,DISP]S$ ,=DISM & A ,NEW ,ORGANISATION ( ,LAB\R ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,ANONYM\S ,TEXT 3 ,! FOLL[+ IS A TRANSACTION ( A TEXT FROM ! ,JUNE '#i#a $ITION ( ! ,SPANI% MAGAZ9E ,ETCET]A BAS$ LOOSELY >\ND ! ,SPANI% TRUCK DRIV]S' /RIKE ( ,OCTOB] #a#i#i4 ,IT C\LD EQUALLY APPLY TO ! ,FR5* TRUCK]S' /RIKE ( ,JULY '#i#b4 ,! OCCASION DOESN'T MATT] TOO MU* AS BASICALLY ! TEXT DEALS ) ! RE-ORGANIZ+ ( PRODUCTION 9 ! #hS4 ,H[ A HIIAN 9VASION ( CAPITAL CANNOT HAVE MU* VISION>Y $GE BUT C\LD PROVE TO BE ONE ( ! DECISIVELY DE/RUCTIVE COMPON5TS ( ! NEW UPSURGE FROM BEL[ WE >E BEG9N+ TO SEE ALL >\ND ! WORLD4 7NOT FROM TRANSLATORS3,B,M ,BLOB74 ,D,I,S,P,],S,$ ,=,D,I,S,M ,& ,A ,N,E,W ,O,R,G,A,N,I,Z,A,T,I,O,N ,( ,L,A,B,O,R4 ,T,[,>,D,S ,A ,N,E,W ,T,Y,P,E ,( ,/,R,U,G,G,L,E4 ,FROM ! #a? TO ! #b? ,OCTOB] #aii ! ROAD HAULAGE 9DU/RY 9 ,SPA91 :I* ACCORD+ TO S\RCES 9 ! ,CONF$]ATION ( ,SPANI% ,9DU/RY C>RIES #g#e.0 ( GOODS 9 TRANSIT BECAME ! SC5E ( SOME ( ! MO/ VIOL5T CONFLICTS 9 REC5T YE>S BECAUSE ( A /RIKE CALL BY ! SELF EMPLOY$ UNIONS4 ,BASICALLY ! /RIKE C\LD BE CIT$ AS A TYPICAL CONFLICT ( 9T]E/ BETWE5 L>GE & SMALL HAULAGE FIRMS4 ,?AT IS1 A CONFRONTATION BETWE5 ! L>GE FIRMS :O CONTROL ! MAJORITY ( ! LONG DI/ANCE TRANSPORT M>KET & SMALL PROPRIETORS 7[N+ FROM ONE TO FIVE LORRIES74 ,AS A CONFLICT ( 9T]E/ BETWE5 TWO FRACTIONS ( CAPITAL ! PLAT=M ( DEM&S BY ! UNIONS CALL+ ! /RIKE :I* ACCORD+ TO ! PRESS REPRES5T$ UPTO #a#e.0 ( ! SECTOR -- IT L$ TO A S]IES ( REQUE/S RELAT+ TO ! DEF5SE ( AN OP]ATIONAL NI*E )9 ! PR(ITABLE TRANSPORT M>KET4 ,?IS REQUIR$ ! 9T]V5TION ( ! GOV]NM5T AGA9/ 0ILLEGAL0 LORRY DRIV]S = EXAMPLE1 & O!R ASPECTS RELAT+ TO ! FIX+ ( RATES1 9SPECTION1 P5SIONS ETC4 ,9 O!R WORDS FROM ! PO9T ( VIEW ( ! =CES AT WORK1 ! LORRY DRIV]S' /RIKE DOES NOT JU/IFY ! 9T]E/ GRANT$ TO IT 9 !SE PAGES4 ,AS HAS BECOME HABITUAL 9 ! LATE/ CONFLICTS 9 ,SPA91 ! /RIKE UNFOLD$ )9 A /RICT CORPORATI/ SPH]E1 AL?\< IT WAS CAPABLE ( G5]AT+ A V]Y T5SE ATMOSPH]E 7CONFRONTATION ) ! POLICE1 ATTACKS ON SCABS & ! BLOCK+ ( 5TRANCES & EXITS ON ! MA9 ROADS & MOTORWAYS74 ,BUT ITS REAL SIGNIFICANCE WAS NOT TO BE F\ND H]E4 ,AS ! M$IA RECOGNIZ$ 9 ITS HA/E TO DISCR$IT ! /RIKE1 ONLY A M9ORITY ( LORRY DRIV]S OBEY$ ! /RIKE CALL & ?AT NOT 9 ALL >EAS4 ,NEV]!LESS ONE MU/ RECOGNIZE ! EXTRAORD9>Y IMPACT ( ! /RIKE ACTION4 ,)9 A FEW DAYS ( DRIV]S HAV+ DRAWN !IR LORRIES ACROSS MOTORWAYS & M\NT$ PICKETS ! DISRUPTION TO SUPPLIES TO ! L>GE T[NS BECAME EVID5T1 TO ! PO9T :]E %ELVES W]E EMPTI$ 9 SUP]M>KETS 7,BILBAO1 ,CATALUNYA7 & SOME PRODUCTS BECAME SC>CE 7FI% AMONG !M7 9 ! ,MADRID & ,B>CELONA M>KETS4 ,BUT ! CONSEQU5CES TO ! 9DU/RIAL SECTOR W]E ( MU* GREAT] MAGNITUDE4 ,AL?\< ! ,CONF$]ATION ( ,SPANI% ,9DU/RY & ! L>G] BOSSES ORGANIZATIONS T5D$ TO EXAGG]ATE ! LOSSES 7!Y M5TION$ FIGURES :I* OSCILLAT$ BETWE5 #e1 MILLION PESETAS & #b47 ! FACT IS ! ?REAT ( TOTAL CLOSURE HUNG OV] ! 9DU/RIAL BELTS ( ! PR9CIPAL REGIONS 7,MADRID1 ,Z>RAGOZA1 ,B>CELONA1 ,GUIPUZCOA74 ,BY WAY ( EXAMPLE -- ,G5]AL ,MOTORS CLOS$ D[N1 ,FIRE/ONE1 ,NISSAN & ,SEAT HALT$ !IR ASSEMBLY L9ES AS DID ,CITRO54 MANY O!R FIRMS SUFF]$ 9T]RUPTIONS TO ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS LIKE ,FASA1 ,R5AULT1 ,MI*EL9 ,=D 7:O COMM&E]$ A FLEET ( #be AIRCRAFT TO FLY 9 COMPON5TS FROM !IR FACTORIES 9 ! ,U4,K4 & ,G]MANY71 ! *EMICAL 9DU/RY 9 ,T>RAGONA & AN 5DLESS NUMB] ( SMALL] 9DU/RIES4 ,! ,IRUN FRONTI] T[N WAS BLOCKAD$ BY LORRIES4 ,! ,V,U,L,N,],A,B,I,L,I,T,Y ,( ,! ,P,R,O,D,U,C,T,I,V,E ,P,R,O,C,E,S,S ,9 ,D,I,S,P,],S,$ ,=,D,I,S,M4 ,9 SPITE ( ! SPECTACUL> *>ACT] ( SOME 9CID5TS1 GIV5 PROM95CE BY ! MASS M$IA 9 !IR CAMPAIGN TO DISCR$IT ! /RIK]S & SPREAD AL>M AMONG ! POPULATION -PEOPLE HURRI$ TO /OCK-UP AS IF A W> WAS IMM95T- ! LORRY DRIV]S' /RIKE TOOK ON A TELL+ DIM5SION ?AT EXCE$$ ! LIMITS ! /RIKE HAD =MALLY SET ITSELF4 ,& ?IS SIGNIFICANT *ALL5GE NOT ONLY REF]R$ TO ! 5ORM\S ECONOMIC_/SOCIAL REP]CUSSIONS FROM :AT WAS 9 ANY CASE NO MORE ?AN A M9ORITY ACTION1 BUT BECAUSE IT BR\IS+ FROM CAPITALI/ RE/RUCTUR+ 9 ! #hS' & ! OBJECTIVE LIMITS ( MOD]N TE*NIQUES ( ORGANIZATION & CONTROL ( ! LABOR =CE4 ,! CYCLE ( CAPITALI/ RE/RUCTUR+ :I* *>ACT]IZ$ ! PA/ DECADE HAD AS ITS AIM A D\BLE /RATEGY1 ! RESULT ( :I* HAS BE5 :AT IS CALL$ ! DISP]S$ FACTORY OR DISP]S$ =DISM4 ,IT WAS = 9DU/RIAL /RATEGY A QUE/ION 9 ! FIR/ 9/ANCE ( OV]COM+ WORK]S' RESI/ANCE 7& ! PRESSURES EX]T$ ON ! T]RA9 ( PRODUCTION ITSELF7 BY DISP]S+ ! GREAT MASS ( WORK]S :I* HAD =M$ >\ND ! PRODUCTIVE C5T]S :I* HAD APPE>$ AFT] ,WORLD ,W> ,I 7& ABOVE ) ! RISE ( ! C> 9DU/RY & CONSUM] GOODS74 ,9 ?IS P]IOD ! MASSIVE AGGREGATION ( ! LABOR =CE >\ND ! PRODUCTION L9ES ( ! L>GE FACTORY COMPLEXES WAS ! BASIS ( ! CYCLE ( CAPITAL ACCUMULATION4 ,?IS EXT5D$ 9TO ! #gS' & IMPLI$ ! CULM9ATION ( ! SCI5TIFIC ORGANIZATION ( LABOR PUT 9TO PRACTICE BY ,=D HALF A C5TURY E>LI]4 ,IT WAS AN ORGANIZATION :I*1 ALONGSIDE ! MASSIVE NUMB]S ( WORK]S1 REVOLV$ >\ND ! P>CELISATION -- BREAKD[N ( ! PHYSICAL MOVEM5T ( ! WORK] ON ! PRODUCTION L9E-& ?IS WAS ! S\RCE ( MANY ACTS ( RESI/ANCE1 /RIKES & SABOTAGES4 ,BUT ! 9DU/RIAL CONGLOM]ATIONS ALSO IMPLI$ ! E/ABLI%M5T BY ! WORK]S' ( A SOCIAL & ECONOMIC =CE ABLE TO EX]T PRESSURE & :O ?R\< A SUCCESSIVE CYCLE ( /RUGGLES 7TRADE UNION 9SPIR$ & AUTONOM\S7 ]OD$ ! RATE ( ACCUMULATION 9 ! 9DU/RIALIZ$ C\NTIES4 ,AT ! 5D ( ! #gS' ! CRISIS ( PR(ITABILITY >RIV$ AT A PO9T :I* MADE A REORGANIZATION ( ! LABOR =CE 9EVITABLE AS REG>DS REORGANIZ+ CONTROL ( ! LABOR =CE & 9T5SIFY+ ! EXPLOITATION ( ! LATT]4 ,A RECOV]Y 9 ! RATE ( CAPITAL ACCUMULATION WAS !N POSSIBLE4 ,IT WAS ! ]A ( SOCIAL CONTRACTS1 ! POLITICS ( AU/]ITY & NEO-LIB]AL MODELS RESULT+ 9 UND]M9+ ! F\NDATION ( ! 0/ATE ( WELL BE+04 ,AS A CONSEQU5CE1 ! SECOND /RATEGIC ORI5TATION ( CAPITAL 9 ! RE/RUCTUR+ A*IEV$ 9 ! PA/ DECADE WAS APP>5T 9 ! RECOMPOSITION ( ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS4 ,9 ADDITION TO OV]COM+ ! RESI/ANCE ( ! MASS-WORK]1 ?IS WAS CAPABLE ( DYNAMIZ+ ! CYCLE ( ACCUMULATION BY RELY+ ON ! IMPLANTATION ( ELECTRONIC TE*NOLOGY & ! NEW SY/EM ( 9DU/RIAL COMMUNICATION4 ,?IS BR\Y ! PRODUCTION ( A LIMIT$ NUMB] ( PRODUCTS 7FACTORIES ATTEMPT$ TO A*IEVE A GREAT] M>KET %>E BAS$ ON ! 9TRODUCTION ( DESIGN1 FA%ION ETC474 ,OV] ! LA/ FEW YE>S WE HAVE WITNESS$ ! DISPLACEM5T ( ! PROCESS ( ASSEMBLY & F9I%+ ( PRODUCTS T[>DS ! CAPITALI/ P]IPH]Y1 PUT TOGE!R BY C\NTRIES ) A PRICE ADVANTAGE AS REG>DS ! LABOR =CE & LABOR P5ALTIES 7,TURKEY1 ,S\? ,KOREA1 ,PHILIPP9ES1 ,BRAZIL1 ,MEXICO74 ,?IS DISP]SION ON A WORLD SCALE HAD ITS C\NT]P>TS ON ! REGIONAL PLANE 9 ! 9DU/RIALIZ$ C\NTRIES !MSELVES4 ,?US WE HAVE OBS]V$ ! BREAK+ UP ( ! BIG 9DU/RIAL COMPLEXES 9TO SMALL PRODUCTIVE UNITS 9CREAS+ ! 9CID5CE ( SUB-CONTRACT+ ?R\< :I* ! BIG 9DU/RIAL CORPORATIONS %IFT$ SOME /AGES ( PRODUCTION TO O!R FIRMS ( A SMALL] SIZE1 :I* TOOK ON ! TASK ( ALLOCAT+ S]VICES & SUPPLY+ PIECES & COMPON5TS NECESS>Y = ! F9AL F9I%+4 ,9 ?IS S5SE ! C> 9DU/RY1 ! REAL MOTOR ( ECONOMIC GR[? 9 CAPITALI/ C\NTRIES UPTO ! #gS'1 IS ! PRIME EXAMPLE4 ,J,I,T @& ,Z,],O ,9,V,5,T,O,R,Y3 ,! ,L,O,G,I,/,I,C,A,L ,*,A,9 ,( ,A,D,D,$ ,V,A,L,U,E ,UND]/&ABLY1 9 SU* AN 9DU/RIAL L&SCAPE1 NEW TE*NIQUES REG>D+ ! ORGANIZATION ( LABOR & ! MANAGEM5T ( PRODUCTION >E A PRESS+ NECESSITY4 ,& ?IS IS H[ !RE BEGAN TO PROLIF]ATE ! PRECEPTS & WAT*WORDS ( ! NEW 5T]PRISE CULTURE 7JU/-9-TIME1 Z]O 9V5TORY7 :I* SORT TO *EAP5 CO/S1 RELEASE TI$-UP CAPITAL1 TOTAL QUALITY CONTROL1 CONTROL ( HUMAN RES\RCES ETC474 ,9 FACT ?IS DESIGNAT$ NEW 5T]PRISE CULTURE WAS 9 RESPONSE TO A NEW /AGE 9 ! DIVISION LABOR BETWE5 FIRMS & W>RANTS BE+ CALL$ ! LOGI/ICAL *A9 ( ADD$ VALUE4 ,TAKE = EXAMPLE1 A C> -- :I* 9VOLVES 9 ITS MANUFACTURE A L>GE NUMB] ( COMPON5T FACTORIES -- :I* C>RY \T 9T]M$IATE ASSEMBLY /AGES & OP]ATE 9 CONDITIONS DICTAT$ BY ! BIG FIRM :I* SELLS ! F9I%$ >TICLE4 ,= EFFICI5T DISP]SAL ( PRODUCTION1 A P]FECT CO-ORD9ATION ( ! MOVEM5T BETWE5 SECOND>Y FIRMS & ! CORPORATIONS ) :OM !Y MA9TA9 SUBCONTACT+ L9KS IS NECESS>Y4 ,?IS MEANS ?AT EV]Y?+ FUNCTIONS ACCORD+ TO ! PR9CIPLE ( ,J,I,T4 ,9 ! WORDS ( ! ,NISSAN PRESID5T1 ! FIR/ FIRM TO PUT IT 9TO PRACTICE 9 ORD] TO L9K-UP !IR FACTORIES 9 ,JAPAN & ,BRITA91 ,J,I,T CONSI/S 9 HAV+ ! NECESS>Y COMPON5TS 0AT ! REQUIR$ TIME1 9 ! REQUIR$ QUANTITY & 9 ! APPROPRIATE PLACE04 ,IT WAS ONLY ONE MORE MANIFE/ATION ( ! SUBORD9ATION ( SMALL CAPITAL 7SUBSIDI>Y FIRM7 TO BIG CAPITAL 7! FIRM ?AT FIXES ! CONTRACT PRICE74 ,IT IS1 ( C\RSE1 A /RATEGY = TRANSF]R+ PR(IT FROM SMALL PRODUCTIVE UNITS TO BIG 9DU/RIAL CORPORATIONS :O %IFT /ORAGE CO/S 7Z]O 9V5TORY7 9 ?IS WAY & ! TY+ UP ( CAPITAL ?AT ! EXI/5CE ( /OCKS C>RIES ) IT4 ,AT ! SAME TIME IT P]MITS ! %IFT+ ( ! /AGES ( ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS ?AT YIELD$ LESS ADD$ VALUE TO SUBCONTRACT$ FIRMS4 ,AS = ! WORK]S1 ?IS NEW 9DU/RIAL ORD] REPRES5TS A NEW TURN ( ! SCREW1 9T5SIFY+ ! EXPLOITATION ( ! LABOR =CE4 ,! SPLITT+ UP ( ! GREAT AGGREGATIONS ( MASSES ( WORK]S IS TRANSPOS$ 9TO A RELATIVE LOSS ( ! CAPACITY TO EX]T PRESSURE1 *>ACT]I/IC ( ! 0 OLD WORK]S MOVEM5T0 HAV+ AS ITS PRIME CONSEQU5CE ! DEVALORIZATION ( LABOR P[] & ! WORS5+ ( WORK CONDITIONS4 ,IT IS ! /ATE ( AFFAIRS WE KN[ AS LACK ( SECURITY4 ,A REALITY :I* TOOK %APE 9 A MYRIAD ( EXAMPLES ( 7TEMPOR>Y7 CONTRACTS EXI/+ 9 SUBSIDI>Y FIRMS :I* >E1 9 ADDITION1 ! ONLY FIRMS 9 ! LABOR M>KET TO TAKE ON WORK]S1 JU/ AS !Y HAVE R$UC$ WAGES ALL R\ND & LIMIT$ ! RI*Y1 ! DIS-AGGREGATION ( ! MASS-WORK] CLASS COMPON5TS1 A NEO-CORPORATI/ & TRADE CONSCI\S CONDUCT ?AT C\NT]POSES EMPLOY$ TO ! UNEMPLOY$1 TEMPOR>Y TO FIX$ CONTRACTS1 ADVANC$ SECTOR WORK]S 79=MATION TE*NICIANS7 TO ! M>G9AL SECTOR 7OP]ATIVES1 CLEAN]S71 ! SKILL$ TO ! UNSKILL$ ETC4 ,ATTEMPT+ TO REM$Y ! COMPACT RESI/ANCE ( ! MASS-WORK]1 ! NEW ORGANIZATIONAL & MANAG]IAL =MULA = ! SOCIALIZ$ PRODUCTION ( COMMODITIES HAS GIV5 A DIFF]5T DIM5SION TO ! CONTRADICTIONS 9H]5T 9 ! SOCIAL RELATIONS BETWE5 CAPITAL & LABOR4 ,! DISSEM9ATION ( PRODUCTION SUB/ANTIALLY 9CREASES ! VULN]ABILITY ( ! PROCESS4 ,9 FACT1 9 ORD] = ! NEW ORGANIZATIONAL TE*NIQUES TO NO LONG] FUNCTION AS !ORETICAL MODELS BUT 9 PRODUCTIVE PRACTICE1 IT IS NECESS>Y TO ELIM9ATE ! POSSIBILITY ( ANY DELAY1 EV5TUALITY OR UN=ESE5 SITUATION ?AT C\LD %UTD[N ! CONT9UAL FL[ ( COMMODITIES & COMPON5TS AS DEF9$ BY ,J,I,T 7AS MU* 9 ! PROCESS ( PRODUCTION PROP] AS 9 ! REALIZATION OR M>KET+74 ,IT BECOMES NECESS>Y ?AT 0ALL0 CONNECT+ L9KS 9 ! PROCESS >E ADEQUATE TO ! 5D PRESET BY ! DECISION MAK+ C5T]4 ,! LEA/ ]ROR AT ANY ONE PO9T 9 ! LOGI/ICAL *A9 :E!R VOLUNT>Y 7SABOTAGE7 OR VOLUNT>Y HAS A PROGRESSIVE EFFECT ON ! :OLE & LEADS 9EVITABLY TO ! COLLAPSE ( ! PROCESS 79 ! PRODUCTIVE & DI/RIBUTIVE SPH]E & ( EV5 BO?7 ,?IS WAS BORN \T 9 ! /RIKE 9 ,=DS ,U4,K4 ! ,SPANI% LORRY DRIV]S /RIKE :I* WE BEGAN ! TEXT ) & ! ,FR5* LORRY DRIV]S 9 #a#i#i#b4 .<#a.> ,SE5 AS A SOCIAL RELATION1 CAPITAL IS NOT A =CE EXT]IOR TO US4 ,IT IS ONLY SO =MALLY1 ?AT IS 9 ! SOCIAL =MS ( DOM9ATION :I* IT CLO!S ITSELF )4 ,FROM H]E !RE COMES AB\T ! 9SOLUBLE CONTRADICTION BETWE5 ! AFFIRMATION ( ! =MS ( =MAL DOM9ATION 7F9ANCIAL_/TE*NOLOGICAL DECISION MAK+ C5T]S7 ?AT REQUIRE ! PHYSICAL SUPPRESSION ( ! POT5TIAL = CONFLICT ?AT LABOR P[] BR+S ) IT & ! NECESSITY ( 9CORPORAT+ & 9T5SIFY+ ! EXPLOITATION ( LABOR P[] AS ! MEANS ( GU>ANTEE+ ! CONT9UATION ( ! PROCESS ( ! EXT5D$ ACCUMULATION ( CAPITAL4 ,! ,O,B,J,E,C,T,I,V,E ,L,I,M,I,T ,( ,C,A,P,I,T,A,L ,I,S ,S,U,P,P,R,E,S,S,$ ,S,U,B,J,E,C,T,I,V,I,T,Y ,U,N,D,] ,! ,=,M ,( ,L,A,B,O,R ,P,[,]4 ,:E!R 9 ! CLASSICAL =D TYPE ORGANIZATION OR 9 ! ACTUAL EXPRESSION ( DISP]S$ =DISM1 ! REALITY IS ?AT ! CONTRADICTION BETWE5 CAPITAL & LABOR CONT9UES TO APPE> & *ANGE1 EA* TIME MORE FUNDAM5TALLY4 ,! REAL LIMITS 7OBJECTIVES7 ( ! GR[? ( ! ACCUMULATION ( CAPITAL IS LOCAT$ 9 LABOR P[]1 OR1 TO PUT IT 9 ANO!R WAY1 9 SUPPRESS$ HUMAN EXI/5CE AS LABOR P[]4 ,)\T EXCEPTION ! AUTOMISATION ( 9DU/RIAL PLANT PUTS ITS DEP5D5CY VIS A VIS LIV+ LABOR P[] 9 GREAT] RELIEF4 ,& ?IS IS TRUE NOT ONLY 9 RESPECT TO ! KN[L$GE 9TEGRAT$ 9TO TE*NOLOGY1 BUT ALSO AS REG>DS ! FUNCTIONS ( CONTROL1 SUP]VISION1 MA9TA95CE & RELAT$ S]VICES -- ?AT GO FROM ! MO/ ADVANC$ SECTOR TO CLEAN+ FUNCTIONS -- ! MO/ DEVALORIZ$ LABOR4 ,)\T :OSE COORD9AT$ 9T]V5TION AUTOMISATION IS NOT POSSIBLE4 ,! ,M,A,N,A,G,E,M,5,T ,( ,H,U,M,A,N ,R,E,S,\,R,C,E,S @& ,! ,I,D,E,O,L,O,G,Y ,( ,! ,F,I,R,M ,H[EV] AB/RACT ! =M] OBS]VATIONS MI1 !Y >E CORROBORAT$ DAILY 9 ! CONDUCT ( FIRMS4 ,FROM ,JAPAN TO ! ,U4,S4 & ,EUROPE ONE ( ! MA9 PREOCCUPATIONS ( ! BIG MULTI-NATIONAL FIRMS IS 0! MANAGEM5T ( HUMAN RES\RCES04 ,?AT IS ! MANAGEM5T ( ELECTRONIC TE*NOLOGY REQUIRES A COMPLIM5T>Y /RATEGY ?AT 5TAILS ! G5]AT+ ( A CONS5SUS AMONG ! DIFF]5T LEVELS ( ! FUNCTIONAL HI]>*Y ( LABOR4 ,?IS SEEKS TO EVADE ANY TRANSLATION 9TO A CLASS ID5TITY1 AS WAS ! CASE ) ! MASS-WORK]4 ,?IS R5D]S POSSIBLE A C]TA9 05T]PRISE CULTURE0 9 :I* EA* WORK] TAKES ON 79T]IORIZES7 ! OBJECTIVES FIX$ BY ! F9ANCIAL_/TE*NOLOGICAL DECISION MAK+ C5T] 7! HEGEMONIC 9DU/RIAL CORPORATIONS74 ,) ! CON/ELLATION ( FIRMS ?AT =M >\ND ! DISP]S$ PROCESS ( PRODUCTION1 ! TAYLORI/ AU?ORIT>IAN =MULAS >E JUXTAPOS$ TO ! =MULAS ( ! NEW CULTURE4 ?IS PRET5DS TO IMPLICATE ! WORK]S 9 ! ATTA9M5T ( ! OBJECTIVES FIX$ BY MANAGEM5T4 ,= EXAMPLE1 ! COMPETITION AGREEM5T PROPOS$ BY ! ,M9I/] ,SOL*AGA GOES 9 ?IS DIRECTION BY PROPOS+ ?AT NEGOTIATIONS CONC]N+ WAGE 9CREASES >E A FUNCTION ( PRODUCTIVITY 9DEXES4 ,! GR[+ IMPORTANCE 9SECURITY PLAYS AMONG SECTIONS ( WORK+ PEOPLE 9DICATES A LIMITATION TO CLASS CONS5SUS4 ,9DU/RIAL /RATEGY >IS+ FROM ?IS T5DS T[>DS A DIFF]5TIAL TREATM5T = EA* WORK] ACCORD+ TO !IR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE 9 ! LOGI/ICAL *A94 ,?IS DET]M9ES A RIGID1 FUNCTIONAL & WAGE HI]>*Y )9 ! FIRM4 ,9 FACT ! NEW ORGANIZATIONAL TE*NIQUES ( ! LABOR PROCESS RELIES ON ! NECESSITY ( OBTA9+ AN EXPLICITLY ASSUM$ CONS5SUS BY EV]YONE BELONG+ TO ! PRODUCTIVE & DI/RIBUTIVE *A94 ,N[1 ! PACE ( ! BUS9ESS CYCLE & ! LEVEL ( TE*NICAL & HI/ORICAL DEVELOPM5T ( ! EXPLOITATION ( ! WORK=CE :I* HAS L$ TO ! DISP]S$ ORGANIZATION ( ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS1 MAKES ! PROMOTION ( CONS5SUS ! CORN]/ONE ( SOCIAL SUBMISSION4 ,J,I,T1 QUALITY CONTROL >E WAT*WORDS EMANAT+ FROM ! MO/ AGGRESSIVE ,JAPANESE MULT9ATIONALS4 ,NOT ONLY >E !Y 9 ! =EFRONT 9 T]MS ( TE*NOLOGY BUT ALSO 9 IDEOLOGY4 ,UNTIL N[ WE HAVE BE5 US$ TO EQUAT+ CAPITALI/ GR[? ) PROTE/ANT MORALITY4 ,BUT PROTE/ANTISM1 ! CULT ( REASON MATUR$ 9 ! ,5LIATION BETWE5 9DIVIDUAL LIB]TY & ACTUAL SUBMISSION TO ! NEW ORD] TYPIFI$ BY ! ORGANIZATIONAL PROCESS ( WORK4 ,?IS SEP>ATION IS P>ALLEL TO ! 9V5TION ( 9DIVIDUALITY 9 ! WE/]N DEMOCRATIC SY/EM4 ,! TOTALIT>IAN DOM9ATION ( CAPITAL EXT5DS 9 A DUAL DIRECTION3 QUALITATIVE -- OV] ! 9DIVIDUAL & HIS_/H] PHYSICAL CAPACITIES2 & QUANTITATIVE -- OV] SOCIAL EXPRESSION 9 ITS 5TIRITY4 ,?IS IS BECOM+ MORE & MORE TOTALIT>IAN4 ,) IDEOLOGY SU* A QUE/ = TOTAL DOM9ATION IS ! 05D ( IDEOLOGY04 ,! IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTION>IES ?AT PROPAGATE SU* A TOTAL VIEW HAVE CEAS$ TO BE =MALLY 9DEP5D5T ( ! MAT]IAL 9T]E/ ?IS REPRES5TS4 ,IDEOLOGY >ISES 9 ! PROCESS ( VALORIZATION ITSELF & IS CONCRETELY EXPRESS$ 9 ! CULT ( MONEY 7AS A G5]ALIZ$ SOCIOLOGICAL MANIFE/ATION7 & 9 ! PRIVATE ACCUMULATION ( WEAL? AS ! BE ALL & 5D ALL ( EXI/5CE4 ,TRULY1 ! IMAG9>Y 9DIVIDUAL IS H&$ OV] TO ! PR9CIPLE ( MONEY1 ! CULT ( VALUE QUANTIFI$ 9 ! POSSESSION ( ?+S4 ,! IDEOLOGY ( ! 5T]PRISE CULTURE !N CON/ITUTES ! BASIS ( CONS5SUS ?AT EXPRESSES ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS4 ,DIFF]5T CAPITALI/ BLOCKS GO AB\T ! PROMOTION ( CONS5SUS BY DIFF]5T ME?ODS4 ,9 ! PRES5T RETROGRADE ]A = CAPITAL1 ! ,JAPANESE APPROA* HAS ! ASC5DANCY OV] ! ,EUROPEAN 0/ATE ( WELL BE+04 ,! GREAT] P>T ( ! TE*NOLOGIES ( CONTROL & ORGANIZATION ( LABOR COME FROM ,JAPAN1 9 CONJUNCTION ) ITS AGGRESSIVE TE*NOLOGICAL & F9ANCIAL P5ETRATION ( ,EUROPE & ! ,U4,S4,A4 ,! TE*NOLOGIES ( CONTROL >E 9TEGRAT$ 9 ! PROCESS ( AUTOMATION4 ,9 ORD] TO C>RY \T ! PHYSICAL CONTROL ( ! PRODUCTIVE SEQU5CE ?IS REQUIRES ?AT !SE CORRESPOND+ TE*NIQUES ( CONTROL BE 9T]IORIZ$ BY ! EMPLOYES ?R\<\T ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS4 ,! AUTOMATION IDEAL IS TO A*IEVE ! SELF-REGULATION ( ! PROCESS3 9 ! COMPREH5SIVE S5SE ( HUMAN & TE*NOLOGICAL COMPON5TS4 ,! ,N,E,W ,C,Y,C,L,E ,( ,/,R,U,G,G,L,E,S ,( ,D,I,S,P,],S,$ ,=,D,I,S,M4 ,?IS DESP]ATE SE>* = CONS5SUS H[EV] 5C\NT]S ITS LIMITATIONS 9 FULFILL+ ! IMP]ATIVE ( OPTIMIZATION & MAXIMATION ( PR(ITS4 ,AL?\< IT S\NDS LIKE SOME?+ FROM ! PA/1 WE MU/ RECOGNIZE ?AT ! CAPITALI/ MODE ( PRODUCTION1 EV5 ) ALL ITS ELECTRONIC P>APH]NALIA AS AN 9TR9SICALLY CONTRADICTORY REALITY4 ,! GR[+ COMPLEXITY ( ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS REQUIRES ! SUBMISSION BY CONS5T ( ALL ! L9KS 9 ! PRODUCTIVE *A9 ( ADD$ VALUE4 ,?US ! *EAP5+ ( ! CO/S & ! ABSORPTION ( A CONT9UALLY GREAT] P>T ( ADD$ VALUE1 LEADS TO ! HI]>*ISATION ( ! SUBCONTRACT+ ( S]VICES ?AT CAUSES A MULTIPLICITY ( DIFF]5T 9T]E/S TO APPE>4 ,9 ?IS S5SE ! LORRY DRIV]S /RIKE IS P>ADIGMATIC4 ,! BIG COMPANIES SU* AS ! C> 9DU/RY HAVE DISP5S$ ) ALL !SE /AGES 9 ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS :I* = TE*NICAL-ORGANIZATIONAL OR /RICTLY ECONOMIC REASONS >E C>RI$ \T BY O!R SUBCONTRACT FIRMS4 ,9 ?IS WAY1 :ILE C5T]+ ACTIVITY 9 ! LOGI/ICAL *A9 ) GREAT] ADD$ VALUE1 IT EX]TS A MONOPOLI/IC DICTATOR%IP OV] T>IFFS 9CLUD+ TRANSPORT4 ,NEV]!LESS ?IS SAME BIG FACTORY F9DS ITSELF 9 A POSITION ( CLOSE DEP5D5CY FROM ! LOGI/ICAL PO9T ( VIEW AS REG>DS ! SUBCONTRACTORS -- LORRYDRIV]S OR COMPON5T SUPPLI]S BE+ AN EXAMPLE4 ,) ?IS !RE OP5S A FISSURE = POT5TIAL CONFLICT AMONG ! 9T]E/S PRES5T1 :I* IS :AT CAUS$ ! ,OCTOB] /RIKE TO BREAK \T444 ,! CONFLICT ( 9T]E/S BETWE5 TWO =MS ( CAPITAL BR+S \T ! WEAKNESSES & ! POT5TIAL = CONFLICT EXI/+ 9 ! PREVAIL+ MODEL ( DISP]S$ =DISM4 ,9 ! PA/ FEW YE>S WE HAVE WITNESSES A MULTIPLICITY ( 9T5SELY LOCALIZ$ CONFLICTS 9 SEGM5TS ( ! PRODUCTIVE *A9 & COMPLIM5T>Y S]VICES4 ,?IS IS MORE ?AN CORPORATI/3 ,R5FE TRA9 DRIV]S1 AIRPORT CONTROLL]S1 CLEAN]S1 BUSSES1 HOSPITALS ETC444 ,MO/ ( !SE DISPUTES SPECIFICALLY RELATE TO TRADE_/PR(ESSIONAL /ATUS 9 ! NEW 9DU/RIAL HI]>*Y4 ,RANK & FILE COMMITTEES1 EV5 IF !Y EXI/ )9 ! FRAMEWORK ( TRADITIONAL UNION DEM&S1 >E ! EXPRESSION ( ! =MS ( SOLID>ITY CORRESPOND+ TO DISP]S$ =DISM4 ,9 ! SAME WAY1 MASS ACTIONS W]E ! EXPRESSIONS ( ! MASS WORK] 9 CLASSICAL =DISM1 ) P[]FUL 9DU/RIAL CONC5TRATIONS ( ! LABOR =CE4 ,TO CRITICIZE ITS SECTORAL OR N>R[ *>ACT] IS SIMPLY USELESS4 ,TO ! ATOMIZ$ ORGANIZATION ( ! LABOR PROCESS !RE CORRESPONDS ATOMIZ$ =MS ( SOLID>ITY & RESI/ANCE4 ,MORE PRECISELY1 ! CAPACITY = GLOBAL CONTROL ( ! PROCESS IS ROOT$ 9 ! TE*NICO-SCI5TIFIC CONTROL ( EA* ONE ( ! L9KS ( ! SOCIAL PRODUCTIVE *A94 ,A HI]>*Y ( PRIVILEGE )9 ! DI/9CT 9DU/RIAL CATEGORIES IS1 AS A CONSEQU5CE1 E/ABLI%$ ON ACC\NT ( !IR RELATIVE IMPORTANCE 9 ! REALIZATION ( ! PROCESS4 ,?AT IS1 ACCORD+ TO !IR CONTRIBUTION TO ! LOGI/ICAL *A9 ( ADD$ VALUE4 ,! DIS-AGGREGATION ( ! =MS ( SOCIABILITY & RESI/ANCE ( ! MASS WORK] BR+S 9 A REALITY :]E CONTEMPOR>Y PROLET>IAN RESI/ANCE IS ATTUN$ TO ! NEW CONDITIONS ( EXPLOITATION4 ,IT IS ! 5D ( ! TELEOLOGICAL CONCEPT ?AT D$UCES ! OBJECTIVE NECESSITY ( COMMUNISM & ( HALL[$ CONCEPTS4 ,!SE W]E AN*OR$ 9 ! RECUP]ATION ( PREVI\S =MS ( COMMUNITY :I* UP TO N[ HAD PROVID$ 9SPIRATION TO ! MOVEM5TS OPPOS$ TO ! WAGES SY/EM4 ,9 FACT ) ! IMPLANT+ ( =DISM1 ! P]SPECTIVE ( 0GO+ BEYOND0 CAPITAL WAS ALREADY BE+ AB&ON$ TO A NEW REALISM ( 0LIV+ 9 CAPITAL04 ,! ABS5CE ( A PROJECT D]IVES FROM AN ABSORPTION 9 ! IMM$IATE4 ,?IS TYPIFIES ! NEW CYCLE ( PROLET>IAN /RUGGLES & IS ITSELF A REFLECTION ( ! /AGE ( TOTAL DOM9ATION4 ! ABS5CE ( ANY NEW PROJECT BY CAPITAL ITSELF CORRESPONDS TO A PROCESS ( ACCUMULATION TURN+ 9TO A Z]O T5D5CY4 ,?AT IS1 9 ! R$UCTION TO Z]O ( ! TIME ( CAPITAL ROTATION :I* D5IES 9 ! CONCRETE PRACTICE ( ACCUMULATION ITS CAPACITY = CYCLICAL G5]ATION ( ADM9I/]$ TIME4 ,AS A RESULT ! IDEAL ( PROGRESS ?AT CON/ITUTES ! 7B\RGEOIS7 PROJECT ( ASC5DANT CAPITALISM L9K$ TO A BUS9ESS CYCLE1 :I* US$ TO C>RY A /AKE -- & A RISK -- 9 ! FUTURE1 HAS BE5 TRANSMUT$ 9TO A BUS9ESS CYCLE ?AT D$ICAT$ TO 9CREAS+ ! MASS ( CAPITAL4 ,?IS 9/ANTANE\S =M DOES NOT CONTEMPLATE ANY P]SPECTIVE ( PROJECTION 9 ! FUTURE4 ,9 REALITY1 ! FUTURE ONLY REMA9S 9 ! DOM9ANT DISC\RSE AS A RESIDUAL SPECTACUL> CATEGORY PROP] TO A MODEL ( CIVILIZATION ?AT IS LO/ 9 ITSELF4 ,! ,U,N,/,A,B,L,E ,D,I,S-,A,G,G,R,E,G,A,T,I,O,N ,! DIS-AGGREGATION ( ! =MAL EXPRESSION ( RESI/ANCE REPRES5TS 9 FACT ! BREAK+ UP ( ! =MS ( ORGANIZATION ( ! RUL+ PRODUCTIVE PROCESS4 ,! PH5OM5OLOGICAL REALITY ( CAPITAL IS A WORLD WIDE TOTALIT>IAN REALITY4 ,?IS IS C>RI$ 9TO EFFECT AS EXT5SIVE DOM9ATION ( ! WORLD M>KET & 9T5SIVE WEI<+ D[N ON POT5TIAL SUBJECTIVITY4 ,?IS IS ! /RUCTURAL REALITY CORRESPOND+ TO SU* DISP]S$ PRODUCTION4 ,! EM]G5CE ( SU* C5TRIFUGAL =CES ?REAT5 ! :OLE FROM )94 ,) ! WORLD LEVEL+ ( CULTURAL DIV]SITY !RE CORRESPONDS P>TICUL> ]OSION ( NATIONAL OR O!R ID5TITIES G5]AT$ BY ! DICTATES ( CAPITAL4 ,SIMIL>LY1 SU* GLOBAL DIS-AGGREGATION *ANGES ! ME?ODS ( LABOR =CE EXPLOITATION 9 H>MONY ) ! TOTALIT>IAN REALIZATION ( ! DOMA9 ( CAPITAL4 ,H[EV]1 A WORLD UND] ! SWAY ( CAPITAL IS ALSO ! ACTUALIZATION ( ITS TOTALIT>IAN LIMITS BUT SUBJECT TO CONTRADICTIONS ?AT ?REAT5 ?IS DOMA94 ,! TOTAL DOM9ATION ( CAPITAL CONFIRMS ITSELF AS A M]E AB/RACT UNIFICATION ( ! WORLD >\ND ! COMMODITY & MONEY4 ,BUT ! UNIFICATION >\ND !SE AB/RACT CATEGORIES 7COMMODITIES >E VALUE1 HAVE A VALUE7 IMPLY 9 FACT A BREAK D[N ( ?W>T$ SOCIABILITY4 ,?IS IS PRECISELY BECAUSE ACCESS TO ! COMMODITY1 & TO PUR*AS+ P[]1 IS EV] MORE /AMP$ BY ! POSITION EA* P]SON HAS )9 ! LOGI/ICAL *A9 ( ADD$ VALUE4 ,?IS IS DET]M9$ BY ! MORE OR LESS ADVANTAGE\S POSITION EA* P]SON CAN NEGOTIATE AS A TRANSACTION )9 ! SOCIAL RELATIONS WE DEF9E AS CAPITAL4 ,PRECISELY BECAUSE ACTUAL SOCIABILITY TAKES PLACE 9 ! CONCRETE CIRCUM/ANCES ( ! IMM$IATE 7PRIVATE CONSUMPTION ( ?+S7 !RE IS NO ROOM = A SOCIAL PROJECT4 0,)90 ! COORD9ATES ( COMM]CIAL =MS ( SOCIABILITY ONLY CAPITALI/ SOCIAL RELATIONS CAN EXI/4 ,! MANIFE/ATION ( !SE CRISES ( SOCIABILITY IS MADE OBVI\S 9 ! C5T] ( CAPITALISM ITSELF4 ,! APPE>ANCE ( ! #d? WORLD 9 ! RI* C\NTRIES1 GIVES RISE TO ! !ORY ( ! #c 0?AT*]ITE0 /AGES03 ! DET]IORATION ( LIV+ CONDITIONS 9 ! METROPOLIS1 ! EXT5SION ( PA?OLOGICAL =MS FE$+ (F CAPITAL ACCUMULATION SU* AS DRUG ADDICTION & ! HOMELESS 9 'C>DBO>D CITIES'1 ?OSE :O >E SURPLUS TO ! LOGI/ICAL *A94 ,! ,R,E,P,R,E,S,S,I,V,E ,U,N,I,F,I,C,A,T,I,O,N ,( ,! ,W,O,R,L,D ,U,N,D,] ,! ,S,W,A,Y ,( ,C,A,P,I,T,A,L ,! UN/ABLE EQUILIBRIUM 9 :I* ! PROCESS ( REPRODUCTION 9 ! CAPITALI/ C\NTRIES IS MA9TA9$ & ITS IMPLICIT RECOGNITION BY ! DOM9ANT TE*NOCRACY1 HAS 5G5D]$ ! G5]ALIZ$ 9TRODUCTION ( ! SY/EMS ( 9DU/RIAL BLACKMAIL REPRES5T$ BY ! LACK ( JOB SECURITY & DIRECT REPRESSION :5 CONFLICT BREAKS \T4 ,BUT ! 9SECURITY ?AT ACCOMPANIES DISP]S$ =DISM IMPLIES A POT5TIAL LIMIT TO CONS5SUS4 ,! 9/ABILITY ( EMPLOYM5T G5]ATES DISAFFECTION & PLACES DIFFICULTIES 9 ! WAY ( G5]AT+ 0LOYALTY TO ! FIRM0 4 ,! /RATEGY ( DIFF]5TIAL CONTROL ?AT PRIVILEGES & RECOMP5SES 9 A /RUCTUR$ =M EA* CATEGORY ( ! 9DU/RIAL HI]>*Y1 T5DS TO BRE$ 9SECURITY1 ESPECIALLY AMONG ?OSE :O CONTRIBUTE LESS TO ! *A9 ( ADD$ VALUE FOLL[+ ! NOTIONS ( POLITICAL ECONOMY ?AT >E DOM9ANT 9 REALITY4 ,EV5 ! PRES5T SUCCESS 9 T]MS ( TE*NIQUES ( CONTROL WILL REA* LIMITATIONS4 ,!SE >E MANIFE/ 9 ! GR[+ NE$ TO VALORIZE ALL ! /AGES ( ! PRODUCTIVE *A9 9 ORD] TO MAXIMIZE ! SURPLUS VALUE AT EA* LEVEL ( ! PRODUCTIVE *A94 ,AL?\< /RATEGIES ( DIVIDE & RULE HAVE PREV5T$ A UNIFI$ SOLID>ITY AMONG WORK]S ?IS HAS NOT PREV5T$ /RATEGICALLY SIGNIFICANT /OPPAGES SU* AS ! CLEAN+ WORK]S 9 ,MADRID AIRPORT REC5TLY4 ,9SECURITY 9 ! LABOR =CE REFLECTS ! UN/ABLE EQUILIBRIUM & ! PROMOTION ( CONS5SUS IS BACK$ UP BY OP5LY REPRESSIVE OPTIONS4 ,! EXTRA RECRUITM5T ( POLICE1 ! RE/RICTION ( SO-CALL$ DEMOCRATIC RIE ALL FEATURES ( MOD]N DEMOCRACY4 ,) AN 9CREAS$ GULF BETWE5 ! ,POLITICAL & SOCIAL SPH]ES1 DEMOCRATIC LIB]TIES >E R$UC$ TO PROPAG&A1 MASK+ TE*NOCRATIC CONTROL ( PUBLIC LIFE1 9CREAS+LY TOTALIT>IAN 9 APPLICATION4 ,DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMATION DOES NOT N[ CORRESPOND ) ! REALITY ( A WORLD BAS$ ON FUNCTIONAL & PRODUCTIVE DIS-AGGREGATION4 ,A PIVOTAL 9T]E/ GR\P 9 ! F9ANCIAL OR SOCIAL SECTOR CAN DEVA/ATE ! PROCESS ( SOCIAL REPRODUCTION P]HAPS AS A RESPONSE TO DISRUPTION ELSE:]E 9 ! *A94 ,SU* IS ! CONC5TRATION ( CAPITAL1 DEMOCRATIC M$IATION R>ELY 9T]F]ES ) ITS AUTONOM\S OP]ATION4 ,EQUALLY ! DISP]SAL ( ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS DICTAT$ BY ! LAWS ( ACCUMULATION MAKES ANY REF]5CE TO DEMOCRACY BANAL4 ,DEMOCRACY M]ELY LEGITIMATES1 RUBB] /AMPS ! P[] ( MULT9ATIONALS4 ,9 ! CASE ( #a#d,D7#c71 ANTI-,NATO OR ANTI-,GULF ,W> ACTIONS !Y 9HABIT A RITUALIZ$ SPACE H>K+ BACK TO ! ]A ( ! MASS WORK] & >E P]IPH]AL TO ! PRES5T SY/EM4 ,:5 AN ORGANIZATION ?REAT5S ! LOGI/ICAL *A9 -- AS 9 ! ,P>IS TRANSPORT CONFLICTS -- ! PROPAG&A APP>ATUS ( ! ,/ATE @& MASS M$IA MOBILIZES PUBLIC OP9ION AGA9/ ! 0ANTI-SOCIAL0 M9ORITY4 ,EXP]I5CE DEMON/RATES ?AT CONFLICTS >E NEI!R CUMULATIVE NOR >E !Y ORI5TAT$ T[>D AN IMAG9>Y GOAL ( EMANCIPATION4 ,!Y BOIL D[N TO PROMPT ACTS ( RESI/ANCE PO9T+ T[>D A REAL GU]RILLA SOCIAL /RUGGLE4 ,H[EV]1 !SE ACTS >E FUNDAM5TALLY RADICAL BECAUSE \R EXI/5CE IS 9CREAS+LY DEF9$ AS A S\RCE ( VALORIZATION 9 A WORLD 9 :I* CAPITAL CON/ITUTES ITSELF AS AN 9TR9SICALLY CONFLICTUAL SOCIAL RELATION4 ,\TSIDE ! SPACE ?AT DET]M9ES ! SOCIAL RELATION ( CAPITAL !RE >E NO REAL OPTIONS4 ,H[EV]1 IT IS A SOCIAL RELATION ?AT 9VOLVES US 9 CONFLICT4 ,TO AFFIRM ONESELF 9 CONFLICT & TO CONSCI\SLY R5\NCE HOPE IS P]HAPS ! LA/ EXI/5TIAL OPTION TO ?OSE R$UC$ TO BE+ LABOR P[] ) NO?+ AT ALL TO LOSE NOT EV5 !IR ILLUSIONS4 .<#a.> EXTRACT FROM TEXT3 ,9 ?IS WAY ! =MALLY SUBJECTIVE VULN]ABILITY RESULT+ FROM ! AGGREGATION ( ! MASS WORK] 9 ! FACTORY1 :OSE 9T]V5TION C\LD PUT ! PRODUCTIVE PROCESS 9 JEOP>DY1 HAS BE5 RESOLV$ BY DISP]S$ ,=DISM BY MEANS ( ! TRANS=MATION ( =MALLY SUBJECTIVE VULN]ABILITY 9TO ! =MALLY OBJECTIVE1 FUNCTIONAL VULN]ABILITY ( ! NEW PRODUCTIVE ORGANIZATION4 ,IF \R 9DIVIDUAL TRAG$Y IS TO BE LABOR P[]1 PRECISELY BECAUSE WE RECOGNIZE \RSELVES AS A CON/ITU5T P>T ( CAPITAL -- ?AT IS ( ! SOCIAL RELATION CONSI/+ 9 ! TRANSACTION ( ! EX*ANGE VALUE ( \R LABOR P[] -- ( ! =MS ( SOCIAL DOM9ATION F\ND$ ON ! BASIS ( CAPITALI/ PRODUCTION IT MOVES BY T5D+ TO NEGATE 7SUPPRESSION ( LIV+ LABOR7 ! REAL S\RCE ( VALORIZATION :I* IS LIV+ LABOR1 CAPABLE ( VALORIZ+ TE*NOLOGY4 ,SUGGE/ ?IS P>AGRAPH TAK5 \T ( TEXT TO AVOID PEOPLE SWIT*+ (F6 ,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,JANU>Y #b#i1 #bba 3 ,DISP]S$ ,=DISM & A ,NEW ,ORGANISATION ( ,LAB\R -- ,ADD$4 ,JANU>Y #g1 #bbb 3 ,DISP]S$ ,=DISM & A ,NEW ,ORGANISATION ( ,LAB\R -- ,UPDAT$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/