,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #e ,LIB]TY & ,ORGANIZATION #aihaih ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,B5JAM9 ,R4 ,TUCK] ,TEXT 3 ,LIB]TY & ,ORGANIZATION ,EXC]PT$ FROM ! BOOK2 ,9DIVIDUAL ,LIB]TY ,SELECTIONS ,FROM ! ,WRIT+S ( ,B5JAM9 ,R4 ,TUCK] ,VANGU>D ,PRESS1 ,NEW ,YORK1 #aibf ,KRAUS ,REPR9T ,CO41 ,MILLWOOD1 ,N,Y1 #a#i#g#c4 ,?IRTY-FIVE YE>S AGO ! ,P]SONAL ,RI*ISM1 BUT ?AT FACT WAS NOT REALIZ$ BY ,LEVY1 ,WORDSWOR? ,DONI/HORPE & O!R CONTRIBUTORS TO ! COLUMNS ( ! ,J\RNAL1 :I* L$ TO DISCUSSIONS BETWE5 ?OSE G5TLEM5 & ! $ITOR ( ,LIB]TY CONC]N+ ,AN>*ISM & ORGANIZATION1 TAXATION1 ETC4 ,MR4 ,TUCK]'S REM>KS >E H]E SET =?3 ,NAMES ASIDE1 ! ?+ ?AT ,9DIVIDUALISM FAVORS IS ORGANIZATION TO MA9TA9 ! WIDE/ LIB]TY EQUALLY = ALL CITIZ5S4 ,WELL1 ?AT IS PRECISELY :AT ,AN>*ISM FAVORS4 ,9DIVIDUALISM DOES NOT WANT SU* ORGANIZATION ANY LONG] ?AN IS NECESS>Y4 ,NEI!R DOES ,AN>*ISM4 ,MR4 ,LEVY'S ASSUMPTION ?AT ,AN>*ISM DOES NOT WANT SU* ORGANIZATION AT ALL >ISES FROM HIS FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE ! ,AN>*I/IC DEF9ITION ( GOV]NM5T4 ,GOV]NM5T HAS BE5 DEF9$ REPEAT$LY 9 !SE COLUMNS AS ! SUBJECTION ( ! NON9VASIVE 9DIVIDUAL TO A WILL NOT HIS [N4 ,! SUBJECTION ( ! 9VASIVE 9DIVIDUAL IS NOT GOV]NM5T1 BUT RESI/ANCE TO & PROTECTION FROM GOV]NM5T4 ,BY !SE DEF9ITIONS GOV]NM5T IS ALWAYS AN EVIL1 BUT RESI/ANCE TO IT IS NEV] AN EVIL OR A POISON4 ,CALL SU* RESI/ANCE AN ANTIDOTE IF Y\ WILL1 BUT REMEMB] ?AT NOT ALL ANTIDOTES >E POISON\S4 ,! WOR/ ?AT CAN BE SAID ( RESI/ANCE OR PROTECTION IS1 NOT ?AT IT IS AN EVIL1 BUT ?AT IT IS A LOSS ( PRODUCTIVE =CE 9 A NECESS>Y EF=T TO OV]COME EVIL4 ,IT CAN BE CALL$ AN EVIL ONLY 9 ! S5SE ?AT NE$FUL & NOT ESPECIALLY HEAL?FUL LABOR CAN BE CALL$ A CURSE4 ,GOV]NM5T IS 9VASION1 & ! ,/ATE IS ! EMBODIM5T ( 9VASION 9 AN 9DIVIDUAL1 OR B& ( 9DIVIDUALS1 ASSUM+ TO ACT AS REPRES5TATIVES OR MA/]S ( ! 5TIRE PEOPLE )9 A GIV5 >EA4 ,! ,AN>*I/S >E OPPOS$ TO ALL GOV]NM5T1 & ESPECIALLY TO ! ,/ATE AS ! WOR/ GOV]NOR & *IEF 9VAD]4 ,FROM ,LIB]TY'S /&PO9T1 !RE >E NOT ?REE POSITIONS1 BUT TWO3 ONE1 ?AT ( ! AU?ORIT>IAN ,SOCIALI/S1 FAVOR+ GOV]NM5T & ! ,/ATE2 ! O!R1 ?AT ( ! ,9DIVIDUALI/S & ,AN>*I/S1 AGA9/ GOV]NM5T & ! ,/ATE4 ,I MAY ADD1 9 CONCLUSION1 ?AT V]Y PROBABLY ! DISPOSITION ( ! ,9DIVIDUALI/ TO GIVE GREAT] PROM95CE ?AN DOES ! ,AN>*I/ TO ! NECESSITY ( ORGANIZATION = PROTECTION IS DUE TO ! FACT ?AT HE SEEMS TO SEE LESS CLE>LY ?AN ! ,AN>*I/ ?AT ! NECESSITY = DEF5SE AGA9/ 9DIVIDUAL 9VAD]S IS L>GELY & P]HAPS1 9 ! 5D1 :OLLY DUE TO ! OPPRESSIONS ( ! 9VASIVE ,/ATE1 & ?AT :5 ! ,/ATE FALLS1 CRIM9ALS WILL BEG9 TO DISAPPE>4 0,:ATEV] ELSE ,AN>*ISM MAY MEAN1 IT MEANS ?AT ,/ATE CO]CION ( PEACEABLE CITIZ5S1 9TO COOP]ATION 9 RE/RA9+ ! ACTIVITY ( ,BILL ,SIKES1 IS TO BE CONDEMN$ & \*ISM IMPLIES ! RI*I/ MAY VOLUNT>ILY COOP]ATE TO *ECK AGGRESSION2 BUT ALSO HE MAY NOT4 ,QUA ,AN>*I/1 HE IS )9 HIS RI ! BURD5 ( RESI/ANCE TO AGGRESSION1 OR 9 LEAV+ ! AGGRESSOR TO TRIUMPH UN*ECK$4 ,9DIVIDUALISM1 ON ! O!R H&1 W\LD NOT ONLY RE/RA9 ! ACTIVE 9VAD] UP TO ! PO9T NECESS>Y TO RE/ORE FRE$OM TO O!RS1 BUT W\LD ALSO CO]CE ! MAN :O W\LD O!RWISE BE A PASSIVE WITNESS (1 OR CONNIV] AT1 AGGRESSION 9TO COOP]ATION AGA9/ HIS MORE ACTIVE COLLEAGUE40 ,! =EGO+ P>AGRAPH OCCURS 9 ANY ABLY-WRITT5 >TICLE BY ,MR4 ,J4 ,H4 ,LEVY 9 ! ,P]SONAL ,RI*ISM 9 AN UNFAVORABLE LI*ISM2 & HE HAS NOT DI/ORT$ IT4 ,I REPR9T ! P>AGRAPH 9 $ITORIAL TYPE = ! PURPOSE ( GIV+ IT1 AS AN ,AN>*I/1 MY 5TIRE APPROVAL1 B>R+ ! /IGMA S\*I/S >E NOT AFRAID ( !IR PR9CIPLES4 ,IT IS F> MORE SATISFACTORY TO HAVE ONE'S POSITION /AT$ BALDLY & ACCURATELY BY AN OPPON5T :O UND]/&S IT ?AN 9 A G5IAL1 MILK-&-WAT]1 & 9ACCURATE FA%ION BY AN IGNORAMUS4 ,IT IS AGRE$1 !N1 ?AT1 9 ,AN>*ISM'S VIEW1 AN 9DIVIDUAL HAS A RI A MAN :O IS M9D+ HIS [N BUS9ESS & =CE HIM 9TO A FI HIM = ! PURPOSE ( =C+ HIM TO HELP US TO CO]CE A P>5T 9TO $UCAT+ HIS *ILD1 OR TO COMMIT ANO!R ACT ( 9VASION ?AT MAY SEEM TO US = ! G5]AL GOOD8 ,I CAN SEE NO E?ICAL DI/9CTION H]E :ATEV]4 ,IT IS TRUE ?AT ,MR4 ,LEVY1 9 ! SUCCE$+ P>AGRAPHS1 JU/IFIES ! COLL>+ ( ! NON-COOP]ATIVE 9DIVIDUAL ON ! GR\ND ( NECESSITY4 7,I NOTE H]E ?AT ?IS IS ! SAME GR\ND ON :I* ,CITIZ5 ,MO/ PROPOSES TO COLL> ! NON-COOP]ATOR 9 HIS COMMUNI/IC 5T]PRISES & MAKE HIM WORK = LOVE 9/EAD ( WAGES47 ,BUT SOME O!R MOTIVE ?AN NECESSITY MU/ HAVE BE5 9 ,MR4 ,LEVY'S M9D1 UNCONSCI\SLY1 :5 HE WROTE ! P>AGRAPH :I* ,I HAVE QUOT$4 ,ELSE :Y DOES HE D5Y ?AT ! NON-COOP]ATOR IS 0)9 HIS RIY4 ,NECESS>Y TO :AT8 ,NECESS>Y1 ANSW]S ,MR4 ,LEVY1 09 ORD] ?AT FRE$OM MAY BE AT ! MAXIMUM40 ,SUPPOS+ = ! MOM5T ?AT ?IS IS TRUE ANO!R 9QUIRY SUGGE/S ITSELF3 ,IS ! ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM ( FRE$OM AN 5D TO BE ATTA9$ AT ANY CO/8 ,I REG>D LIB]TY AS ! *IEF ESS5TIAL TO MAN'S HAPP9ESS1 & !RE=E AS ! MO/ IMPORTANT ?+ 9 ! WORLD1 & ,I C]TA9LY WANT AS MU* ( IT AS ,I CAN GET4 ,BUT ,I CANNOT SEE ?AT IT CONC]NS ME MU* :E!R ! AGGREGATE AM\NT ( LIB]TY 5JOY$ BY ALL 9DIVIDUALS ADD$ TOGE!R IS AT ITS MAXIMUM OR A LITTLE BEL[ IT1 IF ,I1 AS ONE 9DIVIDUAL1 AM TO HAVE LITTLE OR NONE ( ?IS AGGREGATE4 ,IF1 H[EV]1 ,I AM TO HAVE AS MU* LIB]TY AS O!RS1 & IF O!RS >E TO HAVE AS MU* AS ,I1 !N1 FEEL+ SECURE 9 :AT WE HAVE1 IT WILL BEHOOVE US ALL UND\BT$LY TO TRY TO ATTA9 ! MAXIMUM ( LIB]TY COMPATIBLE ) ?IS CONDITION ( EQUALITY4 ,:I* BR+S US BACK TO ! FAMILI> LAW ( EQUAL LIB]TY2 ! GREATE/ AM\NT ( 9DIVIDUAL LIB]TY COMPATIBLE ) ! EQUALITY ( LIB]TY4 ,BUT ?IS MAXIMUM ( LIB]TY IS A V]Y DIFF]5T ?+ FROM ?AT :I* IS TO BE ATTA9$1 ACCORD+ TO ! HYPO!SIS1 ONLY BY VIOLAT+ EQUALITY ( LIB]TY4 ,=1 C]TA9LY1 TO CO]CE ! PEACEFUL NON-COOP]ATOR IS TO VIOLATE EQUALITY ( LIB]TY4 ,IF MY NEIY 9 ORD] ?AT WEAL? MAY BE AT ! MAXIMUM4 ,( C\RSE ,MR4 ,LEVY W\LD ANSW] TO ?IS ?AT ! HYPO!SIS IS ABSURD1 & ?AT ! MAXIMUM C\LD NOT BE SO ATTA9$2 BUT HE CLE>LY W\LD HAVE TO ADMIT1 IF PRESS$1 ?AT1 EV5 IF IT C\LD1 ! 5D IS NOT IMPORTANT 5\< TO JU/IFY SU* MEANS4 ,TO BE LOGICAL HE MU/ MAKE ! SAME ADMISSION REG>D+ HIS [N PROPOSITION4 ,BUT AFT] ALL1 IS ! HYPO!SIS ANY MORE ABSURD 9 ! ONE CASE ?AN 9 ! O!R8 ,I ?9K NOT4 ,IT SEEMS TO ME JU/ AS IMPOSSIBLE TO ATTA9 ! MAXIMUM ( LIB]TY BY DEPRIV+ PEOPLE ( !IR LIB]TY AS TO ATTA9 ! MAXIMUM ( WEAL? BY DEPRIV+ PEOPLE ( !IR WEAL?4 ,9 FACT1 IT SEEMS TO ME ?AT 9 BO? CASES ! MEANS IS ABSOLUTELY DE/RUCTIVE ( ! 5D4 ,MR4 ,LEVY WI%ES TO RE/RICT ! FUNCTIONS ( GOV]NM5T2 N[1 ! COMPULSORY COOP]ATION ?AT HE ADVOCATES IS ! *IEF OB/ACLE 9 ! WAY ( SU* RE/RICTION4 ,TO BE SURE1 GOV]NM5T RE/RICT$ BY ! REMOVAL ( ?IS OB/ACLE W\LD NO LONG] BE GOV]NM5T1 AS ,MR4 ,LEVY IS 0QUICK-WITT$ 5\< TO SEE0 7TO RETURN ! COMPLIM5T :I* HE PAYS ! ,AN>*I/S74 ,BUT :AT ( ?AT8 ,IT W\LD /ILL BE A P[] = PREV5T+ ?OSE 9VASIVE ACTS :I* ! PEOPLE >E PRACTICALLY AGRE$ 9 WANT+ TO PREV5T4 ,IF IT %\LD ATTEMPT TO GO BEYOND ?IS1 IT W\LD BE PROMPTLY *ECK$ BY A DIM9UTION ( ! SUPPLIES4 ,! P[] TO CUT (F ! SUPPLIES IS ! MO/ EFFECTIVE WEAPON AGA9/ TYRANNY4 ,TO SAY1 AS ,MR4 ,LEVY DOES1 ?AT TAXATION MU/ BE COEXT5SIVE ) GOV]NM5T0 IS NOT ! PROP] WAY TO PUT IT4 ,IT IS GOV]NM5T 7OR1 RA!R1 ! ,/ATE7 ?AT MU/ & WILL BE COEXT5SIVE ) TAXATION4 ,:5 COMPULSORY TAXATION IS ABOLI%$1 !RE WILL BE NO ,/ATE1 & ! DEF5SIVE 9/ITUTION ?AT WILL SUCCE$ IT WILL BE /EADILY DET]R$ FROM BECOM+ AN 9VASIVE 9/ITUTION ?R\< FE> ?AT ! VOLUNT>Y CONTRIBUTIONS WILL FALL (F4 ,?IS CON/ANT MOTIVE = A VOLUNT>Y DEF5SIVE 9/ITUTION TO KEEP ITSELF TRIMM$ D[N TO ! POPUL> DEM& IS ITSELF ! BE/ POSSIBLE SAFEGU>D AGA9/ ! BUGBE> ( MULTITUD9\S RIVAL POLITICAL AG5CIES :I* SEEMS TO HAUNT ,MR4 ,LEVY4 ,HE SAYS ?AT ! VOLUNT>Y TAXATIONI/S >E VICTIMS ( AN ILLUSION4 ,! *>GE MITICLE1 H[EV]1 IS EXCIT$ BY HIS VALID CRITICISM ( ?OSE ,9DIVIDUALI/S :O ACCEPT VOLUNT>Y TAXATION4 BUT /OP %ORT1 OR ?9K !Y /OP %ORT1 ( ,AN>*ISM4 ,FROM 3 ,FLAG4,BLACK5$4NET4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,NOVEMB] #c1 #aig 3 ,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #e -- ,PUBLICATION4 ,FEBRU>Y #b#b1 #bag 3 ,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #e -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/