY ( LIB]TY ! FUNDAM5TAL LAW ( SOCIAL EXP$I5CY1 & ?AT NE>LY ALL ,AN>*I/S CONSID] LABOR TO BE ! ONLY BASIS ( ! RI<T ( [N]%IP 9 H>MONY ) ?AT LAW2 BUT ?IS IS NOT ESS5TIAL TO ! DEF9ITION1 OR TO ! REFUTATION ( ,MR4 ,BILGRAM'S PO9T AGA9/ ,AN>*ISM47 

,IT WILL BE SE5 ?AT ! ,AN>*I/IC DEF9ITION JU/ GIV5 DOES NOT IMPLY NECESS>ILY ! EXI/5CE ( AN ORGANIZ$ OR 9/ITUT$ SOCIAL P[] TO 5=CE ! RI<T ( [N]%IP4 ,IT CONTEMPLATES A TIME :5 SOCIAL SANCTION %ALL BE SUP]S$$ BY A UNANIM\S 9DIVIDUAL SANCTION1 ?US R5D]+ 5=CEM5T NE$LESS4 ,BUT 9 SU* AN EV5T1 BY ,MR4 ,BILGRAM'S DEF9ITION1 ! RI<T ( [N]%IP W\LD CEASE TO EXI/4 ,9 O!R WORDS1 HE SEEMS TO ?9K ?AT1 IF ALL M5 W]E TO AGREE UPON A PROP]TY /&>D & %\LD VOLUNT>ILY OBS]VE IT1 PROP]TY W\LD !N HAVE NO EXI/5CE SIMPLY BECAUSE ( ! ABS5CE ( ANY 9/ITUTION TO PROTECT IT4 ,N[1 9 ! VIEW ( ! ,AN>*I/S1 PROP]TY W\LD !N EXI/ 9 ITS P]FECTION4 

,SO ,I W\LD ANSW] ,MR4 ,BILGRAM'S QUE/ION1 AS PUT 9 HIS CONCLUD+ P>AGRAPH1 AS FOLL[S3 ,AN>*ISM DOES NOT REPUDIATE ! RI<T ( [N]%IP1 BUT IT HAS A CONCEPTION !RE( SUFFICI5TLY DIFF]5T FROM ,MR4 ,BILGRAM'S TO 9CLUDE ! POSSIBILITY ( AN 5D ( ?AT SOCIAL ORGANIZATION :I* WILL >ISE1 NOT \T ( ! RU9S ( GOV]NM5T1 BUT \T ( ! TRANS=MATION ( GOV]NM5T 9TO VOLUNT>Y ASSOCIATION = DEF5SE4 

,FROM 3 ,FLAG4,BLACK5$4NET4 

,*RONOLOGY 3 
,NOVEMB] #c1 #aig 3 ,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #aa -- ,PUBLICATION4 
,FEBRU>Y #b#b1 #bag 3 ,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #aa -- ,ADD$4 

 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3  
HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/