,FROM ,:5CE ,DO ,PROP]TY ,TITLES ,>ISE8 ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,WILLIAM ,GILLIS ,TEXT 3 ,MANY M>KET !ORI/S TAKE PROP]TY TITLES AS AXIOMATIC & !N DEVELOP CO]CIVE APP>ATUSES TO 5=CE !M -- JU/IFY+ SU* CO]CION BY APPEAL+ TO NOTIONS LIKE IMPLICIT CONS5T &_/OR ! JU/NESS ( CONTRACTS ?AT SELL (F P>T ( ONE'S AG5CY 9 ! FUTURE4 ,?IS RI*O-COMMUNI/S4 ,LEFT M>KET !ORI/S 9 TURN T5D TO WRITE (F !SE APPREH5SIONS AS A CONT5TION OV] DIFF]+ IDEAL SY/EMS ( PROP]TY -- IE DIFF]5CES OV] :AT CON/ITUTES AB&ONM5T & ! G5]AL VIABILITY ( COLLECTIVE PROP]TY4 ,BUT ?IS1 AS ,I'VE >GU$ TIME & TIME AGA91 IS A PR(\NDLY LIMIT$ UND]/&+ ( ! CRITICISMS BE+ LOBB$ AGA9/ !M4 ,FIR/ (F1 NOT EV]Y SY/EM ( M$IAT+ BETWE5 DIFF]5T PEOPLE'S DESIRES OR USES = OBJECTS IS DESCRIBABLE 9 T]MS ( PROP]TY TITLES4 ,PROP]TY TITLES >E CLAIMS BY DISCRETE AG5TS TO ABSOLUTE VETO P[] OV] ! USE ( AN OBJECT2 !Y'RE A CON/RUCT US$ = NEGOTIAT+ BETWE5 ! JU/NESS ( USES BY 9DIVIDUALS ) COMPET+ 9T5TIONS = AN OBJECT4 ,PROP]TY TITLES SOLVE ! PROBLEM BY DET]M9+ :E!R ,A OR ,B !N GETS TO P]SONALLY MAKE ! DECISION BETWE5 DIRECTION #a OR #b = A GIV5 OBJECT4 .-.- ,BUT ?IS CLE>LY ISN'T ! ONLY WAY TO APPROA* SU* SITUATIONS4 ,:5 AN>*O-COMMUNI/S TALK ( SOCIETIES )\T ! CONCEPT ( PROP]TY !Y (T5 MEAN A SOCIAL SY/EM :]E DECISIONS OV] H[ TO USE ANY SPECIFIC OBJECT OR RES\RCE >E NEV] LIMIT$ TO A DISCRETE BODY ( SELECT 9DIVIDUALS BUT >E RA!R DISCUSSIONS OP5 TO ANYONE & EV]YONE ) A /AKE1 DESIRE OR IDEA TO CONTRIBUTE4 ,!RE ! CRITICAL ECONOMIC 5TITIES >E DIRECTIONS RA!R ?AN VETO-TITLES1 CONCEPTS RA!R ?AN 9DIVIDUALS4 ,! M$IATION PROCESSES POSSIBLE CAN BE 9CR$IBLY COMPLEX & DYNAMIC4 ,SO ON A PROTOZOIC LEVEL Y\ MIE GO+ TO HAVE A MORE USEFUL PROPOSAL = ITS USE74 ,:ILE AGGREGATE SY/EMS ( MORE ADVANC$ ME*ANISMS >E VISIBLE 9 ! OP5 S\RCE DEVELOPM5T4 ,9 %ORT :]E ! MO/ SC>CE RES\RCE IS P]SONAL TIME & ! WEIE/ ?+ TO CURR5CY4 ,AT ! SAME TIME !RE >E (T5 SC>CITIES 9 SPACE 7FUNCTIONALLY ID5TICAL TO MAT]IAL7 = WIDELY V>Y+ PROJECTS & 9 RESPONSE 5TIRE ECOSY/EMS ( DISCUSSION OP5 UP4 ,IT'S WOR? NOT+ ?AT UND] MANY SY/EMS ( PROP]TY-TITLES IF ! LEGAL EXP]TS CANNOT REA* CONS5SUS ON :O IS ! LEGITIMATE [N] ( AN OBJECT NO?+ IS DONE ) ! OBJECT 9 ! MEANTIME4 ,?OSE 9VOLV$ 9 CONT5D+ DIFF]+ USES = AN OBJECT 9 A PROP]TY-LESS SOCIETY >E DIRECTLY CAPABLE ( F> MORE DIV]SE MEANS ( NEGOTIATION1 BUT SO TO1 IF !Y CAN'T REA* CONS5SUS1 !N NO?+ IS DONE ) ! OBJECT4 ,BECAUSE LIT]ALLY EV]YONE 9 ! WORLD HAS ! CAPACITY TO VETO4 ,TO SOME ?IS MI -- :ILE A PHILOSOPHICALLY COH]5T C\NT]-PROPOSAL TO PROP]TY1 & EV5 BRIEFLY WORKABLE ON A SMALL LEVEL -- COMPLETELY BAT%IT 9SANE4 ,& MAYBE SO4 ,BUT 9 PRACTICE SU* EXT]NAL-TO-PROP]TY APPROA*ES >E (T5 WORKABLE 5\<4 ,! LONE IMMATURE 9T]JECT+ TR\BLEMAK]1 OR ANY O!R CONCEIVABLE EXPLOIT ( CONS5SUS1 SIMPLY DOESN'T EXI/ AFT] A FEW SOCIAL IT]ATIONS4 ,BECAUSE EV]YONE IS DEP5D5T UPON EV]YONE ELSE1 NO MATT] H[ DI/ANT A COMMUNITY !Y COME FROM & ?US ITS 9 !IR 9T]E/ TO MA9TA91 DEVELOP & CONVEY GOODWILL4 ,OBVI\SLY H[EV]1 JU/ BECAUSE SU* DIFF]+ ECONOMIC APPROA*ES MIE = A FRACTION ( ! 5]GY ,MICROS(T SP5DS DOESN'T MEAN ?AT IT CAN DO ?+S LIKE MOVE GOODS BETWE5 LOCATIONS TO SATISFY DEM& EFFICI5TLY OR SIGNAL ALL ! CO/S ( ONE CONSUMPTION V]SUS ANO!R4 ,)\T ! CAPACITY TO ASSIGN VALUE TO SPATIAL_/PHYSICAL RELATION%IPS 7AS ) ! REALM ( ACTORS & OBJECTS7 ONE CAN'T CONCRETELY M$IATE BETWE5 ?OSE RELATION%IPS4 ,& :ATEV] ! DOM9ANT DILEMMAS MITICUL>LY CONTROV]SIAL TO ASS]T ?AT ! PLACEM5T ( MAT]IAL OBJECTS IS ! C5TRAL CALCULATIONAL PROBLEM 9 ! WORLD TODAY4 ,SOME =M ( PROP]TY TITLES SEEMS CALL$ =1 H[EV] /ICKY1 H[EV] COLLECTIVELY OR 9DIVIDUALLY MANAG$4 ,! PO9T IS ?AT'S A DEBATE OV] FITNESS4 ,:ILE IT MAY BE UNDESIRABLE1 IT REMA9S 5TIRELY POSSIBLE TO CON/RUCT A SOCIETY \TSIDE ( PROP]TY ALTOGE!R4 ,FOLL[+ ! POPUL> SLOGAN 0,EV]Y?+ = ,EV]YONE0 ! /UBBORN M>KET !ORI/ MIILY BE WRONG4 ,BUT AS A !ORETICAL FRAMEWORK 9 SU* 9/ANCE PROP]TY TITLES W\LD BE MISS+ ! PO9T4 ,NO ONE 9 ?AT SOCIETY W\LD ?9K 9 ANY?+ APPROA*+ SU* T]MS4 ,:I* LEADS US TO A SECOND CRITIQUE ( PROP]TY4 ,IT'S NOT H>D TO COME TO ! CONCLUSION ?AT ! V]Y ADOPTION ( PROP]TY TITLES 9 \R M9DS LEADS T[>D A WORLDVIEW ( 9CREAS+ COMP>TM5TALIZATION & TAXONOMY4 ,9DE$ ?IS IS A POPUL> ASSUMPTION4 ,BY PROGRESSIVELY *OPP+ UP ! WORLD >\ND US1 ! NOTION GOES1 WE BECOME 9CL9$ TO VIEW ! WORLD SOLELY AS A TALLY %EET ( [N]%IP4 ,=GIVE ! DIGRESSION TO MY #iS ,NICKELODEON *ILDHOOD1 BUT 9 ILLU/RATION ,I AM REM9D$ ( AN EPISODE ( ,ANGRY ,BEAV]S 9 :I* ! BRO!RS SUDD5LY DISCOV] ?AT !Y EA* HAVE A MUSK P\* CAPABLE ( M>K+ ITEMS ) A COLOR$ P]SONAL /5* ?AT REPELS EV]YONE BUT !MSELVES4 ,?IS QUICKLY SETS (F A W> ( P]SONAL CLAIM UNTIL ! 5TIRE WORLD IS DIVVI$ UP ) ONE /5* OR ! O!R1 EA* BRO!R MORE & MORE COMPLETELY OBSESS$ ) ! TALLY UNTIL !Y CAN ?9K ( NO?+ ELSE4 ,?IS IS P]HAPS ! MO/ CLASSIC CRITICISM ( CAPITALISM -- ONE ( SIMPLE PSY*OLOGY -- & YET IT SEEMS TO BE A CRITIQUE M>KET !ORI/S >E 9CAPABLE ( P>S+4 ,TO MANY AN ANTI-CAPITALI/ ! PROBLEM ) ! CAPITALI/ FRAMEWORK IS ITS 9H]5T B5T T[>DS MAT]IALISM1 ULTIMATELY TO ! PO9T ( TREAT+ HUMAN BE+S AS OBJECTS4 ,BUT ?IS IS 9COMPREH5SIBLE = ,LIB]T>IANS BECAUSE !Y SEE RESPECT = PROP]TY TITLES AS 5TIRELY /EMM+ FROM A RESPECT = P]SONAL AG5CY4 ,9 PRACTICAL1 EV]YDAY T]MS RESPECT = ANO!R P]SON'S AG5CY (T5 COMES D[N TO A RESPECT = ! 9VIOLABILITY ( !IR BODY4 ,DO NOT %OOT !M1 DO NOT RAPE !M1 DO NOT TORTURE !M4 ,BECAUSE HUMANS >E TOOL US+ CREATURES LIKE H]MIT CRABS !RE IS (T5 NO CLE> L9E BETWE5 \R BIOMASS & \R POSSESSIONS 7WE USE CLO!S 9/EAD ( FUR1 RETA9 DEAD MASS EXCRET$ AS HAIR FOLLICLES1 ETC471 & SO A RESPECT = ANO!R'S P]SON SEEMS TO EXT5D 9 SOME WAYS TO A RESPECT = ?+S ?AT !Y USE4 ,BEG9 TO TALK ( ,RIE CLE>LY ON TO SOME?+4 ,EV5 SETT+ ASIDE ! EVOLUTION>Y COGNITIVE BIASES ( HOMO SAPI5S1 WE AS 9DIVIDUALS HAVE LIMIT$ PROCESS+4 ,WE CAN'T ?9K EV]Y?+ AT ! SAME TIME4 ,IF SOME ( ! ?\Y TO SUCCE$ & FL\RI% UND] 9 A GIV5 SY/EM RUN \T ( CONTROL & TAKE UP MORE & MORE SPACE1 O!RS -- LIKE ?OSE BEH9D :Y WE ADOPT$ ?AT SY/EM 9 ! FIR/ PLACE -- WILL GET PU%$ TO ! P]IPH]Y4 ,IF A C]TA9 METRIC IS SET AS ! ALPHA & OMEGA ( A SOCIETY1 :E!R IT BE ! ACQUISITION ( A SPECIFIC UNIV]SAL CURR5CY OR SIMPLY AGGREGATE ATOMS1 ITS /ATUS AS ! REQUIREM5T OR KEY TO ANY PURSUIT OR DESIRE CAN 5D UP HAV+ AN EFFECT UPON ?OSE PURSUITS & DESIRES4 ,ANTI-CAPITALI/S (T5 DIS+5U\SLY BLUR ! DI/9CTION BETWE5 WEAL? & CO]CIVE P[] -- WEAL? &_/OR DISEQUILIBRIA 9 WEAL? DO NOT 9H]5TLY HAVE TO GRANT ANY CAPACITY = SOCIAL CONTROL -- BUT IT'S C]TA9LY TRUE ?AT DIRECT PURSUITS ( P[] & WEAL? %>E ! SAME =M4 ,S+LEM9D$NESS IS PROGRESSIVELY REW>D$1 UNTIL ! 9]TIA ( ?IS APPROA* CR[DS \T ( M9D ! REASON WE ORIG9ALLY ASSIGN$ VALUE TO WEAL? OR P[]4 ,CONSEQU5TLY1 RA!R ?AN FOCUS ON ACCUMULAT+ PROP]TY TITLES OR MONEY AS A GATEWAY TO OPPORTUNITY1 AN>*O-COMMUNI/S >GUE1 WE %\LD FOCUS ON ACCUMULAT+ GOODWILL4 ,I DON'T DISAGREE4 ,BUT ONCE Y\ *>ACT]IZE ?IS FOCUS ON GOODWILL 9 M>KET T]MS1 A LA SOME?+ SIMIL> TO ,DOCTOR['S REPUTATION M>KETS1 ! PA? \T ( ALL !SE TANGLES BECOMES APP>5T4 ,IT SEEMS PRETTY DAMN CLE> ?AT PROP]TY TITLES >E A TOOL ) 9CR$IBLE UTILITY 9 ! WORLD AS IT EXI/S TODAY & ! TE*NICAL *ALL5GES WE FACE4 ,AS SU* IT /&S TO REASON ?AT ?OSE )9 A GOODWILL FOCUS$ AN>*O-COMMUNI/ SOCIETY /& A COMP>ATIVE ADVANTAGE TO NEGOTIATE & ADOPT A SECOND-ORD] SY/EM = DEVELOP+ & RECOGNIZ+ PROP]TY TITLES4 ,REG>DLESS ( PRECISELY H[ !IR M>KET 5DS UP DYNAMICALLY M$IAT+ ?IS1 GOODWILL W\LD REMA9 ! PRIM>Y GOOD CAPABLE ( BE+ TURN$ 9TO1 AMONG O!R ?+S1 SELECTIVE VETO USE TITLES TO PHYSICAL OBJECTS4 ,AS SU* WE CAN CLE> ! PSY*OLOGICAL HURTLE3 )\T A /ATE CO]C$ 5=CEM5T SY/EM UND]P9N+ PROP]TY TITLES OR C5TRALIZ$ BANKS & CURR5CY1 PROP]TY TITLES >E NOT AS /ABLE OR UNIV]SALLY APPLICABLE AN 9VE/M5T AS GOODWILL4 ,& GOODWILL1 AS OPPOS$ TO PROP]TY TITLES1 IS DIRECTLY1 ME?ODOLOGICALLY TI$ TO APPRECIAT+ & RESPECT+ PEOPLE AS AG5TS4.<#a.> ,?IS SUGGE/S A WAY TO TACKLE FR+E CONDITIONS 9 [N]%IP4 ,RO?B>D READILY RECOGNIZ$1 = 9/ANCE1 ?AT A WORLD 9 :I* ONE MAN HELD TITLE TO EV]Y?+ W\LD CLE>LY BE 9DISC]NIBLE FROM TYRANNY4 ,EXP& ! NUMB] ( [N]S & Y\'D /ILL HAVE AN OLIG>*Y4 ,EV5 GRANT+ A TOK5 AM\NT ( WEAL? TO ! RE/ ( ! POPULACE W\LDN'T NECESS>ILY JUMP />T ! M>KET & ALL[ IT TO DRIFT BACK 9 A MORE DYNAMIC & EGALIT>IAN DIRECTION1 BECAUSE SAID WEAL? MAY SIMPLY BE 9SUFFICI5T AS CAPITAL4 ,H[EV]1 IF PROP]TY IS A SECOND-ORD] GOOD D]IV$ FROM M>KET 9/ITUTIONS BAS$ 9 REPUTATION_/GOODWILL_/CR$IT1 !N IF ONE CLASS SY/EMATICALLY FUCK$ OV] !IR CR$IT ) ALL ( ANO!R CLASS ! UND]CLASS W\LD NO LONG] HAVE ANY 9C5TIVE TO RESPECT !IR TITLE CLAIMS BECAUSE NO 9DIVIDUAL )9 IT W\LD FE> EV5 M>G9AL SANCTION OR LOSS ( GOODWILL = OCCUPY+ & APPROPRIAT+ !IR WEAL?4 ,SIMPLY PUT1 IF BE=E ANYONE ELSE CAN DO ANY?+ ON A NEW COLONY ,I CREATE ROBOTS TO TILL ! 5TIRE SURFACE ( ! PLANET1 ?AT DOESN'T 9H]5TLY CREATE AN 9C5TIVE AMONG ! RE/ ( ! COLONI/S TO RESPECT A VETO-USE CLAIM ON MY P>T TO ! 5TIRE PLANET4 ,IF O!RS ADMIRE & D]IVE VALUE FROM MY MASS-TILL+ PROJECT 7OR FROM ! POT5TIAL PRODUCTS ( IT7 !N MY VOICE IS MORE LIKELY TO BE RESPECT$ 9 DISCUSSION OV] ITS USES1 BUT IF ,I WANT TO OBTA9 ACCEPTANCE ( A VETO-USE CLAIM1 IT W\LD HAVE TO D]IVE FROM ! DESIRE ( O!RS' DESIRE ( SOCIAL CONDITIONS ( RESPECT CONDUCIVE TO UND]TAK+ !IR [N PROJECTS & HAV+ !IR [N /UFF RESPECT$4 ,ONE GRAVITATES T[>DS ADOPT+ PROP]TY TITLES BECAUSE ?R\< !IR EX*ANGE ONE CAN MU* FUR!R MAXIMIZE ! SATIATION ( ONE'S DESIRES 7AGREE+ TO BUTT ! HELL \T ( O!R PEOPLE'S DECISIONS :5 IT COMES TO ! USE ( C]TA9 OBJECTS 9 EX*ANGE = !M BUTT+ ! HELL \T ( Y\R DECISIONS ) O!R OBJECTS74 ,ACCEPT+ MY [N]%IP ( LIT]ALLY EV]Y?+ W\LD MAKE ?AT IMPOSSIBLE4 ,NOT ONLY DOES ?IS COPE ) SU* B\ND>Y CONDITIONS1 BUT IT ALSO ADDRESSES OLD M>XI/ P>ANOIA AB\T ! RUNAWAY ACCUMULATION ( WEAL? ?R\< USURY4 ,VIEW$ 9 ! LIKET1 ,J]EMY ,WEIL&'S OLD PO9T IS EV5 MORE APT3 )\T ! /ATE ! MORE WEAL? Y\ CONTROL ! MORE RIDICUL\SLY Y\ /& TO RISK HAV+ TO PAY ?R\< ! NOSE TO SECURE AGA9/ !FT & BETRAYAL FROM ?OSE Y\'RE PAY+4 ,IT'S EASI] TO /EAL A MILLION DOLL>S FROM ! BANK1 OR A VAULT1 ?AN TO ROB A ?\S& OR SO COMMON PEOPLE4 444 ,IT MAY BE ?AT 9 A FREE M>KET !RE WILL EXI/ A NATURAL1 MEAN P]SONAL WEAL? VALUE1 BEYOND :I* DIM9I%+ RETURNS 5T] QUICKLY1 & BEL[ :I* ONE IS EXTREMELY DISPOS$ T[>DS PR(IT & 5RI*M5T4 ,IT'S A DI/9CTION BETWE5 9=MATION & OBJECTS2 ULTIMATELY Y\ CAN'T /EAL GOOD CR$IT4 ,PEOPLE'S TRU/1 GOODWILL & !IR :OLE PANORAMA ( 9T5TION T[>DS Y\ EXI/S )9 !M 9T]NALLY4 ,IT'S ACCESSIBLE BY ANYONE ANY:]E1 BUT !Y'RE ! ONLY ONES CAPABLE ( *ANG+ IT4 ,!RE >E NO BANKS IT CAN BE KEPT )91 ONLY DI/RIBUT$ COLLECTIVE OR 9/ITUTIONAL RELAY PO9TS ?R\< :I* IT CAN BE CONVEY$4 ,& TRU/ CRITICALLY UND]LIES ALL MAT]IAL TRANSACTIONS4 ,9CID5TALLY ?IS R5D]S ! 5TIRE DEBATE OV] PROPOS$ SY/EMATIC PROHIBITIONS ( WAGES1 R5T1 & 9T]E/ MOOT4 ,OBVI\SLY ALL WILL BE1 9 SOME CONTEXTS1 H[EV] FR+E1 DESIRABLY OR NEUTRALLY REG>D$ BY ALL P>TIES4 ,BUT EV5 IF !Y CROP UP AS L>GE PH5OM5ON1 ?AT'S NOT REASON TO PANIC1 FLIP ! FUCK \T & ORGANIZE %IT LIKE >M$ ROV+ 'HOME/EAD]S' ) IDEOLOGICALLY PRECISE DEF9ITIONS ( LEGITIMATE PROP]TY4 ,9/EAD ! M>KET WILL ALREADY BE READY TO GR9D D[N OR IMP$E ANY VA/ SWA!S ( ACCUMULAT$ WEAL? BECAUSE IT WILL BE ! M>KET ?AT NEGOTIATES ! ACCEPTANCE ( SAID WEAL?4 ,NOT NECESS>ILY ?R\< MALICI\S CRIME1 BUT ?R\< HI<]-LEVEL M>KET ME*ANISMS ?AT ULTIMATELY GIVE RISE ! EXT5T & /R5G? ( CLAIM4 ,AS A M>KET IT MIY 'M>KET4' ,BUT !N WE KNEW IT W\LDN'T4 .<#a.> ,!RE IS A PO9T TO BE MADE H]E AB\T ! PROBLEM ( MANIPULATION1 BUT ,I ?9K IT'S A MU* BROAD] PO9T ?AT NO /RUCTURAL SY/EM CAN ADDRESS DIRECTLY1 BECAUSE ON SU* A LEVEL WE CAN'T DICTATE 9T5T1 WE CAN ONLY RECOGNIZE & WORK >\ND BIASES4 ,SO IT'S NO MORE A FUNDAM5TAL PROBLEM ?AN IT IS = AN>*O-COMMUNISM4 ,?AT SAID1 ,I ?9K 9T5T & PSY*OLOGICAL ISSUES ( CONTROL >E RI*I/ PROJECT4 ,IT JU/ FALLS \TSIDE ! PURVIEW ( ?IS DISCUSSION4 ,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,JANU>Y #b#a1 #bba 3 ,FROM ,:5CE ,DO ,PROP]TY ,TITLES ,>ISE8 -- ,ADD$4 ,JANU>Y #f1 #bbb 3 ,FROM ,:5CE ,DO ,PROP]TY ,TITLES ,>ISE8 -- ,UPDAT$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/