,A ,NON-,DOGMATIC ,APPROA* TO ,M>XISM ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,K>L ,KORS* ,TEXT 3 ,FIR/ ,PUBLI%$3 9 ,POLITICS MAGAZ9E 7,NEW ,YORK1 ,MAY #a#i#d#f72 ,S\RCE3 ,BUREAU ( ,PUBLIC ,SECRETS2 ,TRANSCRIB$3 BY ,&Y ,BLUND51 = M>XI/S4ORG #b#c4 ,! DOCUM5TS H]E ASSEMBL$ >E NOT MEANT AS A CONTRIBUTION TO ! DISCUSSION = OR AGA9/ ,M>XISM ?AT HAS BE5 CONDUCT$ 9 ?IS MAGAZ9E = SO MANY MON?S4 ,!RE IS NO USE 9 DISCUSS+ CONTROV]SIAL PO9TS 9 ANY SOCIAL !ORY 7NOT EV5 9 ?AT SOCIAL !ORY :I* IS COMMONLY DESCRIB$ AS RELIGION7 UNLESS SU* DISCUSSION IS P>T ( AN EXI/+ SOCIAL /RUGGLE4 ,!RE MU/ BE SEV]AL POSSIBILITIES ( ACTION = ! P>TY1 GR\P1 OR CLASS TO :I* ! SOCIAL !ORY 9 QUE/ION REF]S4 ,! DIFF]5CE MAY CONC]N SOCIAL AIMS1 TACTICS1 =MS ( ORGANIZATION1 OR ! DEF9ITION ( ! 5EMY1 ( ALLIES1 NEUTRALS1 OR ! MA/] PLAN 7IF ANY7 TO BE BAS$ ON ONE OR ANO!R WAY ( JUDG+ A GIV5 SOCIAL SITUATION OR DEVELOPM5T4 ,YET ! RESULT ( ANY SU* MAT]IALI/ DISCUSSION MU/ 9 ALL CASES 0MAKE A DIFF]5CE0 9 RESPECT TO ! ACTUAL BEHAVIOR NOT ( AN 9DIVIDUAL NOR ( A SMALL GR\P ( PEOPLE1 BUT ( A V]ITABLE COLLECTIVITY1 A SOCIAL MASS4 ,9 ?IS MAT]IALI/ S5SE1 IT IS NOT EV5 SURE ?AT ! P>TICUL> SOCIAL !ORY CALL$ ,M>XISM HAS EV] BE5 ! SUBJECT ( A DISCUSSION 9 ?IS C\NTRY4 ,V>I\S PEOPLE HAVE BE5 ASK$ FROM TIME TO TIME :Y !Y >E1 OR :Y !Y >E NOT1 ,M>XI/S1 JU/ AS !Y MIX REALLY MEANT40 ,LA/ BUT NOT LEA/1 !RE HAS BE5 F> TOO MU* ( ?AT MO/ S5SELESS ( ALL DISCUSSIONS :I* AIM$ AT DECID+ :I* P>TICUL> %ADE ( ! !ORIES ( ,M>X1 ,5GELS & ! SEV]AL G5]ATIONS ( !IR DISCIPLES UP TO ,L591 ,/AL91 OR1 LET US SAY1 ,LEONTOV1 REPRES5TS ! MO/ OR?ODOX V]SION ( ! ,M>XI/ DOCTR9E4 ,OR1 ONE /EP HI<]1 :I* ( ! V>I\S ME?ODS US$ AT DIFF]5T TIMES BY ,HEGEL1 ,M>X1 & ! ,M>XI/S TRULY DES]VES TO BE CALL$ ! G5U9E 0DIALECTICAL0 ME?OD4 ,AS AGA9/ ?AT ALTOGE!R DOGMATIC APPROA* :I* HAD ALREADY /]ILIZ$ ! REVOLUTION>Y ,M>XI/ !ORY 9 ALL BUT A FEW PHASES ( ITS C5TURY-LONG DEVELOPM5T 9 ,EUROPE1 & BY :I* ! ATTEMPT$ EXT5SION ( ,M>XISM TO ! ,U,S HAS BE5 BLIX & :I* DUR+ ! FEW %ORT PHASES ( ITS PR$OM9ANCE HAS MADE ?AT !ORY A MO/ EFFICI5T WEAPON ( ! PROLET>IAN CLASS /RUGGLE4 ,! DOCUM5TS REPR9T$ BEL[ RESULT 9 P>T FROM AN E>LI] ATTEMPT AT REEMPHASIZ+ JU/ ?IS ELEM5T ( ! ,M>XI/ !ORY - AN ATTEMPT ?AT WAS MADE BY ! PRES5T WRIT] & A GR\P ( ASSOCIATES 9 ,G]MANY 9 ! E>LY ?IRTIES & :I* WAS !N TEMPOR>ILY 9T]RUPT$ BY ! ANTI-,M>XI/ VIOL5CE ( ! ,HITL] GOV]NM5T4 ,( ! F\R DOCUM5TS TWO DATE /ILL F>!R BACK TO SIMIL> ATTEMPTS ?AT HAD BE5 MADE 9 #ahid & #aib BY SU* NON-DOGMATIC ,M>XI/S AS ,L59 & ,GEORGES ,SOREL4 ,!Y W]E US$ AS MODELS & AS PO9TS ( DEP>TURE BY ! GR\P ( #aica :5 IT />T$ ON ITS NEW ATTEMPT AT DE-DOGMATIZ+ & REACTIVAT+ ! ,M>XIAN !ORY4 ,! ,L59 PIECE ( #ahid 7,DOCUM5T ,I,I,I7 WAS DIRECT$ AGA9/ A BOOK 9 :I* ! ECONOMIC & SOCIOLOGICAL !ORIES ( ! FAM\S ,N>ODNIKI !ORI/1 ,MIKHAILOVSKI1 HAD BE5 CRITICALLY ATTACK$ BY ! !N 0,M>XI/0 7LAT]1 B\RGEOIS7 WRIT]1 ,PET] ,/RUVE4 ,( ?IS IMPORTANT WORK ( ,L591 UN=TUNATELY ONLY A SMALL P>T HAS APPE>$ 9 ,5GLI% 7,SELECT$ ,WORKS ( ,L591 VOL4 ,I7 & ?AT P>T DOES NOT 9CLUDE ! *APT] FROM :I* WE HAVE TAK5 ! PIECE PR9T$ BEL[4 ,! P>TICUL> 9T]E/ ( \R DOCUM5T LIES 9 ! FACT ?AT JU/ ON ?AT OCCASION ,L591 HIMSELF A MAT]IALI/ CRITIC ( ! IDEALI/ 0SUBJECTIVISM0 ( ! ,N>ODNIKI1 F\ND HIMSELF 9 A POSITION 9 :I* HE HAD TO EXT5D HIS MAT]IALI/ CRITICISM1 ) EQUAL F]VOR1 TO ! AB/RACT & LIFELESS 0OBJECTIVISM0 ( ,/RUVE4 ,9 ORD] TO MAKE ,L59'S >GUM5T FULLY UND]/&ABLE1 WE QUOTE ! S5T5CE ( ,/RUVE :I* >\S$ ,L59'S IRE4 ,/RUVE HAD F\ND FAULT ) ,MIKHAILOVSKI'S OP9ION ?AT !RE >E 0NO UNSURM\NTABLE HI/ORICAL T5D5CIES :I* S]VE AS />T+ PO9TS AS WELL AS OBLIGATORY LIMITS TO ! PURPOSIVE ACTIVITY ( ! 9DIVIDUAL & ! SOCIAL GR\PS40 ,L59 IS QUICK 9 DISCOV]+ ! NON-REVOLUTION>Y IMPLICATIONS ( ?IS ,/RUVEAN COMM5T ON ,MIKHAILOVSKI4 0,?IS10 SAYS ,L591 0IS ! LANGUAGE ( AN OBJECTIVI/1 & NOT ?AT ( A ,M>XI/ 7MAT]IALI/740 ,& FROM ?IS PO9T ( DEP>TURE1 ,L59 EMB>KS ON HIS DEMON/RATION ( ! IMPORTANT DIFF]5CES :I* SEP>ATE ! PR9CIPLES ( ! 0,OBJECTIVI/S0 ON ! ONE H&1 FROM ?OSE ( ! 0,M>XI/S0 7,MAT]IALI/S7 ON ! O!R H&4 ,DOCUM5T ,I,V TRIES TO BR+ \T MORE DI/9CTLY ! NON-DOGMATIC *>ACT] ( ,L59'S ANTI!SIS TO ,/RUVE'S OBJECTIVI/IC V]SION ( ! TRADITIONAL ,M>XI/ DOCTR9E4 ,= ?IS PURPOSE & = A S]IES ( FUR!R EXP]IM5TS 9 LOOS5+ UP & DE-DOGMATIZ+ C]TA9 P>TS ( ! ,M>XI/ !ORY1 ! GR\P ( #aica MADE USE ( ! SIMIL> EXP]IM5T MADE BY ,SOREL 9 #a#i#b4 ,ACCORD+ TO ,SOREL1 ! SIX !SES REPRODUC$ 9 ,DOCUM5T ,I,I BEL[ RESULT FROM A PROCESS ( 0EXTRACT+ ! /RICTLY SCI5TIFIC ELEM5TS ( HI/ORY FROM ! !ORY ( HI/ORICAL MAT]IALISM40 ,9 ?IS CRITICAL RE=MULATION ( HI/ORICAL MAT]IALISM BY ONE ( ! MO/ SCI5TIFIC & MO/ PRAGMATICALLY M9D$ 9T]PRET]S ( ,M>XISM 9 MOD]N TIMES1 ! LEA/ IMPORTANT PO9T IS1 9 ! VIEW ( ! WRIT]1 ,SOREL'S SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON ! ROLE ( LEGAL CONCEPTS & ! LEGAL PR(ESSION4 ,:AT REALLY MATT]S IS ! ATTEMPT TO CL>IFY ! V>I\S CONCAT5ATIONS ?AT EXI/ BETWE5 ! G5]AL T]MS ( ! MAT]IALI/ !ORY & ( :I* ! LAW & ITS PR(ESSIONAL EXPLOIT]S SEEM TO BE ONLY ONE ( A NUMB] ( POSSIBLE ILLU/RATIONS4 ,MO/ IMPORTANT1 H[EV]1 IS ! =M 9 :I* ,SOREL HAS *ANG$ 9TO A POSITIVE 9SPIRATION = UNFETT]$ SCI5TIFIC RESE>* :AT TILL !N MU/ HAVE SEEM$ TO MANY HI/ORIANS A SOME:AT AU?ORIT>IAN LAY+ D[N ( ! RULES ( WRIT+ HI/ORY4 7,A DIFF]5T IMPRESSION MIKABLY FREE APPLICATION ?AT HAD BE5 MADE ( ! NEW 0CRITICAL & MAT]IALI/ ME?OD0 BY ,M>X HIMSELF4 ,YET ! NEW WEAPON ( ! REVOLUTION>Y CLASS /RUGGLE HAD ALREADY LO/ MU* ( ITS CRITICAL $GE 9 ! H&S ( ! FIR/ G5]ATION ( ! ,M>XI/ S*OL>S AT ! TIME ( ,SOREL'S WRIT+4 ,& IT IS NO SECRET ?AT S9CE !N REVOLUTION>Y ,M>XISM HAS LO/ \T COMPLETELY AGA9/ ! 0/ABILIZ+0 9FLU5CES ?AT W]E EXPRESS$ !ORETICALLY 9 ! GR[? ( ! OLD & ! NEW ,M>X OR?ODOXY - FROM ,KAUTSKY TO ,/AL94 ,SO ! ,SORELIAN OP]ATION HAS TO BE P]=M$ ONCE MORE47 ,F9ALLY1 WE HAVE ADD$ A DOCUM5T :I* IS MEANT TO DO = ! FAM\S 0DIALECTICAL ME?OD0 :AT ,SOREL & ,L59 DID = HI/ORICAL MAT]IALISM4 ,! 0,!SES ON ,HEGEL & ,REVOLUTION0 TRANSLAT$ 9 ,DOCUM5T ,I W]E FIR/ WRITT5 9 ,G]MAN = ! C5T5>Y ( ,HEGEL'S DEA?1 9 #a#i#c#a4 ,AS WILL BE SE51 !Y APPROA* FROM A TOTALLY OPPOSITE DIRECTION ! :OLE TANGLE ( DIFFICULTIES :I* BESET ! PROBLEM ( ! ,HEGELIAN DIALECTIC & ITS 7MODIFI$ OR UNMODIFI$7 USE BY ,M>X & ,5GELS4 ,DIALECTICS IS H]E CONSID]$ NOT AS A K9D ( SUP]-LOGIC1 ?AT IS1 NOT AS A SET ( RULES TO BE APPLI$ BY 9DIVIDUAL ?9K]S 9 ! PROCESS ( ?9K+ - JU/ LIKE ORD9>Y LOGIC1 & DI/+UI%$ FROM ! LATT] ONLY 9 ! S5SE 9 :I* SO-CALL$ 0HI<]0 MA!MATICS IS DI/+UI%$ FROM ?OSE SIMPL] &1 9 FACT1 LONG \TDAT$ RULES :I* >E TAUY MA!MATICS0 9 \R S*OOLS TODAY4 ,IT IS TREAT$ RA!R AS A NUMB] ( *>ACT]I/IC PH5OM5A ?AT CAN BE OBS]V$ FROM )\T 9 ! SEQU5CE & DEVELOPM5T ( ?\Y BY /UDY+ DIALECTICS BUT1 ON ! CONTR>Y1 ! REVOLUTION>Y *ANGE 9 HUMAN SOCIETY AFFECTS AMONG O!R ?+S ALSO ! WAY 9 :I* ! PEOPLE ( A P>TICUL> P]IOD T5D TO PRODUCE & TO EX*ANGE !IR ?\Y P]IOD1 & DUR+ ! DIFF]5T PHASES ( ?AT P]IOD1 P>TICUL> SOCIAL CLASSES1 GR\PS1 9DIVIDUALS =M & ACCEPT NEW WORDS & IDEAS4 ,IT DEALS ) ! (T5 UNUSUAL & REM>KABLE =MS 9 :I* !Y CONNECT !IR [N & O!R PEOPLE'S ?\S BY IMPLICATION 7FROM !SES ,I,I & ,I,I,I7 ?AT !RE IS NO REASON TO BOA/ ( ! FACT ?AT BO? ,M>X & ,L591 AFT] A FIR/ VIOL5T CRITICISM & REPUDIATION ( ! OLD ,HEGELIAN 0DIALECTIC10 HAVE RETURN$ AT A LAT] /AGE1 9 A MOOD ( DIS5*ANTM5T & P>TIAL FRU/RATION1 TO A V]Y LITTLE QUALIFI$ ACCEPTANCE ( ?AT SAME PHILOSOPHICAL ME?OD ?AT1 AT ITS BE/1 HAD REFLECT$ ! B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION ( AN E>LI] P]IOD4 ,H]E AS 9 MANY O!R RESPECTS1 ! UNFETT]$ DEVELOPM5T ( ! ,M>XIAN !ORY DOES NOT PO9T BACKW>DS TO OLD B\RGEOIS PHILOSOPHIES & IDEAS1 BUT =W>D TO A NON-DOGMATIC & NON-AU?ORIT>IAN1 SCI5TIFIC & ACTIVI/IC USE ( ! ,M>XIAN AS WELL AS ALL O!R !ORETICAL =MULATIONS ( ! COLLECTIVE EXP]I5CE ( ! WORK+ CLASS4 ,D,O,C,U,M,5,T ,I ,!SES ON ,HEGEL & ,REVOLUTION ,K>L ,KORS*1 #aica ,I4 ,! ,HEGELIAN PHILOSOPHY & ITS DIALECTICAL ME?OD CANNOT BE UND]/OOD )\T TAK+ 9TO ACC\NT ITS RELATION%IP TO REVOLUTION4 #a7 ,IT ORIG9AT$ HI/ORICALLY FROM A REVOLUTION>Y MOVEM5T4 #b7 ,IT FULFILL$ ! TASK ( GIV+ TO ?AT MOVEM5T ITS CONCEPTUAL EXPRESSION4 #c7 ,DIALECTICAL ?\Y EV5 9 ITS =M3 A7 TURN+ AWAY FROM ! IMM$IATELY GIV5 - RADICAL BREAK ) ! HI!RTO EXI/+ - 0/&+ ON ! HEAD0 - NEW BEG9N+2 B7 PR9CIPLE ( CONTRADICTION & NEGATION2 C7 PR9CIPLE ( P]MAN5T *ANGE & DEVELOPM5T - ( ! 0QUALITATIVE LEAP40 #d7 ,ONCE ! REVOLUTION>Y TASK IS \T ( ! WAY & ! NEW SOCIETY FULLY E/ABLI%$1 ! REVOLUTION>Y DIALECTICAL ME?OD 9EVITABLY DISAPPE>S FROM ITS PHILOSOPHY & SCI5CE4 ,I,I4 ,! ,HEGELIAN PHILOSOPHY & ITS DIALECTICAL ME?OD CANNOT BE CRITICIZ$ )\T TAK+ 9TO ACC\NT ITS RELATION%IP TO ! P>TICUL> HI/ORICAL CONDITIONS ( ! REVOLUTION>Y MOVEM5T ( ! TIME4 #a7 ,IT IS A PHILOSOPHY NOT ( REVOLUTION 9 G5]AL1 BUT ( ! B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION ( ! #a#g? & #a#h? C5TURIES4 #b7 ,EV5 AS A PHILOSOPHY ( ! B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION1 IT DOES NOT REFLECT ! 5TIRE PROCESS ( ?AT REVOLUTION1 BUT ONLY ITS CONCLUD+ PHASE4 ,IT IS ?US A PHILOSOPHY NOT ( ! REVOLUTION1 BUT ( ! RE/ORATION4 #c7 ,?IS TW(OLD HI/ORICAL NATURE ( ! ,HEGELIAN DIALECTIC APPE>S =MALLY 9 A TW(OLD LIMITATION ( ITS REVOLUTION>Y *>ACT]4 A7 ,! ,HEGELIAN DIALECTIC ?\< DISSOLV+ ALL PREEXI/+ FIXATIONS1 RESULTS 9 ! 5D 9 A NEW FIXATION3 IT BECOMES AN ABSOLUTE ITSELF &1 AT ! SAME TIME1 0ABSOLUTIZES0 ! :OLE DOGMATIC CONT5T ( ! ,HEGELIAN PHILOSOPHICAL SY/EM ?AT HAD BE5 BAS$ ON IT4 B7 ,! REVOLUTION>Y PO9T ( ! DIALECTICAL APPROA* IS ULTIMATELY B5T BACK TO ! 0CIRCLE10 ?AT IS1 TO A CONCEPTUAL RE9/ATEM5T ( ! IMM$IATELY GIV5 REALITY1 TO A RECONCILIATION ) ?AT REALITY1 & TO A GLORIFICATION ( EXI/+ CONDITIONS4 ,I,I,I4 ,! ATTEMPT MADE BY ! F\ND]S ( SCI5TIFIC SOCIALISM TO SALVAGE ! HI< >T ( DIALECTICAL ?9K+ BY TRANSPLANT+ IT FROM ! ,G]MAN IDEALI/ PHILOSOPHY TO ! MAT]IALI/ CONCEPTION ( NATURE & HI/ORY1 FROM ! B\RGEOIS TO ! PROLET>IAN !ORY ( REVOLUTION1 APPE>S1 BO? HI/ORICALLY & !ORETICALLY1 AS A TRANSITORY /EP ONLY4 ,:AT HAS BE5 A*IEV$ IS A !ORY NOT ( ! PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION DEVELOP+ ON ITS [N BASIS1 BUT ( A PROLET>IAN REVOLUTION ?AT HAS JU/ EM]G$ FROM ! B\RGEOIS REVOLUTION2 A !ORY :I* !RE=E 9 EV]Y RESPECT1 9 CONT5T & 9 ME?OD1 IS /ILL TA9T$ ) ! BIR?M>KS ( ,JACOB9ISM1 ?AT IS1 ( ! REVOLUTION>Y !ORY ( ! B\RGEOISIE4 ,D,O,C,U,M,5,T ,I,I ,!SES ON ! ,MAT]IALI/IC ,CONCEPTION ( ,HI/ORY ,SUBMITT$ TO ! #aib ,CONV5TION ( ! ,SOCIETE ,FRANCAISE DE ,PHILOSOPHIE1 BY ,GEORGES ,SOREL #a7 ,= 9VE/IGAT+ A P]IOD 7( HI/ORY7 IT IS ( GREAT ADVANTAGE TO F9D \T H[ SOCIETY IS DIVID$ 9 CLASSES2 ! LATT] >E DI/+UI%$ BY ! ESS5TIAL LEGAL CONCEPTS CONNECT$ ) ! WAY 9 :I* 9COMES >E =M$ 9 EA* GR\P4 #b7 ,IT IS ADVISABLE TO DISMISS ALL ATOMI/IC EXPLANATIONS2 IT IS NOT WOR?:ILE TO 9QUIRE H[ ! L9KS BETWE5 9DIVIDUAL PSY*OLOGIES >E =M$4 ,:AT CAN BE OBS]V$ DIRECTLY >E ?OSE L9KS !MSELVES1 ?AT :I* REF]S TO ! MASSES4 ,! ?\E FULLY UND]/&ABLE ONLY BY !IR CONNECTION ) ! MOVEM5TS ( ! MASSES4 #c7 ,MU* LIIFY ! CONCAT5ATION BETWE5 ! SY/EM ( PRODUCTIVE =CES1 ! ORGANIZATION ( LABOR1 & ! SOCIAL RELATIONS ?AT RULE PRODUCTION4 #d7 ,RELIGI\S & PHILOSOPHICAL DOCTR9ES HAVE TRADITIONAL S\RCES2 YET 9 SPITE ( !IR T5D5CY TO ORGANIZE !MSELVES 9 SY/EMS TOTALLY CLOS$ TO ALL \TSIDE 9FLU5CES1 !Y >E USUALLY SOMEH[ CONNECT$ ) ! SOCIAL CONDITIONS ( ! P]IOD4 ,FROM ?IS VIEWPO9T1 !Y APPE> AS M5TAL REFLECTIONS ( ! CONDITIONS ( LIFE & (T5 AS ATTEMPTS TO EXPLA9 HI/ORY BY A DOCTR9E ( FAI?4 #e7 ,! HI/ORY ( A DOCTR9E WILL BE FULLY CL>IFI$ ONLY :5 IT CAN BE CONNECT$ ) ! HI/ORY ( A SOCIAL GR\P ?AT MAKES IT ITS TASK TO DEVELOP & APPLY ?AT P>TICUL> DOCTR9E 79FLU5CE ( ! LEGAL PR(ESSION74 #f7 ,ASSUM+ ?AT REVOLUTIONS DO NOT HAVE ! EFFECT TO MAKE POSSIBLE A GREAT] EXT5SION ( ! PRODUCTIVE =CES ?AT >E OB/RUCT$ 9 !IR DEVELOPM5T BY AN \TDAT$ LEGISLATION1 IT IS /ILL ( ! GREATE/ IMPORTANCE TO EXAM9E A SOCIAL TRANS=MATION FROM ?IS PO9T ( VIEW & TO 9VE/IGATE H[ ! LEGAL IDEAS >E TRANS=M$ UND] ! PRESSURE ( A UNIV]SALLY FELT NE$ = ECONOMIC EMANCIPATION4 ,D,O,C,U,M,5,T ,I,I,I ,MAT]IALISM ,V]SUS ,OBJECTIVISM ,L591 #ahid ,! OBJECTIVI/ SPEAKS ( ! NECESSITY ( ! GIV5 HI/ORICAL PROCESS2 ! MAT]IALI/ 7,M>XI/7 DET]M9ES EXACTLY ! GIV5 ECONOMIC =M ( SOCIETY & ! ANTAGONI/IC RELATIONS >IS+ FROM IT4 ,! OBJECTIVI/1 9 PROV+ ! NECESSITY ( A GIV5 S]IES ( FACTS1 ALWAYS RUNS ! RISK TO GET 9TO ! POSITION ( AN APOLOGI/ ( ?OSE FACTS2 ! MAT]IALI/ REVEALS ! ANTAGONISMS ( CLASSES & !REBY DET]M9ES HIS [N POSITION4 ,! OBJECTIVI/ SPEAKS ( 0UNSURM\NTABLE HI/ORICAL T5D5CIES02 ! MAT]IALI/ SPEAKS ( ! CLASS :I* 0DIRECTS0 ! GIV5 ECONOMIC ORD] & ?US1 AT ! SAME TIME1 BR+S =? ONE =M OR ANO!R ( RESI/ANCE BY ! O!R CLASSES4 ,?US1 ! MAT]IALI/ IS1 ON ! ONE H&1 MORE CONSI/5T ?AN ! OBJECTIVI/ & REA*ES A MORE ?OR\< & MORE COMPREH5SIVE OBJECTIVISM4 ,HE IS NOT SATISFI$ ) PO9T+ TO ! NECESSITY ( ! PROCESS1 BUT CLE>LY /ATES ! ECONOMIC =M ( SOCIETY UND]LY+ ! CONT5T ( JU/ ?AT PROCESS1 & ! P>TICUL> CLASS DET]M9+ JU/ ?AT NECESSITY4 ,9 \R CASE1 = EXAMPLE1 ! MAT]IALI/ W\LD NOT CONT5T HIMSELF ) REF]R+ TO 0UNSURM\NTABLE HI/ORICAL T5D5CIES02 HE W\LD PO9T TO ! EXI/5CE ( C]TA9 CLASSES :I* DET]M9E ! CONT5T ( ! GIV5 ORD] & EXCLUDE ANY POSSIBILITY ( A SOLUTION BUT BY ! ACTION ( ! PRODUC]S !MSELVES4 ,ON ! O!R H&1 ! MAT]IALI/ PR9CIPLE IMPLIES1 AS IT W]E1 ! ELEM5T ( P>TY1 BY COMMITT+ ITSELF1 9 ! EVALUATION ( ANY EV5T1 TO A DIRECT & OP5 ACCEPTANCE ( ! POSITION ( A P>TICUL> SOCIAL GR\P4 ,D,O,C,U,M,5,T ,I,V ,ON AN ,ACTIVI/IC ,=M ( ,MAT]IALISM & ON ! ,CLASS & ,P>TISAN ,*>ACT] ( ,SCI5CE ,K>L ,KORS*1 #aica #a7 ,!RE IS LITTLE USE 9 CONFRONT+ ! SUBJECTIVI/ DOCTR9E ( ! DECISIVE ROLE ( ! 9DIVIDUAL 9 ! HI/ORICAL PROCESS ) ANO!R & EQUALLY AB/RACT DOCTR9E ?AT SPEAKS ( ! NECESSITY ( A GIV5 HI/ORICAL PROCESS4 ,IT IS MORE USEFUL TO EXPLORE1 AS PRECISELY AS POSSIBLE1 ! ANTAGONI/IC RELATIONS ?AT >ISE FROM ! MAT]IAL CONDITIONS ( PRODUCTION ( A GIV5 ECONOMIC =M ( SOCIETY = ! SOCIAL GR\PS P>TICIPAT+ 9 IT4 #b7 ,MU* LIY BY ! ACTION ( :I* CLASSES8 B7 :I* MODIFICATIONS WILL BE NECESS>Y 9 ! ACTION ( ! CLASSES FAC$ BY ! ALLEG$ HI/ORICAL NECESSITY8 #c7 ,9 ! 9VE/IGATION ( ! ANTAGONI/IC RELATIONS EXI/+ BETWE5 ! V>I\S CLASSES & CLASS FRACTIONS ( AN ECONOMIC =M ( SOCIETY1 IT IS ADVISABLE TO CONSID] NOT ONLY ! MAT]IAL BUT ALSO ! IDEOLOGICAL =MS 9 :I* SU* ANTAGONI/IC RELATIONS OCCUR )9 ! GIV5 ECONOMIC =M ( SOCIETY4 #d7 ,! CONT5T ( A DOCTR9E 7!ORETICAL SY/EM1 ANY SET ( S5T5CES & OP]ATIONAL RULES US$ = ! /ATEM5T & APPLICATION ( A !ORY OR BELIEF7 CANNOT BE CL>IFI$ SO LONG AS IT IS NOT CONNECT$ ) ! CONT5T ( A GIV5 ECONOMIC =M ( SOCIETY & ) ! MAT]IAL 9T]E/S ( DEF9ITE CLASSES ( ?AT SOCIETY4 #e7 ,!RE IS NO NE$ TO ASSUME ?AT ! OBJECTIVITY ( A DOCTR9E WILL BE IMPAIR$ BY ITS ME?ODICAL CONNECTION ) ! MAT]IAL 9T]E/S & PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES ( DEF9ITE CLASSES4 #f7 ,:5EV] A DOCTR9E IS NOT CONNECT$ ) ! MAT]IAL 9T]E/S ( A DEF9ITE CLASS BY ITS [N PROPON5TS1 ONE WILL (T5 BE JU/IFI$ 9 ASSUM+ ?AT ! PROPON5TS ( SU* DOCTR9E AIM AT DEF5D+ BY IT ! 9T]E/S ( ! RUL+ CLASSES ( ! SOCIETY 9 QUE/ION4 ,9 !SE CASES ! !ORETICAL UNCOV]+ ( ! CLASS FUNCTION ( A GIV5 DOCTR9E IS EQUIVAL5T TO A PRACTICAL ADOPTION ( ! CAUSE ( ! CLASSES OPPRESS$ 9 ?AT SOCIETY4 #g7 ,FROM ?IS /ATE ( AFFAIRS1 & FROM ITS !ORETICAL RECOGNITION1 SPR+S ! OBJECTIVE & SUBJECTIVE P>TISAN NATURE ( SCI5CE4 ,FROM 3 ,M>XI/S4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,M>* #b1 #bba 3 ,A ,NON-,DOGMATIC ,APPROA* TO ,M>XISM -- ,ADD$4 ,JANU>Y #h1 #bbb 3 ,A ,NON-,DOGMATIC ,APPROA* TO ,M>XISM -- ,UPDAT$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/