,BUT :AT AB\T ! *ILDR58 
,A NOTE ON TUTELAGE 

,PEOPLE 3 

,AU?OR 3 ,%AWN ,P4 ,WILBUR 

,TEXT 3 

,IT'S A QUE/ION AGA9 ( 0LEGITIMATE AU?ORITY0 & 0JU/IFI$ HI]>*Y10 & SPECIFICALLY ( ! FAVORITE EXAMPLE US$ BY ?OSE :O WANT TO LEAVE A SPACE )9 AN>*I/ !ORY = ?OSE ?+S3 ! C>E ( V]Y Y\NG *ILDR54 ,! >GUM5T ,I HAVE 5C\NT]$ REPEAT$LY IS ?AT P>5T+ IS1 AT LEA/ 9 ! CASE ( ?OSE V]Y Y\NG *ILDR51 A NECESS>ILY AU?ORIT>IAN RELATION3 *ILDR5 MU/ BE ORD]$ AB\T 9 ORD] TO PROTECT !M FROM HAZ>DS2 P>5TS HAVE A DUTY & PRESUMABLY ALSO A RI<T TO DICTATE TO !IR *ILDR52 & *ILDR5 HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO OBEY4 

,IT'S ONE ( ?OSE DEBATES ?AT ALL TOO (T5 COMES D[N TO3 0,:,Y ,W,O,N',T ,S,O,M,E,O,N,E ,P,L,E,A,S,E ,?,9,K ,( ,! ,*,I,L,D,R,56660 ,& WE KN[ ALL TOO WELL ALL ! DODGY USES TO :I* ?AT APPEAL HAS BE5 PUT4 ,BUT IT %\LD ALSO BE CLE> ?AT ! UND]LY+ QUE/IONS1 REG>D+ \R RELATIONS ) ?OSE 9DIVIDUALS ) SUB/ANTIALLY DIFF]5T CAPACITIES = SELF-DET]M9ATION1 >E IMPORTANT ON !IR [N & PROBABLY HAVE SOME CONNECTION TO H[ WE ORGANIZE \R RELATIONS ) NON-HUMAN NATURE4 ,SO WE HAVE TO TRY TO GET TO ! BOTTOM ( :AT'S REALLY AT /AKE1 DESPITE ! DIFFICULTIES4 ,UN=TUNATELY1 ! T]MS ?AT SEEM MO/ USEFUL TO MAKE ! K9DS ( DI/9CTIONS WE W\LD NE$ >E ! V]Y T]MS ?AT SEEM TO HAVE BE5 EXT5D$ TO 5COMPASS ALL SORTS ( POT5TIALLY CONFLICT+ IDEAS1 SO WE HAVE TO BE TRY TO F9D O!R VOCABUL>IES4 

,! G5]AL DI/9CTION ?AT CRITICS ( ALL AU?ORITY >GUABLY NE$ TO MAKE IS BETWE5 ! CAPACITY TO ACT & V>I\S SORTS ( SOCIAL P]MISSION OR SANCTION = ACTION ?AT 9CLUDE SOME RI<T TO COMM& O!RS4 ,IT'S A DI/9CTION ?AT WE MAKE REGUL>LY3 ! CAPACITY TO KILL ANO!R 9DIVIDUAL DOES NOT G5]ALLY C>RY ) IT ANY RI<T TO DO SO1 NOR DOES ! CAPACITY TO UND]/& COMPLEX SOCIAL RELATIONS ITSELF GRANT ANY RI<T TO >RANGE !M = O!RS4 ,! EXP]T HAS TO POSSESS SOME?+ MORE ?AN M]E EXP]TIZE 9 ORD] = !RE TO BE AU?ORITY 79 ! /RONG S5SE7 VE/$ 9 !M4 ,?AT SOME?+ MORE IS SOCIAL 9 *>ACT]1 & 9DE$ /RUCTURES ! SORT ( SOCIETY ?AT CAN EXI/ BETWE5 9DIVIDUALS4 

,! QUE/ION BECOMES :]E1 9 RELATIONS PRESUMABLY GUID$ BY AN>*I/ PR9CIPLES1 ?AT EXTRA1 SOCIAL SOME?+ C\LD COME FROM4 ,! CASE ( ! P>5TAL RELATION IS AT LEA/ USEFUL AS A PLACE TO EXAM9E ! POSSIBILITIES4 ,9 ORD] TO BE P>TICUL>LY C>EFUL1 IT MAY BE USEFUL TO FIR/ ADDRESS IT 9 T]MS ( ! QUE/ION ( 0LEGITIMATE AU?ORITY0 & !N AGA9 9 T]MS ( 0JU/IFIABLE HI]>*Y40 

,!RE >E SOME POSSIBLE S\RCE ( AU?ORITY1 SU* AS [N]%IP ( ! *ILD BY ! P>5TS1 ?AT WE CAN PROBABLY SET ASIDE )\T MU* COMM5T4 ,SIMIL>LY1 !RE SEEMS TO BE LITTLE SYMPA?Y = ! NOTION ?AT ! P>5TAL RELATION MI<T BE ONE 9 :I* MI<T MAKES RI<T4 ,9 G5]AL1 EV5 ?OSE :O CONSID] ! P>5TAL RELATION NECESS>ILY AU?ORIT>IAN SEEM 9CL9$ TO ALSO TREAT IT AS A RELATION ( C>E4 ,9DE$1 !Y (T5 *>ACT]IZE P>5TAL GU>DIAN%IP AS A DUTY1 AL?\< IT IS (T5 UNCLE> TO :OM ! DUTY IS1 OR C\LD BE1 [$4 ,WE'LL RETURN TO ! DYNAMIC ( DUTY & OBLIGATION4 ,FIR/1 WE %\LD SEE IF P]HAPS P>5TAL AU?ORITY C\LD JU/ BE A MATT] ( SUP]IOR CAPACITY & EXP]TIZE1 & P]HAPS ONE ?AT C\LD MAKE US ?9K DIFF]5TLY AB\T 0! AU?ORITY ( ! BOOTMAK]40 

,C]TA9LY1 ONE ( ! ELEM5TS ( ! P>5T-*ILD RELATION IS ?AT ADULTS HAVE A SIGNIFICANTLY GREAT] EXP]I5CE ( ! WORLD & ! BUS9ESS ( MAK+ \R WAY ?R\< IT RELATIVELY UNSCA!D4 ,!Y HAVE CAPACITIES ?AT >E MORE DEVELOP$ 9 A V>IETY ( WAYS4 ,IF WE W]E TO ASS5T TO ! NOTION ?AT ! DIFF]5CE BETWE5 KN[+ H[ TO MAKE BOOTS & NOT HAV+ ?OSE SKILLS C\LD BE A S\RCE ( AU?ORITY1 !N C]TA9LY ! DIFF]5CE BETWE5 ! SKILLS & CAPACITIES ( P>5T & *ILD C\LD BE A SIMIL> S\RCE4 ,! QUE/ION BECOMES H[ A DIFF]5CE 9 CAPACITIES IS TRANS=M$ 9TO A RI<T TO COMM& ON ! P>T ( ! MORE CAPABLE & A DUTY TO OBEY ON ! P>T ( ! LESS CAPABLE4 

,LET'S IMAG9E A SOCIETY ( TAL5T$ G5]ALI/S1 :]E SKILLS & CAPACITIES >E WIDELY DI/RIBUT$ & EA* 9DIVIDUAL IS RELATIVELY SELF-SUFFICI5T4 ,IT IS H>D TO IMAG9E ! RATIONALE BY :I* WE W\LD SAY ?AT 9T]F]5CE BY C]TA9 9DIVIDUALS 9 ! LIVES ( O!RS C\LD BE CONSID]$ JU/IFI$ OR LEGITIMATE4 ,P]HAPS ! CASE ( PLUCK+ SOMEONE \T ( H>M'S WAY W\LD BE ! SORT ( EXCEPTION WE MI<T NOTE1 BUT1 9 ! CASE ( 9DIVIDUALS ( EQUAL CAPACITIES1 IT SEEMS H>D TO *>ACT]IZE ! ACT AS ONE ( AU?ORITY4 ,UND] !SE CIRCUM/ANCES1 ! 9T]V5TION HAS TO BE CONSID]$ ONE ?AT WE MAKE ON \R [N RESPONSIBILITY & IF WE F9D IT WAS UNWELCOME1 IT ISN'T CLE> ?AT WE C\LD JU/IFY \R 9T]F]5CE 9 ANY WAY ?AT ! RECIPI5T_/VICTIM %\LD FEEL OBLIG$ TO ACCEPT4 ,C]TA9LY1 9 A SOCIETY ( COMPET5T BOOTMAK]S1 NO P>TICUL> BOOTMAK] C\LD BE SAID TO HAVE MU* 9 ! WAY ( AU?ORITY4 

,LET'S CONSID] !N :AT HAPP5S IF1 9 ?IS SOCIETY ( COMPET5T BOOTMAK]S1 ONE 9DIVIDUAL BECOMES EXP]T4 ,IT /ILL ISN'T CLE> ?AT ! ADDITIONAL CAPACITY TRANSLATES 9TO ANY SORT ( AU?ORITY4 ,!RE >E C]TA9LY LIKELY TO BE ECONOMIC EFFECTS AS WE BEG9 TO SEE SPECIALIZATION 9 A SOCIETY1 BUT !RE'S NO OBVI\S WAY 9 :I* ANY P[] OR RI<T TO COMM& EM]GES FROM ! SC5>IO4 

,BUT LET'S CONSID] ! O!R 5D ( A C]TA9 SPECTRUM1 9 A SOCIETY :]E WE HAVE A GREAT DEAL ( SPECIALIZATION--SO MU*1 9 FACT1 ?AT 9DIVIDUALS >E CON/ANTLY CONFRONT$ ) ! NE$ TO CONSULT O!RS TO COMPLETE ! MO/ BASIC ( TASKS4 ,! DYNAMICS ( ! SOCIETY WILL OBVI\SLY BE MORE COMPLEX1 BUT IT ISN'T CLE> ?AT ?IS EXTREME DIVVY+-UP ( EXP]TIZE PROVIDES MU* GREAT] FOO?OLDS = ! E/ABLI%M5T ( AU?ORITY1 AT LEA/ 9 ! REALM ( PR9CIPLE4 ,H]E1 EV]Y 9DIVIDUAL IS1 9 !ORY1 A POT5TIAL AU?ORITY :5 IT COMES TO !IR P>TICUL> SPECIALIZATION & A DEP5D5T 9 MO/ O!R CONTEXTS1 BUT 9 FACT ! COMPLEX 9T]DEP5D5CE MEANS ?AT ALL ( ?AT AU?ORITY REMA9S L>GELY POT5TIAL1 S9CE ! SOCIAL LEV]AGE AVAILABLE TO EA* N>R[ SPECIALIZATION IS M9USCULE 9 COMP>ISON TO ! COMB9$ IMPORTANCE ( ALL ! O!R =MS ( SPECIALIZ$ EXP]TIZE4 

,N[1 9 A MORE COMPLEX SOCIETY !RE >E MORE OPPORTUNITIES = EQUAL 9T]DEP5D5CE TO BREAK D[N4 ,?AT MEANS ?AT SOME ( \R SPECIALI/S MI<T F9D !MSELVES GA9+ RELATIVE ADVANTAGES AS CIRCUM/ANCES GAVE !IR SKILLS P>TICUL> IMPORTANCE4 ,! V>I\S WEAPON-PRODUC]S OR FOOD-PRODUC]S MI<T COLLUDE1 UND] FAVORABLE CIRCUM/ANCES1 TO TRANS=M !IR EXP]TIZE 9TO ! P[] TO COMM&1 BUT WE W\LD BE H>D PUT1 ,I ?9K1 TO F9D AN AN>*I/ PR9CIPLE TO JU/IFY !IR ACTIONS4 ,& ,I ?9K WE W\LD HAVE TO SAY ?AT ! S\RCE ( ?AT POSSIBILITY WAS MORE 9 ! G5]AL 9CAPACITY ( ! POPULATION ) REG>D TO SPECIFIC SKILLS & ! SPECIFIC 5VIRONM5TAL CIRCUM/ANCES ?AN IT WAS 9 ! EXP]TIZE ( ! 9DIVIDUALS ABLE TO CAPITALIZE ON ! SITUATION4 

,OBVI\SLY1 WE LIVE 9 SOCIETIES :]E ! DI/RIBUTION ( EXP]TIZE LIES BETWE5 !SE EXTREMES & :]E ! EXI/+ CONDITIONS ALREADY /RUCTURE :I* SORTS ( EXP]TIZE HAVE ACCESS TO ! P[] TO COMM&1 :E!R IT IS A MATT] ( COMM&+ WEAL? 9 ! M>KET OR OB$I5CE 9 A WIDE RANGE ( AU?ORIT>IAN 9/ITUTIONS4 ,BUT IT ISN'T CLE> H[ \R [N SOCIETIES DIFF] FROM !SE EXTREME EXAMPLES1 :]E ! QUE/ION ( 0LEGITIMATE AU?ORITY0 >IS+ FROM EXP]TIZE IS CONC]N$4 ,! P[] TO COMM& SEEMS TO EM]GE FROM JU/ AB\T EV]Y ELEM5T 9 SOCIETY EXCEPT 9DIVIDUAL EXP]TIZE3 ALREADY EXI/+ POLITICAL AU?ORITY1 ECONOMIC MONOPOLY1 ! COMP>ATIVE 9CAPACITY ( O!RS1 ACCID5TS & 0ACTS ( ,GOD10 ETC4 ,WE CAN'T SEEM TO MAKE ! LEAP FROM 0,I CAN4440 TO 0,I MAY & O!RS MU/44410 BUT ?AT IS PRECISELY ! LEAP WE HAVE TO MAKE 9 ORD] TO E/ABLI% SOME PR9CIPLE BY :I* EXP]TIZE ITSELF REALLY E/ABLI%ES SOME AU?ORITY VE/$ 9 ! EXP]T4 

,ADD TO !SE CONSID]ATIONS ,BAKUN9'S COMM5TS ON ! CORROSIVE EFFECTS ( AU?ORITY ON EXP]TIZE1 & P]HAPS WE CAN ACKN[L$GE WE HAVE TO LOOK ELSE:]E4 ,! ULTIMATE SANCTION ( EXP]TIZE IS PRESUMABLY TRU?1 BUT PRACTICAL TRU? 9 A DEVELOP+ CONTEXT IS NOT ! SORT ( ?+ ?AT /&S /ILL1 SO ?AT SANCTION HAS TO BE R5EW$ & TE/$ BY NEW /UDY & EXP]IM5T4 ,SO EV5 IF WE C\LD E/ABLI% ! PRES5T LEGITIMACY ( AN AU?ORITY BAS$ ON ! MO/ RIGOR\S SORT ( SCI5TIFIC TRU?1 9 SOME WAY ?AT ! NON-EXP]T C\LD V]IFY 7& ?IS IS NOT AT ALL CLE>71 WE HAVE NO GU>ANTEE ?AT ! LEGITIMACY W\LD REMA9 AS CIRCUM/ANCES *ANG$1 :ILE ! EX]CISE ( ! AU?ORITY AS SU* IS ITSELF AT LEA/ POT5TIALLY A BREAK FROM ! EX]CISE ( ! PRACTICES ( ! FIELD ( EXP]TIZE ON :I* IT IS PRESUMABLY BAS$4 ,ONCE CR[N$ AN EXP]T1 IT IS EASY TO /OP R5EW+ ONE'S EXP]TIZE4 

,:5 WE APPLY !SE CONSID]ATIONS TO ! P>5TAL RELATION1 IT DOESN'T SEEM ANY EASI] TO EXPLA9 :Y ! GREAT] CAPACITIES ( ! P>5T W\LD ALONE E/ABLI% A P[] TO COMM& OR AN OBLIGATION TO OBEY 9 ?IS 9/ANCE ?AN IT IS 9 ! RELATIONS BETWE5 ADULTS4 ,AT ! SAME TIME1 !RE SEEM TO BE O!R EXPLANATIONS = :Y WE MI<T ACT 9 !IR DEF5SE ?AT DON'T DEP5D ON EI!R AU?ORITY OR EV5 ON ! RELATIVE DIFF]5CES 9 CAPACITY BETWE5 ADULTS & *ILDR54 ,WE MI<T1 AFT] ALL1 ACT TO SAVE ANO!R ADULT1 )\T ANY ATTEMPT TO E/ABLI% AU?ORITY OR P]MISSION4 ,WE MI<T DO SO \T ( SPECIFIC RELATIONS ( C>E OR SIMPLY ON ! BASIS ( \R EXP]I5CE ( :AT CON/ITUTES 9T5TIONAL & ACCID5TAL BEHAVIOR 9 \R [N SOCIETIES4 ,! MAJOR DIFF]5CE ) *ILDR5 IS ?AT WE CAN BE FAIRLY C]TA9 ?AT NOBODY1 EXCEPT ! *ILD1 IS LIKELY TO MAKE MU* FUSS IF \R EX]CISE ( REAL OR IMAG9$ AU?ORITY SEEMS TO BE 0= ! GOOD ( ! *ILD40 ,& ! REASONS = ?AT MAY HAVE MORE TO DO ) \R T5D5CY TO ?9K ( *ILDR5 & !IR ACTIONS AS EXI/+ )9 A 0JU/IFIABLE HI]>*Y0 B5EA? ADULTS & ! ORD9>Y WORK+S ( ADULT SOCIETY4 

,! P>5T-*ILD HI]>*Y IS (T5 CIT$ AS ONE ( A CLASS ( $UCATIONAL OR TUTEL>Y HI]>*IES4 ,TUTELAGE IS GU>DIAN%IP & 9 TUTEL>Y RELATIONS ! ASSUMPTION IS ?AT ! SUBORD9ATE 7*ILD1 PUPIL1 APPR5TICE1 ETC47 IS AT LEA/ TEMPOR>ILY 9CAPABLE ( PROTECT+ !MSELVES & !IR 9T]E/S1 SO ! RI<T TO EX]CISE ! P[] ( COMM& IS BAS$ ON ! ASSUMPTION ?AT IT IS EX]CIS$ = ! SUBORD9ATE--OR AT LEA/ 0= !IR [N GOOD40 ,BAKUN9 LEFT OP5 ! POSSIBILITY ( EX]CIS+ AU?ORITY OV] V]Y Y\NG *ILDR51 BECAUSE HE UND]/OOD HUMAN DEVELOPM5T AS 9 P>T *>ACT]IZ$ BY A PROGRESSIVE 9CREASE 9 HUMANITY1 AT ! V]Y BEG9N+ ( :I* *ILDR5 >E EFFECTIVELY NOT YET HUMAN & NE$ TO BE GIV5 ! TOOLS TO TAKE ON !IR [N DEVELOPM5T BE=E !Y CAN />T ?AT PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPM5T ON !IR [N T]MS4 

,EV5 ?IS MAY NOT BE 5TIRELY DEF5SIBLE AS A MATT] ( PR9CIPLE4 ,! FAMILI> EXAMPLE ( PULL+ A *ILD BACK FROM TRAFFIC ALREADY ASSUMES A P>TICUL> SORT ( 0ADULT WORLD0 9 :I* ! SPACES = FREE EXPLORATION >E DRAMATICALLY LIMIT$ BY ! BUS9ESS AS USUAL ( ! 9/ITUTIONS WE HAVE CREAT$4 ,IT ISN'T CLE> :AT C\LD JU/IFY ! BUSY /REET1 9 PR9CIPL$ T]MS1 SO IT IS AT LEA/ A LITTLE BIT H>D TO KN[ H[ ?AT BUSY /REET CONTRIBUTES TO ! PR9CIPL$ LEGITIMIZATION ( ! P>5TAL ACT4 

,BUT IF WE ASSUME ?AT1 SPECIFICS ASIDE1 !RE WILL ALWAYS BE SOME SET ( COP+ SKILLS ?AT NE$ TO BE ACQUIR$ BE=E *ILDR5 CAN ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY = !IR [N SAFETY & DEVELOPM5T1 WE /ILL HAVE TO WORK \T JU/ :AT =M ! TUTEL>Y HI]>*Y REALLY TAKES--& !N :E!R IT AM\NTS TO EVID5CE 9 FAVOR ( RETA9+ SOME SPACE = 0LEGITIMATE AU?ORITY0 & 0JU/IFI$ HI]>*Y0 )9 AN>*I/ ?\<T4 

,E>LY 9 \R EXAM9ATION1 IT WAS SUGGE/$ ?AT P>5TAL C>E MI<T BE A DUTY4 ,N[1 IF ?IS WAS ! CASE1 ! P>5T W\LD PRESUMABLY BE SUP]IOR TO ! *ILD BECAUSE !Y W]E 9F]IOR TO SOME O!R P[] ?AT IMPOS$ ! DUTY4 ,WE MI<T C]TA9LY ?9K ( FAMILI> CIRCUM/ANCES1 UND] :I* ! C>E ( *ILDR5 IS 9DE$ DICTAT$ BY LAW & BY SPECIFIC SOCIAL NORMS1 BUT ,I SUSPECT WE CAN ALSO ?9K ( REASONS :Y MO/ ( ?OSE FACTORS :I* PRESUME TO DICTATE TO ! 9DIVIDUAL MI<T NOT BE CONSI/5T ) AN>*I/ PR9CIPLES OR PRES5T 9 AN AN>*I/ SOCIETY4 ,WE C\LD ALSO ?9K ( ! DUTY AS A DUTY TO ! *ILD1 BUT ?AT PUTS US 9 ! /RANGE POSITION ( IMAG9+ A HI]>*Y 9 :I* ! SUP]IOR 9T]E/ IS ?AT ( A BE+ ELEVAT$ TO ?AT /ATUS BY !IR 9CAPACITY4 ,IF !RE IS A HI]>*Y H]E1 IT IS AN ODD ONE1 DISCONNECT$ FROM \R USUAL UND]/&+ ( AU?ORITY1 S9CE ! *ILD :O CANNOT MANAGE !IR [N 9T]E/S IS H>DLY 9 A POSITION TO EX]CISE A RI<T TO COMM&4 

,9/EAD ( A HI]>*Y1 WE SEEM TO BE LEFT ) ONE ( ?OSE COMPLICAT$ RELATION%IPS1 LIKE ! GUE/-HO/ RELATION ( HOSPITALITY1 :]E ! ROLES >E FLUID & ! USUAL RULES >E SUSP5D$4 ,9 ?IS CASE1 WE HAVE SOME ( ! =MS ( COMM& & RULE1 BUT )\T ANY ( ! USUAL AU?ORIT>IAN OR HI]>*ICAL RATIONALES4 ,RA!R ?AN BE+ AN EXCEPTION TO AN>*I/ PR9CIPLES1 P]HAPS WE %\LD UND]/& ! P>5TAL RELATION AS A MO/ ACCESSIBLE EXAMPLE ( H[ AN>*I/S PR9CIPLES \<T TO BE APPLI$ 9 \R /RUGGLE T[>DS A MORE G5U9ELY FREE SOCIETY1 *>ACT]IZ$ BY MORE ?OR\<LY ANTI-AU?ORIT>IAN & NON-HI]>*ICAL RELATIONS4 

,AFT] ALL1 ! P>5TAL RELATION1 ) ALL ( ITS NEGOTIATIONS BETWE5 ! RI<TS & NE$S ( *ILDR5 & ?OSE ( P>5TS1 IS NOT ! SORT ( ?+ ?AT WE 9T5D TO MA9TA9 =EV]1 ASSUM+ ?AT WE VALUE \R *ILDR5 AS DEVELOP+ HUMAN BE+S4 ,CONFRONT$ ) ! LIMIT$ CAPACITIES ( ! *ILD1 \R ACTION IS DIRECT$ T[>D 9CREAS+ ?OSE CAPACITIES4 ,WE TEA* &1 9 ?OSE 9/ANCES :]E \R TEA*+ HAS NOT CAU<T UP ) ! NE$S ( ! DAY1 WE 9T]V5E MORE DIRECTLY4 ,BUT ! HOPE1 ASSUM+ ?AT DESIRE TO SEE *ILDR5 GR[ UP TO BE 9DEP5D5T1 IS ?AT ! TUTELAGE IS A V]Y TEMPOR>Y ?+4 ,& *ILD-RE>+ IS1 LIKE EV]Y O!R K9D ( EXP]TIZE1 ITSELF A MATT] ( PRACTICE & DEVELOP+ EXP]TIZE4 ,! SPECIFIC DIFFICULTIES ( NEGOTIAT+ RI<TS & 9T]E/S MEAN ?AT IT IS NECESS>ILY A WORK ( TRIAL-&-]ROR4 ,!RE'S NO?+ EASY OR COM=TABLE AB\T ! RELATION1 P>TICUL>LY = ?OSE :O CONC]N !MSELVES ) ! PR9CIPL$ CRITIQUE ( AU?ORITY1 SO !RE'S EV5 SOME /RONG 9C5TIVES TO MOVE ?+S ALONG & R$UCE ! QUASI-HI]>*ICAL ELEM5TS ( ! RELATION4 

,?AT DOESN'T S\ND LIKE A SET ( REASONS TO MAKE SPACE 9 AN>*I/ !ORY = ANY MORE EXT5SIVE ACCEPTANCE ( HI]>*Y--& P]HAPS QUITE ! CONTR>Y4 ,IT W\LD SEEM TO ME ?AT EA* TIME WE >E CONFRONT$ ) AN IMBALANCE ( EXP]TIZE & ! OP5+ TO AU?ORIT>IAN RELATIONS1 ! LOGICAL AN>*I/ RESPONSE W\LD BE TO WORK1 ON \R [N RESPONSIBILITY1 TO CULTIVATE GREAT]1 MORE WIDESPREAD KN[L$GE & SKILL1 RA!R ?AN ACCOMMODAT+ \RSELVES TO ! IMBALANCE4 ,!RE WILL1 ( C\RSE1 BE TIMES :5 WE HAVE TO MOVE =W>D ) ! LIMITATIONS IMPOS$ ON US BY H>D NECESSITY4 ,?AT WAS1 AFT] ALL1 ! ONE LAW ?AT AN>*I/S LIKE ,PR\DHON & ,BAKUN9 W\LD ACKN[L$GE4 ,BUT ! PO9T ( NECESSITY-AS-LAW WAS NOT TO GRANT AU?ORITY TO ANY P>TICUL> RESPONSE TO ! 9EVITABLE1 BUT TO EMPHASIZE ?AT WE MU/ RESPOND4 ,H[ WE RESPOND WILL SELDOM BE 5TIRELY DICTAT$ BY \R CIRCUM/ANCES1 :I* IS PRECISELY ! REASON ?AT \R PR9CIPLES NE$ TO BE CLE>1 SO ?AT WE CAN ADVANCE MO/ EFFECTIVELY1 GIV5 \R REAL LIMITATIONS1 T[>D ! BEAUTIFUL IDEAL ( AN>*Y4 

,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 

,*RONOLOGY 3 
,JANU>Y #a#d1 #bba 3 ,BUT :AT AB\T ! *ILDR58 -- ,ADD$4 
,JANU>Y #f1 #bbb 3 ,BUT :AT AB\T ! *ILDR58 -- ,UPDAT$4 

 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3  
HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/