,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #e 
,! ,F,A,I & ! ,C,N,T ,MEET 

,PEOPLE 3 

,AU?OR 3 ,ABEL ,PAZ 

,TEXT 3 

,*,A,P,T,] ,V4 ,! ,F,A,I & ! ,C,N,T MEET 

  

,!RE WAS NO D\BT ?AT ! ,F,A,I HAD A SIGNIFICANT 9FLU5CE ON ! ,C,N,T1 BUT ! RELATION%IP BETWE5 ! TWO ORGANIZATIONS WAS UNCLE>4 ,?AT IS :Y ! ,F,A,I'S ,TI]RA Y ,LIB]TAD EMPHASIZ$ DISAGREEM5TS 9 ! BRIEF >TICLE ?AT IT RAN AB\T ! 9T]NATIONAL RALLY ?AT WE DISCUSS$ 9 ! PREVI\S *APT]4 

0,! VOICE ( ! ,F,A,I WAS NOT HE>D !RE1 :I* W\LD HAVE BE5 ! VOICE ( ,IB]IAN AN>*ISM4 ,IT WAS ABS5T1 & QUITE ABS5T4 ,9 ,SPA91 ! AN>*I/ VOICE HAS MORE RI<T ?AN ANY TO BE HE>D AT !SE MEET+S ( ! ,C,N,T & ,A,I,T40 .<#b#h#a.> 

,ON ,JUNE #a1 ONE DAY BE=E ! ,C,N,T ,CONGRESS WAS DUE TO BEG91 ! ,F,A,I HELD ITS FIR/ ,P59SUL> ,CONF]5CE 9 ,MADRID4 ,ONE HUNDR$ TW5TY C\NTY REPRES5TATIVES W]E PRES5T4 ,! ,CONF]5CE RESOLV$ TO DO ! FOLL[+3  

,CONDUCT A PROPAG&A T\R ?R\<\T ! ,P59SULA1 BEG9N+ ON ,AUGU/ #a4  

,MAKE ! WEEKLY ,TI]RA Y ,LIB]TAD 9TO ! DAILY NEWSPAP] ( ! ,F,A,I1 COM+ \T ( ,MADRID4  

,AFFIRM AN>*ISM )9 ! ,C,N,T4 .<#b#h#b.>  
  

,CONF]5CE P>TICIPANTS ALSO DISCUSS$ ! PRIOR BEHAVIOR ( ! ,P59SUL> ,COMMITTEE4 ,!IR DECL>ATION ON ! MATT] /AT$3  
  

,AFT] A DISCUSSION ( ! FLAW$ CONDUCT ( ! ,F,A,I'S ,P59SUL> ,COMMITTEE BETWE5 ,OCTOB] #aic & ,JANU>Y #a#i#c#a1 WE HAVE DRAWN ! FOLL[+ CONCLUSIONS3 

,?AT COMRADES ,ELIZALDE1 ,H]N&EZ1 & ,SIRV5T ASSUM$ P[]S EXCE$+ ?OSE ASSIGN$ TO !M AS MEMB]S ( ! COMMISSION = REVOLUTION>Y PREP>ATION & DID NOT RESPECT ! RESOLUTION ADOPT$ AT ! ,VAL5CIA MEET+ AGA9/ COLLABORATION ) POLITICIANS FROM ANY CAMP4 ,WE RECOGNIZE ?AT IT W\LD BE EXCESSIVE TO 5UM]ATE ALL ! DETAILS ?AT MAKE UP ! MATT]2 IT IS 5\< TO EXTRACT ! REAL ESS5CE ( ! EV5T4 

,H]E WE ANN\NCE ! APPLICABLE SANCTIONS1 :I* WILL BE ! BEG9N+ ( ! SOLUTION ?AT WE WILL TRY TO GIVE TO ?IS IRRITAT+ 9CID5T3 ,WE RESOLVE ?AT WE WILL NOT TOL]ATE ANO!R DIV]G5CE FROM ! PA?S AGRE$ TO BY ! ,F,A,I AT ! :IM ( ANY ( ITS MEMB]S1 :ATEV] HIS SITUATION )9 ! ORGANIZATION MAY BE4 ,LIKEWISE1 ANYONE :O D>ES TO REPEAT ?IS (F5SE WILL BE REMOV$ FROM !IR PO/S & WILL HAVE TO WAIT1 9 ACCORDANCE ) !IR FUTURE BEHAVIOR1 = ! COLLECTIVE TO RETURN ! TRU/ 9 !M ?AT !Y VIOLAT$4 

,REG>D+ ! COMRADES ?AT HAVE CREAT$ ?IS CIRCUM/ANCE1 :OM WE HAVE NAM$1 WE BELIEVE IT FITT+ ?AT !Y CEASE TO OCCUPY PO/S 9 ! AN>*I/ ORGANIZATION = SOME TIME4 

,! ADDITIONAL DETAILS ( ! 9TIMATE CONTACT ?AT !Y HAD ) ! POLITICAL ELEM5TS1 :ILE C5SURABLE1 >E A P>T ( ! COLLABORATION ?AT WE REJECT4 ,WE ALSO CANNOT ACCEPT ANY ATTEMPT TO JU/IFY !IR ]ROR BY PO9T+ TO AGGRAVAT+ CIRCUM/ANCES4 ,!Y ACT$ AGA9/ A DECISION ( ! ORGANIZATION ?AT !Y REPRES5T4 ,FUR!RMORE1 A PRIOR CONSULTATION ) ! AN>*I/ BODIES W\LD HAVE PREV5T$ ! UNFAVORABLE NATIONAL & 9T]NATIONAL S5SATION ?AT ! COLLECTIVITY HAS HAD TO SUFF]4.<#b#h#c.>  
  

,BY PURIFY+ ITS ORGANIZATION 9 ?IS WAY1 ! ,F,A,I PUT CLOSURE ON ! CONFUS+ P]IOD ( POLITICAL CONSPIRACIES ?AT TOOK PLACE DUR+ ! ,MON>*Y'S LA/ MOM5TS & R5EW$ ! POSSIBILITY ( A BROAD AFFIRMATION ( AN>*ISM4 ,! MATT] ?AT ! ,F,A,I DISCUSS$ & RESOLV$ W\LD ALSO BE C5TRAL TO ! DEBATES AT ! ,C,N,T'S ,?IRD ,CONGRESS1 :I* OCCURR$ BETWE5 ,JUNE #aa & ,JUNE #af 9 ,MADRID'S ,CONS]VATORIO4 

,! LA/ TIME ?AT ! ,C,N,T HAD BE5 ABLE TO HOLD A ,CONGRESS WAS 9 #a#i#a#i4 ,DUR+ ! 9T]V5+ YE>S1 MEET+S OR NATIONAL CONF]5CES GOV]N$ ! ,CONF$]ATION'S ORGANIZATIONAL LIFE1 :I* C\LD 9 NO WAY SUB/ITUTE = A ,CONGRESS4 ,BY #a#i#c#a1 ! ,C,N,T WAS SUFF]+ GREATLY FROM ! LACK ( REGUL> ,CONGRESSES4 ,! NE$ TO MAKE DECISIONS :ILE UND]GR\ND HAD CREAT$ UNDEMOCRATIC & DE/RUCTIVE VICES )9 ! ORGANIZATION4 ,9DE$1 ! GRE5H\SE ( ! UND]GR\ND HAD 9CUBAT$ ! ,C,N,T'S 9T]NAL CRISIS4 

,:ILE CL>IFY+ ! ORGANIZATION'S POLITICAL /ANCE WAS ALREADY A V]Y COMPLEX TASK = ! ,CONGRESS1 ADDITIONAL FACTORS MADE ITS WORK /ILL MORE DIFFICULT & EV5 JEOP>DIZ$ ! ,CONF$]ATION ITSELF4 ,WE HAVE SE5 H[ ! ,C,N,T GREW TO HAVE ONE MILLION MEMB]S AFT] ONLY TWO MON?S ( PUBLIC ACTIVITY4 ,AMONG !SE MEMB]S1 !RE W]E WORK]S :O W]E S9C]ELY IMPRESS$ BY ! ,C,N,T'S H]OIC LEG5D4 ,BUT !RE W]E ALSO SOME :O W]E HI<LY POLITICIZ$ & 9T5D$ TO M9E ! ORGANIZATION = RECRUITS = !IR [N POLITICAL GR\PS4 ,GIV5 ?AT1 & ! DEBATE BETWE5 ! AN>*I/S & UNION ACTIVI/S ?AT HAD UNFOLD$ = MORE ?AN F\R YE>S1 IT WAS EASY TO ANTICIPATE A NEGATIVE & DIVID$ ,CONGRESS4 ,! FACT ?AT IT WAS NEI!R ( !SE ?+S1 BUT RA!R A CON/RUCTIVE WORK]S' EV5T1 AFFIRM$ ! /R5G? ( ! WORK+ CLASS & REBUFF$ ! POLITICAL P>TIES :O HOP$ TO LEAD IT4 ,! ,CONGRESS HAD TO CONSID] A L5G?Y AG5DA ?AT 9CLUD$ MANY IMPORTANT PO9TS3 ! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE'S ,REPORT1 :I* W\LD REVIEW A LONG P]IOD ( ACTIVITIES2 ! ,REORGANIZATION ,PLAN1 BAS$ ON ! ,F$]ATIONS ( ,9DU/RIES C\NT]-POS$ TO ! ,S9DICATOS ,UNICOS .<9DU/RIAL UNION GR\PS.>2 NATIONAL PROPAG&A CAMPAIGNS & ATTRACT+ ! WORK+ CLASS & PEASANTRY TO ! UNIONS2 SAL>Y DEM&S1 %ORT5+ ! WORKDAY1 REJECTION ( 9COME TAXES1 & WAYS TO FI<T =C$ UNEMPLOYM5T2 ,C,N,T PUBLICATIONS & H[ TO IMPROVE !IR COORD9ATION ) O!R EF=TS & MAKE !M MORE EFFECTIVE PROPAG&A TOOLS2 =MULATION ( REPORTS = ! ,A,I,T'S ,F\R? ,CONGRESS2 & ! ,C,N,T'S POSITION ON ! CONVOCATION ( ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY & ! POLITICO-LEGAL-ECONOMIC DEM&S TO PRES5T TO IT4 ,A TOTAL ( #eaa DELEGATES REPRES5T+ UNIONS FROM #bai LOCALITIES DISCUSS$ ! AG5DA4 ,AL?\< IT IS DIFFICULT TO CALCULATE ! TOTAL NUMB] REPRES5T$1 GIV5 IRREGUL>ITIES 9 ! PAYM5T ( DUES & ! 9EXP]I5CE ( MANY ( ! REC5TLY ORGANIZ$ UNIONS1 IT IS NOT AN EXAGG]ATION TO SAY ?AT #h1 WORK]S & PEASANTS W]E REPRES5T$ !RE4 ,ONE IMPORTANT *>ACT]I/IC WAS ?AT DELEGATES C>RI$ A M&ATE FROM !IR UNIONS1 :I* RECORD$ ! NUMB] ( MEMB]S REPRES5T$ & TOPICS TO ADVANCE = CONSID]ATION AT ! ,CONGRESS4 ,ANGEL ,PE/ANA OP5$ ! C]EMONY 9 ! NAME ( ! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE4 ,HE GAVE A %ORT SPEE* ON ! IMPORTANCE ( ! ,CONGRESS & ! ,C,N,T'S TRAJECTORY S9CE ITS ,SECOND ,CONGRESS 9 #a#i#a#i4 ,AS ,A,I,T SECRET>Y1 ,RUDOLF ,ROCK] GREET$ ! ,CONGRESS 9 ! NAME ( ! AN>*O-SYNDICALI/ WORK]S ( ! WORLD3  
  

,! GREATE/ DANG] FAC+ ! ,C,N,T TODAY IS ! DEMOCRATIC DANG]4 ,! ,REPUBLIC (F]S WORK]S ! PROMISE ( IMPROVEM5TS ?AT >E IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTA9 )9 ! CAPITALI/ REGIME4 ,& !RE IS ! RISK ?AT ! MASSES WILL ACCEPT ITS PROMISES4 ,BUT Y\ ALREADY KN[ ?AT DEMOCRACIES ONLY SU/A9 ! OLD CAPITALI/ APP>ATUS1 NOT DE/ROY IT4 ,!Y PLAN TO IMPROVE CAPITALISM &1 :5 ! WORK]S ACCEPT !IR PL$GES1 !Y >E DIV]T$ FROM !IR REAL PA?4 ,!RE=E1 ! DANG] = ,SPANI% AN>*O-SYNDICALI/S IS ! LIKELY DIV]SION ( WORK]S T[>D ,REPUBLICAN DEMOCRACY4 

,POSSIBILITIES UNSUSPECT$ UNTIL N[ >E OP5+ UP DAILY BE=E ! GLOBAL PROLET>IAT4 ,BUT WE HAVE TO WORK QUICKLY1 5]GETICALLY1 & C\RAGE\SLY TO SEIZE !M4 ,! WORK]S HAVE TO FI<T = ! REALIZATION ( !IR ASPIRATIONS1 :I* >E NO?+ O!R ?AN E/ABLI%+ LIB]T>IAN COMMUNISM ?R\< SOCIAL REVOLUTION4  
  

,FRANCESC ,ISGLEAS AS WELL AS ,JUAN ,RAMON & ,GABRIEL ,GONZALEZ 7! LATT] TWO W]E SECRET>IES ( ! ,SEVILLA ,UNIONS7 PRESID$ OV] ! ,CONGRESS ,COMMITTEE4 ,ONCE ! AG5DA WAS PASS$1 ! ,A/URIAN DELEGATES ASK$ ! BODY TO S5D A GR\P TO ! ,M9I/RY ( ,LABOR 9 SUPPORT ( !IR EF=T TO SECURE A SEV5-H\R WORKDAY 9 ! M9ES AS WELL AS A SAL>Y 9CREASE4 0,! GOAL10 !Y /AT$1 0IS TO PUT PRESSURE ON ,L>GO ,CABALL]O1 :O IS ! 5EMY ( ! ,C,N,T'S M9+ UNION 9 ,A/URIAS & ! PROTECTOR ( ! >M$ ,SOCIALI/ SCABS4 ,IF ! MEET+ IS A FAILURE1 ! ,C,N,T WILL TAKE RADICAL MEASURES4 

,! /RIK+ M9]S MU/ NOT BE DEFEAT$40 ,! CONF]5CE VOT$ TO MAKE ,MIGUEL ,ABOS1 ,RAMON ,AC91 ,JOSE ,LOPEZ1 ,JOSE ,G4 ,TRABAL1 & ,ANGEL ,PE/ANA MEMB]S ( ! COMMISSION4 

,!RE WAS A DEBATE 9 ! ?IRD SESSION AB\T :E!R OR NOT TO ACCEPT ! ,F,A,I AS AN OPTIONAL 5TITY AT ! ,CONGRESS4 ,F,A,I MEMB]S 9 ! ,CATALAN ,REGIONAL ,COMMITTEE PREF]R$ TO )DRAW !IR MOTION BE=E HAV+ ! ,F,A,I ACCEPT$ ) LIMIT$ RI<TS4 .<#b#h#d.> ,!RE W]E /RONG DIFF]5CES ( OP9IONS AB\T ! MATT] & P>TICIPANTS FAIL$ TO COME TO A CONCLUSION4 

,! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE'S REPORT WAS EXT5SIVE & TOOK UP P>T ( ! ?IRD & F\R? SESSIONS4 ,SPEAK+ = ! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE1 ,FRANCISCO ,>9 /AT$ ?AT 0! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE WAS APPO9T$ 9 ,JUNE #aic & ?AT ALL ITS ACTIONS PRIOR TO ,APRIL #a#b1 #aica ) RESPECT TO P>TIES OR POLITICAL FIGURES W]E AU?ORIZ$ BY NATIONAL CONF]5CES OR MEET+S4 ,FUR!RMORE1 LET IT BE UND]/OOD ?AT ! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE NEV] SURPASS$ ITS AU?ORITY ) REG>D TO ,C,N,T DECISIONS & WAS ALWAYS FAI?FUL TO ! ,CONF$]ATION'S REVOLUTION>Y & ANTI-POLITICAL /ANCE 9 ITS RELATIONS ) POLITICAL ELEM5TS40 

0,DELEGATES CRITICIZ$ ! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE H>%LY .<AFT] ITS REPORT.>4 ,!Y ACCUS$ IT ( POLITICAL COLLABORATION1 AL?\< IT WAS EVID5T ?AT ! ,CONF$]ALS & ,F,A,II/AS HAD HAD GOOD REVOLUTION>Y 9T5TIONS 9 !IR DEAL+S ) POLITICAL FIGURES4 ,! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE R\NDLY D5I$ ANY P>TICIPATION 9 ! ,PACT ( ,SAN ,SEBA/IAN .<#b#h#e.> & ASS]T$ ?AT C]TA9 CONTACTS W]E MA9TA9$ ONLY BECAUSE !Y HAD BE5 E/ABLI%$ BY ! PREVI\S ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE40 

,! DISCUSSION CONT9U$ 9 ! F\R? SESSION4 ,!RE WAS A DEBATE AB\T :E!R ! ,C,N,T HAD COLLABORAT$ ) ! POLITICAL SECTOR & :AT AGREEM5TS HAD BE5 MADE ) ,LLUIS ,COMPANYS4 ,JUAN ,PEIRO RESPOND$ TO 9S9UATIONS MADE REG>D+ ! LATT] ISSUE BY SAY+ ?AT 0,COMPANYS DID NOT ASK = ?REE MON?S ( PEACE FROM ! ,CONF$]ATION .<DUR+ :I* IT W\LD NOT /RIKE.>1 BUT A HALF YE>4 ,WE MADE NO COMPROMISES ) HIM4 ,ON ! CONTR>Y1 WE EXPLICITLY REJECT$ HIS REQUE/40 ,SEV]AL ,CATALANS ASS]T$ ?AT !IR UNIONS HAD HELD PROTE/ /RIKES 9 ! E>LY DAYS ( ! NEW ,REPUBLIC1 0)\T ANY ,C,N,T COMMITTEE OR ANY ( ! NEW RUL]S--SU* AS ,COMPANYS--CLAIM+ ?AT !Y W]E BREAK+ A DEAL40 ,>91 ,PEIRO1 & ,PE/ANA ALSO SPOKE4 ,DELEGATES ULTIMATELY CONCLUD$ ?AT ! ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE HAD NOT ABUS$ ITS P[]1 & !Y RATIFI$ ?AT LAT]1 BUT !Y ALSO APPO9T$ A NEW ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE1 :I* 0,PE/ANA 9T]PRET$ AS A REBUKE40 

,ANGEL ,PE/ANA 9OPPORTUNELY PRES5T$ AN IMPORTANT PROPOSAL DUR+ ! F\R? SESSION1 :OSE SIGNIFICANCE ESCAP$ ! ,CONGRESS DUE TO ! PREVAIL+ EXCITEM5T4 ,HIS PROPOS$ ?AT ! ,C,N,T 0ASK ! ,REPUBLIC 7:5 IT BECOMES F$]AL7 TO DECL>E ,SPANI% ,MOROCCO A REGION ) ! SAME RI<TS AS ! P59SUL> REGIONS40 ,! ,CONGRESS REJECT$ ?IS1 AL?\< ! ISSUE WAS A S\RCE ( CONT5TION4 ,! AN>*I/S AT ! ,CONGRESS SAW ,PE/ANA'S 9ITIATIVE AS A CLE> ATTEMPT TO NEGOTIATE A SORT ( TRUCE ) ! ,REPUBLICAN GOV]NM5T4 ,TO EV5 SUGGE/ CONTACT ) ! GOV]NM5T WAS LIKE M5TION+ 0ROPE 9 ! H\SE ( A HANG$ MAN0 & ONLY 9CREAS$ SUSPICIONS AB\T ,PE/ANA'S COLLABORATIONISM4 ,= ! AN>*I/S1 IT WAS 9CONCEIVABLE TO ACCEPT ASK+ ! F$]AL ,REPUBLICAN GOV]NM5T TO CONSID] ,SPANI% ,MOROCCO ANO!R REGION4 ,TO ASK = WAS TO NEGOTIATE & ,SPANI% WAS TO ACCEPT ! GOV]NM5T'S COLONIALI/ POLICIES4 ,! AN>*I/S :O REPLI$ TO ,PE/ANA 79CLUD+ ,G>CIA ,OLIV]1 :O WAS REPRES5T+ ! ,REUS UNIONS7 REJECT$ BO? ( !SE ?+S4 ,! OPPRESSION SUFF]$ BY ,RIFIS .<#b#h#f.> WAS ID5TICAL TO ?AT ( O!R PEOPLES SUBJECT TO CAPITALISM & COLONIALISM3 ! ,SPANI% WORK+ CLASS WAS COLONIZ$ & EXPLOIT$ BY ! SAME =CES ?AT DOM9ATE ! ,RIFIS4 

,:AT WAS IMPORTANT WAS UNIT+ ! WORK]S ( ! WORLD 9 A JO9T /RUGGLE AGA9/ ! /ATE & CAPITALISM4 ,! ,C,N,T W\LD TAKE ?IS /RUGGLE TO ! ,RIF NOT TO 9S]T ! ,RIFI 9TO ,SPA9'S AU?ORIT>IAN /RUCTURES BUT TO WORK ) !M TO MAKE A SOCIAL REVOLUTION4 .<#b#h#g.> 

,! AGR>IAN QUE/ION WAS ANO!R IMPORTANT ISSUE AT ! ,CONGRESS4 ,9 FACT1 REPRES5TATIVES FROM MANY PEASANT UNIONS ATT5D$ & ! ,&ALUSIANS HAD EV5 COME 9 !IR WORK CLO!S 9 ORD] TO ILLU/RATE ! MIS]ABLE CONDITIONS ?AT !Y HAD TO 5DURE4 ,! ,C,N,T'S ,PEASANT ,F$]ATION W\LD ADVANCE ! FOLL[+ PROGRAM3  
  

,EXPROPRIATE ALL L>GE E/ATES1 RES]VES1 & >ABLE L&S )\T COMP5SATION & DECL>E !M SOCIAL PROP]TY4  

,CONFISCATE RES]VE LIVE/OCK1 SE$S1 IMPLEM5TS1 & MA*9]Y1 :I* IS ! WRONGFUL PROP]TY ( ! L&[N]S4  

,PROPORTIONAL & FREE DELIV]Y 9 USUFRUCT ( !SE L&S & EFFECTS TO ! PEASANT UNIONS1 = !IR USE & DIRECT ADM9I/RATION4  

,ABOLI% CONTRIBUTIONS1 TAXES1 DEBTS1 & MORTGAGE *>GES ?AT BURD5 SMALL L&[N]S :O DO NOT EXPLOIT MANUAL LABOR BEYOND ! FAMILY UNIT4  

,SUPPRESSION ( 9COME 9 MONEY OR K9D ?AT SMALL T5ANT F>M]S1 COLONOS1 LEAS$ T5ANTS1 ETC4 MU/ PAY TO [N] P>ASITES OR !IR 9T]M$I>IES4  
  

,! ,CONGRESS IS COMMITT$ TO & EMPHASIZES ! REVOLUTION>Y PREP>ATION ( ! PEASANT MASSES AS WELL AS !IR CAPACITY TO MANAGE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION !MSELVES4  
  

,! PRES5TATION ON ! ,C,N,T'S ,REORGANIZATION ,PLAN WAS READ DUR+ ! EI<? SESSION4 ,! REORGANIZATION W\LD TAKE PLACE ON ! BASIS ( ,F$]ATIONS ( ,9DU/RY4 ,! PLAN'S AU?OR WAS ,JUAN ,PEIRO &1 AS NOT$ E>LI]1 HE PREMIS$ HIS >GUM5T ON ! NATIONAL & 9T]NATIONAL EVOLUTION CAPITALISM4 

,TRADES W\LD F$]ATE AT LOCAL1 C\NTY1 PROV9CIAL1 REGIONAL1 & NATIONAL LEVELS & !RE W\LD BE A ,NATIONAL ,F$]ATION ( EA* RESPECTIVE 9DU/RY4 ,! NATIONAL COMMITTEES ( ! TRADES W\LD =M A ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE ( ! ,ECONOMY & ! ,C,N,T ,NATIONAL ,COMMITTEE W\LD OP]ATE ABOVE ALL ( !M4 ,WE HAVE ALREADY M5TION$ ?IS PLAN'S BUREAUCRATIC *>ACT]4 ,WE N[ 5T] ! DEBATE MORE FULLY4 

,! MO/ IMPORTANT SPEE*ES 9 ?IS DEBATE W]E MADE BY3 ,G>CIA ,OLIV] 7,REUS71 AGA9/2 ,PEIRO 7,MAT>O71 9 FAVOR2 ,ALB]OLA 7,GIRONELLA71 AGA9/2 ,SAN ,AGU/9 7,Z>AGOZA71 9 FAVOR2 ,SANT&]1 AGA9/2 & ,EMILIO ,MIRA 7,ALCOY'S ,(ICIOS ,V>IOS71 9 FAVOR4 

,H]E >E !IR >GUM5TS3 

,SANT&]3 0,IF ,SPA9 IS MORE AGRICULTURAL ?AN 9DU/RIAL1 :Y %\LD !RE BE ,F$]ATIONS ( ,9DU/RY8 ,WE >E UNDEVELOP$1 9DU/RIALLY SPEAK+4 ,) ! EXCEPTION ( ! ,PUBLIC ,S]VICE MONOPOLIES1 !RE IS NO 9DU/RIAL DEVELOPM5T 9 ,SPA94444 ,&1 EV5 IF ?AT TYPE ( CAPITALI/ CONC5TRATION DOES EXI/S1 %\LD WE1 :O HAVE FOLL[$ A DIFF]5T TRAJECTORY ?AN ! ,M>XI/S1 DIFF]5T BECAUSE WE APPLY \R PHILOSOPHY TO ALL ?+S2 %\LD WE N[ AB&ON \R PR9CIPLES & GIVE 9 SO EASILY SIMPLY BECAUSE ! B\RGEOISIE ECONOMY DEVELOPS 9 ?AT WAY80 

,JUAN ,PEIRO3 0,IF ! B\RGEOISIE ( A P>TICUL> 9DU/RY UNITES TO DEF5D ITSELF1 NOT AS 9DU/RIALI/S BUT AS A CLASS1 %\LDN'T ! WORK]S ALSO CONC5TRATE !MSELVES & =M A UNIT$ FRONT AGA9/ ! B\RGEOISIE8 ,MY REPLY IS CATEGORICAL1 & P]HAPS ?AT'S MY S940 

,JOSE ,ALB]OLA3 0,! SUPPORT]S ( ! ,F$]ATIONS ( ,9DU/RY EMBRACE IT BECAUSE !Y'VE LO/ CONFID5CE 9 \R ULTIMATE GOALS & ONLY HAVE FAI? 9 ! GE>S ( ! MA*9]Y4 ,?AT MA*9E DOESN'T CULTIVATE /R5G? BUT CONSUMES IT1 & 9 ?AT S5SE WE'LL CREATE A M5TALITY OPPOS$ TO EV]Y?+ IMPLI$ BY 9DIVIDUAL 9ITIATIVE4444 ,WE DEF5D ! ,CONF$]ATION2 WE WORK 9 ACCORDANCE ) ITS BASIC PR9CIPLES4 ,WE HAVE AN IDEAL1 :I* WILL SOON] OR LAT] OV]:ELM ! CAPITALI/ SY/EM4 ,WE DO NOT ACCEPT ANY?+ RESEMBL+ /ATISM1 BECAUSE ALL =MS ( /ATISM 9V>IABLY BECOME ACTS ( CO]CION40 ,EMILIO ,MIRA3 0,CAPITALISM HAS POLITICAL-ECONOMIC AS WELL AS MILIT>I/IC 9/ITUTIONS4 ,IT CAN SAY TO US3 ',SO1 Y\ WANT TO ABOLI% ! /ATE1 PRIVATE PROP]TY1 & ! EXPLOITATION ( MAN2 :AT BODY1 :AT ORGANIZATION1 :AT IDEAL ( SOCIAL LIFE DO Y\ C\NT]-POSE TO \R SY/EM ?AT W\LD BE SO MU* BETT]8' ,AGA9/ ! SUPPOS$ ECONOMIC H>MONY ( CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION1 WE HAVE TO ASS]T ! ECONOMIC H>MONY ( WORK]S' PRODUCTION ?R\< ,9DU/RIAL ,F$]ATIONS &1 = !IR DEF5SE 9 ! POLITICAL & SOCIAL T]RA9S1 ! ,CONF$]ATION40 

,G>CIA ,OLIV]3 0444 WE CANNOT ACCEPT ! ,F$]ATIONS ( ,9DU/RY BECAUSE !Y C>RY ! G]M ( DIS9TEGRATION )9 !MSELVES4 ,!Y KILL ! SPIRIT ( ! MASSES1 :O WE HAVE READY TO GO 9TO ACTION AGA9/ ! /ATE4 ,C,N,T HASN'T FAIL$ AT ALL OR1 IF IT HAS1 IT IS ONLY BECAUSE ( ! LACK ( REVOLUTION>Y 9TELLIG5CE AMONG ITS MO/ DI/+UI%$ MILITANTS4444 ,! ,CONF$]ATION HAS AN EXTREMELY IMPORTANT ROLE TO PLAY RI<T N[4 ,! REVOLUTION HAS BE5 /RANGL$ & ! ,CONF$]ATION W\LD HAVE TO BE PREP>$444 .<! SPEAK] WAS 9T]RUPT$ = EXCE$+ HIS ALLOCAT$ TIME TO COMM5T.>40 ,P>TICIPANTS VOT$ ON ! MATT] & ! ,C,N,T ACCEPT$ ! ,NATIONAL ,F$]ATIONS ( ,9DU/RY BY #c#b1 9 FAVOR AGA9/ #i1#f#g#a AGA9/4 

,DUR+ ! TWELF? SESSION1 ATT5DEES APPROV$ A PROTE/ AGA9/ ! /ATE ( EM]G5CY 9 ,&ALUSIA & ALSO UNANIM\SLY RATIFI$ ! ,C,N,T'S PR9CIPLES & AIMS 7:I* HAD BE5 APPROV$ AT #aiai ,CONGRESS74 ,!Y ALSO HAD TO CONSID] 0,! POSITION ( ! ,C,N,T T[>D ! CONVOCATION ( ! ,CON/ITU5T ,ASSEMBLY40 ,! ,CONGRESS RESOLV$ 0444 ! ,C,N,T MU/ ALWAYS PRACTICE DIRECT ACTION1 PU% ! PEOPLE ON A CLE>LY REVOLUTION>Y PA? T[>D LIB]T>IAN COMMUNISM1 & CONV]T ! POLITICAL EV5T ?AT HAS OCCURR$ 9 ,SPA9 9TO A REVOLUTION>Y EV5T ?AT IS FUNDAM5TALLY TRANS=MATIVE ( ALL POLITICAL & ECONOMIC VALUES4444 ,TO DO SO1 ! ,C,N,T WILL IMM$IATELY & 5]GETICALLY DEVOTE ITSELF TO ORGANIZ+ ITS REVOLUTION>Y =CES & TO IMM95T1 ANTI-ELECTORAL ACTION40 .<#b#h#h.> 

,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 

,*RONOLOGY 3 
,JANU>Y #a1 #bba 3 ,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #e -- ,ADD$4 
,JANU>Y #a#g1 #bbb 3 ,P>T #b1 ,*APT] #e -- ,UPDAT$4 

 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3  
HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/